15.11.2013 Views

UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS

UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS

UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ordovician limestones of Sweden (1955a) and on bland (1963), and already<br />

proved the suitability of these microfossils for detailed biozonation (1955a<br />

and 1971).<br />

From each of the rock-sections 1, 6 and 14, about 50 samples were used.<br />

They were digested in 15% acetic acid solutions of 500-70°e. The limestone<br />

samples were 100-200 gr., whilst those of the Djupvik Formation weighed<br />

up to 1000 gr. After washing the residues, the fractions between SOil and<br />

1.5 mm. were dried. Further isolation of the conodonts was attained by<br />

using the magnetic properties of the anorganic constituents of the resid1±es.<br />

The conodonts were concentrated by a magnetic separator in the a-magnetic<br />

fraction. If separation by this method was insufficient, the conodonts were<br />

afterwards isolated by treatment with bromoform of 2.87 specific gravity .•<br />

All samples of the Kopingsklint Formation, the Bruddesta Formation, and<br />

the Horns Udde Formation were usually rich in conodonts. Once 12.000<br />

conodont specimens were calculated to be present in alSO gr. sample of the<br />

Bruddesta Formation. By using a microsplit, a representative portion of the<br />

total fauna was isolated and studied under binocular microscope. Finally,<br />

approximately 300 conodont specimens were collected and determined from<br />

each sample. To avoid selective collection of these 300 specimens, the<br />

representative portions of the faunas were strewn in a tray with a lineated<br />

bottom and the conodonts were searched systematically along the lines.<br />

Charts II, III and IV show the distribution of the conodont species in the<br />

rock-sections 1, 6 and 14, respectively. The distribution charts are composed<br />

on the basis of the bottom method.<br />

In every rock-section conodont assemblages were distinguished, mainly<br />

using the first appearances of species. In some cases, however, the disappearance<br />

of one or more species was used for zonal boundaries as well. The<br />

assemblage zones of sections 1, 6 and 14 first got a preliminary notation.<br />

After comparison of these three zonations every zone was given an official<br />

name. The zonation was much facilitated by the presence of many discon-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!