15.10.2013 Views

U.S. GAAP v. IFRS: The Basics - Financial Executives International

U.S. GAAP v. IFRS: The Basics - Financial Executives International

U.S. GAAP v. IFRS: The Basics - Financial Executives International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foreign Currency Matters<br />

Similarities<br />

FAS 52 Foreign Currency Translation and IAS 21 <strong>The</strong> Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange<br />

Rates are quite similar in their approach to foreign currency translation. While the guidance<br />

provided by each for evaluating the functional currency of an entity is different, it generally results<br />

in the same determination (that is, the currency of the entity’s primary economic environment). Both<br />

<strong>GAAP</strong>s generally consider the same economies to be hyperinflationary, although the accounting for<br />

an entity operating in such an environment can be very different.<br />

Both <strong>GAAP</strong>s require foreign currency transactions of an entity to be remeasured into its functional<br />

currency with amounts resulting from changes in exchange rates being reported in income. Once a<br />

subsidiary’s financial statements are remeasured into its functional currency, both standards require<br />

translation into its parent’s functional currency with assets and liabilities being translated at the<br />

period-end rate, and income statement amounts generally at the average rate, with the exchange<br />

differences reported in equity. Both standards also permit the hedging of that net investment with<br />

exchange differences from the hedging instrument offsetting the translation amounts reported in<br />

equity. <strong>The</strong> cumulative translation amounts reported in equity are reflected in income when there is<br />

a sale, or complete liquidation or abandonment of the foreign operation, but there are differences<br />

between the two standards when the investment in the foreign operation is reduced through<br />

dividends or repayment of long-term advances as indicated below.<br />

Significant Differences<br />

Translation/functional<br />

currency of foreign operations<br />

in a hyperinflationary economy<br />

Treatment of translation<br />

difference in equity when<br />

a partial return of a foreign<br />

investment is made to the<br />

parent<br />

U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong> <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

Local functional currency financial<br />

statements are remeasured as if the<br />

functional currency was the reporting<br />

currency (U.S. dollar in the case of a<br />

U.S. parent) with resulting exchange<br />

differences recognized in income.<br />

Translation difference in equity is<br />

recognized in income only upon sale (full<br />

or partial), or complete liquidation or<br />

abandonment of the foreign subsidiary.<br />

No recognition is made when there is a<br />

partial return of investment to the parent.<br />

24 u.s. gaaP v. iFrs: t h E <strong>Basics</strong><br />

Local functional currency financial<br />

statements (current and prior period) are<br />

indexed using a general price index, and<br />

then translated to the reporting currency at<br />

the current rate.<br />

A return of investment (for example,<br />

dividend) is treated as a partial disposal of<br />

the foreign investment and a proportionate<br />

share of the translation difference is<br />

recognized in income.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!