Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CONSUMER<br />
Insights today for tomorrow’s decisions<br />
Fall/Winter 2006<br />
<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong><br />
<strong>Segmentation</strong>:<br />
Eight Is Enough<br />
Tune Into Teens:<br />
Test Your Teen<br />
Aptitude<br />
FEATURES:<br />
Global Household Product Sales<br />
Employee Empowerment<br />
Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.
Consumer<br />
Insight:<br />
Seeing Tomorrow…Today<br />
In every issue…<br />
Volume 8, No. 3<br />
Trendwatch<br />
Walk-In Retail Clinics: A Healthy Savings Idea<br />
Publisher<br />
ACNielsen<br />
Editors<br />
Laurel Kennedy<br />
Kathy Mancini<br />
Design & Layout<br />
Blue Lemon Design<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Joe Bucherer<br />
Carolyn Calzavara<br />
Mark Chesney<br />
Tiffany Graves<br />
Todd Hale<br />
Laurel Kennedy<br />
Dan Lyman<br />
Kathy Mancini<br />
Troy Noble<br />
Danell O’Neill<br />
Tom Pirovano<br />
Lori Tanking<br />
Contributing Writers<br />
Doug Anderson<br />
Research & Development<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Joe Bucherer<br />
<strong>Segmentation</strong> Analytics<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Jon Busman<br />
Marketing<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Mark Chesney<br />
Communications<br />
ACNielsen Global Services<br />
Russell Evans<br />
Business Technology Solutions<br />
ACNielsen<br />
Todd Hale<br />
Thought Leadership<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Laurel Kennedy<br />
Marketing Strategy<br />
Age Lessons<br />
Jane Perrin<br />
Communications<br />
ACNielsen Global Services<br />
Tom Pirovano<br />
Retailing Insights<br />
ACNielsen<br />
Bill Rouse<br />
Wal-Mart Analytics<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
For More Information<br />
ACNielsen U.S.<br />
150 North Martingale Road<br />
Schaumburg, IL 60173<br />
800.988.4ACN<br />
www.acnielsen.com/ci<br />
Copyright © 2006 ACNielsen. Printed in USA. All rights reserved. ACNielsen, ACNielsen with<br />
globe design, ACNielsen Answers, Homescan, LabelTrends and Scantrack are trademarks or<br />
registered trademarks of ACNielsen (US), Inc. Spectra and Consumer Trade Areas are trademarks<br />
or registered trademarks of Spectra Marketing Systems, Inc. Other brand, product or<br />
service names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
4<br />
On<br />
the Cover:<br />
<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong><br />
<strong>Segmentation</strong><br />
contents<br />
4 <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> <strong>Segmentation</strong>: Eight is Enough<br />
Given its relative size and influence on U.S. consumer markets,<br />
surprisingly little formal, quantitative segmentation work has been<br />
conducted on <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong>s. The question remains: how to right-size<br />
the huge <strong>Boomer</strong> cohort? How many segments would capture the<br />
important often subtle nuances that can spell the difference between a<br />
successful new product launch or marketing campaign and a complete<br />
misfire? Turns out, eight segments is enough.<br />
20<br />
Global<br />
Household<br />
Product Sales:<br />
Innovative Items<br />
Clean Up<br />
12<br />
12 Global Household Product Sales:<br />
Innovative Items Clean Up<br />
Analyzing household products on a global scale involves a pretty big<br />
bucket of categories and countries. What’s Hot Around the Globe—<br />
Insights on Growth in Household Products, one in a series of ACNielsen<br />
reports on the fastest-growing products and category drivers, encompasses<br />
66 markets and 29 household product areas.<br />
20 Tune Into Teens: Test Your Teen Aptitude<br />
Teens are a moving target. They were born and raised during a digitized<br />
age where change happens rapidly. Born into the MTV generation where<br />
the rally cry was “I want my MTV”, they have learned that what they want,<br />
they get. In their world, everything is immediate. From instant messaging<br />
to microwave meals, instant gratification is their mantra.<br />
28 Employee Empowerment:<br />
The Key to Capturing Productivity<br />
Ask any successful salesperson, and they’ll tell you that timely, accurate<br />
information represents the best armor they’ve got in the profit wars.<br />
The bulletproof concept resonates with every salesperson who has<br />
ever had to sell-in a new product, argue a price increase or stave off a<br />
competitive threat. To be effective in today’s hyper-charged, customized,<br />
store-level–focused retail environment, salespeople need a virtual arsenal<br />
of presentations capable of being refreshed with current data at the<br />
touch of a button.<br />
34 Gas Price Hikes Put Brakes on Spending<br />
Crude oil prices ignited again this summer, surpassing the $70 a barrel<br />
threshold and pushing prices at the pump to an inflammatory $3+ per<br />
gallon. Factors like market speculation, refinery capacity shortages and<br />
a pronounced decline in spare global oil production converged, leaving<br />
cash-strapped consumers scrambling to adjust budgets and spending<br />
accordingly.<br />
Tune Into Teens: Test<br />
Your Teen Aptitude<br />
34<br />
Gas Price Hikes<br />
Put Brakes on<br />
Spending<br />
28<br />
Employee<br />
Empowerment:<br />
The Key to<br />
Capturing<br />
Productivity<br />
42 Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.<br />
Winning at retail is enabled by applying a simple, systematic four-step<br />
process that we call “Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.” The methodology<br />
employs a series of critical steps to optimize brand or product success<br />
in the marketplace. This consumer-centric approach links actions in the<br />
store—where they matter the most—back to the consumers most likely<br />
to purchase your brand.<br />
50 Trendwatch—Walk-In Retail Clinics:<br />
A Healthy Savings Idea<br />
“Would you like some chicken soup with that prescription?” While grocery<br />
stores have always stocked this form of “liquid penicillin”, today they’re<br />
home to the real deal—walk-in clinics staffed by nurse practitioners<br />
licensed to diagnose and treat common conditions such as allergies,<br />
bladder infections, bronchitis, ear infections, the flu, heartburn, muscle<br />
pain, pink eye, minor burns and rashes.
Overview<br />
ACNielsen recently completed the 15th edition of its annual<br />
Trade Promotion Practices Study which has traced industry<br />
promotion budget and allocation trends on the manufacturer<br />
side for 15 years, and corresponding retailer practices for nine<br />
years. The longitudinal view of spending habits and preferences<br />
affords unique insights into the ebb and flow of promotional<br />
methods through time, and an enlightened look at the similarities<br />
and differences between these trade partners.<br />
Conducted via the Internet, the online survey polled senior sales<br />
and marketing executives from 61 manufacturers and 38 retailer<br />
organizations. The electronic field work was supplemented<br />
with in-depth telephone interviews to more fully develop areas<br />
of special interest. The Trade Promotion Practices Study has<br />
been distributed to ACNielsen clients and is available for purchase<br />
on our website at http://www.acnielsen.com/store.<br />
Benchmarking performance<br />
Perennial favorite topics up for debate include the efficacy of<br />
frequent shopper programs and an assessment of which elements<br />
in the category management tool kit (assortment planning,<br />
promotional planning, shelf management, category business<br />
planning, everyday low pricing, frequent shopper/loyalty<br />
programs, micro-merchandising and micro-marketing) have<br />
gained or lost favor in the calendar year.<br />
A matter of opinion<br />
While retailers and manufacturers disagreed on any number of<br />
issues ranging from the sufficiency of trade promotion dollars<br />
to the effectiveness of shelf management, there were five areas<br />
of accord. The following topics were identified by both groups<br />
as critical success factors important to their business:<br />
1. understanding consumers<br />
2. new product introductions/implementation<br />
3. category management<br />
4. promotion efficiency/effectiveness<br />
5. variety and assortment<br />
Additionally, each faction identified important subjects specific<br />
to their operations. In the case of retailers, those subjects<br />
included private label activities and customer loyalty/retention<br />
programs. In the case of manufacturers, those subjects included<br />
trade partners, vendor relationships and category management.<br />
Tailoring content<br />
With study input available to guide editorial selections, the<br />
Fall/Winter issue of Consumer Insight magazine serves up a<br />
number of articles that directly address the top-ranked concerns<br />
of retailers and manufacturers. When it comes to understanding<br />
consumers (factor 1), the publication places the two largest<br />
age cohorts in the U.S. squarely in the crosshairs—<strong>Baby</strong><br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s and Millennials.<br />
The article titled “<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> <strong>Segmentation</strong>: Eight is<br />
Enough” introduces a robust segmentation model from<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra, based on the single<br />
most influential determinant of consumer purchase behavior—<br />
household composition, and in particular, presence of<br />
children in the home.<br />
The mantra “it’s all good” describes the teen scene in the article<br />
titled “Tune into Teens” for marketers who take the time to<br />
understand the zeitgeist of Millennials and their propensity for<br />
electronic multi-tasking. While teens may not have the bank<br />
accounts to purchase big ticket items, their influence over<br />
household spending decisions is undeniable.<br />
New product intros<br />
Opening a window onto the global new product scene<br />
(factor 2), the article titled “Global Household Product Sales:<br />
Innovative Items Clean Up” analyzes the packaging, ingredient<br />
and social trends that contribute to successful new product<br />
uptake. Cleaning products with oxidizing properties swept<br />
the worldwide sales ratings, along with so-called system<br />
approaches to cleaning like the innovative Swiffer line.<br />
C.O.D.E. breakers<br />
For a comprehensive view of consumer-driven micromarketing,<br />
readers will want to spend time with the article<br />
titled “Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.”, which touches on<br />
each of the critical success factors from the Trade Promotion<br />
Practices Study. Expanded, the acronym C.O.D.E. stands for<br />
2 Fall/Winter 2006
1. Consumer Profiling—accurately captures the<br />
demographic profile of the brand’s consumer.<br />
2. Opportunity Gapping—quantifies store-level<br />
opportunities based on consumer demand potential<br />
and diagnoses the prospect.<br />
3. Dynamic Clustering—groups similar stores using<br />
multiple store attributes, including shopper demographics,<br />
the competitive set, and upside opportunity.<br />
4. Executing for the Consumer—takes findings from steps<br />
1–3 and develops store-level tactical plans, giving<br />
the field force the right information to optimize<br />
in-store presence.<br />
Forward-looking insights<br />
With winter and the annual Consumer and Market Trends<br />
Report release approaching, more than the ambient<br />
temperature is dropping. The VNU Retailer Sentiment<br />
Index (RSI) saw a continuation of the downtrend which<br />
started in January 2005.<br />
Comprising monthly polls of roughly 500 retailers about<br />
current and future economic conditions, the VNU Retailer<br />
Sentiment Index also takes into account indicators such as<br />
store openings, hiring, earnings and general economic trends,<br />
synthesizing the input into a comprehensive view of current<br />
and future conditions.<br />
Traditionally, retailers cited the competitive environment as<br />
their top concern since the inception of the RSI. By midyear<br />
2006, for the first time, the overall economy knocked<br />
competition out of the top spot.<br />
Social responsibility<br />
This year’s Consumer and Market Trends Report exhibits a<br />
decidedly altruistic bent, delivered by two articles. One article<br />
outlines the rise in organic products and the downstream<br />
influence of Wal-Mart’s green commitment on the environment.<br />
The second article discusses how corporate sustainability and<br />
consumer pressure for environmental responsibility is sweeping<br />
through board rooms.<br />
True blue<br />
Segueing from the green theme, the Consumer and Market<br />
Trends Report will also cover the subject of true blue customers<br />
in a detailed article on the subject of loyalty marketing. The<br />
article walks through a framework for integrating a broad<br />
range of data from loyalty programs and POS numbers, to<br />
demographic profiles, attitudinal studies, share of wallet and<br />
promotional responsiveness to convert regular shoppers into<br />
loyal, high value customers.<br />
Classic updates<br />
Now in its tenth year, the Consumer and Market Trends<br />
Report will include updates on classic measures of industry<br />
performance including channel blurring and category summaries.<br />
The channel blurring article investigates the impact<br />
of consolidation on channel dominance and the behavior of<br />
valuable multi-channel shoppers, while the category review<br />
article examines results from the convenience channel.<br />
Pricing it right<br />
Price compression and assortment expansion are two opposing<br />
forces that define the fast-moving consumer goods climate of<br />
today. From our custom analytical group comes a detailed<br />
discussion of a repertoire modeling approach for simulating the<br />
impact of a price change on volume, share, revenue and profit.<br />
It’s all about you<br />
By lifting the curtain on this and future Consumer Insight<br />
articles, we hope to have piqued your interest in the publication,<br />
while demonstrating that we practice what we preach.<br />
You are our readers. You are our customers. And our goal is<br />
to provide customer-centric editorial content that addresses<br />
the fundamental needs of your business.<br />
To make sure that we stay on point, you can e-mail our<br />
editor at ConsumerInsight@acnielsen.com or contact<br />
your client service representative any time to make a<br />
suggestion that will improve our core product set or<br />
thought leadership publications. We’re listening. C i<br />
3
<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong><br />
<strong>Segmentation</strong>:<br />
Eight Is Enough<br />
by: Doug Anderson<br />
Research & Development<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Laurel Kennedy<br />
Marketing Strategy<br />
Age Lessons<br />
“The most important thing to remember about <strong>Boomer</strong>s is<br />
that they are rule breakers. Individuality over conformity is<br />
a consistent <strong>Boomer</strong> pattern. They always have done it<br />
differently than the way it was done before, and as they<br />
get older, they will continue to demand products that fit<br />
their individuality.”<br />
–From Rocking The Ages:<br />
The Yankelovich Report on Generational Marketing<br />
by J. Walker Smith & Ann Clurman<br />
Given its relative size and influence on U.S. consumer markets,<br />
surprisingly little formal, quantitative segmentation<br />
work has been conducted on <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong>s. The question<br />
remains: how to right-size the huge <strong>Boomer</strong> cohort? How<br />
many segments would capture the important, often subtle,<br />
nuances that can spell the difference between a successful<br />
new product launch or marketing campaign and a complete<br />
misfire? Turns out, eight segments is enough.<br />
Often, when shaping products or programs for <strong>Boomer</strong>s,<br />
marketers have viewed this generation as a single, monolithic<br />
entity with lockstep needs and purchasing patterns. Akin to<br />
a “big gulp” theory, this framework poured every <strong>Boomer</strong><br />
into one purchasing pool of interchangeable consumers.<br />
