UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS
UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS
UTRECHT MICROPALEONTOLOGICAL BUllETINS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
whereas slightly asymmetrical variants of the latter form the scandodiform<br />
elements (PI. 3, figs. 4a, b).<br />
Acodiform elements were not found in the studied material.<br />
The oistodiform element (see PI. 3, figs. la, b) has been described as<br />
Scandodus furnishi LINDSTROM and this is the type-species of the form<br />
genus Scandodus LINDSTROM. However, the shape of the base and its<br />
orientation with regard to the cusp are rather typical for the oistodiform<br />
elements of other species of the genus Drepanoistodus (see for instance the<br />
more erect types of the oistodiform elements of Drepanoistodus inaequalis<br />
(PANDER), emend. herein, see PI. 2, fig. 7. The lack of acodiform elements<br />
and the rareness of oistodiform elements make the generic position of this<br />
multi-element species doubtful.<br />
Regional occurrence: At Kopingsklint this species occurs from the top of<br />
member Kk 2 up to a level at about 2.20 m. above the base of the Bruddesta<br />
Formation. In section 6 it was found from member Ka-d1 up to a level at<br />
about 2.10 m. above the base of the Bruddesta Formation. Near Horns Udde<br />
from the base of the member Ku up to a level at about 3.80 m. above the<br />
base of the Bruddesta Formation. .<br />
Biostratigraphic range: Drepanoistodus conulatus was found from the<br />
Triangulodus subtilis/Gothodus microdentatus Assemblage Zone up to and<br />
including part of the Microzarkodina flabellum Assemblage Zone (see<br />
fig. 15).<br />
Drepanoistodus forceps (LINDSTROM), emend. LINDSTROM, 1971<br />
(PI. 2, figs. 14-22)<br />
Oistodusforceps LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 574, PI. 4, figs. 9-13; Fig. 3M.<br />
Drepanoistodusforceps (LINDSTROM). LINDSTROM, 1971, p. 42, figs. 5,8.<br />
Oistodus basiovalis SERGEEVA, 1963, p. 96, Pi. VII, figs. 6, 7.<br />
Drepanoistodus basiovalis (SERGEEVA). LINDSTROM, 1?71, p. 43, figs. 6, 8.<br />
Drepanodus suberectus (BRANSON & MEHL). LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 568, Pi. 2, figs. 21,22.<br />
Drepanodus planus LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 565, Pi. 2, figs. 35-37; Fig. 4a.<br />
Drepanodus homocurvatus LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 563, PI. 2, figs. 23,24,39; Fig. 4d.<br />
Acodus gratus LINDSTROM, 1955a, p. 545, PI. 2, figs. 27-29.<br />
Remarks: Oistodiform and drepanodiform elements are most common in the<br />
assemblage.<br />
Amongst the scandodiform elements there are asymmetrical variants of<br />
Drepanodus planus (see PI. 2, fig. 20) and forms which carry a lateral carina<br />
and obviously occupy a position intermediate between Drepanodus homocurvatus<br />
and Acodus gratus (see PI. 2, fig. 21). These scandodiform elements<br />
were never described as separate form species.