22.12.2013 Views

2001-June 6-8 MILU - Iiinstitute.nl

2001-June 6-8 MILU - Iiinstitute.nl

2001-June 6-8 MILU - Iiinstitute.nl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report of working group A: Changing harbour related functions into city<br />

related functions, together with group B: Building above railway stations.<br />

The Bjørvika case<br />

Report by Anke Loska<br />

On the background of the<br />

presentation of the planning<br />

project in the Bjørvika area in<br />

Oslo and related projects of<br />

revitalization of the waterfront<br />

in Amsterdam, Göteborg,<br />

Lisbon, Barcelona, Melbourne<br />

and other cities, the group<br />

discussed points of evaluations<br />

and intervention criteria related<br />

to the <strong>MILU</strong>-strategy.<br />

Due to the comparison of the<br />

Bjørvika case and the other<br />

presented cases it became<br />

clear that we dealt with different<br />

needs for reclaiming and<br />

revitalizing the waterfront.<br />

A main reason for the otherthen-Oslo<br />

cases was the urge<br />

for more space for dwellings. Even though there is also a need for more housing in<br />

Oslo, the project of the Bjørvika area is not driven specifically by the lack of space<br />

elsewhere in the city. It’s a common urban redevelopment project 2 .<br />

The reclaiming of the waterfront is of great significance for any city in order to find or<br />

re-define its identity. Especially when a reclaimed waterfront is connected to the city<br />

centre. Such a crucial project is a priority for both, the planning authorities and the<br />

politicians.<br />

During the discussion several key aspects around the planning process were<br />

elaborated:<br />

• The need of flexible plans: Put influence of policy in perspective (economically<br />

and technically). That means have no fear of time; you need to treat time in a<br />

flexible way.<br />

• Who owns the land, has the financial benefit?: The city has to plan public<br />

functions and -spaces first and sell land in accordance with these plans. In this<br />

way the city will profit from the value increases triggered by here own quality<br />

ambitions regarding public spaces and it ensures that the developments live up to<br />

these ambitions. In the case of Göteborg it was the State who owned the land.<br />

2<br />

There will be some protests around the word ”common” since the Oslo opera is located here. But in terms of<br />

providing new land, the area seeks to provide more public space by using the old harbour areas.<br />

12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!