17.12.2013 Views

Rethinking Decentralization in the Unitary States

Rethinking Decentralization in the Unitary States

Rethinking Decentralization in the Unitary States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Disagreement<br />

◦ Falleti (2004): excludes market from decentralization.<br />

<strong>Decentralization</strong> is a set of state reforms; it does not <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

transfers of authority to non–state actors.<br />

◦ Coll<strong>in</strong>s & Green (1994): decentralization transfers authority<br />

from centre to periphery; while privatization transfers from public<br />

sector to private sector.<br />

◦ Sherwood (1969): decentralization describes an <strong>in</strong>traorganizational<br />

pattern of power relationships; while devolution<br />

describes an <strong>in</strong>ter-organizational pattern.<br />

◦ Fesler (1968): deconcentration is not a type of decentralization<br />

at all. It does not require any decentralization of power s<strong>in</strong>ce it does<br />

not provide <strong>the</strong> opportunity to exercise substantial local discretion <strong>in</strong><br />

decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

◦ Ribot (2004): <strong>Decentralization</strong> comes <strong>in</strong> two primary forms:<br />

democratic decentralization (also called political decentralization or<br />

devolution) & deconcentration (also known as adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

decentralization).<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!