JAN j 6 2010 - United States District Court

More documents

Recommendations

Info

judgments, the rule recognizes two distinct groups of in rem claimants. The first category of claimants include those who by ownership or otherwise, would, but for the arrest of the property, be entitled to its possession. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule C(6), these claimants must file a claim setting forth their interest in the property, demand their right to receive possession, and to appear and defend the action. In the case of such claimants, the operation of standard default procedures foreclose their rights to contest positions of the party in whose favor the default is rendered, and the entry of default judgment is both fair and appropriate. The second category of claimants embodies a potentially numerous and varying class of claimants. The claims of these other claimants do not give rise to a right of possession of the vessel from the marshal or other appropriate custodian, but rather invoke the power of the Court in admiralty to foreclose against the property by the ultimate rendering of a judgment in rem against property entitlements. Such judgments would be predicated upon non-possessory liens. The time in which the second category of claimants may intervene is governed by the provisions of Local Admiralty Rule E. Such lien claimants are not obligated, and indeed are probably not entitled to file a claim of possession to the vessel, or to answer and defend in the name of the vessel. As to them, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the essential averments of all the complaints are taken as automatically denied. No default judgments entered pursuant to this rule will operate to adjudicate priorities among competing non-possessory lien claimants. In attempting to reconcile the traditional notions of default and default judgments with the concept of in rem proceedings, the final language has been formulated to maintain the efficacy of the default procedure without resulting in premature adjudication effecting priorities and distributions. The default procedure establishes in favor of the holder of such a default judgment, a lien position against the proceeds of the property, resulting from any sale or disposition, or, if currency is involved, the ultimate adjudication, inferior to all other competing priorities, except the otherwise escheating right of the property owner to the remnants and surpluses after all full-claims satisfactions. At the same time, the right of a person obtaining a default judgment to contend and compete with other claimants for priority distribution remains unaffected. (2000) Local Admiralty Rule C(9) is amended to give the party seeking entry of a default judgment up to thirty days, rather than five days, to file a motion and supporting legal memorandum. (2001) Corrections to rule number references. (2010) Amended to conform tabulation to the style used in the federal rules of procedure. Rule B4. Possessory, Petitory and Partition Actions 414-(a) Establishing Dates for the Return of Process. In possessory actions 118
filed pursuant to Supplemental Rule D, the Court may order that process be returnable at a time shorter than that prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a). If the Court shortens the time, the Court shall specify the date upon which the answer must be filed, and may also set a hearing date to expedite the disposition of the possessory action. When possible, possessory actions shall be given preference on a judicial officer's calendar. Effective Dec. 1, 1994. Amended effective April 15, 2007. Advisory Notes (1993) This rule continues in substance the provisions of former Local Admiralty Rule 15. The rule recognizes the equity in allowing for a prompt resolution in possessory actions. Since a possessory action is brought to reinstate an owner of a vessel alleging wrongful deprivation of property, rather than to allow original possession, the rule permits the Court to expedite these actions, thereby providing a quick remedy for the one wrongfully deprived of his rightful property. See Silver v. Sloop Silver Cloud, 259 F.Supp. 187 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). Since a petitory and possessory action can be joined to obtain original possession, The Friendship, Fed.Cas. No. 5,123 (CCD Maine, 1855), this rule contemplates that an expedited hearing will only occur in purely possessory actions. (2010) Amended to conform tabulation to the style used in the federal rules of procedure. Rule E5_. Actions in Rem and Quasi in Rem: General Provisions 4±Ma}_ Statement of Itemized Damages and Expenses Required. Every complaint in a Supplemental Rule B and C action shall state the amount of the debt, damages, or salvage for which the action is brought. In addition, the statement shall also specify the amount of any unliquidated claims, including attorneys' fees. 424-(b) Requirements and Procedures for Effecting Intervention. Whenever a vessel or other property is arrested or attached in accordance with any Supplemental Rule, and the vessel or property is in the custody of the United States Marshal, or duly authorized substitute custodian, any other person having a claim against the vessel or property shall be required to present their claim as indicated below: f (1) Jntervention of Right When No Sale of the Vessel or Property Is Pending. Except as limited by Local Admiralty Rule E(2) (b)5(b) (2), any person having a claim against a vessel or property previously arrested or attached by the Marshal may, as a matter of right, file an intervening complaint at any time before an order is entered by the Court scheduling the vessel or property for sale. Coincident with the filing of an intervening complaint, the offering party 119
