24.12.2013 Views

Baby Boomer Segmentation:

Baby Boomer Segmentation:

Baby Boomer Segmentation:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONSUMER<br />

Insights today for tomorrow’s decisions<br />

Fall/Winter 2006<br />

<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong><br />

<strong>Segmentation</strong>:<br />

Eight Is Enough<br />

Tune Into Teens:<br />

Test Your Teen<br />

Aptitude<br />

FEATURES:<br />

Global Household Product Sales<br />

Employee Empowerment<br />

Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.


Consumer<br />

Insight:<br />

Seeing Tomorrow…Today<br />

In every issue…<br />

Volume 8, No. 3<br />

Trendwatch<br />

Walk-In Retail Clinics: A Healthy Savings Idea<br />

Publisher<br />

ACNielsen<br />

Editors<br />

Laurel Kennedy<br />

Kathy Mancini<br />

Design & Layout<br />

Blue Lemon Design<br />

Editorial Board<br />

Joe Bucherer<br />

Carolyn Calzavara<br />

Mark Chesney<br />

Tiffany Graves<br />

Todd Hale<br />

Laurel Kennedy<br />

Dan Lyman<br />

Kathy Mancini<br />

Troy Noble<br />

Danell O’Neill<br />

Tom Pirovano<br />

Lori Tanking<br />

Contributing Writers<br />

Doug Anderson<br />

Research & Development<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Joe Bucherer<br />

<strong>Segmentation</strong> Analytics<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Jon Busman<br />

Marketing<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Mark Chesney<br />

Communications<br />

ACNielsen Global Services<br />

Russell Evans<br />

Business Technology Solutions<br />

ACNielsen<br />

Todd Hale<br />

Thought Leadership<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Laurel Kennedy<br />

Marketing Strategy<br />

Age Lessons<br />

Jane Perrin<br />

Communications<br />

ACNielsen Global Services<br />

Tom Pirovano<br />

Retailing Insights<br />

ACNielsen<br />

Bill Rouse<br />

Wal-Mart Analytics<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

For More Information<br />

ACNielsen U.S.<br />

150 North Martingale Road<br />

Schaumburg, IL 60173<br />

800.988.4ACN<br />

www.acnielsen.com/ci<br />

Copyright © 2006 ACNielsen. Printed in USA. All rights reserved. ACNielsen, ACNielsen with<br />

globe design, ACNielsen Answers, Homescan, LabelTrends and Scantrack are trademarks or<br />

registered trademarks of ACNielsen (US), Inc. Spectra and Consumer Trade Areas are trademarks<br />

or registered trademarks of Spectra Marketing Systems, Inc. Other brand, product or<br />

service names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.


4<br />

On<br />

the Cover:<br />

<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong><br />

<strong>Segmentation</strong><br />

contents<br />

4 <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> <strong>Segmentation</strong>: Eight is Enough<br />

Given its relative size and influence on U.S. consumer markets,<br />

surprisingly little formal, quantitative segmentation work has been<br />

conducted on <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong>s. The question remains: how to right-size<br />

the huge <strong>Boomer</strong> cohort? How many segments would capture the<br />

important often subtle nuances that can spell the difference between a<br />

successful new product launch or marketing campaign and a complete<br />

misfire? Turns out, eight segments is enough.<br />

20<br />

Global<br />

Household<br />

Product Sales:<br />

Innovative Items<br />

Clean Up<br />

12<br />

12 Global Household Product Sales:<br />

Innovative Items Clean Up<br />

Analyzing household products on a global scale involves a pretty big<br />

bucket of categories and countries. What’s Hot Around the Globe—<br />

Insights on Growth in Household Products, one in a series of ACNielsen<br />

reports on the fastest-growing products and category drivers, encompasses<br />

66 markets and 29 household product areas.<br />

20 Tune Into Teens: Test Your Teen Aptitude<br />

Teens are a moving target. They were born and raised during a digitized<br />

age where change happens rapidly. Born into the MTV generation where<br />

the rally cry was “I want my MTV”, they have learned that what they want,<br />

they get. In their world, everything is immediate. From instant messaging<br />

to microwave meals, instant gratification is their mantra.<br />

28 Employee Empowerment:<br />

The Key to Capturing Productivity<br />

Ask any successful salesperson, and they’ll tell you that timely, accurate<br />

information represents the best armor they’ve got in the profit wars.<br />

The bulletproof concept resonates with every salesperson who has<br />

ever had to sell-in a new product, argue a price increase or stave off a<br />

competitive threat. To be effective in today’s hyper-charged, customized,<br />

store-level–focused retail environment, salespeople need a virtual arsenal<br />

of presentations capable of being refreshed with current data at the<br />

touch of a button.<br />

34 Gas Price Hikes Put Brakes on Spending<br />

Crude oil prices ignited again this summer, surpassing the $70 a barrel<br />

threshold and pushing prices at the pump to an inflammatory $3+ per<br />

gallon. Factors like market speculation, refinery capacity shortages and<br />

a pronounced decline in spare global oil production converged, leaving<br />

cash-strapped consumers scrambling to adjust budgets and spending<br />

accordingly.<br />

Tune Into Teens: Test<br />

Your Teen Aptitude<br />

34<br />

Gas Price Hikes<br />

Put Brakes on<br />

Spending<br />

28<br />

Employee<br />

Empowerment:<br />

The Key to<br />

Capturing<br />

Productivity<br />

42 Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.<br />

Winning at retail is enabled by applying a simple, systematic four-step<br />

process that we call “Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.” The methodology<br />

employs a series of critical steps to optimize brand or product success<br />

in the marketplace. This consumer-centric approach links actions in the<br />

store—where they matter the most—back to the consumers most likely<br />

to purchase your brand.<br />

50 Trendwatch—Walk-In Retail Clinics:<br />

A Healthy Savings Idea<br />

“Would you like some chicken soup with that prescription?” While grocery<br />

stores have always stocked this form of “liquid penicillin”, today they’re<br />

home to the real deal—walk-in clinics staffed by nurse practitioners<br />

licensed to diagnose and treat common conditions such as allergies,<br />

bladder infections, bronchitis, ear infections, the flu, heartburn, muscle<br />

pain, pink eye, minor burns and rashes.


Overview<br />

ACNielsen recently completed the 15th edition of its annual<br />

Trade Promotion Practices Study which has traced industry<br />

promotion budget and allocation trends on the manufacturer<br />

side for 15 years, and corresponding retailer practices for nine<br />

years. The longitudinal view of spending habits and preferences<br />

affords unique insights into the ebb and flow of promotional<br />

methods through time, and an enlightened look at the similarities<br />

and differences between these trade partners.<br />

Conducted via the Internet, the online survey polled senior sales<br />

and marketing executives from 61 manufacturers and 38 retailer<br />

organizations. The electronic field work was supplemented<br />

with in-depth telephone interviews to more fully develop areas<br />

of special interest. The Trade Promotion Practices Study has<br />

been distributed to ACNielsen clients and is available for purchase<br />

on our website at http://www.acnielsen.com/store.<br />

Benchmarking performance<br />

Perennial favorite topics up for debate include the efficacy of<br />

frequent shopper programs and an assessment of which elements<br />

in the category management tool kit (assortment planning,<br />

promotional planning, shelf management, category business<br />

planning, everyday low pricing, frequent shopper/loyalty<br />

programs, micro-merchandising and micro-marketing) have<br />

gained or lost favor in the calendar year.<br />

A matter of opinion<br />

While retailers and manufacturers disagreed on any number of<br />

issues ranging from the sufficiency of trade promotion dollars<br />

to the effectiveness of shelf management, there were five areas<br />

of accord. The following topics were identified by both groups<br />

as critical success factors important to their business:<br />

1. understanding consumers<br />

2. new product introductions/implementation<br />

3. category management<br />

4. promotion efficiency/effectiveness<br />

5. variety and assortment<br />

Additionally, each faction identified important subjects specific<br />

to their operations. In the case of retailers, those subjects<br />

included private label activities and customer loyalty/retention<br />

programs. In the case of manufacturers, those subjects included<br />

trade partners, vendor relationships and category management.<br />

Tailoring content<br />

With study input available to guide editorial selections, the<br />

Fall/Winter issue of Consumer Insight magazine serves up a<br />

number of articles that directly address the top-ranked concerns<br />

of retailers and manufacturers. When it comes to understanding<br />

consumers (factor 1), the publication places the two largest<br />

age cohorts in the U.S. squarely in the crosshairs—<strong>Baby</strong><br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s and Millennials.<br />

The article titled “<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> <strong>Segmentation</strong>: Eight is<br />

Enough” introduces a robust segmentation model from<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra, based on the single<br />

most influential determinant of consumer purchase behavior—<br />

household composition, and in particular, presence of<br />

children in the home.<br />

The mantra “it’s all good” describes the teen scene in the article<br />

titled “Tune into Teens” for marketers who take the time to<br />

understand the zeitgeist of Millennials and their propensity for<br />

electronic multi-tasking. While teens may not have the bank<br />

accounts to purchase big ticket items, their influence over<br />

household spending decisions is undeniable.<br />

New product intros<br />

Opening a window onto the global new product scene<br />

(factor 2), the article titled “Global Household Product Sales:<br />

Innovative Items Clean Up” analyzes the packaging, ingredient<br />

and social trends that contribute to successful new product<br />

uptake. Cleaning products with oxidizing properties swept<br />

the worldwide sales ratings, along with so-called system<br />

approaches to cleaning like the innovative Swiffer line.<br />

C.O.D.E. breakers<br />

For a comprehensive view of consumer-driven micromarketing,<br />

readers will want to spend time with the article<br />

titled “Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.”, which touches on<br />

each of the critical success factors from the Trade Promotion<br />

Practices Study. Expanded, the acronym C.O.D.E. stands for<br />

2 Fall/Winter 2006


1. Consumer Profiling—accurately captures the<br />

demographic profile of the brand’s consumer.<br />

2. Opportunity Gapping—quantifies store-level<br />

opportunities based on consumer demand potential<br />

and diagnoses the prospect.<br />

3. Dynamic Clustering—groups similar stores using<br />

multiple store attributes, including shopper demographics,<br />

the competitive set, and upside opportunity.<br />

4. Executing for the Consumer—takes findings from steps<br />

1–3 and develops store-level tactical plans, giving<br />

the field force the right information to optimize<br />

in-store presence.<br />

Forward-looking insights<br />

With winter and the annual Consumer and Market Trends<br />

Report release approaching, more than the ambient<br />

temperature is dropping. The VNU Retailer Sentiment<br />

Index (RSI) saw a continuation of the downtrend which<br />

started in January 2005.<br />

Comprising monthly polls of roughly 500 retailers about<br />

current and future economic conditions, the VNU Retailer<br />

Sentiment Index also takes into account indicators such as<br />

store openings, hiring, earnings and general economic trends,<br />

synthesizing the input into a comprehensive view of current<br />

and future conditions.<br />

Traditionally, retailers cited the competitive environment as<br />

their top concern since the inception of the RSI. By midyear<br />

2006, for the first time, the overall economy knocked<br />

competition out of the top spot.<br />

Social responsibility<br />

This year’s Consumer and Market Trends Report exhibits a<br />

decidedly altruistic bent, delivered by two articles. One article<br />

outlines the rise in organic products and the downstream<br />

influence of Wal-Mart’s green commitment on the environment.<br />

The second article discusses how corporate sustainability and<br />

consumer pressure for environmental responsibility is sweeping<br />

through board rooms.<br />

True blue<br />

Segueing from the green theme, the Consumer and Market<br />

Trends Report will also cover the subject of true blue customers<br />

in a detailed article on the subject of loyalty marketing. The<br />

article walks through a framework for integrating a broad<br />

range of data from loyalty programs and POS numbers, to<br />

demographic profiles, attitudinal studies, share of wallet and<br />

promotional responsiveness to convert regular shoppers into<br />

loyal, high value customers.<br />

Classic updates<br />

Now in its tenth year, the Consumer and Market Trends<br />

Report will include updates on classic measures of industry<br />

performance including channel blurring and category summaries.<br />

The channel blurring article investigates the impact<br />

of consolidation on channel dominance and the behavior of<br />

valuable multi-channel shoppers, while the category review<br />

article examines results from the convenience channel.<br />

Pricing it right<br />

Price compression and assortment expansion are two opposing<br />

forces that define the fast-moving consumer goods climate of<br />

today. From our custom analytical group comes a detailed<br />

discussion of a repertoire modeling approach for simulating the<br />

impact of a price change on volume, share, revenue and profit.<br />

It’s all about you<br />

By lifting the curtain on this and future Consumer Insight<br />

articles, we hope to have piqued your interest in the publication,<br />

while demonstrating that we practice what we preach.<br />

You are our readers. You are our customers. And our goal is<br />

to provide customer-centric editorial content that addresses<br />

the fundamental needs of your business.<br />

To make sure that we stay on point, you can e-mail our<br />

editor at ConsumerInsight@acnielsen.com or contact<br />

your client service representative any time to make a<br />

suggestion that will improve our core product set or<br />

thought leadership publications. We’re listening. C i<br />

3


<strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong><br />

<strong>Segmentation</strong>:<br />

Eight Is Enough<br />

by: Doug Anderson<br />

Research & Development<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Laurel Kennedy<br />

