26.10.2013 Views

Appendix D: Human Health Risk Assessment - Garfield County ...

Appendix D: Human Health Risk Assessment - Garfield County ...

Appendix D: Human Health Risk Assessment - Garfield County ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Appendix</strong> D Screening Level <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> February 2011<br />

Battlement Mesa, Colorado <strong>Health</strong> Impact <strong>Assessment</strong> Colorado School of Public <strong>Health</strong><br />

These results indicate that short-term (acute) and sub-chronic exposures to COPCs during<br />

well completion activities have the potential to be significantly greater than overall<br />

ambient air exposures, especially for residents living near the well pads.<br />

2.6.2 Observed Temporal Trends<br />

Temporal trends were evaluated for select COPCs from the five year of data that have<br />

been collected in <strong>Garfield</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

Figure 2-1 illustrates temporal trends for BTEX at the Bell-Melton Ranch monitoring<br />

station from 2005 to 2010. There is a consistent seasonal pattern for BTEX with higher<br />

concentrations in the winter than the summer, with the exception of one high<br />

concentration measured in August 2008. Overall, it does not appear that BTEX<br />

concentrations are increasing at the Bell-Melton Ranch monitoring site.<br />

Figure 2-2 illustrates temporal trends for formaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, and<br />

acetaldehyde at the Bell Melton Ranch monitoring station from 2008 to 2010. A<br />

consistent seasonal pattern for crotonaldehyde is apparent, with the highest<br />

concentrations observed in the summer months. The seasonal pattern is not as apparent<br />

for formaldehyde or acetaldehyde. Overall, it does not appear that carbonyl<br />

concentrations are increasing at the Bell-Melton Ranch monitoring site.<br />

Figure 2-2 also show a formaldehyde outlier in the sample collected in January 2009.<br />

The 95% UCL for formaldehyde was calculated with and without the outlier. The outlier<br />

was retained and not treated separately because the difference between the two 95%<br />

UCLs was less than 10 percent.<br />

<strong>Appendix</strong> D page 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!