That theory just doesn’t hold water.<br />
At best, marketers acknowledged the sweeping 19-year age<br />
span of 1946–1964, and using a little rough justice, split the<br />
segment in half or thirds, addressing campaigns to older or<br />
younger <strong>Boomer</strong>s. In this generational approach, age serves<br />
as an overly simplistic proxy for the correct measure—<br />
household composition.<br />
Under the generations method, rather than directly measuring<br />
the elements of household composition, observed differences<br />
in purchasing behavior are wrongly attributed to some<br />
underlying, shared social/political/cultural touchpoints.<br />
That theory is out of touch with marketplace realities.<br />
■ See chart 1.<br />
Chart 1: Finding the years of the <strong>Baby</strong> Boom is pretty easy…<br />
Annual Birth Rate of the United States<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
Small cohort of young<br />
post war adults<br />
+<br />
Higher incomes and a<br />
prosperous economy<br />
=<br />
Higher consumption—<br />
especially housing, autos,<br />
homes and appliances<br />
&<br />
Lots of children<br />
10<br />
1900<br />
1914<br />
1920<br />
1926<br />
1932<br />
1938<br />
1944<br />
1950<br />
1956<br />
1962<br />
1968<br />
1974<br />
1980<br />
1986<br />
1992<br />
1998<br />
4 Fall/Winter 2006
Simply put, there is no shared cultural milieu that resonates<br />
with all <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong>s. Many age cohort members were neither<br />
born in the United States, nor grew up here, leaving the<br />
shared culture concept significantly diluted.<br />
Size matters<br />
When people hear the term <strong>Baby</strong> Boom generation, the first<br />
thing that comes to mind is its massive size. The second<br />
thing is its unabated appetite for conspicuous consumption.<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s have been tagged with superlatives since birth,<br />
re-shaping American culture and institutions to reflect their<br />
unique zeitgeist. Today, this age cohort is defined as follows:<br />
• The biggest age band in history, numbering some 77<br />
million persons<br />
Chart 2: Percent of <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> households<br />
by the behavioral consumer segments<br />
Trailing Edge<br />
Couples<br />
Leading Edge<br />
Couples<br />
Single<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
15.5<br />
22.1<br />
11.5<br />
New Family<br />
Frontiers<br />
11.3<br />
5.1<br />
9.3<br />
15.5<br />
9.8<br />
Ready to<br />
Launch<br />
Late Blooming<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
Trailing Edge<br />
Families<br />
Leading Edge<br />
Families<br />
• The highest earners, with a median household income of<br />
$54,170; 55% greater than post-<strong>Boomer</strong>s and 61% more<br />
than pre-<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
No Kids<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Kids
Chart 3: Segmenting <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> households with<br />
children less than 18<br />
Total <strong>Baby</strong><br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> HHs<br />
with Children<br />
Smaller Families<br />
Size 2–3<br />
Larger Families<br />
Size 4+<br />
Younger<br />
Children<br />
< 12 Only<br />
Late Blooming<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Older<br />
Children<br />
12 +<br />
Ready to<br />
Launch<br />
Trailing Edge<br />
HOH<br />
Age 42–48<br />
Trailing Edge<br />
Families<br />
Leading Edge<br />
HOH<br />
Age 49–60<br />
Leading Edge<br />
Families<br />
Kid stuff<br />
Marketing to the <strong>Boomer</strong> segments with children is anything<br />
but child’s play. It requires an understanding of the nuances<br />
between the four groups. For example, highly educated Late<br />
Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s may have made the choice to start families<br />
later in life or are the by-product of divorce. As a result,<br />
Late Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s have smaller, younger families comprising<br />
one to two children under the age of 12. A single<br />
parent heads fully one-third of Late Blooming households,<br />
which also index above average for African-American and<br />
Asian ethnicities, but below average for Hispanics.<br />
Late Blooming heads of household span the entire <strong>Baby</strong><br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> age group. Since education correlates strongly with<br />
income, any attempt to divide <strong>Boomer</strong>s on the basis of age<br />
alone would clearly miss the mark here, and leave out a<br />
significant number of affluent Late Blooming households.<br />
■ See chart 3.<br />
Trailing Edge Families comprise larger, stable households<br />
of 4+ persons who have lived at the same address for more<br />
than five years. Unlike Late Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s, Trailing<br />
Edge heads of household fall into a narrow age parameter,<br />
sharing a birth date between the years 1958 and 1964.<br />
Averaging 2.5 children per household, they have far fewer<br />
(less than half as many) adult children than Leading Edge<br />
families, which appears to be a direct function of<br />
parental age.<br />
The least educated of any <strong>Boomer</strong> group, Trailing Edgers<br />
are even less educated than the post-<strong>Baby</strong> Boom cohort.<br />
Another note of internal segment consistency demarcating<br />
Trailing Edgers is the above average concentration of<br />
Hispanics populating the group, the most of any <strong>Boomer</strong><br />
sub-segment.<br />
Older, not necessarily wiser, kids<br />
Leading Edge Families feature older parents born between<br />
1946 and 1957, large households averaging 2.4 children,<br />
with approximately one “adult child” for every four children<br />
under age 18. As one might expect from the doting<br />
parents who pioneered those ubiquitous baby-on-board<br />
signs, the apron strings are proving hard to cut—or perhaps<br />
just more elastic—as young adult children bounce back to<br />
the security of home.<br />
The purse strings to Junior are even harder to untie. As a<br />
consequence, <strong>Boomer</strong> offspring are returning to the nest<br />
after college in record numbers, or remaining at home while<br />
getting their start in the working world. According to 2000<br />
U.S. Census figures, 56% of men and 43% of women in the<br />
18–24 age bracket reside with a parent, and 65% of recent<br />
college grads enjoy the largesse of Mom & Dad’s hospitality.<br />
While better educated than pre-and post-<strong>Boomer</strong>s, Leading<br />
Edge Families fall into the lower tier of academic accomplishment<br />
compared with other <strong>Boomer</strong> segments. After<br />
Trailing Edge Families, Leading Edge Families are the most<br />
Hispanic-dominant of any <strong>Boomer</strong> group and far and away<br />
the “most married.” Seven in ten Leading Edge Family<br />
households are headed by married couples.<br />
7
Chart 4: Segmenting <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> households<br />
without children<br />
Single<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
Single<br />
Person HHs<br />
Trailing Edge<br />
HOH<br />
Age 42–54<br />
Trailing Edge<br />
Couples<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Total <strong>Baby</strong><br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> HHs<br />
without Children<br />
Two<br />
Person HHs<br />
Leading Edge<br />
HOH<br />
Age 55–60<br />
Leading Edge<br />
Couples<br />
Three +<br />
Person HHs<br />
New Family<br />
Frontiers<br />
By contrast, the Ready-to-Launch segment weighs in with<br />
the lowest incidence of Hispanics and the highest incidence<br />
of African-Americans among <strong>Boomer</strong>s. All Ready-to-Launch<br />
households have at least one child over 12, and for the most<br />
part, only children over twelve, skewing toward the late<br />
teens. The Ready-to-Launch segment splits roughly in half<br />
between couples with one child and single parents with one<br />
or two children. Heads of household can be any age within<br />
the <strong>Boomer</strong> bandwidth, and there are few adult children<br />
in view.<br />
Adults only<br />
Apparently Single <strong>Boomer</strong>s hit the books in college, tying<br />
Late Bloomers for the title of “most educated.” Some 41%<br />
of Single <strong>Boomer</strong>s never opted for marriage, and established<br />
single households. Half of the Single segment unpacked<br />
their bags five or more years ago and still call the same<br />
residence home today. ■ See chart 4.<br />
Working<br />
Retirements<br />
Work long and prosper. That’s the new mantra of the <strong>Boomer</strong><br />
generation as it edges toward Social Security eligibility and<br />
retirement age. So hold on to those gold watches, because the<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s plan on retiring the traditional concept of retirement<br />
with a characteristically bold move that will surprise detractors<br />
and benefit—rather than hijack—the economic future of the<br />
generations that follow.<br />
The idea is simplicity itself: keep on working, earning and<br />
contributing to the economy for as long as one is able and<br />
enabled. Driven by a host of motivations ranging from selfactualization<br />
to financial need, many <strong>Boomer</strong>s reject the idea of<br />
a leisurely retirement and plan to work well into their 70s and<br />
beyond. In a 2006 Merrill Lynch study, 71% of adults envision<br />
working in retirement, and half of those said they intended to<br />
work as long as they were physically and intellectually able.<br />
Companies need the workers<br />
While the statistics vary dramatically (estimates of a labor shortage<br />
as early as 2010 range from 800,000 workers to almost<br />
10 million), the inescapable fact remains that the “baby bust”<br />
generation numbers 11 million fewer bodies than the <strong>Boomer</strong>s.<br />
Even with productivity gains, process changes, outsourcing<br />
options and immigration inflows, there simply may not be<br />
enough workers to fill available jobs. The obvious solution:<br />
retain the ones you’ve got.<br />
Progressive employers are experimenting with any number of<br />
riffs on the traditional consulting contracts or part-time positions<br />
available to retired employees. Among the more innovative<br />
working retirement ideas:<br />
• capability-specific personnel banks of skilled temporary<br />
workers;<br />
• roadblocking schedules, where retirees rotate between time<br />
on/off the job for a pre-determined time increment (e.g.,<br />
three months on/off);<br />
• job sharing, reviving what <strong>Boomer</strong> women elevated to an art<br />
form; two individuals sharing a job, salary and performance<br />
expectations;<br />
8 Fall/Winter 2006
Trailing Edge Couples carved their own path on the matrimonial<br />
front, and report the highest rate of unmarried<br />
partners living together. Trailing Edge Couples typically<br />
are headed by a person born in the 1952–1964 period,<br />
who have occupied the same house for the past five years,<br />
find themselves situated in the bottom <strong>Boomer</strong> tier on the<br />
education dimension, and have fewer than expected<br />
Hispanic and African-American members.<br />
The social vanguard<br />
Leading Edge Couples, with a head of household born<br />
between 1946 and 1951, represent the first group of the<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> generation to serve as social change agents. One<br />
of the top three best-educated <strong>Boomer</strong> segments, Leading<br />
Edge Couples exhibit just half the unmarried rate of Trailing<br />
Edge Couples and two-thirds have shared a residence for<br />
five or more years. Less ethnically diverse than other<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> strata, Leading Edge Couples report a low incidence<br />
of Hispanics and the lowest African-American incidence of<br />
all <strong>Boomer</strong> groups.<br />
One of the most interesting segments to emerge from the<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> study was the New Family Frontiers faction, characterized<br />
by three or more adults sharing a household. The<br />
typical New Family Frontiers household encompasses 1.1<br />
children between the ages of 18 and 24, with 40% claiming<br />
another resident relative such as a parent (1/3 of such family<br />
units) or adult siblings.<br />
From an economic perspective, it is worthwhile to note that<br />
54% of New Family Frontiers households have three or<br />
more employed workers in the home. Among the highest<br />
earning households, New Family Frontiers do a pretty<br />
good job of hanging on to what they make, second only<br />
to Leading Edge Couples on the savings front.<br />
■ See chart 5 on page 10.<br />
• seasonal positions that follow employees who split time<br />
between two geographical locations (e.g., New York and<br />
Florida);<br />
• sampling arrangements that enable a worker to move<br />
across departments for a new challenge.<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s need the money<br />
It’s a good thing that <strong>Boomer</strong>s say they want to work, because<br />
it’s clear that many will have to work for financial reasons. One<br />
factor that impacted even diligent savers was the stock market<br />
decline of 2001–2003 that eradicated roughly $7–8 trillion in<br />
shareholder wealth, much of it held by <strong>Boomer</strong>s.<br />
In the process, the dot-com crash ate away some $279 billion<br />
in 401(k) assets and huge chunks of other retirement savings.<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s dialed-in to the nuances of finance recognize that<br />
401(k) and IRA/retirement money statements can create a false<br />
sense of wealth, since these amounts will be federally taxed on<br />
withdrawal (with the exception of Roth IRAs).<br />
Everybody wins<br />
Working <strong>Boomer</strong> retirees will have more discretionary income<br />
to continue fueling the economic engine, less need to draw<br />
down savings and liquidate investments, and can readily fill the<br />
emerging labor gap by staying employed. Meaningful employment<br />
enables critical knowledge transfer from highly skilled<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s to other workers, and keeps older employees mentally<br />
and physically engaged.<br />
At the same time, employers access a labor pool of proven<br />
workers with the flexibility to calibrate hours to match demand.<br />
In a Center for Retirement Research survey, older workers<br />
earned consistently higher marks than younger counterparts<br />
from employers for their “knowledge of procedures and other<br />
job aspects” and “ability to interact with customers”. Overall,<br />
older workers were seen as more productive based on their<br />
accumulated institutional knowledge and efficient work habits.<br />
Retailers like CVS Pharmacy, Home Depot and Borders have<br />
already tapped the retiree talent vein with outstanding results.<br />
When it comes to the workplace, some things apparently do<br />
get better with age.<br />
9
Chart 5: New family configurations have new numbers of workers<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Percent of HHs<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Post <strong>Baby</strong> Boom<br />
Late Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
Trailing Edge Families<br />
Leading Edge Families<br />
Ready to Launch<br />
Single <strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />
Trailing Edge Couples<br />
Leading Edge Couples<br />
New Family Frontiers<br />
Pre <strong>Baby</strong> Boom<br />
No Workers One Worker Two Workers Three or More Workers<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Gray matters<br />
The shift towards adult-only households will continue as<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s age. By 2007, fewer than 30% of <strong>Boomer</strong> households<br />
will have children under 18 at home. By 2010, that<br />
number will have declined again to just 20%. By 2014,<br />
fewer than 10% of all <strong>Boomer</strong> households will include<br />
children under 18. Americans are getting older, living<br />
longer and having fewer children.<br />
An 85+ population growing eight times faster than the<br />
