23.11.2013 Views

Amino acid transmitters in the mammalian central nervous system

Amino acid transmitters in the mammalian central nervous system

Amino acid transmitters in the mammalian central nervous system

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> Acid Transmitters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mammalian Central Nervous System 131<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence of am<strong>in</strong>o-oxyacetic <strong>acid</strong> (Rat: HOKFELT and LJUNGDAHL,<br />

1971 b).<br />

Electrophoretically adm<strong>in</strong>istered GABA depresses <strong>the</strong> fir<strong>in</strong>g of neurones <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> many regions of <strong>the</strong> cat rh<strong>in</strong>encephaton which have been exam<strong>in</strong>ed--CA1,<br />

CA2, CA3 (STEEANIS, 1964; BISCOE and STRAUGHAN, 1966; CURTIS et al., 1971b):<br />

dentate gyrus (STEFANIS, 1964): septum (HERz and GOGOLAK, 1965): amygdala<br />

(STRAUGHAN and LEGGE, 1965): pyriform cortex (LEGGE, RANDI~, and STRAUGnAN,<br />

1966); and similar results have been observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rat (STEINER and<br />

RUE, 1967). Although GABA was a more effective depressant of <strong>the</strong> fir<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

pyramidal cells than ei<strong>the</strong>r glyc<strong>in</strong>e or fl-alan<strong>in</strong>e (CURTIS et al., 197 lb), hyperpolarization<br />

by GABA has yet to be demonstrated. However, bicucull<strong>in</strong>e blocks <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>hibition of pyramidal cells by GABA (and by fl-alan<strong>in</strong>e, CURTIS et al., 1971b)<br />

and reduces <strong>the</strong> prolonged synaptic <strong>in</strong>hibition (ANDERSEN, ECCLES, and LOYNING,<br />

1964) of <strong>the</strong>se neurones which follows excitation of basket cells (CURTIS, FELIX,<br />

and MCLENNAN, 1970C). This synaptic <strong>in</strong>hibition is not affected by strychn<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(ANDERSEN et al., 1963), an alkaloid which appeared to have little selectivity<br />

as an am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong> antagonist <strong>in</strong> this region (CURTISet al., 1971b). The effects<br />

of <strong>system</strong>ic or topical convulsants on hippocampal responses are complex (BAKER,<br />

KRATKY and BENEDICT, 1965; GESSI, RABINI, and VOLTA, 1967).<br />

4.4. Ret<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Although a number of am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong>s are present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vertebrate ret<strong>in</strong>a, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with relevant enzymes and transport processes (LOLLEr, 1969), <strong>the</strong> precise nature<br />

of <strong>the</strong> neurones syn<strong>the</strong>sis<strong>in</strong>g and releas<strong>in</strong>g particular am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong>s has yet to<br />

be determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The organization and structure of <strong>the</strong> vertebrate ret<strong>in</strong>a has been<br />

reviewed recently by DOWLING (1970).<br />

The high levels of both GABA and GAD <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ganglion cell layer of <strong>the</strong><br />

rabbit were considered to reflect technical difficulties <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical separation<br />

of ret<strong>in</strong>al layers ra<strong>the</strong>r than an association of <strong>the</strong> am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong> with excitatory<br />

neurones (KuRIYAMA, SISKEN, HABEN and ROBERTS, 1968). The distribution of<br />

<strong>the</strong> enzyme and am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> frog ret<strong>in</strong>a led to <strong>the</strong> suggestion that amacr<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

and probably also horizontal, cells may syn<strong>the</strong>sise GABA (GRAHAM, 1972). Glutamate<br />

is evenly distributed between <strong>the</strong> receptor, bipolar and ganglion cell layers<br />

of <strong>the</strong> frog ret<strong>in</strong>a, and <strong>the</strong> levels are not significantly different <strong>in</strong> ret<strong>in</strong>ae adapted<br />

to light or to darkness. In contrast GABA levels <strong>in</strong> both bipolar and ganglion<br />

cell layers are decreased <strong>in</strong> dark adapted frog ret<strong>in</strong>a (GRAHAM, BAXTER, and<br />

LOLLEY, 1970). Similarly, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> goldfish, light stimulation enhances <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

of GABA from glutamate (LAM, 1972).<br />

Ret<strong>in</strong>al tissue takes up am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong>s, both <strong>in</strong> vivo and <strong>in</strong> vitro, and use has<br />

been made of radiolabelled compounds to determ<strong>in</strong>e both <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>etics of <strong>the</strong><br />

processes (GABA-Rat: GOODCHILD and NEAL, 1973: high aff<strong>in</strong>ity, STARR and<br />

VOADEN, 1972a; NEAL and STARR, 1973. Glyc<strong>in</strong>e-Rabbit: high aff<strong>in</strong>ity, BRUUN<br />

and EHINGER, 1972. Taur<strong>in</strong>e-Rat: low aff<strong>in</strong>ity, STARR and VOADEN, 1972 b ; Chicken:<br />

PASANTES-MORALES, KLETHI, URBAN, and MANDEL, 1972. Glutamate-Rat:<br />

high aff<strong>in</strong>ity, NEAL and WHITE, 1971) and sites of am<strong>in</strong>o <strong>acid</strong> accumulation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!