Marketing Strategy<br />

Age Lessons<br />

“The most important thing to remember about <strong>Boomer</strong>s is<br />

that they are rule breakers. Individuality over conformity is<br />

a consistent <strong>Boomer</strong> pattern. They always have done it<br />

differently than the way it was done before, and as they<br />

get older, they will continue to demand products that fit<br />

their individuality.”<br />

–From Rocking The Ages:<br />

The Yankelovich Report on Generational Marketing<br />

by J. Walker Smith & Ann Clurman<br />

Given its relative size and influence on U.S. consumer markets,<br />

surprisingly little formal, quantitative segmentation<br />

work has been conducted on <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong>s. The question<br />

remains: how to right-size the huge <strong>Boomer</strong> cohort? How<br />

many segments would capture the important, often subtle,<br />

nuances that can spell the difference between a successful<br />

new product launch or marketing campaign and a complete<br />

misfire? Turns out, eight segments is enough.<br />

Often, when shaping products or programs for <strong>Boomer</strong>s,<br />

marketers have viewed this generation as a single, monolithic<br />

entity with lockstep needs and purchasing patterns. Akin to<br />

a “big gulp” theory, this framework poured every <strong>Boomer</strong><br />

into one purchasing pool of interchangeable consumers.<br />

That theory just doesn’t hold water.<br />

At best, marketers acknowledged the sweeping 19-year age<br />

span of 1946–1964, and using a little rough justice, split the<br />

segment in half or thirds, addressing campaigns to older or<br />

younger <strong>Boomer</strong>s. In this generational approach, age serves<br />

as an overly simplistic proxy for the correct measure—<br />

household composition.<br />

Under the generations method, rather than directly measuring<br />

the elements of household composition, observed differences<br />

in purchasing behavior are wrongly attributed to some<br />

underlying, shared social/political/cultural touchpoints.<br />

That theory is out of touch with marketplace realities.<br />

■ See chart 1.<br />

Chart 1: Finding the years of the <strong>Baby</strong> Boom is pretty easy…<br />

Annual Birth Rate of the United States<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

Small cohort of young<br />

post war adults<br />

+<br />

Higher incomes and a<br />

prosperous economy<br />

=<br />

Higher consumption—<br />

especially housing, autos,<br />

homes and appliances<br />

&<br />

Lots of children<br />

10<br />

1900<br />

1914<br />

1920<br />

1926<br />

1932<br />

1938<br />

1944<br />

1950<br />

1956<br />

1962<br />

1968<br />

1974<br />

1980<br />

1986<br />

1992<br />

1998<br />

4 Fall/Winter 2006


Simply put, there is no shared cultural milieu that resonates<br />

with all <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong>s. Many age cohort members were neither<br />

born in the United States, nor grew up here, leaving the<br />

shared culture concept significantly diluted.<br />

Size matters<br />

When people hear the term <strong>Baby</strong> Boom generation, the first<br />

thing that comes to mind is its massive size. The second<br />

thing is its unabated appetite for conspicuous consumption.<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s have been tagged with superlatives since birth,<br />

re-shaping American culture and institutions to reflect their<br />

unique zeitgeist. Today, this age cohort is defined as follows:<br />

• The biggest age band in history, numbering some 77<br />

million persons<br />

Chart 2: Percent of <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> households<br />

by the behavioral consumer segments<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

Couples<br />

Leading Edge<br />

Couples<br />

Single<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

15.5<br />

22.1<br />

11.5<br />

New Family<br />

Frontiers<br />

11.3<br />

5.1<br />

9.3<br />

15.5<br />

9.8<br />

Ready to<br />

Launch<br />

Late Blooming<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

Families<br />

Leading Edge<br />

Families<br />

• The highest earners, with a median household income of<br />

$54,170; 55% greater than post-<strong>Boomer</strong>s and 61% more<br />

than pre-<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

No Kids<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Kids


Chart 3: Segmenting <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> households with<br />

children less than 18<br />

Total <strong>Baby</strong><br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> HHs<br />

with Children<br />

Smaller Families<br />

Size 2–3<br />

Larger Families<br />

Size 4+<br />

Younger<br />

Children<br />

< 12 Only<br />

Late Blooming<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Older<br />

Children<br />

12 +<br />

Ready to<br />

Launch<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

HOH<br />

Age 42–48<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

Families<br />

Leading Edge<br />

HOH<br />

Age 49–60<br />

Leading Edge<br />

Families<br />

Kid stuff<br />

Marketing to the <strong>Boomer</strong> segments with children is anything<br />

but child’s play. It requires an understanding of the nuances<br />

between the four groups. For example, highly educated Late<br />

Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s may have made the choice to start families<br />

later in life or are the by-product of divorce. As a result,<br />

Late Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s have smaller, younger families comprising<br />

one to two children under the age of 12. A single<br />

parent heads fully one-third of Late Blooming households,<br />

which also index above average for African-American and<br />

Asian ethnicities, but below average for Hispanics.<br />

Late Blooming heads of household span the entire <strong>Baby</strong><br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> age group. Since education correlates strongly with<br />

income, any attempt to divide <strong>Boomer</strong>s on the basis of age<br />

alone would clearly miss the mark here, and leave out a<br />

significant number of affluent Late Blooming households.<br />

■ See chart 3.<br />

Trailing Edge Families comprise larger, stable households<br />

of 4+ persons who have lived at the same address for more<br />

than five years. Unlike Late Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s, Trailing<br />

Edge heads of household fall into a narrow age parameter,<br />

sharing a birth date between the years 1958 and 1964.<br />

Averaging 2.5 children per household, they have far fewer<br />

(less than half as many) adult children than Leading Edge<br />

families, which appears to be a direct function of<br />

parental age.<br />

The least educated of any <strong>Boomer</strong> group, Trailing Edgers<br />

are even less educated than the post-<strong>Baby</strong> Boom cohort.<br />

Another note of internal segment consistency demarcating<br />

Trailing Edgers is the above average concentration of<br />

Hispanics populating the group, the most of any <strong>Boomer</strong><br />

sub-segment.<br />

Older, not necessarily wiser, kids<br />

Leading Edge Families feature older parents born between<br />

1946 and 1957, large households averaging 2.4 children,<br />

with approximately one “adult child” for every four children<br />

under age 18. As one might expect from the doting<br />

parents who pioneered those ubiquitous baby-on-board<br />

signs, the apron strings are proving hard to cut—or perhaps<br />

just more elastic—as young adult children bounce back to<br />

the security of home.<br />

The purse strings to Junior are even harder to untie. As a<br />

consequence, <strong>Boomer</strong> offspring are returning to the nest<br />

after college in record numbers, or remaining at home while<br />

getting their start in the working world. According to 2000<br />

U.S. Census figures, 56% of men and 43% of women in the<br />

18–24 age bracket reside with a parent, and 65% of recent<br />

college grads enjoy the largesse of Mom & Dad’s hospitality.<br />

While better educated than pre-and post-<strong>Boomer</strong>s, Leading<br />

Edge Families fall into the lower tier of academic accomplishment<br />

compared with other <strong>Boomer</strong> segments. After<br />

Trailing Edge Families, Leading Edge Families are the most<br />

Hispanic-dominant of any <strong>Boomer</strong> group and far and away<br />

the “most married.” Seven in ten Leading Edge Family<br />

households are headed by married couples.<br />

7


Chart 4: Segmenting <strong>Baby</strong> <strong>Boomer</strong> households<br />

without children<br />

Single<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

Single<br />

Person HHs<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

HOH<br />

Age 42–54<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

Couples<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Total <strong>Baby</strong><br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> HHs<br />

without Children<br />

Two<br />

Person HHs<br />

Leading Edge<br />

HOH<br />

Age 55–60<br />

Leading Edge<br />

Couples<br />

Three +<br />

Person HHs<br />

New Family<br />

Frontiers<br />

By contrast, the Ready-to-Launch segment weighs in with<br />

the lowest incidence of Hispanics and the highest incidence<br />

of African-Americans among <strong>Boomer</strong>s. All Ready-to-Launch<br />

households have at least one child over 12, and for the most<br />

part, only children over twelve, skewing toward the late<br />

teens. The Ready-to-Launch segment splits roughly in half<br />

between couples with one child and single parents with one<br />

or two children. Heads of household can be any age within<br />

the <strong>Boomer</strong> bandwidth, and there are few adult children<br />

in view.<br />

Adults only<br />

Apparently Single <strong>Boomer</strong>s hit the books in college, tying<br />

Late Bloomers for the title of “most educated.” Some 41%<br />

of Single <strong>Boomer</strong>s never opted for marriage, and established<br />

single households. Half of the Single segment unpacked<br />

their bags five or more years ago and still call the same<br />

residence home today. ■ See chart 4.<br />

Working<br />

Retirements<br />

Work long and prosper. That’s the new mantra of the <strong>Boomer</strong><br />

generation as it edges toward Social Security eligibility and<br />

retirement age. So hold on to those gold watches, because the<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s plan on retiring the traditional concept of retirement<br />

with a characteristically bold move that will surprise detractors<br />

and benefit—rather than hijack—the economic future of the<br />

generations that follow.<br />

The idea is simplicity itself: keep on working, earning and<br />

contributing to the economy for as long as one is able and<br />

enabled. Driven by a host of motivations ranging from selfactualization<br />

to financial need, many <strong>Boomer</strong>s reject the idea of<br />

a leisurely retirement and plan to work well into their 70s and<br />

beyond. In a 2006 Merrill Lynch study, 71% of adults envision<br />

working in retirement, and half of those said they intended to<br />

work as long as they were physically and intellectually able.<br />

Companies need the workers<br />

While the statistics vary dramatically (estimates of a labor shortage<br />

as early as 2010 range from 800,000 workers to almost<br />

10 million), the inescapable fact remains that the “baby bust”<br />

generation numbers 11 million fewer bodies than the <strong>Boomer</strong>s.<br />

Even with productivity gains, process changes, outsourcing<br />

options and immigration inflows, there simply may not be<br />

enough workers to fill available jobs. The obvious solution:<br />

retain the ones you’ve got.<br />

Progressive employers are experimenting with any number of<br />

riffs on the traditional consulting contracts or part-time positions<br />

available to retired employees. Among the more innovative<br />

working retirement ideas:<br />

• capability-specific personnel banks of skilled temporary<br />

workers;<br />

• roadblocking schedules, where retirees rotate between time<br />

on/off the job for a pre-determined time increment (e.g.,<br />

three months on/off);<br />

• job sharing, reviving what <strong>Boomer</strong> women elevated to an art<br />

form; two individuals sharing a job, salary and performance<br />

expectations;<br />

8 Fall/Winter 2006


Trailing Edge Couples carved their own path on the matrimonial<br />

front, and report the highest rate of unmarried<br />

partners living together. Trailing Edge Couples typically<br />

are headed by a person born in the 1952–1964 period,<br />

who have occupied the same house for the past five years,<br />

find themselves situated in the bottom <strong>Boomer</strong> tier on the<br />

education dimension, and have fewer than expected<br />

Hispanic and African-American members.<br />

The social vanguard<br />

Leading Edge Couples, with a head of household born<br />

between 1946 and 1951, represent the first group of the<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> generation to serve as social change agents. One<br />

of the top three best-educated <strong>Boomer</strong> segments, Leading<br />

Edge Couples exhibit just half the unmarried rate of Trailing<br />

Edge Couples and two-thirds have shared a residence for<br />

five or more years. Less ethnically diverse than other<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> strata, Leading Edge Couples report a low incidence<br />

of Hispanics and the lowest African-American incidence of<br />

all <strong>Boomer</strong> groups.<br />

One of the most interesting segments to emerge from the<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> study was the New Family Frontiers faction, characterized<br />

by three or more adults sharing a household. The<br />

typical New Family Frontiers household encompasses 1.1<br />

children between the ages of 18 and 24, with 40% claiming<br />

another resident relative such as a parent (1/3 of such family<br />

units) or adult siblings.<br />

From an economic perspective, it is worthwhile to note that<br />

54% of New Family Frontiers households have three or<br />

more employed workers in the home. Among the highest<br />

earning households, New Family Frontiers do a pretty<br />

good job of hanging on to what they make, second only<br />

to Leading Edge Couples on the savings front.<br />

■ See chart 5 on page 10.<br />

• seasonal positions that follow employees who split time<br />

between two geographical locations (e.g., New York and<br />

Florida);<br />

• sampling arrangements that enable a worker to move<br />

across departments for a new challenge.<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s need the money<br />