country as a whole will throw a new wrinkle into longstanding<br />
assumptions which form the underpinnings of<br />
social services programs. In 1995, Federal spending per<br />
child under 18 years of age was $1,693 per child. For the<br />
same period, per capita spending on each 65+ adult was<br />
$15,636. The combined effect of population trends and<br />
federal spending patterns results in a double whammy—<br />
fewer wage earners paying into a system serving an<br />
exploding population base.<br />
Golden, global concerns<br />
Not only is the U.S. population aging, the very old component<br />
is growing at an even faster rate. In 2000, there were<br />
approximately 72,000 centenarians in the U.S. By 2050,<br />
using mid-range Census Bureau estimates, that number will<br />
increase fourteen-fold, exceeding 834,000. To get a relative<br />
sense of size, it would take a city as large as Detroit to<br />
house all the people older than 100 at the mid-century point.<br />
Concerns about aging are not confined within the borders<br />
of the United States. Worldwide, the current ratio between<br />
the young (under 20) and the old (over 65) is roughly 3:1.<br />
By 2050, that ratio will recalibrate to equilibrium at 1:1.<br />
At that point, older people will outnumber younger ones<br />
for the first time in recorded history.<br />
Spending shifts<br />
Consumption and spending patterns mirror changes in the<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> demographic. Food away from home eats up a<br />
larger share of <strong>Boomer</strong> budgets when the need to stage a<br />
nightly family dinner with the kids goes away. Beer and<br />
wine top off the shopping list for those <strong>Boomer</strong>s furthest<br />
from child-rearing responsibilities. Alcoholic beverage marketers<br />
can expect to tap into this bottled-up demand in the<br />
future as consumption levels are expected to maintain even<br />
as <strong>Boomer</strong>s age.<br />
When it comes to home improvements, <strong>Boomer</strong>s gravitate<br />
toward household textiles and furniture, outspending other<br />
segments. Staying connected to friends and families is a<br />
10 Fall/Winter 2006
It is not uncommon to find a <strong>Boomer</strong> parent liquidating<br />
retirement savings or mortgaging their home to subsidize<br />
their child’s college tuition. Despite years of denying themselves<br />
luxuries, they will indulge an offspring’s demands for<br />
a car, expensive vacation or the latest and greatest in consumer<br />
electronics.<br />
A perfect storm<br />
The graying of America presents a number of questions such<br />
as the prospective impact of impending retirements on:<br />
1. financial markets, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s prepare to liquidate equity<br />
holdings and supplement retirement savings;<br />
2. real estate markets, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s prepare to trade down<br />
from large homes—a flurry of sales may add momentum<br />
to the imploding housing market;<br />
3. employment issues, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s exit the workplace and<br />
the baby bust generation comes up 11 million people<br />
short of available openings;<br />
4. consumer spending, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s retire or are forced into<br />
second careers, part-time or lower paying positions;<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong> imperative, accounting for their 50% higher spending<br />
rate on cellular phones and pagers. Plugged in to electronic<br />
entertainment media, <strong>Boomer</strong> spending rates outpace<br />
the average for audio equipment, televisions and radios.<br />
The <strong>Boomer</strong> obsession with health and wellness extends to<br />
their extended family—including the four-footed, finned and<br />
winged members. <strong>Boomer</strong>s willingly open their wallets for<br />
veterinary care and other pet services such as grooming and<br />
doggie day care.<br />
Family finances<br />
The <strong>Boomer</strong> relationship with money is complicated and<br />
convoluted. Shaped by parental stories of the Depression<br />
and WWII deprivation, <strong>Boomer</strong>s learned to respect money,<br />
save money, value work over leisure and savings over debt.<br />
They look askance at credit issuers who mail out unsolicited<br />
cards to college students, in the hopes they’ll be used. All<br />
in all, one could say <strong>Boomer</strong>s are a fiscally conservative<br />
bunch—except when it comes to their kids.<br />
5. healthcare system, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s begin to experience the<br />
inevitable decline of physical vigor and the onset of<br />
chronic illnesses like high blood pressure and diabetes.<br />
An uncertain outcome<br />
Some pundits ponder these issues and see the makings of<br />
a perfect storm capable of capsizing the U.S. economy.<br />
Others see the opportunity to extend the consumer use-life<br />
by extending the <strong>Boomer</strong> work-life from an arbitrary retirement<br />
at age 65, to an open-ended employment contract that<br />
keeps people working, and earning, for as long as they are<br />
physically able. ■ See sidebar on “Working Retirements”<br />
on pages 8 and 9.<br />
Society has never been asked to solve a socioeconomic equation<br />
with so many unknown variables before. There simply<br />
have never been so many old people, living so long and<br />
staying so healthy.<br />
From a marketing perspective, one thing is certain. Older<br />
<strong>Boomer</strong>s represent both a viable market and one too large<br />
to ignore. C i<br />
11
Global Household<br />
Product Sales:<br />
Innovative Items Clean Up<br />
by: Jane Perrin<br />
Communications<br />
ACNielsen Global Services<br />
Mark Chesney<br />
Communications<br />
ACNielsen Global Services<br />
Analyzing household products on a global scale involves a<br />
pretty big bucket of categories and countries. What’s Hot<br />
Around the Globe: Insights on Growth in Household<br />
Products, one in a series of ACNielsen reports on the<br />
fastest-growing products and category drivers, encompasses<br />
66 markets and 29 household product areas.<br />
Findings surfaced by the study identified four major trends<br />
responsible for growth: new product innovation, health and<br />
wellness concerns, convenient delivery systems and developing<br />
country contributions. Aggregated 2005 sales growth<br />
remained consistent with other reports in the series covering<br />
food and beverages and personal care products, showing<br />
4% growth.<br />
Regional results<br />
On an upbeat note, there were several regional pockets of<br />
double-digit growth. Emerging markets posted a 13%<br />
increase and Latin America an 11% jump in household<br />
product sales, leading Asia Pacific, North America and<br />
Europe results. Romania and Russia, both classified as<br />
emerging markets, reported impressive category expansion<br />
rates of 25%. ■ See chart 1.<br />
The complexity of dissecting regional and country contributions<br />
is illustrated by Asia Pacific, a sector comprising both<br />
emerging and developed markets, where the modest 4%<br />
gain in Japan blended with the momentum of a 14% jump<br />
in China. Turning from percentages to the absolute dollar<br />
metric, Asia Pacific achieved the largest dollar value growth<br />
overall at just under $U.S. 1 billion in 2005.<br />
Chart 1: Global findings<br />
Value Sales (U.S.$M) in<br />
Household Products*<br />
Global Growth in<br />
Household Products* (2004–2005)<br />
Global (66)<br />
Global (66)<br />
4%<br />
Europe (19)<br />
Europe (19)<br />
0%<br />
North America (2)<br />
North America (2)<br />
3%<br />
Asia Pacific (15)<br />
Asia Pacific (15)<br />
6%<br />
Latin America (12)<br />
Latin America (12)<br />
11%<br />
Emerging Markets (18)<br />
Emerging Markets (18)<br />
13%<br />
0 $50,000 $100,000<br />
0%<br />
5%<br />
10%<br />
15%<br />
*Based on number of countries measured (Number of countries in parentheses)<br />
12 Fall/Winter 2006
Leading categories<br />
Among the 29 categories studied, only nine grew faster than<br />
the global average, five paced the 4% rate; and the rest<br />
lagged behind. In prior studies, the fastest-growing categories<br />
were also among the smallest in dollar sales. That was not<br />
the case in 2005. Five categories in the fastest-growing top<br />
nine—garbage bags, household cleaners, air fresheners,<br />
insect control and fabric softener—also registered among<br />
the top 10 categories in value sales. ■ See chart 2.<br />
Chart 2: Only nine categories grew<br />
faster than 4%<br />
Top No. of Markets Category Category<br />
Growing Growing/ Growth Rate Growth Value<br />
Categories Measured 04–05 $000<br />
1. Abrasive Cleaning Pads 13 of 23 13% 129,215<br />
2. Disinfectants 18 of 26 13% 81,148<br />
3. Garbage Bags* 15 of 19 8% 209,806<br />
4. Laundry Stain Remover/Booster 30 of 37 6% 82,876<br />
5. Household Cleaners* 55 of 65 6% 338,553<br />
6. Air Fresheners* 50 of 61 5% 244,081<br />
7. Insect Control* 28 of 47 5% 168,489<br />
8. Plastic Storage Bags 28 of 34 5% 78,040<br />
9. Fabric Softener* 44 of 58 5% 255,008<br />
*Also among the largest 10 categories in value sales<br />
The remaining top performers included abrasive cleaning<br />
pads, which shared top billing with disinfectants at 13%,<br />
laundry stain removers/boosters at 6% and plastic storage<br />
bags at 5%.<br />
Performance enhancers<br />
On closer examination, specific sub-segments accounted for<br />
the strong overall showing in some categories. For example,<br />
battery-operated freshening systems powered up a 191%<br />
sales increase, and air sanitizing sprays vaporized the<br />
category with their supercharged growth in sales of 36%.<br />
Similarly, the power cleaning sub-segment of household<br />
cleaners (75%) and those products with oxidizing ingredients<br />
for stain removal (11%) wiped up the rest of the category.<br />
The cleaning system concept debuted by Swiffer, comprising<br />
a re-useable element such as a handle with disposable<br />
cloths, sponges or brushes, has been syndicated to other categories<br />
including bathroom cleaners, toilet bowl cleaners,<br />
dusters, air care and insect control. The jury is still out on<br />
whether or not the consumer uptake on systems and onestep,<br />
multi-use products will successfully cross category<br />
boundaries.<br />
Worthy of consideration<br />
Consumer health concerns gave a shot in the arm to household<br />
cleaner and disinfectant category results. Both recorded<br />
higher than average growth rates, which may indicate a shift<br />
in the type of products used to clean around the world.<br />
While the discussion to date has surrounded growth rates, it<br />
is worthwhile to note that even though laundry detergent<br />
only expanded at the average pace, it represents the largest<br />
category overall and contributed more than any other category<br />
to global growth.<br />
continued on page 16<br />
Chart 3: Top 10 categories and growth rate by region<br />
Europe<br />
Total Household Care (0%)<br />
North America<br />
Total Household Care (3%)<br />
Asia Pacific<br />
Total Household Care (6%)<br />
Latin America<br />
Total Household Care (11%)<br />
Emerging Markets<br />
Total Household Care (13%)<br />
Brooms, Brushes, Mops (10%)<br />
Disinfectants (23%)<br />
Auto Dish Detergent (17%)<br />
Abrasive Cleaning Pads (74%)<br />
Fabric Fresheners (277%)<br />
Disinfectants (3%)<br />
Laundry Stain Remover (12%)<br />
Auto Dish Additives (16%)<br />
Laundry Stain Remover (36%)<br />
Carpet/Rug Cleaner (37%)<br />
Household Cleaners (3%)<br />
Garbage Bags (12%)<br />
Abrasive Cleaning Pads (14%)<br />
Air Fresheners (16%)<br />
Waste Pipe Openers (37%)<br />
Laundry Stain Remover (3%)<br />
Abrasive Cleaning Pads (7%)<br />
Fabric Fresheners (10%)<br />
Bleach/Ammonia (15%)<br />
Air Fresheners (23%)<br />
Garbage Bags (3%)<br />
Toilet Care (7%)<br />
Air Fresheners (10%)<br />
Plastic Storage Bags (14%)<br />
Laundry Water Softeners (21%)<br />
Auto Dish Detergent (2%)<br />
Kitchen Paper/Towel (7%)<br />
Plastic Storage Bags (9%)<br />
Fabric Softener (14%)<br />
Auto Dish Detergent (20%)<br />
Auto Dish Additives (2%)<br />
Air Fresheners (5%)<br />
Fabric Softener (9%)<br />
Insect Control (13%)<br />
Cleaning Cloths/Sponges (19%)<br />
Plastic Storage Bags (2%)<br />
Plastic Storage Bags (5%)<br />
Batteries (8%)<br />
Aluminum Foil (13%)<br />
Household Cleaners (17%)<br />
Batteries (2%)<br />
Household Cleaners (5%)<br />
Garbage Bags (8%)<br />
Toilet Care (12%)<br />
Fabric Softener (16%)<br />
Waste Pipe Openers (2%)<br />
Aluminum Foil (4%)<br />
Brooms, Brushes, Mops (8%)<br />
Household Cleaners (11%)<br />
Laundry Stain Remover (16%)<br />
14 Fall/Winter 2006
Stepping Outside Your<br />
Own Borders?<br />
Use the right marketing information to<br />
make your expansion decisions.<br />
Contact ACNielsen Global Services at 847-605-5904.<br />
Global Services
Global Household Product Trends continued from page 14<br />
Different strokes<br />
The top ten categories within each region differ significantly,<br />
and none of the overall fastest-growing products shows up<br />
in every regional ranking. In Europe, only the leading category—<br />
brooms, brushes and mops—charted 2005 results<br />
that bettered the global average. ■ See chart 3, page 14.<br />
In North America, disinfectants killed off any competition<br />
in the top ten with a 23% annual growth rate. Only the<br />
laundry stain remover and garbage bag categories also posted<br />
double digit regional growth at 12%.<br />
Automatic dish detergents and automatic dish additives<br />
floated to the top of the Asia Pacific top ten list. In Latin<br />
America, every top ten contender boasted double-digit<br />
growth, but abrasive cleaning pad results scoured all comers<br />
with a whopping 74%. Laundry stain removers were a<br />
distant second in the line-up at 36%.<br />
The Emerging Markets’ winning entry, fabric fresheners,<br />
was in a class by itself with a 277% annual growth rate.<br />
Carpet/rug cleaners and waste pipe openers trailed with<br />
strong 37% increases.<br />
Coming clean<br />
Abrasive cleaning pads, the runaway category growth winner<br />
in Latin America, owes its phenomenal success to a single<br />
country: Brazil. This one country accounted for more<br />
than 95% of category sales, divided among three brands.<br />
Aggressive media support generated a 45% increase for the<br />
leading brand, with the number two and three brands each<br />
expanding by more than 200%.<br />
Global brand dominance was more diffused than in Latin<br />
America, with the top three brands comprising 65% of<br />
category sales and private label brands absorbing an additional<br />
16%.<br />
Hygienic habits<br />
Germ-aphobic Americans kicked their cleaning standards<br />
up a notch, striving for a sanitized—versus merely clean—<br />
household. This microbe-free goal resulted in a 23% regional<br />
category sales increase. As always, convenience played into<br />
consumer decision-making, explaining why 80% of the<br />
absolute dollar growth in U.S. sales (excluding Wal-Mart)<br />
derived from a 60% increase in wipes.<br />
Disinfectant wipes, measured in only five markets, mopped<br />
up consumer dollars on a global basis for a 35% growth in<br />
sales. Their counterpart, disinfectant sprays, expanded at<br />
an average 10% rate in 12 of 19 markets measured. Brand<br />
sales are so heavily concentrated in this category that three<br />
brands accounted for 71% of dollar sales on a global basis.<br />
It’s worthy of note that although only 8% of sales can be<br />
ascribed to private label brands, their sales expanded by<br />
26% in 2005.<br />
Tying up sales<br />
Garbage bag sales expanded at an 8% annual rate, twice the<br />
global tempo, with North America the sole region to wrap the<br />
year with double digit growth (12%). For such a seemingly<br />
mundane category, garbage bags represent an endless source<br />
of innovative benefits from anti-odor attributes to a host of<br />
tying options to stretch-and-flex fabrics that won’t rip.<br />
New features, coupled with raw material cost increases for<br />
the oil-based resins used in manufacturing, combined to<br />
justify the higher retail prices that raised dollar value sales.<br />
