2001-June 6-8 MILU - Iiinstitute.nl

Report of working group C: Designing the process in which several
commissioning public and private parties can work together contributing
financially and functionally in order to realize a MILU strategy. Cases "Skøyen"
and "Nydalen"
Report by Brede Norderud
Case studies:
Two Oslo-cases were presented:
• "Skøyen" and "Nydalen": Business area’s laying in the direct extension of the
urban structure of Oslo. The question here is: Transformation of earlier
industrial areas into (still private) monofunctional urban satellites or into
multifunctional extensions of Oslo.
(see in the annex the facts sheets as presented by Brede Norderud)
Two Dutch cases were presented:
• Improvements of urban structure in Delft and Nijmegen organized as PPP
(Private Public Partnership). Questions here is: What are the favorable
process designs and what steps or elements have to be emphazised in the
process design.
(see in the annex the presentation of Toon van der Pas)
• A proposal for an evaluation-and decision making tool for the application of
different building typologies versus criteria for density.
(see in the annexes the presentation of mrs. Cilian Terwindt)
Similarities:
The group found obvious similarities in the complexity of concerning physical frames,
partners and roles, and the need for PPPartnership.
The group found also common interest in the need of a tool for evaluation of different
building concepts versus density and quality in different urban situations. The
proposed density-nomogram (see in the annex the presentation of Mrs. Cilian
Terwindt) supplied with typology-typical illustrations can provide a useful tool for
assessing and communicating the consequences of and preferences for different
building typologies versus a "desired" FloorSpaceIndex (FSI).
15.