12.11.2013 Views

the ocular harpsichord of louis-bertrand castel - Gewina

the ocular harpsichord of louis-bertrand castel - Gewina

the ocular harpsichord of louis-bertrand castel - Gewina

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The first announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ocular</strong> <strong>harpsichord</strong><br />

Castel's <strong>ocular</strong> <strong>harpsichord</strong> 19<br />

It was in this context that <strong>the</strong>re appeared in <strong>the</strong> Mercure de France <strong>of</strong> November<br />

1725 a letter from Castel directed to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rwise unknown Monsieur Decourt<br />

<strong>of</strong> Amiens, entitled "Clavecin pour les yeux, avec Part de peindre les sons, et<br />

toutes sortes de pieces de musique.""* In this letter, Castel set out to prove that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was an analogy between <strong>the</strong> phenomena <strong>of</strong> sound and light, and between<br />

tones and colours, such that what had up till <strong>the</strong>n been performed only with<br />

sound, that is, arranging different tones in such a way that we appreciate <strong>the</strong><br />

effect as a form <strong>of</strong> art, should be equally possible by arranging different colours,<br />

so that a whole new form <strong>of</strong> art would emerge, a music <strong>of</strong> colours.<br />

Castel motivated <strong>the</strong> analogy between .sound and light by <strong>the</strong> supposition that<br />

both were vibrational phenomena. By way <strong>of</strong> a rhetorical question he wondered<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r "sound and light do not equally consist in <strong>the</strong> insensible wigglings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sonorous and luminous bodies, and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> media that transmit <strong>the</strong>m to our ears<br />

[and to our eyes]?"'" And as tones are modifications <strong>of</strong> sound and colours are<br />

modifications <strong>of</strong> light, this implied an analogy between tones and colours. For<br />

arguments for this view he did not refer to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n current light <strong>the</strong>ories<br />

<strong>of</strong> Newton, Malebranche or Descartes, but to <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> his Jesuit predecessor<br />

Athanasius Kircher, whom Castel on a later occasion called "my true, my first,<br />

and as it were my only master"." From Kircher Castel derived a number <strong>of</strong><br />

observational analogies between sound and light: <strong>the</strong>y both are reflected by<br />

plane surfaces; both can penetrate into denser media and are refracted in <strong>the</strong><br />

process; and both can be concentrated in a focus by a hollow mirror. Moreover,<br />

<strong>the</strong> speaking trumpet or ear trumpet, Kircher's own invention, seemed <strong>the</strong><br />

perfect analogue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> telescope. These observations sufficiently supported <strong>the</strong><br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that sound and light were manifestations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same kind <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

process.<br />

It was already Kircher who had concluded that, if this were true, <strong>the</strong>re had to<br />

be an analogy between <strong>the</strong> art forms <strong>of</strong> tone and colour. According to Kircher:<br />

"If, when a musical instruments sounds, someone would perceive <strong>the</strong> finest<br />

movements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air, he certainly would see nothing but a painting with an<br />

extraordinary variety <strong>of</strong> colours." And again: "The colours also have <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

harmony, which pleases no less than music, and this analogous harmony even<br />

"* Mercure dc France, November 1725, pp. 2552-2577.<br />

Ibid., p. 2557: "le son & la lumiere ne consistent-ils pas egalement dans les tremou-ssemens<br />

insensibles des corps sonores & lumineux. & du milieu qui les transmet jusqu'a nos oreilles?"<br />

Memoires de Trewtix. October 17.35, p. 2033: "mon veritable, mon premier, & comme mon<br />

unique Maitre".

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!