It’s a good thing that <strong>Boomer</strong>s say they want to work, because<br />

it’s clear that many will have to work for financial reasons. One<br />

factor that impacted even diligent savers was the stock market<br />

decline of 2001–2003 that eradicated roughly $7–8 trillion in<br />

shareholder wealth, much of it held by <strong>Boomer</strong>s.<br />

In the process, the dot-com crash ate away some $279 billion<br />

in 401(k) assets and huge chunks of other retirement savings.<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s dialed-in to the nuances of finance recognize that<br />

401(k) and IRA/retirement money statements can create a false<br />

sense of wealth, since these amounts will be federally taxed on<br />

withdrawal (with the exception of Roth IRAs).<br />

Everybody wins<br />

Working <strong>Boomer</strong> retirees will have more discretionary income<br />

to continue fueling the economic engine, less need to draw<br />

down savings and liquidate investments, and can readily fill the<br />

emerging labor gap by staying employed. Meaningful employment<br />

enables critical knowledge transfer from highly skilled<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s to other workers, and keeps older employees mentally<br />

and physically engaged.<br />

At the same time, employers access a labor pool of proven<br />

workers with the flexibility to calibrate hours to match demand.<br />

In a Center for Retirement Research survey, older workers<br />

earned consistently higher marks than younger counterparts<br />

from employers for their “knowledge of procedures and other<br />

job aspects” and “ability to interact with customers”. Overall,<br />

older workers were seen as more productive based on their<br />

accumulated institutional knowledge and efficient work habits.<br />

Retailers like CVS Pharmacy, Home Depot and Borders have<br />

already tapped the retiree talent vein with outstanding results.<br />

When it comes to the workplace, some things apparently do<br />

get better with age.<br />

9


Chart 5: New family configurations have new numbers of workers<br />

100<br />

80<br />

Percent of HHs<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Post <strong>Baby</strong> Boom<br />

Late Blooming <strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

Trailing Edge Families<br />

Leading Edge Families<br />

Ready to Launch<br />

Single <strong>Boomer</strong>s<br />

Trailing Edge Couples<br />

Leading Edge Couples<br />

New Family Frontiers<br />

Pre <strong>Baby</strong> Boom<br />

No Workers One Worker Two Workers Three or More Workers<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Gray matters<br />

The shift towards adult-only households will continue as<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s age. By 2007, fewer than 30% of <strong>Boomer</strong> households<br />

will have children under 18 at home. By 2010, that<br />

number will have declined again to just 20%. By 2014,<br />

fewer than 10% of all <strong>Boomer</strong> households will include<br />

children under 18. Americans are getting older, living<br />

longer and having fewer children.<br />

An 85+ population growing eight times faster than the<br />

country as a whole will throw a new wrinkle into longstanding<br />

assumptions which form the underpinnings of<br />

social services programs. In 1995, Federal spending per<br />

child under 18 years of age was $1,693 per child. For the<br />

same period, per capita spending on each 65+ adult was<br />

$15,636. The combined effect of population trends and<br />

federal spending patterns results in a double whammy—<br />

fewer wage earners paying into a system serving an<br />

exploding population base.<br />

Golden, global concerns<br />

Not only is the U.S. population aging, the very old component<br />

is growing at an even faster rate. In 2000, there were<br />

approximately 72,000 centenarians in the U.S. By 2050,<br />

using mid-range Census Bureau estimates, that number will<br />

increase fourteen-fold, exceeding 834,000. To get a relative<br />

sense of size, it would take a city as large as Detroit to<br />

house all the people older than 100 at the mid-century point.<br />

Concerns about aging are not confined within the borders<br />

of the United States. Worldwide, the current ratio between<br />

the young (under 20) and the old (over 65) is roughly 3:1.<br />

By 2050, that ratio will recalibrate to equilibrium at 1:1.<br />

At that point, older people will outnumber younger ones<br />

for the first time in recorded history.<br />

Spending shifts<br />

Consumption and spending patterns mirror changes in the<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> demographic. Food away from home eats up a<br />

larger share of <strong>Boomer</strong> budgets when the need to stage a<br />

nightly family dinner with the kids goes away. Beer and<br />

wine top off the shopping list for those <strong>Boomer</strong>s furthest<br />

from child-rearing responsibilities. Alcoholic beverage marketers<br />

can expect to tap into this bottled-up demand in the<br />

future as consumption levels are expected to maintain even<br />

as <strong>Boomer</strong>s age.<br />

When it comes to home improvements, <strong>Boomer</strong>s gravitate<br />

toward household textiles and furniture, outspending other<br />

segments. Staying connected to friends and families is a<br />

10 Fall/Winter 2006


It is not uncommon to find a <strong>Boomer</strong> parent liquidating<br />

retirement savings or mortgaging their home to subsidize<br />

their child’s college tuition. Despite years of denying themselves<br />

luxuries, they will indulge an offspring’s demands for<br />

a car, expensive vacation or the latest and greatest in consumer<br />

electronics.<br />

A perfect storm<br />

The graying of America presents a number of questions such<br />

as the prospective impact of impending retirements on:<br />

1. financial markets, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s prepare to liquidate equity<br />

holdings and supplement retirement savings;<br />

2. real estate markets, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s prepare to trade down<br />

from large homes—a flurry of sales may add momentum<br />

to the imploding housing market;<br />

3. employment issues, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s exit the workplace and<br />

the baby bust generation comes up 11 million people<br />

short of available openings;<br />

4. consumer spending, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s retire or are forced into<br />

second careers, part-time or lower paying positions;<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong> imperative, accounting for their 50% higher spending<br />

rate on cellular phones and pagers. Plugged in to electronic<br />

entertainment media, <strong>Boomer</strong> spending rates outpace<br />

the average for audio equipment, televisions and radios.<br />

The <strong>Boomer</strong> obsession with health and wellness extends to<br />

their extended family—including the four-footed, finned and<br />

winged members. <strong>Boomer</strong>s willingly open their wallets for<br />

veterinary care and other pet services such as grooming and<br />

doggie day care.<br />

Family finances<br />

The <strong>Boomer</strong> relationship with money is complicated and<br />

convoluted. Shaped by parental stories of the Depression<br />

and WWII deprivation, <strong>Boomer</strong>s learned to respect money,<br />

save money, value work over leisure and savings over debt.<br />

They look askance at credit issuers who mail out unsolicited<br />

cards to college students, in the hopes they’ll be used. All<br />

in all, one could say <strong>Boomer</strong>s are a fiscally conservative<br />

bunch—except when it comes to their kids.<br />

5. healthcare system, as <strong>Boomer</strong>s begin to experience the<br />

inevitable decline of physical vigor and the onset of<br />

chronic illnesses like high blood pressure and diabetes.<br />

An uncertain outcome<br />

Some pundits ponder these issues and see the makings of<br />

a perfect storm capable of capsizing the U.S. economy.<br />

Others see the opportunity to extend the consumer use-life<br />

by extending the <strong>Boomer</strong> work-life from an arbitrary retirement<br />

at age 65, to an open-ended employment contract that<br />

keeps people working, and earning, for as long as they are<br />

physically able. ■ See sidebar on “Working Retirements”<br />

on pages 8 and 9.<br />

Society has never been asked to solve a socioeconomic equation<br />

with so many unknown variables before. There simply<br />

have never been so many old people, living so long and<br />

staying so healthy.<br />

From a marketing perspective, one thing is certain. Older<br />

<strong>Boomer</strong>s represent both a viable market and one too large<br />

to ignore. C i<br />

11


Global Household<br />

Product Sales:<br />

Innovative Items Clean Up<br />

by: Jane Perrin<br />

Communications<br />

ACNielsen Global Services<br />

Mark Chesney<br />

Communications<br />

ACNielsen Global Services<br />

Analyzing household products on a global scale involves a<br />

pretty big bucket of categories and countries. What’s Hot<br />

Around the Globe: Insights on Growth in Household<br />

Products, one in a series of ACNielsen reports on the<br />

fastest-growing products and category drivers, encompasses<br />

66 markets and 29 household product areas.<br />

Findings surfaced by the study identified four major trends<br />

responsible for growth: new product innovation, health and<br />

wellness concerns, convenient delivery systems and developing<br />

country contributions. Aggregated 2005 sales growth<br />

remained consistent with other reports in the series covering<br />

food and beverages and personal care products, showing<br />

4% growth.<br />

Regional results<br />

On an upbeat note, there were several regional pockets of<br />

double-digit growth. Emerging markets posted a 13%<br />

increase and Latin America an 11% jump in household<br />

product sales, leading Asia Pacific, North America and<br />

Europe results. Romania and Russia, both classified as<br />

emerging markets, reported impressive category expansion<br />

rates of 25%. ■ See chart 1.<br />

The complexity of dissecting regional and country contributions<br />

is illustrated by Asia Pacific, a sector comprising both<br />

emerging and developed markets, where the modest 4%<br />

gain in Japan blended with the momentum of a 14% jump<br />

in China. Turning from percentages to the absolute dollar<br />

metric, Asia Pacific achieved the largest dollar value growth<br />

overall at just under $U.S. 1 billion in 2005.<br />

Chart 1: Global findings<br />

Value Sales (U.S.$M) in<br />

Household Products*<br />

Global Growth in<br />

Household Products* (2004–2005)<br />

Global (66)<br />

Global (66)<br />

4%<br />

Europe (19)<br />

Europe (19)<br />

0%<br />

North America (2)<br />

North America (2)<br />

3%<br />

Asia Pacific (15)<br />

Asia Pacific (15)<br />

6%<br />

Latin America (12)<br />

Latin America (12)<br />

11%<br />

Emerging Markets (18)<br />

Emerging Markets (18)<br />

13%<br />

0 $50,000 $100,000<br />

0%<br />

5%<br />

10%<br />

15%<br />

*Based on number of countries measured (Number of countries in parentheses)<br />

