02.10.2013 Views

TECHNICAL REPORT 92-14 - Nagra

TECHNICAL REPORT 92-14 - Nagra

TECHNICAL REPORT 92-14 - Nagra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NAGRA NTB <strong>92</strong>-<strong>14</strong> - 45 -<br />

Case 1: Finite elements which have temperatures above the melting temperature<br />

are set inactive at liquefaction and are reset active at solidification.<br />

Since a whole element is set inactive/active because of a temperature<br />

at a single point, the transition temperatures are not sharply defined.<br />

The liquefaction gives no problems. While the material is molten,<br />

the displacements are kept constant at a low effective stress. The<br />

solidification results in an abrupt and sometimes very large jump of<br />

the displacements and an increase of the effective stress with a later<br />

overshoot due to the inaccurately determined stresses at material<br />

transition. The final effective stresses match with those obtained by<br />

Melander.<br />

Case 2: Temperatures above a certain cut-off temperature (1100 °C) are reset<br />

to this temperature, i.e. the material is kept solid at a temperature just<br />

below the melting temperature. Therefore, the final drop of the yield<br />

limit may be avoided in the heat-up phase, thus preventing possible<br />

numerical problems.<br />

Small instabilities in the displacements are observed during the molten<br />

phase, whereas the displacements continue smoothly at liquefaction<br />

and solidification. The final effective stresses match with those<br />

obtained by Melander.<br />

Case 3: The solidifying molten material is reset in a virgin state.<br />

The liquefaction results in large changes of the displacements since no<br />

measures were taken to prevent instabilities. The solidification keeps<br />

the displacements and stresses smooth. The final effective stresses<br />

match with those obtained by Melander.<br />

Case 4: The molten material is simulated by a solid with constant volume<br />

and no thennal expansion; it is further reset in a virgin state<br />

at solidification. Volume conservation was assumed to simulate the<br />

liquefied material more realistically. Melander proposed resetting the<br />

coefficient of thennal expansion to zero to eliminate further expansion;<br />

this procedure gives rise to large thermal strains at liquefaction<br />

and solidification and therefore to numerical problems. However, a<br />

smooth continuation without expansion is reached for temperatures<br />

above melting temperature if the coefficient of thermal expansion is<br />

chosen such that its product with temperature is constant, i.e. equal<br />

to the product at melting temperature.<br />

Along the whole temperature cycle, the displacements develop rather<br />

smoothly and the effective stresses match with those obtained by Melander.<br />

The reset in a virgin state keeps the final plastic strains small<br />

(about 3 %), whereas the large strains obtained by Melander (about<br />

28 %) are mainly produced during the molten material state.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!