National Code of Practice for Managing Intellectual Property ... - Forfás

More documents

Recommendations

Info

44 SECTION G - RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION G.1 RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND DEALING WITH DISAGREEMENTS Established relationships create trust and facilitate the process of managing collaborative research. Partners should take care to maintain good relationships with their collaborators. Having established mechanisms for dealing with disagreements simplifies and speeds up resolution. Partners should develop an agreed mechanism and timescale for dealing with disagreements. Guidelines: 4 In the event of any dispute or difference between project partners, this should be referred to the project manager who should communicate a decision to all project partners. The project manager’s decision should be deemed to have been approved unless one of the partners notifies the other partners of their dissatisfaction within 14 days. 4 If a partner is dissatisfied with the project manager’s decision, the decision should be referred to the management team which should attempt to resolve the matter amicably within 30 days. 4 If the management team is unable to resolve the matter amicably within 30 days, the partners may pursue the dispute resolution procedure, as provided for in the collaboration agreement. SECTION H – MONITORING AND EVALUATION H.1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION Monitoring and evaluation can strengthen the effectiveness of IP management and exploitation mechanisms. Partners should develop and implement clear systems for monitoring and evaluating their performance of collaborative research.
45 Guidelines: For the PRO, routine records of IP management measurement indicators can: 4 Illustrate to external organisations that the partners are managing IP effectively, including regular review of background IP; 4 Identify problems and opportunities relating to IP management, enabling organisations to change budgets and strategies in response; 4 Provide information useful for retention and recruitment of employees. In recognition of these considerations, PROs, in conjunction with the funding agencies, should collect and publish data annually on appropriate indicators. Industrial partners should assist their PRO partners in the collection of appropriate data.
Page 1 and 2: NATIONAL CODE OF PRACTICE FOR MANAG
Page 3 and 4: 1 FOREWORD Minister Micheál Martin
Page 5: 3 The Code should not be interprete
Page 8 and 9: PART II CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE MA
Page 10 and 11: 8 For industry, this Code aims to:
Page 12 and 13: 10 This Code has been prepared foll
Page 14 and 15: 12 State Aid 4 A European Commissio
Page 16 and 17: 13 PART I CODE OF PRACTICE: PRINCIP
Page 18 and 19: 15 B.4 VERIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP As
Page 20 and 21: 17 As all research collaborations a
Page 22 and 23: 19 issues of IP ownership, exploita
Page 24: 21 SECTION G - RELATIONSHIP MANAGEM
Page 27 and 28: 23 PART II CODE OF PRACTICE SECTION
Page 29 and 30: 25 SECTION B - IP MANAGEMENT B.1 FO
Page 31 and 32: 27 4 The extent to which the partne
Page 33 and 34: 29 B.3 RECORD KEEPING Demonstrating
Page 35 and 36: 31 B.6 EVALUATION All disclosures o
Page 37 and 38: 33 SECTION C - OWNERSHIP C.1 EARLY
Page 39 and 40: 35 Discussion between parties to ar
Page 41 and 42: 37 Where employees from two or more
Page 43 and 44: 39 4 Partners should have an agreed
Page 45 and 46: 41 D.5 EXPLOITATION IN IRELAND Expl
Page 47: 43 E.2 INCENTIVES FOR INDUSTRIAL PA
Page 52 and 53: 47 TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP MEMBERS Dr
Page 54 and 55: 49 31 Dublin Institute for Advanced
Page 56 and 57: 51 100 Royal College of Surgeons, I
Page 58: 53 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Council wou

National Code of Practice for Managing Intellectual Property ... - Forfás

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?