12 Fall/Winter 2006


Leading categories<br />

Among the 29 categories studied, only nine grew faster than<br />

the global average, five paced the 4% rate; and the rest<br />

lagged behind. In prior studies, the fastest-growing categories<br />

were also among the smallest in dollar sales. That was not<br />

the case in 2005. Five categories in the fastest-growing top<br />

nine—garbage bags, household cleaners, air fresheners,<br />

insect control and fabric softener—also registered among<br />

the top 10 categories in value sales. ■ See chart 2.<br />

Chart 2: Only nine categories grew<br />

faster than 4%<br />

Top No. of Markets Category Category<br />

Growing Growing/ Growth Rate Growth Value<br />

Categories Measured 04–05 $000<br />

1. Abrasive Cleaning Pads 13 of 23 13% 129,215<br />

2. Disinfectants 18 of 26 13% 81,148<br />

3. Garbage Bags* 15 of 19 8% 209,806<br />

4. Laundry Stain Remover/Booster 30 of 37 6% 82,876<br />

5. Household Cleaners* 55 of 65 6% 338,553<br />

6. Air Fresheners* 50 of 61 5% 244,081<br />

7. Insect Control* 28 of 47 5% 168,489<br />

8. Plastic Storage Bags 28 of 34 5% 78,040<br />

9. Fabric Softener* 44 of 58 5% 255,008<br />

*Also among the largest 10 categories in value sales<br />

The remaining top performers included abrasive cleaning<br />

pads, which shared top billing with disinfectants at 13%,<br />

laundry stain removers/boosters at 6% and plastic storage<br />

bags at 5%.<br />

Performance enhancers<br />

On closer examination, specific sub-segments accounted for<br />

the strong overall showing in some categories. For example,<br />

battery-operated freshening systems powered up a 191%<br />

sales increase, and air sanitizing sprays vaporized the<br />

category with their supercharged growth in sales of 36%.<br />

Similarly, the power cleaning sub-segment of household<br />

cleaners (75%) and those products with oxidizing ingredients<br />

for stain removal (11%) wiped up the rest of the category.<br />

The cleaning system concept debuted by Swiffer, comprising<br />

a re-useable element such as a handle with disposable<br />

cloths, sponges or brushes, has been syndicated to other categories<br />

including bathroom cleaners, toilet bowl cleaners,<br />

dusters, air care and insect control. The jury is still out on<br />

whether or not the consumer uptake on systems and onestep,<br />

multi-use products will successfully cross category<br />

boundaries.<br />

Worthy of consideration<br />

Consumer health concerns gave a shot in the arm to household<br />

cleaner and disinfectant category results. Both recorded<br />

higher than average growth rates, which may indicate a shift<br />

in the type of products used to clean around the world.<br />

While the discussion to date has surrounded growth rates, it<br />

is worthwhile to note that even though laundry detergent<br />

only expanded at the average pace, it represents the largest<br />

category overall and contributed more than any other category<br />

to global growth.<br />

continued on page 16<br />

Chart 3: Top 10 categories and growth rate by region<br />

Europe<br />

Total Household Care (0%)<br />

North America<br />

Total Household Care (3%)<br />

Asia Pacific<br />

Total Household Care (6%)<br />

Latin America<br />

Total Household Care (11%)<br />

Emerging Markets<br />

Total Household Care (13%)<br />

Brooms, Brushes, Mops (10%)<br />

Disinfectants (23%)<br />

Auto Dish Detergent (17%)<br />

Abrasive Cleaning Pads (74%)<br />

Fabric Fresheners (277%)<br />

Disinfectants (3%)<br />

Laundry Stain Remover (12%)<br />

Auto Dish Additives (16%)<br />

Laundry Stain Remover (36%)<br />

Carpet/Rug Cleaner (37%)<br />

Household Cleaners (3%)<br />

Garbage Bags (12%)<br />

Abrasive Cleaning Pads (14%)<br />

Air Fresheners (16%)<br />

Waste Pipe Openers (37%)<br />

Laundry Stain Remover (3%)<br />

Abrasive Cleaning Pads (7%)<br />

Fabric Fresheners (10%)<br />

Bleach/Ammonia (15%)<br />

Air Fresheners (23%)<br />

Garbage Bags (3%)<br />

Toilet Care (7%)<br />

Air Fresheners (10%)<br />

Plastic Storage Bags (14%)<br />

Laundry Water Softeners (21%)<br />

Auto Dish Detergent (2%)<br />

Kitchen Paper/Towel (7%)<br />

Plastic Storage Bags (9%)<br />

Fabric Softener (14%)<br />

Auto Dish Detergent (20%)<br />

Auto Dish Additives (2%)<br />

Air Fresheners (5%)<br />

Fabric Softener (9%)<br />

Insect Control (13%)<br />

Cleaning Cloths/Sponges (19%)<br />

Plastic Storage Bags (2%)<br />

Plastic Storage Bags (5%)<br />

Batteries (8%)<br />

Aluminum Foil (13%)<br />

Household Cleaners (17%)<br />

Batteries (2%)<br />

Household Cleaners (5%)<br />

Garbage Bags (8%)<br />

Toilet Care (12%)<br />

Fabric Softener (16%)<br />

Waste Pipe Openers (2%)<br />

Aluminum Foil (4%)<br />

Brooms, Brushes, Mops (8%)<br />

Household Cleaners (11%)<br />

Laundry Stain Remover (16%)<br />

14 Fall/Winter 2006


Stepping Outside Your<br />

Own Borders?<br />

Use the right marketing information to<br />

make your expansion decisions.<br />

Contact ACNielsen Global Services at 847-605-5904.<br />

Global Services


Global Household Product Trends continued from page 14<br />

Different strokes<br />

The top ten categories within each region differ significantly,<br />

and none of the overall fastest-growing products shows up<br />

in every regional ranking. In Europe, only the leading category—<br />

brooms, brushes and mops—charted 2005 results<br />

that bettered the global average. ■ See chart 3, page 14.<br />

In North America, disinfectants killed off any competition<br />

in the top ten with a 23% annual growth rate. Only the<br />

laundry stain remover and garbage bag categories also posted<br />

double digit regional growth at 12%.<br />

Automatic dish detergents and automatic dish additives<br />

floated to the top of the Asia Pacific top ten list. In Latin<br />

America, every top ten contender boasted double-digit<br />

growth, but abrasive cleaning pad results scoured all comers<br />

with a whopping 74%. Laundry stain removers were a<br />

distant second in the line-up at 36%.<br />

The Emerging Markets’ winning entry, fabric fresheners,<br />

was in a class by itself with a 277% annual growth rate.<br />

Carpet/rug cleaners and waste pipe openers trailed with<br />

strong 37% increases.<br />

Coming clean<br />

Abrasive cleaning pads, the runaway category growth winner<br />

in Latin America, owes its phenomenal success to a single<br />

country: Brazil. This one country accounted for more<br />

than 95% of category sales, divided among three brands.<br />

Aggressive media support generated a 45% increase for the<br />

leading brand, with the number two and three brands each<br />

expanding by more than 200%.<br />

Global brand dominance was more diffused than in Latin<br />

America, with the top three brands comprising 65% of<br />

category sales and private label brands absorbing an additional<br />

16%.<br />

Hygienic habits<br />

Germ-aphobic Americans kicked their cleaning standards<br />

up a notch, striving for a sanitized—versus merely clean—<br />

household. This microbe-free goal resulted in a 23% regional<br />

category sales increase. As always, convenience played into<br />

consumer decision-making, explaining why 80% of the<br />

absolute dollar growth in U.S. sales (excluding Wal-Mart)<br />

derived from a 60% increase in wipes.<br />

Disinfectant wipes, measured in only five markets, mopped<br />

up consumer dollars on a global basis for a 35% growth in<br />

sales. Their counterpart, disinfectant sprays, expanded at<br />

an average 10% rate in 12 of 19 markets measured. Brand<br />

sales are so heavily concentrated in this category that three<br />

brands accounted for 71% of dollar sales on a global basis.<br />

It’s worthy of note that although only 8% of sales can be<br />

ascribed to private label brands, their sales expanded by<br />

26% in 2005.<br />

Tying up sales<br />

Garbage bag sales expanded at an 8% annual rate, twice the<br />

global tempo, with North America the sole region to wrap the<br />

year with double digit growth (12%). For such a seemingly<br />

mundane category, garbage bags represent an endless source<br />

of innovative benefits from anti-odor attributes to a host of<br />

tying options to stretch-and-flex fabrics that won’t rip.<br />

New features, coupled with raw material cost increases for<br />

the oil-based resins used in manufacturing, combined to<br />

justify the higher retail prices that raised dollar value sales.<br />

Private label products captured a significant share of<br />

16 Fall/Winter 2006


garbage bag sales (40%), almost enveloping the 49% sales<br />

component contributed by the top three brands. Both private<br />

label and branded offerings increased by 8%.<br />

Spotless outcomes<br />

Both the pre-wash and in-wash products that compose the<br />

laundry stain remover category captured double-digit sales<br />

in three of five regions, with four of five regions ranking<br />

the category among the top ten. Tepid Asia Pacific results<br />

of 1% growth dampened the overall category average.<br />

“Oxi” products cleaned up in the category, spreading in<br />

seven of the 10 markets measured at an 11% overall rate.<br />

No-wash stain removers, including pen delivery systems,<br />

achieved explosive sales of 200% over the prior year. Key<br />

manufacturers virtually own the category, with the top three<br />

brands accounting for 72% of sales.<br />

Shipshape results<br />

Convenient, effective household cleaners were swept off<br />

shelves by tidy consumers, with Emerging Market and<br />

Latin America households setting the pace. The two<br />

attributes dominating product selection were convenience<br />

and effectiveness.<br />

Major multinationals entered the power cleaning competitive<br />

fray, where sales velocity reached 75% last year. Sprayons<br />

earned high marks on the convenience criteria, and at<br />

11% represented one of the fastest-growing segments.<br />

Product proliferation served to modulate the trend toward<br />

brand dominance observed in other categories, with the top<br />

three branded household cleaners garnering 43%, private<br />

label 9% and other products 48% of sales.<br />

Something in the air<br />

Air freshener sales caught a favorable updraft in Emerging<br />

Markets, Latin America and Asia Pacific, where 2005 consumption<br />

increased by 23%, 16% and 10%, respectively.<br />

Recent new product entries have kept sales aloft and in the<br />

top-ten tiers for four of five regions studied.<br />

Battery air fresheners, unveiled just last year, saw 2005 sales<br />

rocket into the stratosphere at a 150% rate. Air sanitizers<br />

eliminated odors and obstacles to consumer trial, hitting a<br />

respectable 36% growth number. Air freshener candle sales,<br />

reinvigorated by the introduction of scented oils, achieved<br />

an 8% growth rate, double that of the global average.<br />

Abuzz with potential<br />

Insect control, the eighth fastest-growing category, owed<br />

its 5% expansion to Latin America, a region where bugs<br />

are more than a nuisance; they carry potentially harmful<br />

diseases such as dengue fever and malaria. Product refinements,<br />

such as electrically-powered items, command a price<br />

premium reflected in sales results.<br />

The North American no-growth scenario masks a 7% spike<br />

from Canada, possibly reflecting that country’s concern with<br />

the mosquito-borne West Nile virus. Private Label products<br />

barely show up on the radar screen in the insect control<br />

Chart 4: Private Label growth by category<br />

Private Label Private Label Manufacturer<br />

Product Area Share Growth Growth<br />

1 Aluminum Foil 43% 0% 3%<br />

2 Plastic Storage Bags* 41% 8% 3%<br />

3 Garbage Bags* 40% 8% 8%<br />

4 Kitchen Paper/Towel 28% 5% 3%<br />

5 Cleaning Cloths/Sponges 26% 7% 1%<br />

6 Auto Dish Additives 22% 1% 4%<br />

7 Plastic Wrap 19% 4% -3%<br />

8 Auto Dish Detergent 18% 4% 4%<br />

9 Bleach/Ammonia 17% 4% 5%<br />

10 Abrasive Cleaning Pads* 16% 4% 15%<br />

11 Laundry Water Softeners 16% -18% 6%<br />

12 Toilet Care 12% 4% 2%<br />

13 Brooms, Brushes, Mops 11% 18% 1%<br />

14 Fabric Softener* 11% 4% 5%<br />

15 Batteries 10% 3% 2%<br />

16 Hand Dish Detergent 10% 5% 4%<br />

17 Household Cleaners* 9% 5% 6%<br />

18 Disinfectant* 8% 26% 12%<br />

19 Oven Cleaners 7% 5% -1%<br />

20 Laundry Starch 7% -16% 0%<br />

21 Carpet/Rug Cleaner 6% 6% -4%<br />

22 Laundry Detergent 6% 1% 4%<br />

23 Air Fresheners* 6% 1% 6%<br />

24 Laundry Stain Remover* 5% 16% 6%<br />

25 Fabric Fresheners 5% -5% -8%<br />

26 Furniture Polish 5% 6% -4%<br />

27 Waste Pipe Openers 4% 13% 2%<br />

28 Floor Polish/Wax 2% -12% -2%<br />

29 Insect Control* 2% -4% 5%<br />

*Fastest Growing Categories<br />

Manufacturer brands growing faster than Private Label<br />

17


category with a miniscule 2% of sales; the top three brands<br />

and all others split the rest of the category sales evenly at<br />

49% apiece.<br />

In the bag<br />

Plastic storage bag sales did slightly better at 5% than the<br />

global all-product average, with pockets of strength in Latin<br />

America (14%) and Asia Pacific (9%). Interestingly, private<br />

label sales for this category (8%) bested manufacturer brand<br />

performance of 3%. The private label preference was clearly<br />

strongest in Europe, North America and Emerging Markets,<br />

but picking up in Asia Pacific.<br />

A soft touch<br />

New product formulations, improved distribution, increased<br />

advertising penetration and price reductions contributed to<br />

the fabric softener category sales increases in Emerging<br />

Markets (16%) and Latin America (14%). Of note, in<br />

Mexico, products such as Downy Libre Enjuague (Rinse-<br />

Free) reduced the hassle factor for consumers who hand<br />

wash by eliminating the rinse step.<br />

The top three brands occupy the number 1, 2 and 3 positions<br />

across the majority of markets studied and together<br />

claim 68% of category sales.<br />

Commodity concerns<br />

While private label offerings earned a 12% share of global<br />

household product sales, that penetration level underperformed<br />

the norm reported in the ACNielsen 2005 study,<br />

The Power of Private Label. However, the private label<br />

expansion velocity equaled that of manufacturer branded<br />

household products (4%), so private label neither gain nor<br />

lost ground in relative terms.<br />

Private label share and growth figures varied widely by category,<br />

from a 43% share in aluminum foil with zero growth,<br />

to an 8% share in disinfectants with a 26% growth rate.<br />

Regional considerations such as economic development and<br />

lifestyles influenced product uptake and utilization figures.<br />

■ See chart 4, page 17.<br />

Home basics<br />

Household products weighed in with overall global growth<br />

rates consistent with other fast moving consumer product<br />

areas. There is no denying the influence of Emerging<br />

Markets as a factor in household product category growth,<br />

alongside a continuous stream of product innovations that<br />

keep consumers engaged and prices on the rise. Uniformly,<br />

consumers across the world gravitate to products that deliver<br />

against two key benefits: value and convenience. C i<br />

About the Study<br />

This survey of Household Products included 66 markets around the world and 29 categories. These 66 markets account for<br />

more than 90% of the world’s GDP and over 75% of the world’s population. The markets have been grouped regionally into<br />

five areas: Asia Pacific, Emerging Markets, Europe, Latin America and North America. For the purposes of this study, Mexico<br />

has been included in Latin America.<br />

ACNielsen analyzed data across 29 Household Products categories, comparing year-ending data from December 2005 with<br />

December 2004. Within these 29 categories, ACNielsen reviewed subcategories of products, which for the purposes of this study<br />

are called “segments.” This study looks at some of these key segments to understand the changes impacting the categories.<br />

New to the study this year is the inclusion and analysis of private label products within each category. ACNielsen Global<br />

