03.11.2013 Views

The Question of Enlightenment - Theory and Practice in Eighteenth ...

The Question of Enlightenment - Theory and Practice in Eighteenth ...

The Question of Enlightenment - Theory and Practice in Eighteenth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Question</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enlightenment</strong> 45<br />

now dropped his unequivocal opposition to the writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> histories <strong>of</strong> concepts from the revised version <strong>of</strong> “Mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g” (cf. “Mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Undesrt<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g” 30-39 <strong>and</strong> Visions <strong>of</strong> Politics I:67-72).<br />

48<br />

For an attempt to reconcile these two approaches, see Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical <strong>and</strong> Temporal Perspectives<br />

on Conceptual Change,” F<strong>in</strong>nish Yearbook <strong>of</strong> Political Thought 3 (1999) 41-59.<br />

49<br />

50<br />

Koselleck, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>of</strong> Conceptual History (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002) 31-32.<br />

J. G. A. Pocock, “Concepts <strong>and</strong> Discourses: A Difference <strong>in</strong> Culture? Comment on a Paper by Melv<strong>in</strong><br />

Richter,” <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong> Mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Historical Terms <strong>and</strong> Concepts 53.<br />

51<br />

52<br />

53<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, Visions <strong>of</strong> History180; see also Koselleck, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>of</strong> Conceptual History31-32<br />

Cite Stuke <strong>and</strong> other discussions, <strong>in</strong> German, <strong>of</strong> the concept<br />

See Koselleck, “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Eighteenth</strong> Century as the Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Modernity,” <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>of</strong> Conceptual<br />

History 154-169 <strong>and</strong> Koselleck, “’Neuzeit’: Remarks on the Semantics <strong>of</strong> the Modern Concepts <strong>of</strong> Movement,” <strong>in</strong><br />

Koselleck, Futures Past 238.<br />

54<br />

55<br />

On this po<strong>in</strong>t, see Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, Visions <strong>of</strong> Politics, 145-57, 175-87<br />

First published <strong>in</strong> 1891, the “E” volume was sub-edited dur<strong>in</strong>g 1881 <strong>and</strong> 1882 by Philip Whitt<strong>in</strong>gton Jacob,<br />

a former alderman <strong>and</strong> mayor <strong>of</strong> Guilford, who subsequently revised the volume <strong>in</strong> 1884-85, <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

additional examples. <strong>The</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> enlightenment has survived, unchanged, <strong>in</strong>to the on-l<strong>in</strong>e 3 rd edition. In 1933,<br />

the same def<strong>in</strong>ition was carried over without substantial modification <strong>in</strong>to the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary but<br />

has been revised <strong>in</strong> more recent editiosn <strong>of</strong> the Shorter Oxford.<br />

56<br />

Peter Gay, <strong>The</strong> Party <strong>of</strong> Humanity (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, NJ: Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton University Press, 1959) 263. See also the<br />

criticisms <strong>of</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition found <strong>in</strong> Karl R. Popper, “Kant’s Critique <strong>and</strong> Cosmology,” <strong>in</strong> Conjectures <strong>and</strong><br />

Refutations: <strong>The</strong> Growth <strong>of</strong> Scientific Knowledge (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1965) 176, John Lough,<br />

“Reflections on <strong>Enlightenment</strong> <strong>and</strong> Lumières,” <strong>The</strong> British Journal for <strong>Eighteenth</strong>-Century Studies 8:1 (1985): 1-2,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Roy Porter, <strong>The</strong> Creation <strong>of</strong> the Modern World: <strong>The</strong> Untold Story <strong>of</strong> the British <strong>Enlightenment</strong> (New York:<br />

Norton, 2000) 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!