15.11.2013 Views

UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS

UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS

UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

whereas slightly asymmetrical variants of the latter form the scandodiform<br />

elements (PI. 3, figs. 4a, b).<br />

Acodiform elements were not found in the studied material.<br />

The oistodiform element (see PI. 3, figs. la, b) has been described as<br />

Scandodus furnishi LINDSTROM and this is the type-species of the form<br />

genus Scandodus LINDSTROM. However, the shape of the base and its<br />

orientation with regard to the cusp are rather typical for the oistodiform<br />

elements of other species of the genus Drepanoistodus (see for instance the<br />

more erect types of the oistodiform elements of Drepanoistodus inaequalis<br />

(PANDER), emend. herein, see PI. 2, fig. 7. The lack of acodiform elements<br />

and the rareness of oistodiform elements make the generic position of this<br />

multi-element species doubtful.<br />

Regional occurrence: At Kopingsklint this species occurs from the top of<br />

member Kk 2 up to a level at about 2.20 m. above the base of the Bruddesta<br />

Formation. In section 6 it was found from member Ka-d1 up to a level at<br />

about 2.10 m. above the base of the Bruddesta Formation. Near Horns Udde<br />

from the base of the member Ku up to a level at about 3.80 m. above the<br />

base of the Bruddesta Formation. .<br />

Biostratigraphic range: Drepanoistodus conulatus was found from the<br />

Triangulodus subtilis/Gothodus microdentatus Assemblage Zone up to and<br />

including part of the Microzarkodina flabellum Assemblage Zone (see<br />

fig. 15).<br />

Drepanoistodus forceps (LINDSTROM), emend. LINDSTROM, 1971<br />

(PI. 2, figs. 14-22)<br />

Oistodusforceps LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 574, PI. 4, figs. 9-13; Fig. 3M.<br />

Drepanoistodusforceps (LINDSTROM). LINDSTROM, 1971, p. 42, figs. 5,8.<br />

Oistodus basiovalis SERGEEVA, 1963, p. 96, Pi. VII, figs. 6, 7.<br />

Drepanoistodus basiovalis (SERGEEVA). LINDSTROM, 1?71, p. 43, figs. 6, 8.<br />

Drepanodus suberectus (BRANSON & MEHL). LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 568, Pi. 2, figs. 21,22.<br />

Drepanodus planus LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 565, Pi. 2, figs. 35-37; Fig. 4a.<br />

Drepanodus homocurvatus LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 563, PI. 2, figs. 23,24,39; Fig. 4d.<br />

Acodus gratus LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 545, PI. 2, figs. 27-29.<br />

Remarks: Oistodiform and drepanodiform elements are most common in the<br />

assemblage.<br />

Amongst the scandodiform elements there are asymmetrical variants of<br />

Drepanodus planus (see PI. 2, fig. 20) and forms which carry a lateral carina<br />

and obviously occupy a position intermediate between Drepanodus homocurvatus<br />

and Acodus gratus (see PI. 2, fig. 21). These scandodiform elements<br />

were never described as separate form species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!