Quanto Adjustments in the Presence of Stochastic Volatility
Quanto Adjustments in the Presence of Stochastic Volatility
Quanto Adjustments in the Presence of Stochastic Volatility
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Appendix<br />
Lemma 1. Let ν be a mean-reversion Ornste<strong>in</strong>-Uhlenbeck process under <strong>the</strong> measure Q, i.e.:<br />
Fu<strong>the</strong>rmore, let <strong>the</strong> function y be def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
dν(t) = κ (θ − ν(t)) dt + δdW Q (t), ν(0) = ν0.<br />
�<br />
Q<br />
y (t, T, ν(t)) = E e −s1<br />
� Tt<br />
ν(u) 2 � Tt<br />
du−s2 ν(u)du+s3v(T ) �<br />
for arbitrary complex numbers s1,s2, s3 and −s1ν(u) 2 − s2ν(u) is lower bounded. Then y has <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g solution:<br />
where <strong>the</strong> function D is given by<br />
with<br />
y (t, T, ν(t)) = D (t, T, ν(t), s1, s2, s3)<br />
D (t, T, ν(t), s1, s2, s3) = e 1 2 A(t,T,s1,s2)ν(t) 2 +B(t,T,s1,s2,s3)ν(t)+C(t,T,s1,s2,s3)<br />
A (t, T, s1, s2) = κ γ1<br />
−<br />
δ2 δ2 Ψ (γ1, γ2)<br />
Φ (γ1, γ2)<br />
B (t, T, s1, s2, s3) =<br />
κθγ1 − γ2γ3 + γ3Ψ (γ1, γ2)<br />
δ 2 γ1Φ (γ1, γ2)<br />
− κθ<br />
δ 2<br />
C (t, T, s1, s2, s3) = − 1<br />
κ<br />
ln (Φ (γ1, γ2)) + (T − t)<br />
�<br />
2 2<br />
2 2 2<br />
κ θ γ1 − γ<br />
+<br />
2� 3<br />
2δ2γ 3 � �<br />
s<strong>in</strong>h (γ1 (T − t))<br />
− γ1 (T − t)<br />
1 Φ (γ1, γ2)<br />
� �<br />
cosh (γ1 (T − t)) − 1<br />
Φ (γ1, γ2)<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. See <strong>the</strong> appendix <strong>of</strong> Schöbel and Zhu [9].<br />
+ (κθγ1 − γ2γ3) γ3<br />
δ2γ 3 1<br />
Ψ (γ1, γ2) = s<strong>in</strong>h (γ1 (T − t)) + γ2 cosh (γ1 (T − t))<br />
Φ (γ1, γ2) = cosh (γ1 (T − t)) + γ2 s<strong>in</strong>h (γ1 (T − t))<br />
γ1 = � 2δ2s1+κ2 γ2 = 1 � 2 �<br />
κ − 2δ s3<br />
γ1<br />
γ3 = κ 2 θ − s2δ 2 .<br />
11