Services intends to include private label information in future reports on product areas, to show the impact of both manufacturer<br />

and retailer products as drivers of consumer purchasing behavior.<br />

As with Global Services’ other studies, this report is based on purchasing information from retailers in grocery, drug and mass<br />

merchandise outlets and generally excludes kiosks or vending machines. In a few markets, sales from convenience stores<br />

may be included. Within the United States, data from the ACNielsen Homescan consumer panel service has been included<br />

to provide a total market read that includes Wal-Mart information.<br />

18 Fall/Winter 2006


Identify and Target High Opportunity<br />

Beauty Care Consumer Segments<br />

Look at the world of beauty care through the<br />

eyes of a consumer and what do you see? A<br />

world filled with choice. As new products and<br />

efficacy claims proliferate and the retail landscape<br />

becomes increasingly fragmented, marketers<br />

are challenged to find a complete measure<br />

of their brands’ performance and identify<br />

high opportunity consumer segments and new<br />

product opportunities.<br />

ACNielsen’s Beauty Care Panel provides<br />

the most complete, accurate and actionable<br />

view of beauty care consumers across all<br />

categories and channels. From massmarket<br />

to high-end/prestige brands and from<br />

supermarkets to specialty beauty stores, the<br />

Homescan ® Beauty Care Panel provides data<br />

at the most granular level to help you effectively<br />

target consumers and maximize sales opportunities<br />

in these channels.<br />

The Beauty Care Panel will help you:<br />

• Identify high opportunity distribution channels and quantify the<br />

sales opportunity of gaining distribution there.<br />

• Identify “white space” in the marketplace and quantify new product<br />

development opportunities.<br />

• Evaluate new product performance and quantify cannibalization.<br />

• Target high opportunity consumers and monitor your performance<br />

across all channels.<br />

The Beauty Care Panel gives you:<br />

• The most comprehensive measurement of Beauty Care purchase<br />

behavior across all channels in 32 beauty care categories, including:<br />

–Make-up/Color Cosmetics<br />

–Facial Skin Care<br />

–Hand & Body Skin Care<br />

–Self-Tanning<br />

–Bath & Shower<br />

–Men’s & Women’s Fragrance<br />

• The Spectra BehaviorScape Framework, which helps you<br />

increase the effectiveness of your marketing dollars.<br />

To learn more about the Beauty Care Panel, please contact your ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services representative<br />

or visit our web site at www.acnielsen.com.


Tune Into Teens:<br />

Test Your Teen Aptitude<br />

by: Tom Pirovano<br />

Retailing Insights<br />

ACNielsen<br />

If you’ve never visited YouTube.com, listened to Gnarls<br />

Barkley or used the acronym ROTFL while instant messaging,<br />

then find yourself a teenager and get educated. Today’s<br />

younger generation, typically called Millennials (born<br />

between 1980 and 2000), represent a group of wellconnected,<br />

over-stimulated, media-savvy consumers who<br />

are open-minded, optimistic and well-educated. They<br />

represent the future. Tune in to what drives this very diverse<br />

group of consumers and you will not only score points on<br />

the “uber-cool” chart, but will also deliver messaging that<br />

resonates with the world they live in.<br />

Test your teen aptitude<br />

If you are thinking that teens do as teens did, then think<br />

again. While it is true that all teens go through the same<br />

growing pains, history tells us that each generation leaves<br />

behind its own distinctive mark (see U.S. Teens Through<br />

the Decades on page 24). To test your knowledge of today’s<br />

teen market, see if you can answer the following questions:<br />

1. Who is one of the lead singers for the Black Eyed Peas?<br />

2. Who said, “Don’t be jealous that I’ve been chatting<br />

online with babes all day”?<br />

3. Who hosted MTV’s 2006 Video Music Awards?<br />

4. What is an emoticon?<br />

5. Who is known for the phrase, “That’s Hot”?<br />

6. What is the starting price for a Tracfone?<br />

7. Billie Joe Armstrong is the lead singer of which band?<br />

So how did you do? If you were able to answer 8 out of<br />

the 10 questions, then you are either: a) the parent of a<br />

teenager, b) an actual teenager, c) a teenager wannabe, or<br />

d) a superbly in-sync teen marketer. However, if you are<br />

like most of us and had some trouble, then it is time to<br />

brush up your knowledge of this influential and lucrative<br />

market segment.<br />

A moving target<br />

Teens are a moving target. They were born and raised during<br />

a digitized age where change happens rapidly. Born into the<br />

MTV generation where the rally cry was “I want my MTV”,<br />

they have learned that what they want, they get. In their<br />

world, everything is immediate. From instant messaging to<br />

microwave meals, instant gratification is their mantra.<br />

Millennials are the first generation of true multi-taskers,<br />

easily balancing e-mail, text messaging, music downloads,<br />

homework and a strict schedule of sporting and other<br />

activities, simultaneously. This generation is more adept at<br />

communications than any of its predecessors. The wireless<br />

Internet is their central nervous system, and simply put, they<br />

just don’t need much else.<br />

If they’re that connected, then connecting with teens should<br />

be simple, right? Not necessarily. While it may seem easy to<br />

develop a systematic marketing plan (if teens = computers,<br />

then website advertising = success), connecting in the right<br />

places at the right time to the right audience is a challenge<br />

at best.<br />

8. What is Naruto?<br />

9. Who is Shiloh?<br />

10.Who are two main characters on “Degrassi the Next<br />

Generation”?<br />

Answers: 1. Will.I.Am or Fergie; 2. Kip Dynamite; 3. Jack Black; 4. Emotion Icon =) made using<br />

punctuation or type; 5. Paris Hilton; 6. $29.99; 7. Green Day; 8. Japanese anime series; 9. Daughter<br />

of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie; 10. Emma Nelson, Jimmy Brooks.<br />

20 Fall/Winter 2006


Equally different<br />

All teens are not alike, and grouping them together could be<br />

a roadmap for disaster. Take, for example, a typical eighth<br />

grader compared with a college student. While Disney’s<br />

“High School Musical” is all the rage for one, the other is<br />

much more engaged by the latest drama on MTV’s “The<br />

Real World.”<br />

And don’t discount the hugely important gender differences.<br />

Anybody with kids knows how different boys are from girls.<br />

Therefore, when analyzing teens, boys and girls need to be<br />

viewed separately. For example, girls believe that they are<br />

more grown-up than boys, and spend their money on very<br />

different things, such as jewelry and clothing, while boys’<br />

interests trend toward games and electronics. However, both<br />

spend money on music and movies, which increases as kids<br />

shift from the 12–14 age bracket to the 15–17 one.<br />

It is also important to realize that “what’s hot” can be<br />

polarizing, because for each teen fad with adoring fans,<br />

there is a subset of teens who simply hate it. Finding a teen<br />

idol as a spokesperson for a brand could divide an audience.<br />

For each loyal fan of Justin Timberlake, there is another<br />

teen who simply abhors him. Interestingly, this love/hate<br />

relationship seems to be more common with the “beautiful<br />

people” than with stars like John Heder or Jack Black, who<br />

garner more universal appeal.<br />

Stay ahead of the curve<br />

For the most part, young people take their cues from those<br />

a few years older than themselves for trends. This may be<br />

why the Harry Potter books and movies which feature teens<br />

have their strongest appeal to younger children. Or why<br />

movies with a PG-13 rating are more enticing to teens. Or<br />

why Paris Hilton, who is in her mid-twenties, is a fashion<br />

icon for many teenage girls.<br />

Whether the new fashion is Crocs or Lacoste, whether the<br />

latest video craze is Nintendo DS Lite or GameTap, you<br />

can be sure of one thing: what’s hot today is not tomorrow.<br />

Rather than focusing on what’s hot right now, it is more<br />

important to develop tools and approaches to monitor and<br />

anticipate changes.<br />

For example, tap into the fickle world of teen trends by<br />

checking out websites such as Billboard.com for the most<br />

popular ringtones, which btw, as of this writing, is the<br />

Nintendo Super Mario Brothers Theme by Koji Kondo, or<br />

the hottest digital songs (Fergie’s London Bridge), or number<br />

one album (the self-named Danity Kane), or top single<br />

(Justin Timberlake’s “SexyBack”). Another popular teen<br />

website is MySpace.com, where teens connect with others,<br />

blog, rank music, and much more.<br />

Cash or credit<br />

The fact of the matter is, teenagers represent a powerful<br />

buying force in the U.S. market. According to the 2005<br />

Roper Youth Report, kids are earning $29.20 per week, two<br />

dollars more than in 2004, with 29% of their money coming<br />

straight from parents. Chores (37%) and gifts (23%)<br />

account for other popular sources of teen income. Nearly<br />

one-third (30%) of 8–17-year-olds say they are involved in<br />

making family purchase decisions, up four percentage points<br />

from last year, as parents increasingly turn to their kids for<br />

advice on what to buy. Teens also indicate that they influence<br />

purchase decisions on everything from cell phone service<br />

to the right cable provider.<br />

For better or worse (probably the latter), teens are also<br />

enamored by the magic of credit. According to the<br />

Jump$tart Coalition for Personal Financial Literacy, an educational<br />

organization, nearly a third of high school seniors<br />

reported having a credit card of their own or one co-signed<br />

by a parent.<br />

22 Fall/Winter 2006


Products with appeal<br />

If you live in a household with a teen, get ready to stock<br />

up on deodorants, grooming aids, acne remedies and<br />

other personal care products, instant meals and school<br />

supplies—in that order. According to information from<br />

ACNielsen Homescan, categories such as these are greatly<br />

overdeveloped for the teen market.<br />

While that may not come as a complete shocker, consider<br />

the fact that many of the brands that have risen to the top<br />

of this typical list are those that cater to this trend-conscious<br />

segment by offering something new, different or cutting<br />

edge. Take for example Unilever’s AXE deodorant for men.<br />

Appealing to the raging hormones of boys (and young men),<br />

the product comes complete with its own risqué website<br />

where the “AXE effect” promises to attract the opposite sex<br />

“when used responsibly.” AXE now generates $269 million<br />

per year in the food, drug and mass merchandiser channels<br />

(including Wal-Mart).<br />

Another product high on the dollar volume index scale purchased<br />

by households with teens offering a unique edge is<br />

Hershey’s Ice Breakers gum that explodes with a burst of<br />

mouth-freshening extra mint taste. Cutesy advertising featuring<br />

Hilary and Haylie Duff appeals like a gem to their<br />

target audience.<br />

While these products get high marks for originality, there is<br />

a tremendous untapped opportunity to cross-merchandise.<br />

For example, most cereals are marketed to either young<br />

children or adults, but not teens. Offering a free iTune<br />

download on the package would certainly have more appeal<br />

to this audience than would an action figure from the latest<br />

kid movie.<br />

Chart 1: Boys spend more on video games than girls<br />

LifeStyle<br />

Affluent Struggling Modest Plain<br />

Cosmopolitan Suburban Comfortable Urban Working Rural<br />

BehaviorStage Centers Spreads Country Cores Towns Living Total<br />

Male 12–14 253 234 202 205 215 129 202<br />

Male 15–17 89 144 113 178 97 101 120<br />

Female 12–14 103 45 42 129 38 51 62<br />

Female 15–17 2 4 30 26 8 5 13<br />

Total 114 107 97 138 92 72 100<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra, Penetration (Population)/% Penetration Index, All Channels/United States, BehaviorScape Framework.<br />

High Consumer, 120–149 Very High Consumer, 150+<br />

Chart 2: Girls spend more on clothes than boys<br />

LifeStyle<br />

Affluent Struggling Modest Plain<br />

Cosmopolitan Suburban Comfortable Urban Working Rural<br />

BehaviorStage Centers Spreads Country Cores Towns Living Total<br />

Male 12–14 56 47 36 86 56 36 50<br />

Male 15–17 50 52 67 82 32 63 58<br />

Female 12–14 186 132 127 122 187 114 141<br />

Female 15–17 97 173 132 123 135 223 156<br />

Total 97 101 90 103 101 108 100<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra, Penetration (Population)/% Penetration Index, All Channels/United States, BehaviorScape Framework.<br />