Page 1 and 2:
United States District Court Southe
Page 3 and 4:
Administrative Order 94-51, In Re A
Page 5 and 6:
e disclosed to the Clerk of the Cou
Page 7 and 8:
Authority (1993) Former Local Rules
Page 9 and 10:
compliance with the CM/ECF Administ
Page 11 and 12:
Re: Repeal of Local Rule 5.2.D and
Page 13 and 14:
and Court filings are matters of pu
Page 15 and 16:
supplanting original electronic fil
Page 17 and 18:
the date of any hearing held on the
Page 19 and 20:
limitations. (2000) The addition of
Page 21 and 22:
A. Motions for Attornoyo Food and/o
Page 23 and 24:
substantially similar to) AO 133 of
Page 25 and 26:
Authority (1993) Former Local Rule
Page 27 and 28:
Roll of Attorneys. The Bar of this
Page 29 and 30:
Except as otherwise ordered by a Ju
Page 31 and 32:
If the complaint alleges a violatio
Page 33 and 34:
Comments (1993) This Local Rule has
Page 35 and 36:
Rule 16.1^A(a) above; 4fef(B) The d
Page 37 and 38:
the specific acts or omissions reli
Page 39 and 40:
anticipated; and with the Court's p
Page 41 and 42:
of Mediators. j^(l) Certification o
Page 43 and 44:
Procedures to Refer a Case or Claim
Page 45 and 46:
: : . ORDER OF REFERRAL Trial havi
Page 47 and 48:
: . ORDER SCHEDULING MEDIATION The
Page 49 and 50:
or to the Chief Judge's designee. E
Page 51 and 52:
class action plaintiff move, within
Page 53 and 54:
conducted until after the expert su
Page 55 and 56:
discovery or for a protective order
Page 57 and 58:
(1996)[I.] The "attempt to confer"
Page 59 and 60:
depositions or hearings made necess
Page 61 and 62:
(2010) Amended to conform tabulatio
Page 63 and 64:
In cases of a post-judgment writ of
Page 65 and 66:
victim if the announcement is not o
Page 67 and 68: 9029 does not suggest that such a d
Page 69 and 70: Motions for Stay and Other Intermed
Page 71 and 72: for example, the disposition of a m
Page 73 and 74: and costs of the proceedings refere
Page 75 and 76: posted and forfeited in lieu of app
Page 77 and 78: individualization, or time limits,
Page 79 and 80: Effective Dec. 1, 1994. Amended eff
Page 81 and 82: (1996) A. Removes any explicit requ
Page 83 and 84: K-s-(k) The government shall, upon
Page 85 and 86: When a defendant is arrested after
Page 87 and 88: 4. No provision of the Discovery Pr
Page 89 and 90: (5) Stays or Limitation of Discover
Page 91 and 92: subject to the objection. A lawyer
Page 93 and 94: d. The videographer shall certify t
Page 95 and 96: B. Procedures Governing Manner of P
Page 97 and 98: answer. Interrogatories propounded
Page 99 and 100: producing party may be required to
Page 101 and 102: occurs, counsel for movant must spe
Page 103 and 104: MS Excel Spreadsheet); (2) the gene
Page 105 and 106: I am the defendant named above. I h
Page 107 and 108: security; all process shall be issu
Page 109 and 110: As noted in the revised Local Admir
Page 111 and 112: If the seizure was predicated upon
Page 113 and 114: (2000) Local Admiralty Rule B(7) is
Page 115 and 116: Local Admiralty Rules. 4feH2) Proof
Page 117: Cir.1981); Merchants Nat'l Bank v.
Page 121 and 122: Counsel for the intervening party s
Page 123 and 124: equired by Local Admiralty Rule B(5
Page 125 and 126: 43-HC) Execution of Process. The ar
Page 127 and 128: Any order issued pursuant to this s
Page 129 and 130: (2) Involuntary Dismissal. If the C
Page 131 and 132: the "Request for Confirmation of Sa
Page 133 and 134: A concern was expressed about the p
Page 135 and 136: Publication of the Notice. Immediat
Page 137 and 138: Defendant. PROCESS OF ATTACHMENT
Page 139 and 140: Defendant. WARRANT FOR ARREST IN R
Page 141 and 142: (4) The vessel is currently berthed
Page 143 and 144: Attorney Name (Bar Number Typed Nam
Page 145 and 146: the Court to enter an Order directi
Page 147 and 148: THEREFORE, in light of the facts pr
Page 149 and 150: located and to be found at and desc
Page 151 and 152: Defendant. AFFIDAVIT (Foreign Attac
Page 153 and 154: B^-(B) Motions for judgment on the
Page 155 and 156: Effective Dec. 1, 1994; amended eff
Page 157 and 158: States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(B).
Page 159 and 160: ) Plaintiff,) ) vs.) ) Defendant.)
Page 161 and 162: Rule 3. Retention of Membership in
Page 163 and 164: j— (i) Referral. Any District Jud
Page 165 and 166: Effective Dec. 1, 1994. Amended eff
Page 167 and 168: cause for such withdrawal is furnis
Page 169 and 170:
Comments (1996) Section A. and B.2.
Page 171 and 172:
Jurisdiction and Powers. (1) The Co
Page 173 and 174:
Court shall issue an order requirin
Page 175 and 176:
jfc-r (1) the procedure in that oth
Page 177 and 178:
If after meeting with the attorney
Page 179 and 180:
the reinstatement proceeding. Effec
show all

JAN j 6 2010 - United States District Court

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?