Private label products captured a significant share of<br />
16 Fall/Winter 2006
garbage bag sales (40%), almost enveloping the 49% sales<br />
component contributed by the top three brands. Both private<br />
label and branded offerings increased by 8%.<br />
Spotless outcomes<br />
Both the pre-wash and in-wash products that compose the<br />
laundry stain remover category captured double-digit sales<br />
in three of five regions, with four of five regions ranking<br />
the category among the top ten. Tepid Asia Pacific results<br />
of 1% growth dampened the overall category average.<br />
“Oxi” products cleaned up in the category, spreading in<br />
seven of the 10 markets measured at an 11% overall rate.<br />
No-wash stain removers, including pen delivery systems,<br />
achieved explosive sales of 200% over the prior year. Key<br />
manufacturers virtually own the category, with the top three<br />
brands accounting for 72% of sales.<br />
Shipshape results<br />
Convenient, effective household cleaners were swept off<br />
shelves by tidy consumers, with Emerging Market and<br />
Latin America households setting the pace. The two<br />
attributes dominating product selection were convenience<br />
and effectiveness.<br />
Major multinationals entered the power cleaning competitive<br />
fray, where sales velocity reached 75% last year. Sprayons<br />
earned high marks on the convenience criteria, and at<br />
11% represented one of the fastest-growing segments.<br />
Product proliferation served to modulate the trend toward<br />
brand dominance observed in other categories, with the top<br />
three branded household cleaners garnering 43%, private<br />
label 9% and other products 48% of sales.<br />
Something in the air<br />
Air freshener sales caught a favorable updraft in Emerging<br />
Markets, Latin America and Asia Pacific, where 2005 consumption<br />
increased by 23%, 16% and 10%, respectively.<br />
Recent new product entries have kept sales aloft and in the<br />
top-ten tiers for four of five regions studied.<br />
Battery air fresheners, unveiled just last year, saw 2005 sales<br />
rocket into the stratosphere at a 150% rate. Air sanitizers<br />
eliminated odors and obstacles to consumer trial, hitting a<br />
respectable 36% growth number. Air freshener candle sales,<br />
reinvigorated by the introduction of scented oils, achieved<br />
an 8% growth rate, double that of the global average.<br />
Abuzz with potential<br />
Insect control, the eighth fastest-growing category, owed<br />
its 5% expansion to Latin America, a region where bugs<br />
are more than a nuisance; they carry potentially harmful<br />
diseases such as dengue fever and malaria. Product refinements,<br />
such as electrically-powered items, command a price<br />
premium reflected in sales results.<br />
The North American no-growth scenario masks a 7% spike<br />
from Canada, possibly reflecting that country’s concern with<br />
the mosquito-borne West Nile virus. Private Label products<br />
barely show up on the radar screen in the insect control<br />
Chart 4: Private Label growth by category<br />
Private Label Private Label Manufacturer<br />
Product Area Share Growth Growth<br />
1 Aluminum Foil 43% 0% 3%<br />
2 Plastic Storage Bags* 41% 8% 3%<br />
3 Garbage Bags* 40% 8% 8%<br />
4 Kitchen Paper/Towel 28% 5% 3%<br />
5 Cleaning Cloths/Sponges 26% 7% 1%<br />
6 Auto Dish Additives 22% 1% 4%<br />
7 Plastic Wrap 19% 4% -3%<br />
8 Auto Dish Detergent 18% 4% 4%<br />
9 Bleach/Ammonia 17% 4% 5%<br />
10 Abrasive Cleaning Pads* 16% 4% 15%<br />
11 Laundry Water Softeners 16% -18% 6%<br />
12 Toilet Care 12% 4% 2%<br />
13 Brooms, Brushes, Mops 11% 18% 1%<br />
14 Fabric Softener* 11% 4% 5%<br />
15 Batteries 10% 3% 2%<br />
16 Hand Dish Detergent 10% 5% 4%<br />
17 Household Cleaners* 9% 5% 6%<br />
18 Disinfectant* 8% 26% 12%<br />
19 Oven Cleaners 7% 5% -1%<br />
20 Laundry Starch 7% -16% 0%<br />
21 Carpet/Rug Cleaner 6% 6% -4%<br />
22 Laundry Detergent 6% 1% 4%<br />
23 Air Fresheners* 6% 1% 6%<br />
24 Laundry Stain Remover* 5% 16% 6%<br />
25 Fabric Fresheners 5% -5% -8%<br />
26 Furniture Polish 5% 6% -4%<br />
27 Waste Pipe Openers 4% 13% 2%<br />
28 Floor Polish/Wax 2% -12% -2%<br />
29 Insect Control* 2% -4% 5%<br />
*Fastest Growing Categories<br />
Manufacturer brands growing faster than Private Label<br />
17
category with a miniscule 2% of sales; the top three brands<br />
and all others split the rest of the category sales evenly at<br />
49% apiece.<br />
In the bag<br />
Plastic storage bag sales did slightly better at 5% than the<br />
global all-product average, with pockets of strength in Latin<br />
America (14%) and Asia Pacific (9%). Interestingly, private<br />
label sales for this category (8%) bested manufacturer brand<br />
performance of 3%. The private label preference was clearly<br />
strongest in Europe, North America and Emerging Markets,<br />
but picking up in Asia Pacific.<br />
A soft touch<br />
New product formulations, improved distribution, increased<br />
advertising penetration and price reductions contributed to<br />
the fabric softener category sales increases in Emerging<br />
Markets (16%) and Latin America (14%). Of note, in<br />
Mexico, products such as Downy Libre Enjuague (Rinse-<br />
Free) reduced the hassle factor for consumers who hand<br />
wash by eliminating the rinse step.<br />
The top three brands occupy the number 1, 2 and 3 positions<br />
across the majority of markets studied and together<br />
claim 68% of category sales.<br />
Commodity concerns<br />
While private label offerings earned a 12% share of global<br />
household product sales, that penetration level underperformed<br />
the norm reported in the ACNielsen 2005 study,<br />
The Power of Private Label. However, the private label<br />
expansion velocity equaled that of manufacturer branded<br />
household products (4%), so private label neither gain nor<br />
lost ground in relative terms.<br />
Private label share and growth figures varied widely by category,<br />
from a 43% share in aluminum foil with zero growth,<br />
to an 8% share in disinfectants with a 26% growth rate.<br />
Regional considerations such as economic development and<br />
lifestyles influenced product uptake and utilization figures.<br />
■ See chart 4, page 17.<br />
Home basics<br />
Household products weighed in with overall global growth<br />
rates consistent with other fast moving consumer product<br />
areas. There is no denying the influence of Emerging<br />
Markets as a factor in household product category growth,<br />
alongside a continuous stream of product innovations that<br />
keep consumers engaged and prices on the rise. Uniformly,<br />
consumers across the world gravitate to products that deliver<br />
against two key benefits: value and convenience. C i<br />
About the Study<br />
This survey of Household Products included 66 markets around the world and 29 categories. These 66 markets account for<br />
more than 90% of the world’s GDP and over 75% of the world’s population. The markets have been grouped regionally into<br />
five areas: Asia Pacific, Emerging Markets, Europe, Latin America and North America. For the purposes of this study, Mexico<br />
has been included in Latin America.<br />
ACNielsen analyzed data across 29 Household Products categories, comparing year-ending data from December 2005 with<br />
December 2004. Within these 29 categories, ACNielsen reviewed subcategories of products, which for the purposes of this study<br />
are called “segments.” This study looks at some of these key segments to understand the changes impacting the categories.<br />
New to the study this year is the inclusion and analysis of private label products within each category. ACNielsen Global<br />
Services intends to include private label information in future reports on product areas, to show the impact of both manufacturer<br />
and retailer products as drivers of consumer purchasing behavior.<br />
As with Global Services’ other studies, this report is based on purchasing information from retailers in grocery, drug and mass<br />
merchandise outlets and generally excludes kiosks or vending machines. In a few markets, sales from convenience stores<br />
may be included. Within the United States, data from the ACNielsen Homescan consumer panel service has been included<br />
to provide a total market read that includes Wal-Mart information.<br />
18 Fall/Winter 2006
Identify and Target High Opportunity<br />
Beauty Care Consumer Segments<br />
Look at the world of beauty care through the<br />
eyes of a consumer and what do you see? A<br />
world filled with choice. As new products and<br />
efficacy claims proliferate and the retail landscape<br />
becomes increasingly fragmented, marketers<br />
are challenged to find a complete measure<br />
of their brands’ performance and identify<br />
high opportunity consumer segments and new<br />
product opportunities.<br />
ACNielsen’s Beauty Care Panel provides<br />
the most complete, accurate and actionable<br />
view of beauty care consumers across all<br />
categories and channels. From massmarket<br />
to high-end/prestige brands and from<br />
supermarkets to specialty beauty stores, the<br />
Homescan ® Beauty Care Panel provides data<br />
at the most granular level to help you effectively<br />
target consumers and maximize sales opportunities<br />
in these channels.<br />
The Beauty Care Panel will help you:<br />
• Identify high opportunity distribution channels and quantify the<br />
sales opportunity of gaining distribution there.<br />
• Identify “white space” in the marketplace and quantify new product<br />
development opportunities.<br />
• Evaluate new product performance and quantify cannibalization.<br />
• Target high opportunity consumers and monitor your performance<br />
across all channels.<br />
The Beauty Care Panel gives you:<br />
• The most comprehensive measurement of Beauty Care purchase<br />
behavior across all channels in 32 beauty care categories, including:<br />
–Make-up/Color Cosmetics<br />
–Facial Skin Care<br />
–Hand & Body Skin Care<br />
–Self-Tanning<br />
–Bath & Shower<br />
–Men’s & Women’s Fragrance<br />
• The Spectra BehaviorScape Framework, which helps you<br />
increase the effectiveness of your marketing dollars.<br />
To learn more about the Beauty Care Panel, please contact your ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services representative<br />
or visit our web site at www.acnielsen.com.
Tune Into Teens:<br />
Test Your Teen Aptitude<br />
by: Tom Pirovano<br />
Retailing Insights<br />
ACNielsen<br />
If you’ve never visited YouTube.com, listened to Gnarls<br />
Barkley or used the acronym ROTFL while instant messaging,<br />
then find yourself a teenager and get educated. Today’s<br />
younger generation, typically called Millennials (born<br />
between 1980 and 2000), represent a group of wellconnected,<br />
over-stimulated, media-savvy consumers who<br />
are open-minded, optimistic and well-educated. They<br />
represent the future. Tune in to what drives this very diverse<br />
group of consumers and you will not only score points on<br />
the “uber-cool” chart, but will also deliver messaging that<br />
resonates with the world they live in.<br />
Test your teen aptitude<br />
If you are thinking that teens do as teens did, then think<br />
again. While it is true that all teens go through the same<br />
growing pains, history tells us that each generation leaves<br />
behind its own distinctive mark (see U.S. Teens Through<br />
the Decades on page 24). To test your knowledge of today’s<br />
teen market, see if you can answer the following questions:<br />
1. Who is one of the lead singers for the Black Eyed Peas?<br />
2. Who said, “Don’t be jealous that I’ve been chatting<br />
online with babes all day”?<br />
3. Who hosted MTV’s 2006 Video Music Awards?<br />
4. What is an emoticon?<br />
5. Who is known for the phrase, “That’s Hot”?<br />
6. What is the starting price for a Tracfone?<br />
7. Billie Joe Armstrong is the lead singer of which band?<br />
So how did you do? If you were able to answer 8 out of<br />
the 10 questions, then you are either: a) the parent of a<br />
teenager, b) an actual teenager, c) a teenager wannabe, or<br />
d) a superbly in-sync teen marketer. However, if you are<br />
like most of us and had some trouble, then it is time to<br />
brush up your knowledge of this influential and lucrative<br />
market segment.<br />
A moving target<br />
Teens are a moving target. They were born and raised during<br />
a digitized age where change happens rapidly. Born into the<br />
MTV generation where the rally cry was “I want my MTV”,<br />
they have learned that what they want, they get. In their<br />
world, everything is immediate. From instant messaging to<br />
microwave meals, instant gratification is their mantra.<br />
Millennials are the first generation of true multi-taskers,<br />
easily balancing e-mail, text messaging, music downloads,<br />
homework and a strict schedule of sporting and other<br />
activities, simultaneously. This generation is more adept at<br />
communications than any of its predecessors. The wireless<br />
Internet is their central nervous system, and simply put, they<br />
just don’t need much else.<br />
If they’re that connected, then connecting with teens should<br />
be simple, right? Not necessarily. While it may seem easy to<br />
develop a systematic marketing plan (if teens = computers,<br />
then website advertising = success), connecting in the right<br />
places at the right time to the right audience is a challenge<br />
at best.<br />
8. What is Naruto?<br />
9. Who is Shiloh?<br />
10.Who are two main characters on “Degrassi the Next<br />
Generation”?<br />
Answers: 1. Will.I.Am or Fergie; 2. Kip Dynamite; 3. Jack Black; 4. Emotion Icon =) made using<br />
punctuation or type; 5. Paris Hilton; 6. $29.99; 7. Green Day; 8. Japanese anime series; 9. Daughter<br />
of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie; 10. Emma Nelson, Jimmy Brooks.<br />
20 Fall/Winter 2006
Equally different<br />
All teens are not alike, and grouping them together could be<br />
a roadmap for disaster. Take, for example, a typical eighth<br />
grader compared with a college student. While Disney’s<br />
“High School Musical” is all the rage for one, the other is<br />
much more engaged by the latest drama on MTV’s “The<br />
Real World.”<br />
And don’t discount the hugely important gender differences.<br />
Anybody with kids knows how different boys are from girls.<br />
Therefore, when analyzing teens, boys and girls need to be<br />
viewed separately. For example, girls believe that they are<br />
more grown-up than boys, and spend their money on very<br />
different things, such as jewelry and clothing, while boys’<br />
interests trend toward games and electronics. However, both<br />
spend money on music and movies, which increases as kids<br />
shift from the 12–14 age bracket to the 15–17 one.<br />
It is also important to realize that “what’s hot” can be<br />
polarizing, because for each teen fad with adoring fans,<br />
there is a subset of teens who simply hate it. Finding a teen<br />
idol as a spokesperson for a brand could divide an audience.<br />
For each loyal fan of Justin Timberlake, there is another<br />
teen who simply abhors him. Interestingly, this love/hate<br />
relationship seems to be more common with the “beautiful<br />
people” than with stars like John Heder or Jack Black, who<br />
garner more universal appeal.<br />
Stay ahead of the curve<br />
For the most part, young people take their cues from those<br />
a few years older than themselves for trends. This may be<br />
why the Harry Potter books and movies which feature teens<br />
have their strongest appeal to younger children. Or why<br />
movies with a PG-13 rating are more enticing to teens. Or<br />
why Paris Hilton, who is in her mid-twenties, is a fashion<br />
icon for many teenage girls.<br />
Whether the new fashion is Crocs or Lacoste, whether the<br />
latest video craze is Nintendo DS Lite or GameTap, you<br />
can be sure of one thing: what’s hot today is not tomorrow.<br />
Rather than focusing on what’s hot right now, it is more<br />
important to develop tools and approaches to monitor and<br />
anticipate changes.<br />
For example, tap into the fickle world of teen trends by<br />
checking out websites such as Billboard.com for the most<br />
popular ringtones, which btw, as of this writing, is the<br />
Nintendo Super Mario Brothers Theme by Koji Kondo, or<br />