23


Aligning the cross hairs<br />

For marketers, targeting households with teens is just a<br />

start. For some products in which consumption is driven by<br />

individuals, however, a more granular approach is necessary.<br />

Using Simmons Teen National Consumer Survey (NCS)<br />

data, Spectra has developed a Teen Targeting Solution that<br />

helps to understand the teen consumer and identify the best<br />

way to reach and locate teens in their neighborhoods.<br />

The NCS Simmons Teens Survey is a comprehensive survey<br />

of American teens aged 12–17. It provides single-source<br />

measurement of major media, products, services and indepth<br />

consumer demographics and lifestyle/psychographic<br />

characteristics. Fueled by this survey, the Teen Targeting<br />

Solution allows marketers to more precisely market their<br />

brand to the teenager who buys the product.<br />

The importance of analyzing teens by both age and gender<br />

is illustrated in the following example. Young males ages<br />

12–14 are twice as likely as the average teen to spend their<br />

allowance on video games. Interestingly, teens in Struggling<br />

Urban Core neighborhoods are also 38% more likely to buy.<br />

U.S. Teens Through the Decades<br />

1910s<br />

• Youth Crisis—<br />

Kids spending too<br />

much on gambling<br />

and watching movies<br />

• U.S. Boy Scouts and<br />

Campfire Girls founded<br />

• World War One<br />

• “Newsies”—kids<br />

selling newspapers<br />

• Many teens worked<br />

vs. attending school<br />

24 Fall/Winter 2006<br />

1920s<br />

• The Charleston,<br />

fox-trot and<br />

shimmy (dances)<br />

• Flappers<br />

• Flagpole sitting<br />

• Marathon dancing<br />

• Jazz<br />

• Emily Post’s<br />

manners book<br />

• First peanut butter<br />

& jelly sandwiches<br />

• First Miss America<br />

• The Depression<br />

• Fair Labor Standards Act<br />

limited the age of child<br />

laborers to 16<br />

• Roosevelt’s Civilian<br />

Conservation Corps<br />

• Long-playing<br />

phonograph records<br />

• The “golden age”<br />

of radio<br />

• 250,000 teens living<br />

on the railroad<br />

• Swing music<br />

• Board games<br />

• Hats were mandatory<br />

for men<br />

• First drive-in theaters<br />

1930s 1940s<br />

• The word “teenager”<br />

was coined<br />

• World War 2, rationing,<br />

victory gardens<br />

• Many jobs available to<br />

teens during WW2<br />

• Seventeen magazine<br />

founded in 1944<br />

• The jitterbug (dance)<br />

• Term “juvenile<br />

delinquent” coined<br />

• Zoot suits for young men,<br />

“slacks” for women<br />

• Largest number of teen<br />

marriages after WW2<br />

• Swallowing goldfish<br />

• “Kilroy was here.”<br />

1950s<br />

• Birth of rock & roll<br />

• First hula hoops<br />

• Brylcreem<br />

(hair tonic)<br />

• Jack Kerouac, beatniks<br />

• Marilyn Monroe, Elvis<br />

Presley, James Dean<br />

• Telephone booth stuffing<br />

• 3D movies<br />

• Poodle skirts, saddle<br />

shoes, letter sweaters<br />

• Car hops (before<br />

drive-throughs)<br />

• Sideburns


By contrast, female teens are much more interested in the<br />

fashion scene, spending far more than average on clothing.<br />

Thus, marketing programs designed only for the household<br />

or for the adult consumer will not offer the most effective<br />

way to reach heavy teen consumers. ■ See charts 1 and 2,<br />

page 23.<br />

Zooming in<br />

Once the teen consumer has been identified, direct marketing<br />

can begin. Using the Spectra system, a targeted profile of<br />

the Brand A teen consumer is devised to reveal what magazines<br />

they read, what TV shows they watch, what websites<br />

they surf, how they spend their free time and where they shop.<br />

In addition, subtle neighborhood differences are also<br />

exposed. For example, in the upscale urban areas characterized<br />

by Cosmopolitan Centers, teens are more likely to be<br />

achievers. They have good access to home computers, are<br />

savvy with money, and are less likely to watch TV. Teens in<br />

more downscale areas, Struggling Urban Cores, are more<br />

likely to access the Internet at school, and are very music<br />

oriented. They know what songs are in the Top 10, wear<br />

clothes that reflects their musical tastes and are likely to<br />

characterize themselves as rebels.<br />

Understanding the unique demographic nuances of teen consumers<br />

allows the execution of a precise marketing strategy<br />

among all the consumer segments that purchase the brand.<br />

In addition, not only do teens represent a large share of<br />

some product’s volume, they also are the next generation of<br />

consumers who will fuel growth for all brands in the CPG<br />

industry. A successful marketing campaign to teens will provide<br />

the foundation for brand loyalty and growth among<br />

this generation well into the future.<br />

The next big thing<br />

Keeping abreast of the next big thing on the horizon is critical.<br />

Think back to when the iPod Nano was introduced in<br />

September 2005 and the Video iPod in October 2005. At<br />

that time, Apple discontinued their older models, but several<br />

mainstream retailers continued to advertise these models<br />

while selling the incompatible accessories. Only a very few<br />

nimble retailers were quick to align themselves with the new<br />

iPod models by including photos and information on the<br />

front page of their websites.<br />

1960s<br />

• 40% of the U.S.<br />

population was under<br />

20 years old in 1965<br />

• Woodstock<br />

• Protests, civil rights,<br />

Vietnam<br />

• British invasion, Beatles<br />

• Bell bottoms, mini<br />

skirts, turtlenecks<br />

• The twist (dance)<br />

• Love beads<br />

• Surfing<br />

• Tie-dyed shirts<br />

• Bouffant hairdos,<br />

hair ironing, Afros<br />

• Go-go boots<br />

• Hippies, counter-culture<br />

or “alternative” culture<br />

• Recreational drugs<br />

1970s<br />

• Voting aged dropped<br />

to 18<br />

• The draft ended<br />

• 8-track tapes<br />

• Streaking<br />

• Feminism<br />

• Punk rock<br />

• Mopeds<br />

• Platform shoes,<br />

earth shoes<br />

• Disco<br />

• First video games<br />

• Rocky Horror<br />

Picture Show<br />

• Ecology<br />

1980s<br />

• MTV goes on the air<br />

• Latchkey kids<br />

• Jelly shoes<br />

• Video arcades<br />

• Rubik’s Cube<br />

• Boom boxes<br />

• Rap, hip-hop,<br />

break-dancing<br />

• Hacky sack<br />

• Trivial Pursuit<br />

• Madonna, Miami Vice,<br />

Michael Jackson<br />

• The Breakfast Club,<br />

and other John Hughes<br />

movies<br />

• Big hair<br />

• Live Aid<br />

• Music on CDs<br />

• Mullet haircuts<br />

1990s<br />

• The Worldwide Web,<br />

online chat rooms<br />

• Beanie babies<br />

• Piercings, tattoos<br />

• Boy bands—Backstreet<br />

Boys, N Sync, O-town,<br />

98 Degrees<br />

• Grunge<br />

• The Macarena<br />

• Extreme sports<br />

• Christian music<br />

• “Seinfeld,” “Friends,”<br />

“Simpsons”<br />

• DVDs<br />

2000s<br />

• iPod, MP3 players<br />

• Mobile phones for teens,<br />

text messaging,<br />

camera phones<br />

• Xbox, Playstation 2,<br />

Gameboy<br />

• Rubber wristbands<br />

• Reality TV shows<br />

• Tivo, DVRs<br />

• MySpace.com<br />

• Low-rise jeans<br />

• Napoleon Dynamite<br />

• Sports gambling,<br />

fantasy leagues<br />

• Body sprays<br />

• September 11th<br />

what’s next?<br />

25


While we can only speculate about what will happen in the<br />

future, simple observations can be made to help keep in<br />

tune with what teens are buying and what they are interested<br />

in. A few recommendations include:<br />

• track what kinds of gift cards teens give and receive and<br />

find out what they redeem;<br />

• visit popular teen web sites such as MySpace.com and see<br />

who advertises there;<br />

• view videos posted on YouTube.com;<br />

• check out iTunes and discover the top podcasts. Look<br />

for ways to connect with the iPod and podcasting craze,<br />

which shows no sign of slowing;<br />

• learn about Zune, Microsoft’s answer to iPod. This may<br />

be the next hot device;<br />

• be careful to speak their language and don’t use terminology<br />

that is old news (“da bomb” or “bling-bling”—now just<br />

“bling”);<br />

• use bright colors and splashy graphics to complement<br />

their fast-moving lifestyles and personalities.<br />

The bottom line is this: understand your audience. In order<br />

to make a difference, you have to think differently—even if<br />

that means stepping back (or perhaps forward) in time to<br />

relive those dreaded, wonderful teen years. :) C i<br />

Instant Consumer<br />

Feedback on<br />

Your New Products<br />

Wouldn’t it be nice to know why a customer purchased your<br />

product—just after they made the purchase? ACNielsen<br />

Homescan’s New Product Alert provides unique insights to<br />

understand the motivation behind purchases of new products.<br />

For the first time, you can reliably quantify the factors influencing<br />

the purchase of your new products almost instantly after trial.<br />

Knowing who uses the product, how satisfied they were and<br />

whether they would buy it again give you the insight necessary<br />

to ensure new product success.<br />

Instant Surveys<br />

Homescan ® panelists with online access transmit their purchases<br />

via the Internet. Purchase data is instantly interrogated for defined<br />

UPCs of interest. If any of these products are purchased, a brief<br />

online survey pops up asking the panelist to respond immediately.<br />

No other research method allows you to survey early adopters of<br />

specific UPCs. Since households transmit purchases the same<br />

week they shop, recall effect is virtually eliminated. The standard<br />

“reasons for trial” question provides normative benchmarks to<br />

evaluate the effectiveness of your marketing plan. Custom<br />

questions can be used to address specific marketing issues.<br />

To learn more about New Product Alert, please contact your<br />

ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services representative or visit<br />

our web site at www.acnielsen.com.<br />

26 Fall/Winter 2006


Individual Targeting Solutions for Teens<br />

All teens are not alike. Individual purchasing behavior, media exposure,<br />

attitudes and opinions can vary greatly by age, gender and<br />

lifestyles—especially when it comes to categories such as snacks,<br />

beverages, consumer electronics, apparel and personal grooming<br />

products.<br />

Understanding the unique nuances of your teen consumer allows you<br />

to execute a marketing strategy among all the consumer segments<br />

that purchase your brand. In addition, not only do teens represent a<br />

key driver for many brands, they also represent the next generation<br />

of consumers who will fuel growth for all brands in the CPG industry.<br />

A successful teen marketing program will provide the foundation for<br />

brand loyalty and growth among this generation well into the future.<br />

Solution<br />

Using Simmons Market Research Teen Survey, ACNielsen Homescan<br />

& Spectra has developed a Teen Targeting Solution, which helps<br />

you understand the teen consumer, identify the best way to reach<br />

teens and locate teens in their neighborhoods.<br />

The Simmons Market Research Teen Survey is a comprehensive<br />

survey of American teens aged 12–17. It provides single-source<br />

measurement of major media, products, services, and in-depth<br />

consumer demographic and lifestyle/psychographic characteristics.<br />

Fueled by this survey, the Teen Targeting Solution allows marketers<br />

to more precisely market their brand to the teenager who buys<br />

their product.<br />

The Teen Targeting Solution helps you:<br />

• Evaluate brand opportunities among different teen consumer<br />

segments for household products.<br />

• Compare teen profiles to the adult’s consumption for products<br />

purchased for individual consumption.<br />

• Create a teen profile for your brand.<br />

• Identify media outlets to reach your teen consumer.<br />

• Locate teens in the neighborhoods they live and go to school.<br />

For more information, please contact Sean Jafar at<br />

sean_jafar@spectramarketing.com.


