JAN j 6 2010 - United States District Court
JAN j 6 2010 - United States District Court
JAN j 6 2010 - United States District Court
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
€-r(6) No agreement between parties or their attorneys, the existence of<br />
which is not conceded, in relation to the proceedings or evidence in an<br />
action, will be considered by the <strong>Court</strong> unless the same is made before<br />
the <strong>Court</strong> and noted in the record or is reduced to writing and subscribed<br />
by the party or attorney against whom it is asserted.<br />
3-r(7) Only one (1) attorney on each side shall examine or cross-examine a<br />
witness, and not more than two (2) attorneys on each side shall argue the<br />
merits of the action or proceeding unless the <strong>Court</strong> shall otherwise<br />
permit.<br />
fc-(e) Relations With Jury. All attempts to curry favor with juries by<br />
fawning flattery, or pretend solicitude for their personal comfort are<br />
unprofessional. Suggestions of counsel, looking to the comfort or<br />
convenience of jurors, and propositions to dispense with argument, should<br />
be made to the <strong>Court</strong> out of the jury's hearing. Before, during, and<br />
after the trial, a lawyer should avoid conversing or otherwise<br />
communicating with a juror on any subject, whether pertaining to the case<br />
or not. Provided, however, after the jury has been discharged, upon<br />
application in writing and for good cause shown, the <strong>Court</strong> may allow<br />
counsel to interview jurors to determine whether their verdict is subject<br />
to legal challenge. In this event, the <strong>Court</strong> shall enter an order<br />
limiting the time, place, and circumstances under which the interviews<br />
shall be conducted. The scope of the interviews should be restricted and<br />
caution should be used to avoid embarrassment to any juror and to avoid<br />
influencing the juror's action in any subsequent jury services.<br />
&-r(f) Relation to Other Rules. This Local Rule governing attorneys is<br />
supplemented by the Special Rules Governing the Admission and Practice of<br />
Attorneys-7—the Rulca—ef—fcfee—Grievance—Committee—and—fefee—Rules—©#<br />
Diociplinarv Enforcement and the Rules Governing Attorney Discipline of<br />
this <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Effective Dec. 1, 1994. Amended effective April 15, 2002; April 15,<br />
2007.<br />
Authority<br />
(1993) Former Local Rule 16. Renumbered per Model Rules.<br />
Comments<br />
(1994) Changed to make the Local Rule gender neutral.<br />
(2002) Local Rule 11.1.D.7. deleted, as the issue addressed by this Local<br />
Rule deals with an ethical rule, see Rule 4-3.7 of the Rules of<br />
Professional Conduct of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, subject to<br />
exceptions and distinctions not encompassed by the Local Rule.<br />
(<strong>2010</strong>) Amended to conform tabulation to the style used in the federal<br />
rules of procedure.<br />
Rule 12.1 Civil RICO Case Statement<br />
28