Rethinking Decentralization in the Unitary States
Rethinking Decentralization in the Unitary States
Rethinking Decentralization in the Unitary States
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CONCLUSION<br />
◦ <strong>Decentralization</strong> has multiple mean<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>terpretation, and<br />
implementation <strong>in</strong> different country and different context. But<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is common essence of decentralization, that is,<br />
streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g local authorities through transfer of power and<br />
resources from <strong>the</strong> central govt.<br />
◦ It must never be forgotten that <strong>the</strong> purpose of decentralization is<br />
not to re<strong>in</strong>force local powers or to preserve central power but<br />
exclusively to ensure <strong>the</strong> best service to <strong>the</strong> citizen, service that is<br />
closer, more comprehensible and less costly. By quot<strong>in</strong>g Bernard:<br />
“<strong>Decentralization</strong> cannot be forced. It must be made alive for and<br />
by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>habitants of <strong>the</strong> City of Mank<strong>in</strong>d.”<br />
◦ Consequently, contrast<strong>in</strong>g unitary and federal states, or<br />
contrast<strong>in</strong>g decentralization and deconcentration, is no longer<br />
relevant. The more important th<strong>in</strong>g to be noticed is that both<br />
unitary and federal states have equal opportunity to promote<br />
asymmetrical decentralization.<br />
◦ Asymmetrical decentralization constitutes a w<strong>in</strong>-w<strong>in</strong> solution to<br />
resolve any conflict between Unitarian supporters and separatist<br />
movement. 58