the hottest digital songs (Fergie’s London Bridge), or number<br />
one album (the self-named Danity Kane), or top single<br />
(Justin Timberlake’s “SexyBack”). Another popular teen<br />
website is MySpace.com, where teens connect with others,<br />
blog, rank music, and much more.<br />
Cash or credit<br />
The fact of the matter is, teenagers represent a powerful<br />
buying force in the U.S. market. According to the 2005<br />
Roper Youth Report, kids are earning $29.20 per week, two<br />
dollars more than in 2004, with 29% of their money coming<br />
straight from parents. Chores (37%) and gifts (23%)<br />
account for other popular sources of teen income. Nearly<br />
one-third (30%) of 8–17-year-olds say they are involved in<br />
making family purchase decisions, up four percentage points<br />
from last year, as parents increasingly turn to their kids for<br />
advice on what to buy. Teens also indicate that they influence<br />
purchase decisions on everything from cell phone service<br />
to the right cable provider.<br />
For better or worse (probably the latter), teens are also<br />
enamored by the magic of credit. According to the<br />
Jump$tart Coalition for Personal Financial Literacy, an educational<br />
organization, nearly a third of high school seniors<br />
reported having a credit card of their own or one co-signed<br />
by a parent.<br />
22 Fall/Winter 2006
Products with appeal<br />
If you live in a household with a teen, get ready to stock<br />
up on deodorants, grooming aids, acne remedies and<br />
other personal care products, instant meals and school<br />
supplies—in that order. According to information from<br />
ACNielsen Homescan, categories such as these are greatly<br />
overdeveloped for the teen market.<br />
While that may not come as a complete shocker, consider<br />
the fact that many of the brands that have risen to the top<br />
of this typical list are those that cater to this trend-conscious<br />
segment by offering something new, different or cutting<br />
edge. Take for example Unilever’s AXE deodorant for men.<br />
Appealing to the raging hormones of boys (and young men),<br />
the product comes complete with its own risqué website<br />
where the “AXE effect” promises to attract the opposite sex<br />
“when used responsibly.” AXE now generates $269 million<br />
per year in the food, drug and mass merchandiser channels<br />
(including Wal-Mart).<br />
Another product high on the dollar volume index scale purchased<br />
by households with teens offering a unique edge is<br />
Hershey’s Ice Breakers gum that explodes with a burst of<br />
mouth-freshening extra mint taste. Cutesy advertising featuring<br />
Hilary and Haylie Duff appeals like a gem to their<br />
target audience.<br />
While these products get high marks for originality, there is<br />
a tremendous untapped opportunity to cross-merchandise.<br />
For example, most cereals are marketed to either young<br />
children or adults, but not teens. Offering a free iTune<br />
download on the package would certainly have more appeal<br />
to this audience than would an action figure from the latest<br />
kid movie.<br />
Chart 1: Boys spend more on video games than girls<br />
LifeStyle<br />
Affluent Struggling Modest Plain<br />
Cosmopolitan Suburban Comfortable Urban Working Rural<br />
BehaviorStage Centers Spreads Country Cores Towns Living Total<br />
Male 12–14 253 234 202 205 215 129 202<br />
Male 15–17 89 144 113 178 97 101 120<br />
Female 12–14 103 45 42 129 38 51 62<br />
Female 15–17 2 4 30 26 8 5 13<br />
Total 114 107 97 138 92 72 100<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra, Penetration (Population)/% Penetration Index, All Channels/United States, BehaviorScape Framework.<br />
High Consumer, 120–149 Very High Consumer, 150+<br />
Chart 2: Girls spend more on clothes than boys<br />
LifeStyle<br />
Affluent Struggling Modest Plain<br />
Cosmopolitan Suburban Comfortable Urban Working Rural<br />
BehaviorStage Centers Spreads Country Cores Towns Living Total<br />
Male 12–14 56 47 36 86 56 36 50<br />
Male 15–17 50 52 67 82 32 63 58<br />
Female 12–14 186 132 127 122 187 114 141<br />
Female 15–17 97 173 132 123 135 223 156<br />
Total 97 101 90 103 101 108 100<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra, Penetration (Population)/% Penetration Index, All Channels/United States, BehaviorScape Framework.<br />
23
Aligning the cross hairs<br />
For marketers, targeting households with teens is just a<br />
start. For some products in which consumption is driven by<br />
individuals, however, a more granular approach is necessary.<br />
Using Simmons Teen National Consumer Survey (NCS)<br />
data, Spectra has developed a Teen Targeting Solution that<br />
helps to understand the teen consumer and identify the best<br />
way to reach and locate teens in their neighborhoods.<br />
The NCS Simmons Teens Survey is a comprehensive survey<br />
of American teens aged 12–17. It provides single-source<br />
measurement of major media, products, services and indepth<br />
consumer demographics and lifestyle/psychographic<br />
characteristics. Fueled by this survey, the Teen Targeting<br />
Solution allows marketers to more precisely market their<br />
brand to the teenager who buys the product.<br />
The importance of analyzing teens by both age and gender<br />
is illustrated in the following example. Young males ages<br />
12–14 are twice as likely as the average teen to spend their<br />
allowance on video games. Interestingly, teens in Struggling<br />
Urban Core neighborhoods are also 38% more likely to buy.<br />
U.S. Teens Through the Decades<br />
1910s<br />
• Youth Crisis—<br />
Kids spending too<br />
much on gambling<br />
and watching movies<br />
• U.S. Boy Scouts and<br />
Campfire Girls founded<br />
• World War One<br />
• “Newsies”—kids<br />
selling newspapers<br />
• Many teens worked<br />
vs. attending school<br />
24 Fall/Winter 2006<br />
1920s<br />
• The Charleston,<br />
fox-trot and<br />
shimmy (dances)<br />
• Flappers<br />
• Flagpole sitting<br />
• Marathon dancing<br />
• Jazz<br />
• Emily Post’s<br />
manners book<br />
• First peanut butter<br />
& jelly sandwiches<br />
• First Miss America<br />
• The Depression<br />
• Fair Labor Standards Act<br />
limited the age of child<br />
laborers to 16<br />
• Roosevelt’s Civilian<br />
Conservation Corps<br />
• Long-playing<br />
phonograph records<br />
• The “golden age”<br />
of radio<br />
• 250,000 teens living<br />
on the railroad<br />
• Swing music<br />
• Board games<br />
• Hats were mandatory<br />
for men<br />
• First drive-in theaters<br />
1930s 1940s<br />
• The word “teenager”<br />
was coined<br />
• World War 2, rationing,<br />
victory gardens<br />
• Many jobs available to<br />
teens during WW2<br />
• Seventeen magazine<br />
founded in 1944<br />
• The jitterbug (dance)<br />
• Term “juvenile<br />
delinquent” coined<br />
• Zoot suits for young men,<br />
“slacks” for women<br />
• Largest number of teen<br />
marriages after WW2<br />
• Swallowing goldfish<br />
• “Kilroy was here.”<br />
1950s<br />
• Birth of rock & roll<br />
• First hula hoops<br />
• Brylcreem<br />
(hair tonic)<br />
• Jack Kerouac, beatniks<br />
• Marilyn Monroe, Elvis<br />
Presley, James Dean<br />
• Telephone booth stuffing<br />
• 3D movies<br />
• Poodle skirts, saddle<br />
shoes, letter sweaters<br />
• Car hops (before<br />
drive-throughs)<br />
• Sideburns
By contrast, female teens are much more interested in the<br />
fashion scene, spending far more than average on clothing.<br />
Thus, marketing programs designed only for the household<br />
or for the adult consumer will not offer the most effective<br />
way to reach heavy teen consumers. ■ See charts 1 and 2,<br />
page 23.<br />
Zooming in<br />
Once the teen consumer has been identified, direct marketing<br />
can begin. Using the Spectra system, a targeted profile of<br />
the Brand A teen consumer is devised to reveal what magazines<br />
they read, what TV shows they watch, what websites<br />
they surf, how they spend their free time and where they shop.<br />
In addition, subtle neighborhood differences are also<br />
exposed. For example, in the upscale urban areas characterized<br />
by Cosmopolitan Centers, teens are more likely to be<br />
achievers. They have good access to home computers, are<br />
savvy with money, and are less likely to watch TV. Teens in<br />
more downscale areas, Struggling Urban Cores, are more<br />
likely to access the Internet at school, and are very music<br />
oriented. They know what songs are in the Top 10, wear<br />
clothes that reflects their musical tastes and are likely to<br />
characterize themselves as rebels.<br />
Understanding the unique demographic nuances of teen consumers<br />
allows the execution of a precise marketing strategy<br />
among all the consumer segments that purchase the brand.<br />
In addition, not only do teens represent a large share of<br />
some product’s volume, they also are the next generation of<br />
consumers who will fuel growth for all brands in the CPG<br />
industry. A successful marketing campaign to teens will provide<br />
the foundation for brand loyalty and growth among<br />
this generation well into the future.<br />
The next big thing<br />
Keeping abreast of the next big thing on the horizon is critical.<br />
Think back to when the iPod Nano was introduced in<br />
September 2005 and the Video iPod in October 2005. At<br />
that time, Apple discontinued their older models, but several<br />
mainstream retailers continued to advertise these models<br />
while selling the incompatible accessories. Only a very few<br />
nimble retailers were quick to align themselves with the new<br />
iPod models by including photos and information on the<br />
front page of their websites.<br />
1960s<br />
• 40% of the U.S.<br />
population was under<br />
20 years old in 1965<br />
• Woodstock<br />
• Protests, civil rights,<br />
Vietnam<br />
• British invasion, Beatles<br />
• Bell bottoms, mini<br />
skirts, turtlenecks<br />
• The twist (dance)<br />
• Love beads<br />
• Surfing<br />
• Tie-dyed shirts<br />
• Bouffant hairdos,<br />
hair ironing, Afros<br />
• Go-go boots<br />
• Hippies, counter-culture<br />
or “alternative” culture<br />
• Recreational drugs<br />
1970s<br />
• Voting aged dropped<br />
to 18<br />
• The draft ended<br />
• 8-track tapes<br />
• Streaking<br />
• Feminism<br />
• Punk rock<br />
• Mopeds<br />
• Platform shoes,<br />
earth shoes<br />
• Disco<br />
• First video games<br />
• Rocky Horror<br />
Picture Show<br />
• Ecology<br />
1980s<br />
• MTV goes on the air<br />
• Latchkey kids<br />
• Jelly shoes<br />
• Video arcades<br />
• Rubik’s Cube<br />
• Boom boxes<br />
• Rap, hip-hop,<br />
break-dancing<br />
• Hacky sack<br />
• Trivial Pursuit<br />
• Madonna, Miami Vice,<br />
Michael Jackson<br />
• The Breakfast Club,<br />
and other John Hughes<br />
movies<br />
• Big hair<br />
• Live Aid<br />
• Music on CDs<br />
• Mullet haircuts<br />
1990s<br />
• The Worldwide Web,<br />
online chat rooms<br />
• Beanie babies<br />
• Piercings, tattoos<br />
• Boy bands—Backstreet<br />
Boys, N Sync, O-town,<br />
98 Degrees<br />
• Grunge<br />
• The Macarena<br />
• Extreme sports<br />
• Christian music<br />
• “Seinfeld,” “Friends,”<br />
“Simpsons”<br />
• DVDs<br />
2000s<br />
• iPod, MP3 players<br />
• Mobile phones for teens,<br />
text messaging,<br />
camera phones<br />
• Xbox, Playstation 2,<br />
Gameboy<br />
• Rubber wristbands<br />
• Reality TV shows<br />
• Tivo, DVRs<br />
• MySpace.com<br />
• Low-rise jeans<br />
• Napoleon Dynamite<br />
• Sports gambling,<br />
fantasy leagues<br />
• Body sprays<br />
• September 11th<br />
what’s next?<br />
25
While we can only speculate about what will happen in the<br />
future, simple observations can be made to help keep in<br />
tune with what teens are buying and what they are interested<br />
in. A few recommendations include:<br />
• track what kinds of gift cards teens give and receive and<br />
find out what they redeem;<br />
• visit popular teen web sites such as MySpace.com and see<br />
who advertises there;<br />
• view videos posted on YouTube.com;<br />
• check out iTunes and discover the top podcasts. Look<br />
for ways to connect with the iPod and podcasting craze,<br />
which shows no sign of slowing;<br />
• learn about Zune, Microsoft’s answer to iPod. This may<br />
be the next hot device;<br />
• be careful to speak their language and don’t use terminology<br />
that is old news (“da bomb” or “bling-bling”—now just<br />
“bling”);<br />
• use bright colors and splashy graphics to complement<br />
their fast-moving lifestyles and personalities.<br />
The bottom line is this: understand your audience. In order<br />
to make a difference, you have to think differently—even if<br />
that means stepping back (or perhaps forward) in time to<br />
relive those dreaded, wonderful teen years. :) C i<br />
Instant Consumer<br />
Feedback on<br />
Your New Products<br />
Wouldn’t it be nice to know why a customer purchased your<br />
product—just after they made the purchase? ACNielsen<br />
Homescan’s New Product Alert provides unique insights to<br />
understand the motivation behind purchases of new products.<br />
For the first time, you can reliably quantify the factors influencing<br />
the purchase of your new products almost instantly after trial.<br />
Knowing who uses the product, how satisfied they were and<br />
whether they would buy it again give you the insight necessary<br />
to ensure new product success.<br />
Instant Surveys<br />
Homescan ® panelists with online access transmit their purchases<br />
via the Internet. Purchase data is instantly interrogated for defined<br />
UPCs of interest. If any of these products are purchased, a brief<br />
online survey pops up asking the panelist to respond immediately.<br />
No other research method allows you to survey early adopters of<br />
specific UPCs. Since households transmit purchases the same<br />
week they shop, recall effect is virtually eliminated. The standard<br />
“reasons for trial” question provides normative benchmarks to<br />
evaluate the effectiveness of your marketing plan. Custom<br />
questions can be used to address specific marketing issues.<br />
To learn more about New Product Alert, please contact your<br />
ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services representative or visit<br />
our web site at www.acnielsen.com.<br />
26 Fall/Winter 2006
Individual Targeting Solutions for Teens<br />
All teens are not alike. Individual purchasing behavior, media exposure,<br />
attitudes and opinions can vary greatly by age, gender and<br />
lifestyles—especially when it comes to categories such as snacks,<br />
beverages, consumer electronics, apparel and personal grooming<br />
products.<br />
Understanding the unique nuances of your teen consumer allows you<br />
to execute a marketing strategy among all the consumer segments<br />
that purchase your brand. In addition, not only do teens represent a<br />
key driver for many brands, they also represent the next generation<br />
of consumers who will fuel growth for all brands in the CPG industry.<br />
A successful teen marketing program will provide the foundation for<br />
brand loyalty and growth among this generation well into the future.<br />
Solution<br />
Using Simmons Market Research Teen Survey, ACNielsen Homescan<br />
& Spectra has developed a Teen Targeting Solution, which helps<br />
you understand the teen consumer, identify the best way to reach<br />
teens and locate teens in their neighborhoods.<br />
The Simmons Market Research Teen Survey is a comprehensive<br />
survey of American teens aged 12–17. It provides single-source<br />
measurement of major media, products, services, and in-depth<br />
consumer demographic and lifestyle/psychographic characteristics.<br />
Fueled by this survey, the Teen Targeting Solution allows marketers<br />
to more precisely market their brand to the teenager who buys<br />
their product.<br />
The Teen Targeting Solution helps you:<br />
• Evaluate brand opportunities among different teen consumer<br />
segments for household products.<br />
• Compare teen profiles to the adult’s consumption for products<br />
purchased for individual consumption.<br />
• Create a teen profile for your brand.<br />
• Identify media outlets to reach your teen consumer.<br />
• Locate teens in the neighborhoods they live and go to school.<br />
For more information, please contact Sean Jafar at<br />
sean_jafar@spectramarketing.com.
