23.10.2013 Views

Groundwater HIA post edit - FreshwaterLife

Groundwater HIA post edit - FreshwaterLife

Groundwater HIA post edit - FreshwaterLife

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 Basic concepts<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

Before delving into the detail of the <strong>HIA</strong> methodology, it is useful to discuss some basic<br />

concepts that are fundamental to <strong>HIA</strong>, namely uncertainty, risk, and conceptual<br />

modelling. This section also deals with some common misconceptions about the way<br />

in which groundwater abstractions behave. Unfortunately, there is no magic tool for<br />

assessing the hydrogeological impacts of groundwater abstraction; the emphasis is on<br />

developing good conceptual models, taking uncertainty and risk into account, and<br />

using appropriate tools and techniques to answer specific questions.<br />

2.2 Uncertainty and risk<br />

The Environment Agency’s approach to environmental risk assessment is based on the<br />

guidelines published by the Government (DETR 2000). In these guidelines, the<br />

following definitions are given:<br />

Hazard: a property or situation that in particular circumstances could lead<br />

to harm.<br />

Risk: a combination of the probability (or frequency) of occurrence of a<br />

defined hazard and the magnitude of the consequences of the occurrence.<br />

In groundwater abstraction licensing, the hazard is the act of abstracting water, and the<br />

risk relates to potential impacts on the environment, or other impacts such as<br />

derogation of the rights of existing abstractors. In order to evaluate and use risk<br />

assessments effectively as a credible basis for decision-making, it is important to<br />

understand how different sources of uncertainty contribute to the final risk estimates.<br />

Uncertainty can affect all stages of risk assessment, and environmental scientists are<br />

increasingly being required to provide information on how certain their decisions are.<br />

Analysing the sources and magnitudes of uncertainties can help to focus discussion,<br />

identify knowledge gaps, and feed into decisions about risk management.<br />

Uncertainties generally fall into the following categories (DETR 2000):<br />

• Model uncertainty: where models provide only an approximation of the<br />

real environment. Model uncertainty may have two components: (i)<br />

conceptual modelling uncertainty due to insufficient knowledge of the<br />

system; and (ii) mathematical model uncertainty arising from the limitations<br />

of the model selected in accurately representing reality.<br />

• Sample uncertainty: where uncertainties arise from the accuracy of<br />

measurements or the validity of the sample (number and location of<br />

sampling points).<br />

• Data uncertainty: where data are interpolated or extrapolated from other<br />

sources.<br />

• Knowledge uncertainty: where there is inadequate scientific<br />

understanding of the processes involved.<br />

• Environmental uncertainty: where the inherent variability of the natural<br />

environment leads to errors in our approximations. For groundwater<br />

4 Science Report – Hydrogeological impact appraisal for groundwater abstractions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!