Employee<br />

Empowerment:<br />

The Key to Capturing Productivity<br />

by: Russell Evans<br />

Business Technology Solutions<br />

ACNielsen<br />

No discussion of productivity would be complete without a<br />

reference to employee empowerment and the policies and<br />

tools that make it possible. Any number of factors play into<br />

empowerment—for example:<br />

• whether it has been embraced as a corporate value and<br />

validated from the CEO office on down;<br />

• whether policies and procedures exist to define and shape<br />

empowered behaviors;<br />

• whether review systems capture, measure and mete out<br />

rewards for taking action;<br />

• whether support mechanisms are in place to initialize or<br />

enable field decisions;<br />

• whether information technology facilitates ready access to<br />

needed data, be it about product, pricing, distribution or<br />

other issues.<br />

For each employee to serve as a self-actualized unit, there<br />

must be organic, seamless connectivity to all parts of the<br />

organization.<br />

Get connected<br />

In the knowledge economy, everything revolves around the<br />

concept of connectivity, and Metcalf’s Law serves as the<br />

behavioral guideline.<br />

Metcalf’s Law:<br />

The value of a computer is<br />

proportional to the square of the<br />

number of connections it makes.<br />

Few jobs require as much independent thinking and employee<br />

empowerment as sales. Empowered salespeople represent<br />

the forward line, the guardians of differentiation, the customer<br />

touchpoint in every marketing equation. They are<br />

the ultimate players in the so-called knowledge economy.<br />

Unlike employees in silo or niche areas, salespeople need to<br />

reach out and connect disparate information from diverse<br />

sources in quick time to effectively address customer needs.<br />

Their knowledge base reaches across the enterprise from an<br />

understanding of customers to products and services,<br />

processes and systems, the competitive set, and the arcane<br />

combination of psychological and social skills necessary to<br />

close a deal.<br />

Technology to the rescue<br />

Ask any successful salesperson, and they’ll tell you that<br />

timely, accurate information represents the best armor<br />

they’ve got in the profit wars. The bulletproof concept<br />

resonates with every salesperson who has ever had to<br />

sell-in a new product, argue a price increase or stave off a<br />

competitive threat. To be effective in today’s hyper-charged,<br />

customized, store-level–focused retail environment, salespeople<br />

need a virtual arsenal of presentations capable of<br />

being refreshed with current data at the touch of a button.<br />

That need spawned the fast-track development of<br />

ACNielsen Answers ® Presentation Builder, a best practices<br />

solution that automates and standardizes the development<br />

of data-driven presentation decks. Custom-designed to your<br />

unique specifications by ACNielsen consultants, the application<br />

automatically populates templates using the data calculations<br />

and benchmark metrics you choose. The look, feel,<br />

reporting style and approach are exclusive to your company<br />

28 Fall/Winter 2006


and readily accessible via any Internet connection when and<br />

where you want. Last minute changes and updates become a<br />

mere matter of logging on instead of experiencing logistical<br />

logjams.<br />

Presentation power<br />

In the fast-moving consumer goods industry, presentations<br />

are a fact of life. A truly great deck can facilitate a contract,<br />

substantiate a strategy and move a group toward consensus.<br />

Secondary benefits that accrue from presentations include<br />

the opportunity to enhance the corporate brand image and<br />

values with key audiences like customers, prospects and<br />

business partners.<br />

Maintaining and nurturing the corporate brand has become<br />

a top priority of global companies because it represents one<br />

of the few points of differentiation that cannot be duplicated.<br />

Establishing a consistent presentation format and<br />

methodology ensures that the corporate brand is communicated<br />

correctly, and in alignment with brand standards,<br />

throughout the organization.<br />

Productivity booster<br />

Businesses run on a 24/7 basis in a global economy, so every<br />

minute off-line translates into a minute behind the times.<br />

Productivity aids help compensate by enabling people to<br />

log on, tune in and reach out from virtually any location.<br />

Recognizing the need to stay connected, designers scoped<br />

ACNielsen Answers Presentation Builder as a web-based<br />

tool that delivers presentation decks directly to a laptop<br />

or desktop.<br />

By automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks,<br />

Presentation Builder frees up valuable personnel for invaluable<br />

face-to-face time with clients and other high value-add<br />

activities. Great-looking reports rich with timely information<br />

and telling benchmarks can be generated by salespeople<br />

who have no prior knowledge of PowerPoint or the<br />

ACNielsen access and analysis tool.<br />

Productivity calculator<br />

How much time does your sales organization spend rebuilding<br />

standardized reports for individual clients? You<br />

might be surprised at the hidden savings that can be recovered<br />

by automating this time-consuming task with<br />

Presentation Builder.<br />

Take the case of Dan, a typical manufacturer sales representative<br />

serving the Midwest region. Dan needs to prepare a<br />

20 slide presentation deck summarizing the most recent<br />

performance in the Chicago market. Without Presentation<br />

Builder, Dan is looking at more than 7 hours of grinding<br />

work; with Presentation Builder, he can finish the job in<br />

under 7 minutes. ■ See chart 1.<br />

Best of all: Dan’s employer just saved over $1,000 in underutilized<br />

personnel time that can now be deployed against<br />

revenue-generating tasks.<br />

Chart 1: Time saved using Presentation Builder<br />

Without Presentation Builder<br />

Time x Task<br />

(minutes)<br />

1. Determine which slides need to be built 50<br />

2. Create calculations 8<br />

3. Determine data requirements by slide 200<br />

4. Design slide and manipulate data into presentation format 130<br />

5. Perform final edit/run/testing of deck 40<br />

6. Save final deck on hard drive/off to client meeting 1<br />

Total Time (minutes): 429<br />

(hours): 7:09<br />

With Presentation Builder<br />

Time x Task<br />

(minutes)<br />

1. Log into ACNielsen Answers portal


The Answer for Busy Professionals<br />

Standardized client-ready presentations are a fundamental<br />

necessity in today’s business environment. Countless hours are<br />

spent building presentations. ACNielsen announces a way to<br />

reduce your presentation building time significantly. Now you<br />

can focus your time on adding value to your organization<br />

with bottom-line results instead of countless hours creating<br />

presentation decks each month.<br />

Presentation Builder, delivered through ACNielsen Answers ® ,<br />

eliminates the time-consuming task of pulling syndicated data<br />

content into the right format for client-ready presentations.<br />

ACNielsen Business Technology Solutions consultants can<br />

automate the creation of your standard business presentations<br />

seamlessly. This intelligent solution uses advanced proprietary<br />

processes to effortlessly create your presentation decks. You<br />

design the presentation format and standard data calculations,<br />

and our expert consulting teams do the rest.<br />

Accessible from any Internet connection via ACNielsen Answers,<br />

your presentation data is delivered directly to your desktop. This<br />

time-saving solution is available when you need it, where you<br />

need it.<br />

ACNielsen Answers Presentation Builder<br />

allows you to:<br />

• Automate the process of creating standard business<br />

presentations.<br />

• Gain web-enabled access anywhere, anytime.<br />

• Standardize the format in which content is presented to your<br />

customers.<br />

• Free up resources from the routine task of building<br />

presentation slides.<br />

Increase your productivity by having online access to key<br />

information to manage your business.<br />

One Click. One Place. All the Answers.<br />

Contact your ACNielsen representative for more information,<br />

call 800.988.4ACN or visit our web site at www.acnielsen.com.


Employee Empowerment continued from page 30<br />

Even first-time users can immediately understand the<br />

Presentation Builder program and realize efficiencies from<br />

the initial log-on without constantly referencing the built-in<br />

help advisory.<br />

Value can be expressed any number of ways, from a rapid<br />

ROI calculation on the spend, to anticipated increases in<br />

product movement, market share, promotion penetration or<br />

distribution reach. Once the most important value levers for<br />

the customer have been identified, they become part of a<br />

template that ensures consistent data presentation and<br />

review within and across accounts.<br />

Getting organized<br />

Finally, we come to the issue of organization, the bane of<br />

every salesperson who has ever juggled a cell phone, laptop,<br />

PDA, customer file and call sheet while sitting in the airport<br />

lounge or reception area. There are no issues with misplacing<br />

data or crashing a computer. Presentation Builder<br />

reserves critical information on the server, accessible via the<br />

Internet, so nothing goes missing or gets lost in translation.<br />

Once the sales group has agreed on client metrics and presentation<br />

flow and defined the desired templates, all a sales<br />

rep needs to do is update a deck with fresh data before a<br />

customer meeting. All the time-wasting decisions—which<br />

data to show, how best to express them, the most highimpact<br />

way to illustrate them, what comparisons will be<br />

most powerful, what competitive information to feature—<br />

have been thought through and programmed in. That way,<br />

each meeting, each rep, each contact, each account, shares a<br />

consistent, detailed view of their business. This self-organizing<br />

feature proves especially helpful in global situations,<br />

automatically synchronizing data for easy aggregation.<br />

Power to the people<br />

You’ve heard it a million times: “people are our most<br />

important asset.” Smart companies are those that act like it,<br />

empowering employees by putting the right technology,<br />

tools and training in place to guarantee success. C i<br />

32 Fall/Winter 2006


Open your window to collaborative<br />

business intelligence<br />

One Click, One Place, All the Answers. Spend less time searching<br />

for and organizing information and make fact-based decisions on<br />

category business planning, forecasting, item assortment, pricing,<br />

promotional programs, space management and replenishment.<br />

ACNielsen Answers ® revolutionizes the way you make business<br />

decisions by addressing your most pressing business issues in a<br />

user-friendly, intuitive web-based environment.<br />

Review personalized market information reports, headlines, alerts<br />

and presentations over the Internet. Gain access to ACNielsen<br />

Answers business-oriented solutions, such as CBP ® –Category<br />

Business Planner, Sales Management Planner, and Homescan ®<br />

& Spectra ® content. ACNielsen Answers enables you to access<br />

and analyze mission-critical information to make educated, timely<br />

decisions offering you the right information, in the right format,<br />

at the right time, so that the right decision can be made in a<br />

repeatable manner.<br />

ACNielsen Answers helps you:<br />

• Address critical business issues relating to brand/sales management,<br />

category management, consumer management and retail<br />

management.<br />

• Make better decisions, faster, by collaborating with your service<br />

team and using best demonstrated practices.<br />

• Direct marketing and merchandising activities with on-the-fly,<br />

fact-based solutions.<br />

• Grow revenue, reduce costs of business and improve your<br />

competitive position by converting all types of consumer<br />

information into valued intelligence.<br />

• Drive consumer-focused actions anytime and anywhere.<br />

• Access business-critical information in a web-based environment<br />

to make educated, timely decisions.<br />

ACNielsen Answers gives you:<br />

• Personalized “news” headlines answering key questions on<br />

your category’s performance.<br />

• Hyperlinks giving you drill-down, detailed information on<br />

your category.<br />

• Access to categories defined by a specific retailer—both in terms<br />

of the category itself and the retailer’s trading areas.<br />

• Access to personalized, proprietary internal content and links to<br />

other third-party content.<br />

• Streamlined delivery of information and insights in a timely manner.<br />

To learn more about ACNielsen Answers, please contact your<br />

ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services representative or visit<br />

our web site at www.acnielsen.com.


Gas Price Hikes Put<br />

Brakes on Spending<br />

by: Todd Hale<br />

Thought Leadership<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Crude oil prices ignited again this summer, surpassing the<br />

$70 a barrel threshold and pushing prices at the pump to an<br />

inflammatory $3+ per gallon. Factors like market speculation,<br />

refinery capacity shortages and a pronounced decline<br />

in spare global oil production converged, leaving cashstrapped<br />

consumers scrambling to adjust budgets and<br />

spending accordingly.<br />

To gauge the nature and depth of the consumer response to<br />

fuel-flation, we repeated a survey of ACNielsen Homescan<br />

Panel members that was fielded twice in 2005 (June/July<br />

and October/November periods). The objective was to<br />

provide manufacturers and retailers with a window on<br />

consumer shopping and spending habits when they felt<br />

the pinch at the pump.<br />

Think ahead<br />

As with last year’s surveys, consumers geared up for the<br />

long haul by doing some advance planning, combining<br />

errands and trips to conserve gas. More than two-thirds<br />

Chart 1: Households combining trips, eating out<br />

less & staying home<br />

Impact higher gas<br />

prices had on driving June/July Oct. June/July Chg vs<br />

& spending habits ’05 ’05 ’06 yr ago<br />

Combine errands/trips 61% 68% 68% +7<br />

Eat out less 31% 35% 39% +8<br />

Do more things at home 30% 33% 39% +9<br />

Buy larger, economy size 10% 9% 11% +1<br />

Shop more at warehouse clubs 9% 7% 10% +1<br />

Shop more on Internet 5% 5% 9% +4<br />

Use public transportation more 3% 3% 4% +1<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra Panel Views Surveys<br />