Employee<br />
Empowerment:<br />
The Key to Capturing Productivity<br />
by: Russell Evans<br />
Business Technology Solutions<br />
ACNielsen<br />
No discussion of productivity would be complete without a<br />
reference to employee empowerment and the policies and<br />
tools that make it possible. Any number of factors play into<br />
empowerment—for example:<br />
• whether it has been embraced as a corporate value and<br />
validated from the CEO office on down;<br />
• whether policies and procedures exist to define and shape<br />
empowered behaviors;<br />
• whether review systems capture, measure and mete out<br />
rewards for taking action;<br />
• whether support mechanisms are in place to initialize or<br />
enable field decisions;<br />
• whether information technology facilitates ready access to<br />
needed data, be it about product, pricing, distribution or<br />
other issues.<br />
For each employee to serve as a self-actualized unit, there<br />
must be organic, seamless connectivity to all parts of the<br />
organization.<br />
Get connected<br />
In the knowledge economy, everything revolves around the<br />
concept of connectivity, and Metcalf’s Law serves as the<br />
behavioral guideline.<br />
Metcalf’s Law:<br />
The value of a computer is<br />
proportional to the square of the<br />
number of connections it makes.<br />
Few jobs require as much independent thinking and employee<br />
empowerment as sales. Empowered salespeople represent<br />
the forward line, the guardians of differentiation, the customer<br />
touchpoint in every marketing equation. They are<br />
the ultimate players in the so-called knowledge economy.<br />
Unlike employees in silo or niche areas, salespeople need to<br />
reach out and connect disparate information from diverse<br />
sources in quick time to effectively address customer needs.<br />
Their knowledge base reaches across the enterprise from an<br />
understanding of customers to products and services,<br />
processes and systems, the competitive set, and the arcane<br />
combination of psychological and social skills necessary to<br />
close a deal.<br />
Technology to the rescue<br />
Ask any successful salesperson, and they’ll tell you that<br />
timely, accurate information represents the best armor<br />
they’ve got in the profit wars. The bulletproof concept<br />
resonates with every salesperson who has ever had to<br />
sell-in a new product, argue a price increase or stave off a<br />
competitive threat. To be effective in today’s hyper-charged,<br />
customized, store-level–focused retail environment, salespeople<br />
need a virtual arsenal of presentations capable of<br />
being refreshed with current data at the touch of a button.<br />
That need spawned the fast-track development of<br />
ACNielsen Answers ® Presentation Builder, a best practices<br />
solution that automates and standardizes the development<br />
of data-driven presentation decks. Custom-designed to your<br />
unique specifications by ACNielsen consultants, the application<br />
automatically populates templates using the data calculations<br />
and benchmark metrics you choose. The look, feel,<br />
reporting style and approach are exclusive to your company<br />
28 Fall/Winter 2006
and readily accessible via any Internet connection when and<br />
where you want. Last minute changes and updates become a<br />
mere matter of logging on instead of experiencing logistical<br />
logjams.<br />
Presentation power<br />
In the fast-moving consumer goods industry, presentations<br />
are a fact of life. A truly great deck can facilitate a contract,<br />
substantiate a strategy and move a group toward consensus.<br />
Secondary benefits that accrue from presentations include<br />
the opportunity to enhance the corporate brand image and<br />
values with key audiences like customers, prospects and<br />
business partners.<br />
Maintaining and nurturing the corporate brand has become<br />
a top priority of global companies because it represents one<br />
of the few points of differentiation that cannot be duplicated.<br />
Establishing a consistent presentation format and<br />
methodology ensures that the corporate brand is communicated<br />
correctly, and in alignment with brand standards,<br />
throughout the organization.<br />
Productivity booster<br />
Businesses run on a 24/7 basis in a global economy, so every<br />
minute off-line translates into a minute behind the times.<br />
Productivity aids help compensate by enabling people to<br />
log on, tune in and reach out from virtually any location.<br />
Recognizing the need to stay connected, designers scoped<br />
ACNielsen Answers Presentation Builder as a web-based<br />
tool that delivers presentation decks directly to a laptop<br />
or desktop.<br />
By automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks,<br />
Presentation Builder frees up valuable personnel for invaluable<br />
face-to-face time with clients and other high value-add<br />
activities. Great-looking reports rich with timely information<br />
and telling benchmarks can be generated by salespeople<br />
who have no prior knowledge of PowerPoint or the<br />
ACNielsen access and analysis tool.<br />
Productivity calculator<br />
How much time does your sales organization spend rebuilding<br />
standardized reports for individual clients? You<br />
might be surprised at the hidden savings that can be recovered<br />
by automating this time-consuming task with<br />
Presentation Builder.<br />
Take the case of Dan, a typical manufacturer sales representative<br />
serving the Midwest region. Dan needs to prepare a<br />
20 slide presentation deck summarizing the most recent<br />
performance in the Chicago market. Without Presentation<br />
Builder, Dan is looking at more than 7 hours of grinding<br />
work; with Presentation Builder, he can finish the job in<br />
under 7 minutes. ■ See chart 1.<br />
Best of all: Dan’s employer just saved over $1,000 in underutilized<br />
personnel time that can now be deployed against<br />
revenue-generating tasks.<br />
Chart 1: Time saved using Presentation Builder<br />
Without Presentation Builder<br />
Time x Task<br />
(minutes)<br />
1. Determine which slides need to be built 50<br />
2. Create calculations 8<br />
3. Determine data requirements by slide 200<br />
4. Design slide and manipulate data into presentation format 130<br />
5. Perform final edit/run/testing of deck 40<br />
6. Save final deck on hard drive/off to client meeting 1<br />
Total Time (minutes): 429<br />
(hours): 7:09<br />
With Presentation Builder<br />
Time x Task<br />
(minutes)<br />
1. Log into ACNielsen Answers portal
The Answer for Busy Professionals<br />
Standardized client-ready presentations are a fundamental<br />
necessity in today’s business environment. Countless hours are<br />
spent building presentations. ACNielsen announces a way to<br />
reduce your presentation building time significantly. Now you<br />
can focus your time on adding value to your organization<br />
with bottom-line results instead of countless hours creating<br />
presentation decks each month.<br />
Presentation Builder, delivered through ACNielsen Answers ® ,<br />
eliminates the time-consuming task of pulling syndicated data<br />
content into the right format for client-ready presentations.<br />
ACNielsen Business Technology Solutions consultants can<br />
automate the creation of your standard business presentations<br />
seamlessly. This intelligent solution uses advanced proprietary<br />
processes to effortlessly create your presentation decks. You<br />
design the presentation format and standard data calculations,<br />
and our expert consulting teams do the rest.<br />
Accessible from any Internet connection via ACNielsen Answers,<br />
your presentation data is delivered directly to your desktop. This<br />
time-saving solution is available when you need it, where you<br />
need it.<br />
ACNielsen Answers Presentation Builder<br />
allows you to:<br />
• Automate the process of creating standard business<br />
presentations.<br />
• Gain web-enabled access anywhere, anytime.<br />
• Standardize the format in which content is presented to your<br />
customers.<br />
• Free up resources from the routine task of building<br />
presentation slides.<br />
Increase your productivity by having online access to key<br />
information to manage your business.<br />
One Click. One Place. All the Answers.<br />
Contact your ACNielsen representative for more information,<br />
call 800.988.4ACN or visit our web site at www.acnielsen.com.
Employee Empowerment continued from page 30<br />
Even first-time users can immediately understand the<br />
Presentation Builder program and realize efficiencies from<br />
the initial log-on without constantly referencing the built-in<br />
help advisory.<br />
Value can be expressed any number of ways, from a rapid<br />
ROI calculation on the spend, to anticipated increases in<br />
product movement, market share, promotion penetration or<br />
distribution reach. Once the most important value levers for<br />
the customer have been identified, they become part of a<br />
template that ensures consistent data presentation and<br />
review within and across accounts.<br />
Getting organized<br />
Finally, we come to the issue of organization, the bane of<br />
every salesperson who has ever juggled a cell phone, laptop,<br />
PDA, customer file and call sheet while sitting in the airport<br />
lounge or reception area. There are no issues with misplacing<br />
data or crashing a computer. Presentation Builder<br />
reserves critical information on the server, accessible via the<br />
Internet, so nothing goes missing or gets lost in translation.<br />
Once the sales group has agreed on client metrics and presentation<br />
flow and defined the desired templates, all a sales<br />
rep needs to do is update a deck with fresh data before a<br />
customer meeting. All the time-wasting decisions—which<br />
data to show, how best to express them, the most highimpact<br />
way to illustrate them, what comparisons will be<br />
most powerful, what competitive information to feature—<br />
have been thought through and programmed in. That way,<br />
each meeting, each rep, each contact, each account, shares a<br />
consistent, detailed view of their business. This self-organizing<br />
feature proves especially helpful in global situations,<br />
automatically synchronizing data for easy aggregation.<br />
Power to the people<br />
You’ve heard it a million times: “people are our most<br />
important asset.” Smart companies are those that act like it,<br />
empowering employees by putting the right technology,<br />
tools and training in place to guarantee success. C i<br />
32 Fall/Winter 2006
Open your window to collaborative<br />
business intelligence<br />
One Click, One Place, All the Answers. Spend less time searching<br />
for and organizing information and make fact-based decisions on<br />
category business planning, forecasting, item assortment, pricing,<br />
promotional programs, space management and replenishment.<br />
ACNielsen Answers ® revolutionizes the way you make business<br />
decisions by addressing your most pressing business issues in a<br />
user-friendly, intuitive web-based environment.<br />
Review personalized market information reports, headlines, alerts<br />
and presentations over the Internet. Gain access to ACNielsen<br />
Answers business-oriented solutions, such as CBP ® –Category<br />
Business Planner, Sales Management Planner, and Homescan ®<br />
& Spectra ® content. ACNielsen Answers enables you to access<br />
and analyze mission-critical information to make educated, timely<br />
decisions offering you the right information, in the right format,<br />
at the right time, so that the right decision can be made in a<br />
repeatable manner.<br />
ACNielsen Answers helps you:<br />
• Address critical business issues relating to brand/sales management,<br />
category management, consumer management and retail<br />
management.<br />
• Make better decisions, faster, by collaborating with your service<br />
team and using best demonstrated practices.<br />
• Direct marketing and merchandising activities with on-the-fly,<br />
fact-based solutions.<br />
• Grow revenue, reduce costs of business and improve your<br />
competitive position by converting all types of consumer<br />
information into valued intelligence.<br />
• Drive consumer-focused actions anytime and anywhere.<br />
• Access business-critical information in a web-based environment<br />
to make educated, timely decisions.<br />
ACNielsen Answers gives you:<br />
• Personalized “news” headlines answering key questions on<br />
your category’s performance.<br />
• Hyperlinks giving you drill-down, detailed information on<br />
your category.<br />
• Access to categories defined by a specific retailer—both in terms<br />
of the category itself and the retailer’s trading areas.<br />
• Access to personalized, proprietary internal content and links to<br />
other third-party content.<br />
• Streamlined delivery of information and insights in a timely manner.<br />
To learn more about ACNielsen Answers, please contact your<br />
ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services representative or visit<br />
our web site at www.acnielsen.com.
Gas Price Hikes Put<br />
Brakes on Spending<br />
by: Todd Hale<br />
Thought Leadership<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Crude oil prices ignited again this summer, surpassing the<br />
$70 a barrel threshold and pushing prices at the pump to an<br />
inflammatory $3+ per gallon. Factors like market speculation,<br />
refinery capacity shortages and a pronounced decline<br />
in spare global oil production converged, leaving cashstrapped<br />
consumers scrambling to adjust budgets and<br />
spending accordingly.<br />
To gauge the nature and depth of the consumer response to<br />
fuel-flation, we repeated a survey of ACNielsen Homescan<br />
Panel members that was fielded twice in 2005 (June/July<br />
and October/November periods). The objective was to<br />
provide manufacturers and retailers with a window on<br />
consumer shopping and spending habits when they felt<br />
the pinch at the pump.<br />
Think ahead<br />
As with last year’s surveys, consumers geared up for the<br />
long haul by doing some advance planning, combining<br />
errands and trips to conserve gas. More than two-thirds<br />
Chart 1: Households combining trips, eating out<br />
less & staying home<br />
Impact higher gas<br />
prices had on driving June/July Oct. June/July Chg vs<br />
& spending habits ’05 ’05 ’06 yr ago<br />
Combine errands/trips 61% 68% 68% +7<br />
Eat out less 31% 35% 39% +8<br />
Do more things at home 30% 33% 39% +9<br />
Buy larger, economy size 10% 9% 11% +1<br />
Shop more at warehouse clubs 9% 7% 10% +1<br />
Shop more on Internet 5% 5% 9% +4<br />
Use public transportation more 3% 3% 4% +1<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra Panel Views Surveys<br />
(68%) of respondents adopted this tactic, a seven percentage<br />
point increase from June/July 2005, maintaining the upward<br />
trend from October 2005 results. ■ See chart 1.<br />
Gas gouging really took a bite out of restaurant food sales<br />
(39% of respondents said they were “eating out less”) and<br />
general entertainment spending (39% said they were “doing<br />
more things at home”). These findings proved consistent<br />
with published reports about softness in some casual dining<br />
restaurants.<br />
Encourage cocooning<br />
Setting politics aside, it is clear that unrest in the Middle<br />
East will continue to put a crimp in the oil pipeline, and<br />
high fuel prices that convert into higher transportation and<br />
home heating/cooling costs are here to stay. Manufacturers<br />
and retailers will greet this with mixed reviews.<br />
On one hand, manufacturing, packaging and shipping costs<br />
will rise apace, given their reliance on petroleum-based<br />
products. On the other hand, when consumers cocoon, dollars<br />
once spent dining or playing out will be diverted back<br />
to the grocery, club, drug and mass merchandiser channels.<br />
Price pressures<br />
The key will be to hold the line and avoid the temptation of<br />
passing along cost increases directly to the consumer in the<br />
form of higher prices. Consider the fact that in the span of a<br />
single year, 12% more consumers (almost half of all respondents)<br />
stated they were reducing spending to either a<br />
“small” or “great degree.” Clearly, price sensitivity enters<br />
the equation when consumers evaluate spending trade-offs.<br />
continued on page 36<br />
34 Fall/Winter 2006
Gas Price Hikes continued from page 34<br />
Chart 2: Dollar stores decline, Club &<br />
Supercenters increase<br />
% household shopper penetration<br />
Warehouse<br />
50<br />
50<br />
52<br />
2001<br />
2005<br />
mid-2006<br />
Supercenters*<br />
51<br />
5861<br />
Dollar<br />
Drug<br />
Mass Merch<br />
Grocery<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
*Includes Kmart, Target & Wal-Mart Supercenters<br />
59<br />
67<br />
65<br />
86<br />
83<br />
83<br />
95<br />
87<br />
85<br />
100<br />
99<br />
99<br />
Value pricing assumes even more importance in this volatile<br />
climate, and promotions touting at-home family fun nights,<br />
home-cooked family meals and at-home entertaining concepts<br />
accelerate to the front of the strategy options.<br />
Changing habits<br />
Consumers also cited other budget-stretching adjustments to<br />
their shopping and purchasing patterns. Among them are<br />
patronizing supercenters to buy in bulk at lower unit prices,<br />
clipping coupons to capture available savings, and switching<br />
to less expensive grocery brands.<br />
Premium and mid-grade gas patrons downgraded to regular.<br />
Warehouse club stores and Internet shopping options both<br />
benefited from the desire to keep the lid on the gas tank and<br />
spending.<br />
Homefront, workfront<br />
A Florida State University professor explored different<br />
aspects of the fallout from gas prices, discovering that 44%<br />
of the 300 employed consumers surveyed worried about<br />
making ends meet; 41% were paying off debt more slowly<br />
and 25% had gone without basic necessities like food and<br />
heat to conserve funds.<br />
When queried about how changes in their financial picture<br />
affected their job, results were alarming. Respondents cited<br />
negative outcomes across the board, related to more stress<br />
at home. They were less enthusiastic about work and their<br />
employer, less agreeable and helpful to others, less productive,<br />
more sensitive to daily irritants at work and more<br />
depressed overall.<br />
Penetrating insights<br />
Dollar stores, once on a seemingly unstoppable expansion<br />
trajectory, actually experienced a two percent decline in<br />
household penetration, the sole exception among the<br />
“value” channels to lose ground. In a surprising turn<br />
of events, this represents the first decline in dollar store<br />
shopper penetration since we first began tracking the<br />
channel. ■ See chart 2.<br />
This is surprising on the one hand, because gas price<br />
increases that affect those on fixed incomes and with<br />
modest means (the prototypical dollar store shoppers),<br />
might be expected to drive more consumers toward<br />
dollar outlets. It is less surprising in the context of trip<br />
consolidation, where shoppers try to meet all their needs<br />
in the fewest trips possible. The limited food and beverage<br />
assortment and lack of fresh foods at most dollar stores<br />
may be the force behind the decline.<br />
36 Fall/Winter 2006
Consumer &<br />
Shopping<br />
Insights—Online!<br />
Homescan ® Consumer & Shopping Insights provides<br />
web access to the latest shopping insights available<br />
across all major categories and channels of trade,<br />
presented in an issue-oriented menu for simple<br />
navigation to your most pressing business issue.<br />
Get right to the subject. With Homescan Consumer &<br />
Shopping Insights, you won’t waste time wading through<br />
unnecessary data. Interested in a regional comparison<br />
report of your brands? Want to know which retailers drive<br />
category spending? Need to target the best demographic<br />
match? Simply choose the business application to fit<br />
your needs and view the results immediately.<br />
Homescan Consumer & Shopping Insights gives you:<br />
• Fastest access to the most recent data available.<br />
• Issue-oriented navigation capabilities for easy drill down<br />
to the information you need most.<br />
• Interactive graphs to expedite analysis for presentationready<br />
text and charts.<br />
• Access to the full Consumer & Shopping Insights<br />
Syndicated Suite: Consumer Facts, Channel Facts,<br />
Account Shopper Profiler, Cross Outlet Facts and<br />
Category Management Templates.<br />
To learn more about Consumer & Shopping Insights,<br />
please contact your ACNielsen Client Service or Retail<br />
Services representative or visit our web site at<br />
www.acnielsen.com.<br />
Available in the U.S.
