The Question of Enlightenment - Theory and Practice in Eighteenth ...
The Question of Enlightenment - Theory and Practice in Eighteenth ...
The Question of Enlightenment - Theory and Practice in Eighteenth ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Question</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enlightenment</strong> 45<br />
now dropped his unequivocal opposition to the writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> histories <strong>of</strong> concepts from the revised version <strong>of</strong> “Mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>and</strong> Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g” (cf. “Mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Undesrt<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g” 30-39 <strong>and</strong> Visions <strong>of</strong> Politics I:67-72).<br />
48<br />
For an attempt to reconcile these two approaches, see Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical <strong>and</strong> Temporal Perspectives<br />
on Conceptual Change,” F<strong>in</strong>nish Yearbook <strong>of</strong> Political Thought 3 (1999) 41-59.<br />
49<br />
50<br />
Koselleck, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>of</strong> Conceptual History (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002) 31-32.<br />
J. G. A. Pocock, “Concepts <strong>and</strong> Discourses: A Difference <strong>in</strong> Culture? Comment on a Paper by Melv<strong>in</strong><br />
Richter,” <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong> Mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Historical Terms <strong>and</strong> Concepts 53.<br />
51<br />
52<br />
53<br />
Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, Visions <strong>of</strong> History180; see also Koselleck, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>of</strong> Conceptual History31-32<br />
Cite Stuke <strong>and</strong> other discussions, <strong>in</strong> German, <strong>of</strong> the concept<br />
See Koselleck, “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Eighteenth</strong> Century as the Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Modernity,” <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>of</strong> Conceptual<br />
History 154-169 <strong>and</strong> Koselleck, “’Neuzeit’: Remarks on the Semantics <strong>of</strong> the Modern Concepts <strong>of</strong> Movement,” <strong>in</strong><br />
Koselleck, Futures Past 238.<br />
54<br />
55<br />
On this po<strong>in</strong>t, see Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, Visions <strong>of</strong> Politics, 145-57, 175-87<br />
First published <strong>in</strong> 1891, the “E” volume was sub-edited dur<strong>in</strong>g 1881 <strong>and</strong> 1882 by Philip Whitt<strong>in</strong>gton Jacob,<br />
a former alderman <strong>and</strong> mayor <strong>of</strong> Guilford, who subsequently revised the volume <strong>in</strong> 1884-85, <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
additional examples. <strong>The</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> enlightenment has survived, unchanged, <strong>in</strong>to the on-l<strong>in</strong>e 3 rd edition. In 1933,<br />
the same def<strong>in</strong>ition was carried over without substantial modification <strong>in</strong>to the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary but<br />
has been revised <strong>in</strong> more recent editiosn <strong>of</strong> the Shorter Oxford.<br />
56<br />
Peter Gay, <strong>The</strong> Party <strong>of</strong> Humanity (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, NJ: Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton University Press, 1959) 263. See also the<br />
criticisms <strong>of</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition found <strong>in</strong> Karl R. Popper, “Kant’s Critique <strong>and</strong> Cosmology,” <strong>in</strong> Conjectures <strong>and</strong><br />
Refutations: <strong>The</strong> Growth <strong>of</strong> Scientific Knowledge (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1965) 176, John Lough,<br />
“Reflections on <strong>Enlightenment</strong> <strong>and</strong> Lumières,” <strong>The</strong> British Journal for <strong>Eighteenth</strong>-Century Studies 8:1 (1985): 1-2,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Roy Porter, <strong>The</strong> Creation <strong>of</strong> the Modern World: <strong>The</strong> Untold Story <strong>of</strong> the British <strong>Enlightenment</strong> (New York:<br />
Norton, 2000) 5.