Concurrently, the competing warehouse club and supercenter<br />
“value” channels enjoyed two and three percentage<br />
point increases, respectively, in the penetration measure.<br />
Underlying reasons for the upticks include continuing store<br />
count expansion, which enhances accessibility, and a relentless<br />
commitment to delivering consumer value.<br />
Trip decay<br />
Trip count results proved that consumers not only talked<br />
the talk, they walked the walk and reduced the number of<br />
shopping trips in every channel except warehouse clubs,<br />
which held steady at 11 trips per household per year.<br />
A review of trip count results by channel suggests that grocery<br />
stores might need to re-examine their value proposition.<br />
Trip counts sagged by one trip per household at dollar<br />
and drug stores, mass merchandisers and supercenters, but<br />
the grocery trip frequency declined at twice that rate.<br />
Basket bonanza<br />
Consumer behavior aligned with attitudes again, as bigger<br />
basket rings across channels validated the “shop less, buy<br />
more” reaction to gas prices. Warehouse clubs were the primary<br />
beneficiary of the new consumer spending directive;<br />
witness the $6 increase in the average trip receipt, for a total<br />
of $93 per trip. ■ See chart 3.<br />
Chart 3: Larger baskets in all channels—consumers making fewer small trips<br />
Average $ basket ring—Total expenditures<br />
Dollar<br />
11<br />
12<br />
2001<br />
2005<br />
mid-2006<br />
13<br />
19<br />
2223<br />
32<br />
3538<br />
39<br />
4447<br />
51<br />
Drug<br />
Grocery<br />
Mass Merch<br />
Supercenters*<br />
60<br />
63<br />
Warehouse<br />
82<br />
87<br />
93<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
*Includes Kmart, Target & Wal-Mart Supercenters<br />
38 Fall/Winter 2006
Chart 4: Those who can afford higher gas prices drive more<br />
% household by weekly mileage driven<br />
Poor<br />
10<br />
8<br />
14<br />
20<br />
21<br />
9<br />
7<br />
12<br />
Getting By<br />
4<br />
3<br />
11<br />
21<br />
20<br />
13<br />
9<br />
19<br />
Living Comfortably<br />
2 1<br />
8<br />
16<br />
20<br />
16<br />
12<br />
25<br />
Affluent<br />
11<br />
5<br />
10<br />
17<br />
15<br />
14<br />
38<br />
No Vehicle<br />
51–100 Miles<br />
0 Miles<br />
101–150 Miles<br />
1–25 Miles<br />
151–200 Miles<br />
26–50 Miles<br />
200+ Miles<br />
Source: June/July 2005 ACNielsen Homescan Survey<br />
Grocery, mass merchandisers and supercenters each experienced<br />
a $3 per basket expenditure increase, raising the average<br />
consumer spend per format trip to $38, $47 and $63,<br />
respectively. Drug and dollar stores sat at the bottom of the<br />
rankings with an extra $1 added to the average shopping tab.<br />
Resilient response<br />
In June 2006, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan<br />
Greenspan remarked that American business “to date has<br />
largely succeeded in finding productivity improvements<br />
that have contained energy costs.” However, he raised the<br />
specter of continued upward oil price pressure leading to<br />
an observable impact on the U.S. economy.<br />
One reason Americans have been able to absorb price<br />
increases to date ascribes to the fact that those who drive<br />
the most can afford it. A larger percentage of affluent<br />
consumers drive 200+ miles per week than those living<br />
comfortably, getting by or the poor. ■ See chart 4.<br />
Poor pay more<br />
Unfortunately, rising gas prices will impact the most those<br />
who can afford it the least. While gasoline costs represent<br />
just 6% of the pre-tax household income for families earning<br />
$75,000 per year, they consume double that proportion<br />
(12%) for households earning $20,000 annually.<br />
■ See chart 5 on page 40.<br />
Turning a moment to the rising cost of natural gas and<br />
other home heating alternatives, consumers can expect those<br />
costs to increase as well. Last year, a mild winter mitigated<br />
price hikes, minimizing the wallet wallop. In the aggregate,<br />
the implications are obvious for the manufacturers and<br />
retailers who target lower income households—get ready<br />
to feel the heat.<br />
Strategic fallout<br />
The thirst for oil will prompt manufacturers and retailers to<br />
sharpen their pencils and continuously monitor the consumer<br />
pulse to combat the margin squeeze. How will the fuel<br />
39
Chart 5: Rising gas prices will impact low income<br />
households and the retailers/manufacturers that<br />
serve them<br />
At $3 a gallon<br />
Dollar Amount<br />
$20,000<br />
12 $2,382<br />
Annual Income<br />
$25,000<br />
$50,000<br />
8<br />
11<br />
$2,820<br />
$4,179<br />
$75,000<br />
6<br />
$4,647<br />
Gasoline costs as % of pre-tax household income<br />
Source: Department of Energy, USA Today<br />
crunch impact brand and format loyalty? How will<br />
promotional strategies need to be adjusted in response?<br />
What services could be added to make a store the winning<br />
contender under the single-outlet, consolidation scenario?<br />
Oil price pressures may precipitate any number of market<br />
responses in the fast-moving consumer packaged goods<br />
world, including:<br />
• accelerated private label product growth;<br />
• enhanced interest in large pack sales;<br />
• broader assortments;<br />
• value-based pricing;<br />
• at-home entertainment focus in advertising and<br />
promotions;<br />
• added convenience store features, positionings;<br />
• increased emphasis on trip capture.<br />
Change in attitude<br />
As a country, the United States will need to wean itself from<br />
oil dependency by developing viable alternative fuel options<br />
such as ethanol, moving to gas-saving hybrid vehicles like<br />
the popular Toyota Prius, and re-evaluating our fundamental<br />
relationship with non-renewable energy sources.<br />
As an industry, CPG manufacturers and retailers will need<br />
to re-think the retail calculus and factor-in the impact of<br />
higher transportation and heating costs on the brand buyer<br />
and retail shopper mindsets. Even if the recently discovered<br />
Gulf of Mexico oil field turns into a gusher, industry experts<br />
predict it will be at least four years before that fuel supply<br />
impacts consumers, and it will not be large enough to offset<br />
the chronic and increasing U.S. demand. There is a real<br />
opportunity for CPG industry leaders to convert a deep<br />
understanding of the consumer response to persistent<br />
gas shortages into a strategic lever that will drive sales<br />
and profits. C i<br />
40 Fall/Winter 2006
Cracking the<br />
Retail C.O.D.E.<br />
by: Bill Rouse<br />
Wal-Mart Analytics<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Jon Busman<br />
Marketing<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
You’re pretty good at Sudoku. You know how the DaVinci<br />
code was solved. But do you know how to crack the retail<br />
C.O.D.E.? Turns out, you held the key to unlock sales<br />
potential at the store level all along: the consumer. As the<br />
only common denominator across brand, product, account<br />
and store activities, it is imperative that store-level strategies<br />
and tactics begin and end with the consumer.<br />
Two common factors often hinder the ability to take advantage<br />
of store-by-store growth. First, consumer insights<br />
alone, without resulting actions, simply turn into overhead.<br />
Second, treating an entire retail chain as if it served a single<br />
shopper type often results in missed opportunities.<br />
What’s needed, is to find an approach that enables scalable<br />
action based on store-level insights to position a company<br />
for success with consumers. Store-level growth opportunities<br />
exist, but they are often difficult to identify and procure<br />
with a reasonable return. It takes the right tools to integrate<br />
action and insight into a cohesive, repeatable framework<br />
for success.<br />
Getting started<br />
The first step into the new world of store-level marketing<br />
begins by abandoning any preconceived notions about a<br />
consumer-centric approach. There is no silver bullet report<br />
with all the answers, no bedrock rule about how a category<br />
acts in response to consumers.<br />
Realize that things are not always what they appear to be.<br />
Narrowly focusing solely on category-specific action is no<br />
better than looking down from a tall building and incorrectly<br />
noting that all people are the same. Consumer-centric<br />
planning is about analyzing specific groups of people and<br />
identifying how to impact them where they shop—at ground<br />
zero, the store level. It is a different way of looking at business,<br />
one with an upside that pays off in sales and profits.<br />
Winning at retail is enabled by applying a simple, systematic<br />
four-step process that we call “Cracking the Retail<br />
C.O.D.E.” The methodology employs a series of critical<br />
steps to optimize brand or product success in the marketplace.<br />
This consumer-centric approach links actions in the<br />
store—where they matter the most—back to the consumers<br />
most likely to purchase your brand.<br />
Four steps to success<br />
The acronym C.O.D.E. summarizes a methodology that<br />
begins with Consumer profiling, then moves to Opportunity<br />
gapping, Dynamic clustering and Executing for the consumer,<br />
the four steps to success in store-level marketing.<br />
1. Consumer profiling—accurately captures the demographic<br />
profile of the brand’s consumer.<br />
2. Opportunity gapping—quantifies store-level opportunities<br />
based on consumer demand potential and diagnoses the<br />
prospect.<br />
3. Dynamic clustering—groups similar stores using multiple<br />
store attributes, including shopper demographics, the<br />
competitive set, and upside opportunity.<br />
4. Executing for the consumer—takes findings from steps<br />
1–3 and develops store-level tactical plans, giving the<br />
field force the right information to optimize in-store<br />
presence.<br />
This strategic approach provides a deeper understanding<br />
of the consumers around a given store, measures the gap<br />
between actual and potential demand, and offers an execution<br />
plan at the store and cluster level that fully addresses<br />
42 Fall/Winter 2006
the potential demand. The result is improved operational<br />
execution, reduced out-of-stocks, fewer overstocks,<br />
enhanced promotion performance and better inventory<br />
management.<br />
Step 1: Consumer profiling<br />
The consumer should be the first and last consideration of<br />
any consumer-centric initiative and the C.O.D.E. approach<br />
is no different. Products do not buy themselves, just as<br />
shelves do not mysteriously empty by themselves. While<br />
price reductions, competition, brand equity, slotting and the<br />
like all influence purchasing, the common denominator is<br />
the consumer.<br />
It is only appropriate then, that the C.O.D.E. approach<br />
starts with consumer profiling. There are various types<br />
of consumer profiling information available, from panel<br />
purchase behavior to attitude and usage studies to focus<br />
groups. Traditionally, point-of-sale (POS) data has been<br />
utilized to tell us “what happened” but not who drove it.<br />
Through consumer regression profiling, it becomes<br />
possible to create a sales-weighted store profile by<br />
estimating future consumer demand for products based<br />
on historical sales data.<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra recommends utilizing<br />
panel data to determine category and brand breaks, and<br />
Opportunity Finder solutions to “consumerize” product<br />
movement data, enabling retail-specific and item-specific<br />
store profiles. This approach yields granular analyses down<br />
to the SKU level. The analyses become retail-specific, based<br />
on the retailer’s own data, which adds power to the recommendations.<br />
Regardless of source, consumer profiles can be<br />
used individually or in combination to formulate step one<br />
of Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.<br />
Step 2: Opportunity gapping<br />
Are you leaving sales on the table? If so, how much? What<br />
“Opportunity gapping provides<br />
an indication of how much the<br />
category could grow tomorrow if<br />
I could fully execute, instead of only trying to<br />
capture my fair share of yesterday’s volume.”<br />
needs to change to convert potential and lost sales into reg-<br />
–Michael Himmelfarb, VP of Marketing<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
ister rings? Opportunity gapping quantifies the opportunity<br />
cost to each store for missing the mark two ways—either<br />
with consumers or on the execution level. While fair share<br />
gapping is a common practice to determine if a brand or<br />
product is getting its expected share of the account or market<br />
pie, what if you could estimate how big the slice would be?<br />
Consumer profiling is the first step in executing the<br />
C.O.D.E. approach, but without action it just becomes<br />
“nice to know.” In order to quantify opportunity, matching<br />
the consumer profile to the known shoppers of an account<br />
is critical. The degree of sophistication can vary from profiling<br />
your consumer and identifying a common trait within<br />
a retailer (i.e., matching high income consumers to a high<br />
income account like Whole Foods), to scoring an account<br />
at the store level based on the most volume-predictive<br />
consumers, also known as the Spectra Demand Index.<br />
In essence, while Step One determines your consumer’s<br />
fingerprint, Step Two matches it to an account’s fingerprint—or<br />
even better, an account’s store-level fingerprints.<br />
Now you have a basic roadmap for tomorrow’s volume.<br />
44 Fall/Winter 2006
Windshield vs. rear-view mirror<br />
The C.O.D.E. methodology puts marketers in the driver’s<br />
seat, steering brands and products by looking through the<br />
windshield instead of the rear-view mirror. This approach<br />
focuses action on stores that show growth opportunity, and<br />
suggests maintenance level support for those with lower<br />
growth potential.<br />
Execution opportunity gaps materialize based on the yinyang<br />
interaction of two opposing forces: demand drivers<br />
and demand inhibitors. Demand drivers include activities<br />
such as promotions, cross merchandising and correct shelving.<br />
Demand inhibitors include competition, out-of-stocks<br />
(OOS), distribution voids, and incorrect shelving or space<br />
allocation.<br />
Case in point<br />
In a typical promotion scenario, 16% of stores won’t have<br />
available space, 22% won’t display the promotion signage,<br />
33% will put up the displays too late and 42% won’t have<br />
the skilled labor to execute the promotion. Opportunity<br />
gapping identifies problem stores—those that should have<br />
sold more based on the consumer fit and performance of<br />
similar stores.<br />
Promotions can then be adjusted to focus resources on areas<br />
with the highest potential upside. In essence, opportunity<br />
gapping acts like a forward-looking diagnosis that determines<br />
if the financial upside return from a promotion is<br />
worth the effort of store checks, additional labor, or the<br />
promotion itself.<br />
“Retailers and manufacturers are becoming<br />
more precise in their targeting of consumer<br />
segments and wish to optimize store<br />
conditions at the local level.”<br />
–Paris Gogos, Director<br />
ACNielsen Retail Execution Services<br />
Step 3: Dynamic clustering<br />
Clustering, or localization, as the Harvard Business Review<br />
calls it, is the cornerstone of scalability. More than a capability,<br />
clustering has become an operating necessity in<br />
today’s fragmented marketplace.<br />
Retailers and manufacturers are increasingly moving to<br />
micro views of their business to identify opportunities<br />
associated with the demand drivers and demand inhibitors<br />
unique to each store. This is most clearly seen in the growing<br />
number of retailers adopting local or neighborhood<br />
marketing initiatives. Most recently, Wal-Mart announced<br />
they were dropping their one-size-fits-all approach to stores.<br />
Similarly, manufacturers are becoming more precise in targeting<br />
of consumer segments, and wish to optimize store<br />
conditions at the local level.<br />
Clustering attributes<br />
While there is a virtually limitless set of criteria upon which<br />
clusters can be based, most fall into four major groupings:<br />
1. Consumer Attributes. These may be as simple as<br />
grouping stores based on a common trait like ethnicity,<br />
affluence of the shopper, or a volume-predictive measure<br />
of consumer fit.<br />
2. Organizational Attributes. These may include DSD sales<br />
routes, warehouse locations, regions or districts, or<br />
specific shelving sets.<br />
45
3. Store Attributes. These may range from physical store<br />
attributes like size and presence of specific departments<br />
to proximities to high traffic intersections or landmarks<br />
like beaches or universities.<br />
4. Performance Attributes. These can range from basic<br />
sales rates to promotion response to consumer-driven<br />
category opportunity gaps.<br />
Dynamic clustering brings criteria together into a cohesive<br />
framework that leverages critical differences within the store<br />
segments. Some companies may be able to execute effectively<br />
using just two clusters; others may require 200; but clustering<br />
is a necessary prerequisite for integrating action to “crack<br />
the retail C.O.D.E.”<br />
Step 4: Executing for the consumer<br />
The final step in the C.O.D.E. approach takes us full circle,<br />
back to the consumer and how best to shape and direct<br />
activities to each store or cluster’s shoppers. Merchandising<br />
strategies based on item roles, promotional and sampling<br />
programs, space and facing allocations—all tailored to<br />
defined dynamic clusters—can now be managed by following<br />
the four-step C.O.D.E.<br />
The C.O.D.E. approach makes high definition marketing<br />
possible, allowing marketers and retailers to zero in at the<br />
most granular level possible—the store. Working from a<br />
shared viewpoint, with shared definitions for target clusters<br />
or stores, manufacturers and retailers can collaborate on<br />
promotional and assortment strategies with optimal appeal<br />
to the right set of consumers, and operational strategies that<br />
take cost out of the system by reducing inefficiencies such as<br />
out-of-stocks and distribution voids.<br />
The C.O.D.E. holds the secret to finding opportunity gaps,<br />
making the most of consumer profile information, and<br />
improving logistical execution to squeeze more bottom-line<br />
profit out of even more top-line sales.<br />
See pages 48 and 49 for a case study that illustrates the<br />
C.O.D.E. process in action. C i<br />
46 Fall/Winter 2006
Mark Your<br />
Calendars<br />
2007Consumer 360 Conference<br />
May 14–17<br />
The Westin Diplomat<br />
Resort & Spa<br />
3555 South Ocean Drive<br />
Hollywood, Florida<br />
The number one marketing<br />
and information conference.<br />
www.consumer360.com<br />
® presented by
Cracking the<br />
C.O.D.E.<br />
A Case Study<br />
Step 1: Consumer profiling<br />
Joe’s Cookies utilized a hybrid of ACNielsen Homescan<br />
Panel data and POS-based profiles to identify its preferred<br />
consumer. Since Joe’s Cookies had low penetration in the<br />
marketplace, the company used panel data to profile the total<br />
category, and then used Spectra Opportunity Finder Solutions<br />
to profile individual SKUs.<br />
The result of this analysis: Joe’s Cookies gained an understanding<br />
of how its brand consumers differed from the overall<br />
cookie category and competitors. The typical Joe’s Cookies<br />
buyer skewed to African-American and Hispanic ethnic makeup,<br />
earned $50,000–$100,000 per year and lived in a household<br />
with children. ■ See chart 1.<br />
Chart 1: Cookie consumer profiles<br />
Joe’s Jane’s<br />
Cookie Cookies Cookies<br />
Category 16 oz. 16 oz.<br />
White Med. High Low High<br />
African Am. Low High Very Low<br />
Hispanic Low High Very Low<br />
< $50K Low Low Low<br />
$50K+ High Very High Medium<br />
$100K+ High Low Very High<br />
No Kids in HH Low Very Low Very High<br />
Kids in HH High Very High Very Low<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
Step 2: Opportunity gapping<br />
Joe’s Cookies then ranked retailer stores based on the “fit”<br />
between the store consumer profile and the Joe’s Cookies<br />
consumer profile, quantifying the consumer opportunity gap.<br />
The analysis determined that store opportunity varied greatly<br />
once the consumer was inserted into the equation.<br />
For example, Joe’s Cookies found Store A and Store B identical<br />
in every transactional way. Joe’s Cookies had two facings in<br />
each store, and the store shelf set and total sizes were virtually<br />
identical. However, sales results for Joe’s Cookies were anything<br />
but identical. Store A sold approximately $90 per week of<br />
cookies, while Store B sold closer to $230 per week.<br />
A consumer trade area analysis for each store uncovered very<br />
different shopper bases. Store A was located in an urban setting<br />
with many households without kids in its consumer trade<br />
area. Store B, on the other hand, was in a rural setting with<br />
many households with kids in its consumer trade area. As a<br />
result, Store A was not the underperforming store it initially<br />
appeared to be, but in fact, had captured most, if not all, of its<br />
opportunity. Store B, initially thought to be over-performing in<br />
its trade area, was actually under-performing and should have<br />
sold an incremental $130 more per week. ■ See chart 2.<br />
Instead of allotting resources against a store that appeared to<br />
be an under-performer, Joe’s Cookies targeted the real underperforming<br />
store. Joe’s Cookies followed the C.O.D.E. method<br />
and assessed the different demand drivers and demand<br />
inhibitors affecting the store in order to chart a path for Store B<br />
growth. This exercise was repeated for other chains to diagnose<br />
the amount of unconverted opportunity by account and<br />
develop tactical plan for realizing untapped potential.<br />
Chart 2: Opportunity gapping<br />
Store A: $90 in Sales Store B: $230 in Sales<br />
Consumer Trade Area Consumer Trade Area<br />
Few Kids—Urban<br />
Many Kids—Rural<br />
Consumer Opportunity Gapping<br />
Gap Upside: $8 Gap Upside: +$130!<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
48 Fall/Winter 2006
Step 3: Dynamic clustering<br />
The next step for Joe’s Cookies was to make similar recommendations<br />
to its retailer that could be executed in a scalable<br />
manner. Joe’s Cookies clustered similar stores based on<br />
consumer, store, and performance attributes including<br />
consumer fit, opportunity gaps, competitive interaction<br />
and existing store sales.<br />
In doing so, Joe’s Cookies focused its efforts against several<br />
types of consumers and enabled action that was scaled yet<br />
appeared customized on the shelf. Dynamic Clustering also<br />
identified which clusters were not only a strong fit, but quantified<br />
the upside opportunity. This approach allowed Joe’s<br />
Cookies to take action where it was needed and to minimize<br />
where it was meeting demand. Demonstrating the power of<br />
Dynamic Clustering in action, when applied from the category<br />
down to the SKU level, Joe’s Cookies executed against the<br />
opportunity for its brand and the category. ■ See chart 3.<br />
Chart 3: Dynamic consumer profiling—allows<br />
you to take action where there is potential<br />
Category/Brand<br />
Consumer Fit<br />
Gapping<br />
Opportunity<br />
Clusters<br />
20 Stores<br />
$2.7 Million Gap<br />
35 Stores<br />
$0.8 Million Gap<br />
68 Stores<br />
$0.0 Million Gap<br />
Step 4: Executing for the consumer<br />
Turning to tactical considerations, Joe’s first cluster (Blue Collar<br />
Suburban) represented $2.7 million in sales, spread across 20<br />
stores. It appears to be under-performing with respect to many<br />
product types and within certain cookie sub-segments.<br />
Joe’s Cookies implemented a dynamic clustering framework<br />
and pursued tactics that included:<br />
• identifying cluster potential to assist with assortment<br />
decisions;<br />
• determining the competitive forces affecting each dynamic<br />
cluster to assist with tactics;<br />
• assigning key merchandising roles to SKU-level items by<br />
dynamic clusters to determine the turf and image enhancers;<br />
• allocating shelf size based on dynamic clusters;<br />
• performing SKU-level rationalization based on consumer<br />
demand and potential sales by cluster to put the right<br />
product in the right store.<br />
The Retail C.O.D.E framework has helped many manufacturers<br />
and retailers unlock hidden sales opportunity previously<br />
masked by results aggregated at the account, region or trade<br />
area level. C.O.D.E. proponents integrate a variety of consumer<br />
and retail information to de-code available opportunities and<br />
implement comprehensive action plans designed to improve<br />
product and category performance. Are you ready to crack the<br />
Retail C.O.D.E.? Your sales depend on it. Your consumers<br />
demand it.<br />
Competitive<br />
Interactions<br />
Sales Influencers<br />
46 Stores<br />
$0.0 Million Gap<br />
22 Stores<br />
$2.7 Million Gap<br />
10 Stores<br />
$1.1 Million Gap<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
49
Trendwatch<br />
Walk-In Retail Clinics:<br />
A Healthy Savings Idea<br />
by: Joe Bucherer<br />
<strong>Segmentation</strong> Analytics<br />
ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />
“Would you like some chicken soup with that prescription?”<br />
While grocery stores have always stocked this form of “liquid<br />
penicillin,” today they’re home to the real deal—walk-in clinics<br />
staffed by nurse practitioners licensed to diagnose and treat<br />
common conditions such as allergies, bladder infections, bronchitis,<br />
ear infections, the flu, heartburn, muscle pain, pink eye,<br />
minor burns and rashes.<br />
■ See chart 1.<br />
The ultimate in one-stop shopping, patients can see a health<br />
care professional, hang a left to get the prescription filled, and<br />
be on their way in 20 minutes. Anyone who has cooled their<br />
heels in the typical general practitioner’s waiting room knows<br />
that that kind of turnaround time represents a true medical<br />
miracle.<br />
The consumer pulse<br />
Clearly, consumers are warming-up to the walk-in clinic concept.<br />
In a Spring 2006 survey, ACNielsen Homescan &<br />
Spectra took the public’s temperature on the walk-in clinic<br />
subject and discovered that one-third of respondents were<br />
either very or somewhat likely to visit a walk-in clinic<br />
located in a grocery, drug store or mass merchandiser.<br />
■ See chart 2 on page 52.<br />
While half of participating households had visited a doctor’s<br />
office in the last year, 8% had visited an independent or freestanding<br />
walk-in clinic, and another 1% had visited a walk-in<br />
clinic embedded in a retail format.<br />
Chart 1: Types of ailments suffered in U.S.<br />
Percent of households with at least one household member suffering<br />
from the following ailment during the past 6 months<br />
Total U.S.<br />
Allergies (seasonal and/or year-round) 51%<br />
Acid Reflex/Gerd/Heartburn/Acid Indigestion 41%<br />
High Blood Pressure 36%<br />
Cholesterol Problems 31%<br />
Joint Neck/Back Pains (Not Arthritis) 34%<br />
Obesity/Weight Control 32%<br />
Insomnia/Problem Sleeping 24%<br />
Muscle Pain/Spasms 23%<br />
Anxiety/Depression 23%<br />
Arthritis—Osteo 20%<br />
Constipation 18%<br />
Diarrhea 19%<br />
Asthma 15%<br />
Diabetes-Type II (Oral Medication Needed) 12%<br />
Menopause 10%<br />
Lactose Intolerant 9%<br />
Arthritis—Rheumatoid 9%<br />
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 9%<br />
Heart Disease/Heart Attack/Angina 7%<br />
Osteoporosis/Calcium Deficiency 6%<br />
Attention Deficit Disorder 6%<br />
Incontinence 7%<br />
Diabetes Type I (Insulin Needed) 3%<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan Panel Views Survey—Feb/Mar 2006—Total U.S. Households<br />
Presently, walk-in clinics appear to be a perimeter<br />
phenomenon, with the South Atlantic (21%) and East North<br />
Central (16%) regions leading on a household patronage<br />
basis, followed by the Pacific and West South Central areas at<br />
13% each. The eastern geographic skew may reflect a travel<br />
pattern of older New Yorkers commuting between their winter<br />
home in Florida and the Empire state.<br />
50 Fall/Winter 2006
Everybody wins<br />
Many walk-in retail clinics, like the 100-square-foot<br />
MinuteClinics, are designed and sited to feel like an extension<br />
of the store pharmacy counter, virtually ensuring captive<br />
Rx sales.<br />
While the retailer incentives are obvious and include driving<br />
traffic to the store, raising trip counts and creating the<br />
opportunity for incremental sales, the walk-in clinics benefit<br />
insurers as well. One Minnesota-based health plan determined<br />
that the walk-in clinic fees are so low (a minimum of<br />
30% below a regular doctor visit), that the insurer waived<br />
any co-pay to encourage members to utilize the new service.<br />
A rash of growth<br />
Popularity has led to proliferation. Among the more appealing<br />
aspects of the walk-in clinics are the easy physical<br />
access, proximity to home and work, available parking,<br />
intimate formats (smaller ones have chairs vs. exam tables),<br />
posted prices, evening and weekend hours, and electronic<br />
patient files that can be quickly transmitted to doctors along<br />
with a referral.<br />
Wal-Mart expects to open 50 stores by 2007, then roll out<br />
the service nationally. TakeCare has slated 20 Chicago area<br />
clinics for third-quarter 2006. MedXpress launched this<br />
summer and debuted an aggressive expansion plan calling<br />
for 500 U.S. locations by 2010. Solantic, a Florida-based<br />
company differentiating on the basis of physician staffing,<br />
intends to have 1,000 sites up and running over the next<br />
five years.<br />
Chart 2: One in three households is likely<br />
to visit a retail walk-in clinic, if available<br />
in their area<br />
How likely would you be to use a walk-in medical clinic if it were<br />
available in a grocery, drug or mass merchandise/discount store near<br />
your home?<br />
Very Likely 10%<br />
Somewhat<br />
Likely<br />
Neither Likely<br />
Nor Unlikely<br />
Somewhat<br />
Unlikely<br />
Very<br />
Unlikely<br />
15%<br />
18%<br />
22%<br />
36%<br />
Source: ACNielsen Homescan Panel Views Survey—Apr/May 2006—Total U.S. Households<br />
Rx for the ER?<br />
One of the newest developments in consumer-driven<br />
healthcare, walk-in clinics represent the latest response<br />
to a system that encourages patients to control health<br />
costs. As a serendipitous by-product, walk-in clinics<br />
may prove to be a much-needed panacea for<br />
overtaxed emergency rooms, and an antidote for<br />
the 40 million uninsured Americans who represent<br />
the target audience.<br />
The cost savings are undeniable. One uninsured New<br />
York City paralegal priced out a doctor’s visit to deal<br />
with a minor problem. Quote: $150 for the visit.<br />
Opting to try the walk-in clinic solution, she walked<br />
out with two prescriptions and a bill for $49,<br />
including medications.<br />
Profit prognosis<br />
If retailers needed any additional motivation to take<br />
a serious run at the walk-in solution, the most telling<br />
diagnostic is the profitability test. According to a California<br />
HealthCare Foundation study, prescription drug margins<br />
run around 16% compared with general merchandise profits<br />
of less than 5%. That translates into a profit injection for<br />
the bottom line, even as center store results weaken. C i<br />
52 Fall/Winter 2006
Track the New Health<br />
& Wellness Trends<br />
with a Few Clicks<br />
So what’s the new trend replacing “Low Carb”? There is much activity around Superfoods, as consumers are<br />
looking for food and beverage products that enhance their active lifestyle. While these trends are small, they<br />
are certainly something to closely watch. The mainstream trends like Whole Grain and Low/No Fat are still<br />
popular as consumers are responding to a nationwide concern with obesity. Consumer food marketers are<br />
flooding the market with a plethora of food products with health & wellness claims, but which ones are most successful<br />
in capturing consumer sales? LabelTrends is a new service that monitors sales trends in 27 of the<br />
hottest consumer packaged goods (CPG) product segments, such as low-carb, low-fat, organic and sugar-free.<br />
With over two-thirds of Americans dealing with obesity and many individuals on some sort of diet regimen,<br />
LabelTrends is well suited to help you evaluate new product opportunities to meet consumer demand and work<br />
with your retailer partners in optimizing assortment at the shelf for fast turnover.<br />
LabelTrends help you to:<br />
• Understand the latest trends in the health & wellness arena and develop marketing strategies to<br />
provide consumer solutions.<br />
• Identify potential candidates for mergers and acquisitions.<br />
• Understand which health & wellness claims are most successful in building brand loyalty.<br />
• Assess competitor brand/item performance and develop counteractive strategies.<br />
To learn more about LabelTrends, please contact your ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services<br />
representative or visit our web site at www.acnielsen.com.
It’s All About What’s Happening<br />
at the Store Level<br />
Success goes to the smart, the swift, and those who can manage through the complexity of today’s retail environment. Retailers<br />
and Manufacturers strive to recognize the diverse and changing faces of consumers, focusing on what increases demand while<br />
reducing what inhibits it. The store is where the best-laid plans shine or go awry.<br />
ACNielsen Scantrack StoreView provides the clearest, most flexible and precise store level picture of what's selling where, why<br />
and to whom. It provides a view that allows you to zero in on the store to understand demand drivers and demand inhibitors from<br />
different points of view. It allows for a new perspective, a more precise way to pinpoint consumer demand, focus on sales performance,<br />
analyze merchandising activities and center in on micro-trade areas.<br />
Only ACNielsen Scantrack StoreView couples a high definition view of what just happened with the tactical planning<br />
ability to increase future consumer sales.<br />
ACNielsen Scantrack StoreView<br />
Making High Definition Marketing Possible