(68%) of respondents adopted this tactic, a seven percentage<br />

point increase from June/July 2005, maintaining the upward<br />

trend from October 2005 results. ■ See chart 1.<br />

Gas gouging really took a bite out of restaurant food sales<br />

(39% of respondents said they were “eating out less”) and<br />

general entertainment spending (39% said they were “doing<br />

more things at home”). These findings proved consistent<br />

with published reports about softness in some casual dining<br />

restaurants.<br />

Encourage cocooning<br />

Setting politics aside, it is clear that unrest in the Middle<br />

East will continue to put a crimp in the oil pipeline, and<br />

high fuel prices that convert into higher transportation and<br />

home heating/cooling costs are here to stay. Manufacturers<br />

and retailers will greet this with mixed reviews.<br />

On one hand, manufacturing, packaging and shipping costs<br />

will rise apace, given their reliance on petroleum-based<br />

products. On the other hand, when consumers cocoon, dollars<br />

once spent dining or playing out will be diverted back<br />

to the grocery, club, drug and mass merchandiser channels.<br />

Price pressures<br />

The key will be to hold the line and avoid the temptation of<br />

passing along cost increases directly to the consumer in the<br />

form of higher prices. Consider the fact that in the span of a<br />

single year, 12% more consumers (almost half of all respondents)<br />

stated they were reducing spending to either a<br />

“small” or “great degree.” Clearly, price sensitivity enters<br />

the equation when consumers evaluate spending trade-offs.<br />

continued on page 36<br />

34 Fall/Winter 2006


Gas Price Hikes continued from page 34<br />

Chart 2: Dollar stores decline, Club &<br />

Supercenters increase<br />

% household shopper penetration<br />

Warehouse<br />

50<br />

50<br />

52<br />

2001<br />

2005<br />

mid-2006<br />

Supercenters*<br />

51<br />

5861<br />

Dollar<br />

Drug<br />

Mass Merch<br />

Grocery<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

*Includes Kmart, Target & Wal-Mart Supercenters<br />

59<br />

67<br />

65<br />

86<br />

83<br />

83<br />

95<br />

87<br />

85<br />

100<br />

99<br />

99<br />

Value pricing assumes even more importance in this volatile<br />

climate, and promotions touting at-home family fun nights,<br />

home-cooked family meals and at-home entertaining concepts<br />

accelerate to the front of the strategy options.<br />

Changing habits<br />

Consumers also cited other budget-stretching adjustments to<br />

their shopping and purchasing patterns. Among them are<br />

patronizing supercenters to buy in bulk at lower unit prices,<br />

clipping coupons to capture available savings, and switching<br />

to less expensive grocery brands.<br />

Premium and mid-grade gas patrons downgraded to regular.<br />

Warehouse club stores and Internet shopping options both<br />

benefited from the desire to keep the lid on the gas tank and<br />

spending.<br />

Homefront, workfront<br />

A Florida State University professor explored different<br />

aspects of the fallout from gas prices, discovering that 44%<br />

of the 300 employed consumers surveyed worried about<br />

making ends meet; 41% were paying off debt more slowly<br />

and 25% had gone without basic necessities like food and<br />

heat to conserve funds.<br />

When queried about how changes in their financial picture<br />

affected their job, results were alarming. Respondents cited<br />

negative outcomes across the board, related to more stress<br />

at home. They were less enthusiastic about work and their<br />

employer, less agreeable and helpful to others, less productive,<br />

more sensitive to daily irritants at work and more<br />

depressed overall.<br />

Penetrating insights<br />

Dollar stores, once on a seemingly unstoppable expansion<br />

trajectory, actually experienced a two percent decline in<br />

household penetration, the sole exception among the<br />

“value” channels to lose ground. In a surprising turn<br />

of events, this represents the first decline in dollar store<br />

shopper penetration since we first began tracking the<br />

channel. ■ See chart 2.<br />

This is surprising on the one hand, because gas price<br />

increases that affect those on fixed incomes and with<br />

modest means (the prototypical dollar store shoppers),<br />

might be expected to drive more consumers toward<br />

dollar outlets. It is less surprising in the context of trip<br />

consolidation, where shoppers try to meet all their needs<br />

in the fewest trips possible. The limited food and beverage<br />

assortment and lack of fresh foods at most dollar stores<br />

may be the force behind the decline.<br />

36 Fall/Winter 2006


Consumer &<br />

Shopping<br />

Insights—Online!<br />

Homescan ® Consumer & Shopping Insights provides<br />

web access to the latest shopping insights available<br />

across all major categories and channels of trade,<br />

presented in an issue-oriented menu for simple<br />

navigation to your most pressing business issue.<br />

Get right to the subject. With Homescan Consumer &<br />

Shopping Insights, you won’t waste time wading through<br />

unnecessary data. Interested in a regional comparison<br />

report of your brands? Want to know which retailers drive<br />

category spending? Need to target the best demographic<br />

match? Simply choose the business application to fit<br />

your needs and view the results immediately.<br />

Homescan Consumer & Shopping Insights gives you:<br />

• Fastest access to the most recent data available.<br />

• Issue-oriented navigation capabilities for easy drill down<br />

to the information you need most.<br />

• Interactive graphs to expedite analysis for presentationready<br />

text and charts.<br />

• Access to the full Consumer & Shopping Insights<br />

Syndicated Suite: Consumer Facts, Channel Facts,<br />

Account Shopper Profiler, Cross Outlet Facts and<br />

Category Management Templates.<br />

To learn more about Consumer & Shopping Insights,<br />

please contact your ACNielsen Client Service or Retail<br />

Services representative or visit our web site at<br />

www.acnielsen.com.<br />

Available in the U.S.


Concurrently, the competing warehouse club and supercenter<br />

“value” channels enjoyed two and three percentage<br />

point increases, respectively, in the penetration measure.<br />

Underlying reasons for the upticks include continuing store<br />

count expansion, which enhances accessibility, and a relentless<br />

commitment to delivering consumer value.<br />

Trip decay<br />

Trip count results proved that consumers not only talked<br />

the talk, they walked the walk and reduced the number of<br />

shopping trips in every channel except warehouse clubs,<br />

which held steady at 11 trips per household per year.<br />

A review of trip count results by channel suggests that grocery<br />

stores might need to re-examine their value proposition.<br />

Trip counts sagged by one trip per household at dollar<br />

and drug stores, mass merchandisers and supercenters, but<br />

the grocery trip frequency declined at twice that rate.<br />

Basket bonanza<br />

Consumer behavior aligned with attitudes again, as bigger<br />

basket rings across channels validated the “shop less, buy<br />

more” reaction to gas prices. Warehouse clubs were the primary<br />

beneficiary of the new consumer spending directive;<br />

witness the $6 increase in the average trip receipt, for a total<br />

of $93 per trip. ■ See chart 3.<br />

Chart 3: Larger baskets in all channels—consumers making fewer small trips<br />

Average $ basket ring—Total expenditures<br />

Dollar<br />

11<br />

12<br />

2001<br />

2005<br />

mid-2006<br />

13<br />

19<br />

2223<br />

32<br />

3538<br />

39<br />

4447<br />

51<br />

Drug<br />

Grocery<br />

Mass Merch<br />

Supercenters*<br />

60<br />

63<br />

Warehouse<br />

82<br />

87<br />

93<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

*Includes Kmart, Target & Wal-Mart Supercenters<br />

38 Fall/Winter 2006


Chart 4: Those who can afford higher gas prices drive more<br />

% household by weekly mileage driven<br />

Poor<br />

10<br />

8<br />

14<br />

20<br />

21<br />

9<br />

7<br />

12<br />

Getting By<br />

4<br />

3<br />

11<br />

21<br />

20<br />

13<br />

9<br />

19<br />

Living Comfortably<br />

2 1<br />

8<br />

16<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

25<br />

Affluent<br />

11<br />

5<br />

10<br />

17<br />

15<br />

14<br />

38<br />

No Vehicle<br />

51–100 Miles<br />

0 Miles<br />

101–150 Miles<br />

1–25 Miles<br />

151–200 Miles<br />

26–50 Miles<br />

200+ Miles<br />

Source: June/July 2005 ACNielsen Homescan Survey<br />

Grocery, mass merchandisers and supercenters each experienced<br />

a $3 per basket expenditure increase, raising the average<br />

consumer spend per format trip to $38, $47 and $63,<br />

respectively. Drug and dollar stores sat at the bottom of the<br />

rankings with an extra $1 added to the average shopping tab.<br />

Resilient response<br />

In June 2006, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan<br />

Greenspan remarked that American business “to date has<br />

largely succeeded in finding productivity improvements<br />

that have contained energy costs.” However, he raised the<br />

specter of continued upward oil price pressure leading to<br />

an observable impact on the U.S. economy.<br />

One reason Americans have been able to absorb price<br />

increases to date ascribes to the fact that those who drive<br />

the most can afford it. A larger percentage of affluent<br />

consumers drive 200+ miles per week than those living<br />

comfortably, getting by or the poor. ■ See chart 4.<br />

Poor pay more<br />

Unfortunately, rising gas prices will impact the most those<br />

who can afford it the least. While gasoline costs represent<br />

just 6% of the pre-tax household income for families earning<br />

$75,000 per year, they consume double that proportion<br />

(12%) for households earning $20,000 annually.<br />

■ See chart 5 on page 40.<br />

Turning a moment to the rising cost of natural gas and<br />

other home heating alternatives, consumers can expect those<br />

costs to increase as well. Last year, a mild winter mitigated<br />

price hikes, minimizing the wallet wallop. In the aggregate,<br />

the implications are obvious for the manufacturers and<br />

retailers who target lower income households—get ready<br />

to feel the heat.<br />

Strategic fallout<br />

The thirst for oil will prompt manufacturers and retailers to<br />

sharpen their pencils and continuously monitor the consumer<br />

pulse to combat the margin squeeze. How will the fuel<br />

39


Chart 5: Rising gas prices will impact low income<br />

households and the retailers/manufacturers that<br />

serve them<br />

At $3 a gallon<br />

Dollar Amount<br />

$20,000<br />

12 $2,382<br />

Annual Income<br />

$25,000<br />

$50,000<br />

8<br />

11<br />

$2,820<br />

$4,179<br />

$75,000<br />

6<br />

$4,647<br />

Gasoline costs as % of pre-tax household income<br />

Source: Department of Energy, USA Today<br />

crunch impact brand and format loyalty? How will<br />

promotional strategies need to be adjusted in response?<br />

What services could be added to make a store the winning<br />

contender under the single-outlet, consolidation scenario?<br />

Oil price pressures may precipitate any number of market<br />

responses in the fast-moving consumer packaged goods<br />

world, including:<br />

• accelerated private label product growth;<br />

• enhanced interest in large pack sales;<br />

• broader assortments;<br />

• value-based pricing;<br />

• at-home entertainment focus in advertising and<br />

promotions;<br />

• added convenience store features, positionings;<br />

• increased emphasis on trip capture.<br />

Change in attitude<br />

As a country, the United States will need to wean itself from<br />

oil dependency by developing viable alternative fuel options<br />

such as ethanol, moving to gas-saving hybrid vehicles like<br />

the popular Toyota Prius, and re-evaluating our fundamental<br />

relationship with non-renewable energy sources.<br />

As an industry, CPG manufacturers and retailers will need<br />

to re-think the retail calculus and factor-in the impact of<br />

higher transportation and heating costs on the brand buyer<br />

and retail shopper mindsets. Even if the recently discovered<br />

Gulf of Mexico oil field turns into a gusher, industry experts<br />

predict it will be at least four years before that fuel supply<br />

impacts consumers, and it will not be large enough to offset<br />

the chronic and increasing U.S. demand. There is a real<br />

opportunity for CPG industry leaders to convert a deep<br />

understanding of the consumer response to persistent<br />

gas shortages into a strategic lever that will drive sales<br />

and profits. C i<br />

40 Fall/Winter 2006


Cracking the<br />

Retail C.O.D.E.<br />

by: Bill Rouse<br />

Wal-Mart Analytics<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Jon Busman<br />

Marketing<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

You’re pretty good at Sudoku. You know how the DaVinci<br />

code was solved. But do you know how to crack the retail<br />

C.O.D.E.? Turns out, you held the key to unlock sales<br />

potential at the store level all along: the consumer. As the<br />

only common denominator across brand, product, account<br />

and store activities, it is imperative that store-level strategies<br />

and tactics begin and end with the consumer.<br />

Two common factors often hinder the ability to take advantage<br />

of store-by-store growth. First, consumer insights<br />

alone, without resulting actions, simply turn into overhead.<br />

Second, treating an entire retail chain as if it served a single<br />

shopper type often results in missed opportunities.<br />

What’s needed, is to find an approach that enables scalable<br />

action based on store-level insights to position a company<br />

for success with consumers. Store-level growth opportunities<br />

exist, but they are often difficult to identify and procure<br />

with a reasonable return. It takes the right tools to integrate<br />

action and insight into a cohesive, repeatable framework<br />

for success.<br />

Getting started<br />

The first step into the new world of store-level marketing<br />

begins by abandoning any preconceived notions about a<br />

consumer-centric approach. There is no silver bullet report<br />

with all the answers, no bedrock rule about how a category<br />

acts in response to consumers.<br />

Realize that things are not always what they appear to be.<br />

Narrowly focusing solely on category-specific action is no<br />

better than looking down from a tall building and incorrectly<br />

noting that all people are the same. Consumer-centric<br />

planning is about analyzing specific groups of people and<br />

identifying how to impact them where they shop—at ground<br />

zero, the store level. It is a different way of looking at business,<br />

one with an upside that pays off in sales and profits.<br />

Winning at retail is enabled by applying a simple, systematic<br />

four-step process that we call “Cracking the Retail<br />

C.O.D.E.” The methodology employs a series of critical<br />

steps to optimize brand or product success in the marketplace.<br />

This consumer-centric approach links actions in the<br />

store—where they matter the most—back to the consumers<br />

most likely to purchase your brand.<br />

Four steps to success<br />

The acronym C.O.D.E. summarizes a methodology that<br />

begins with Consumer profiling, then moves to Opportunity<br />

gapping, Dynamic clustering and Executing for the consumer,<br />

the four steps to success in store-level marketing.<br />

1. Consumer profiling—accurately captures the demographic<br />

profile of the brand’s consumer.<br />

2. Opportunity gapping—quantifies store-level opportunities<br />

based on consumer demand potential and diagnoses the<br />

prospect.<br />

3. Dynamic clustering—groups similar stores using multiple<br />

store attributes, including shopper demographics, the<br />

competitive set, and upside opportunity.<br />

4. Executing for the consumer—takes findings from steps<br />

1–3 and develops store-level tactical plans, giving the<br />

field force the right information to optimize in-store<br />

presence.<br />

This strategic approach provides a deeper understanding<br />

of the consumers around a given store, measures the gap<br />

between actual and potential demand, and offers an execution<br />

plan at the store and cluster level that fully addresses<br />

42 Fall/Winter 2006


the potential demand. The result is improved operational<br />

execution, reduced out-of-stocks, fewer overstocks,<br />

enhanced promotion performance and better inventory<br />

management.<br />

Step 1: Consumer profiling<br />

The consumer should be the first and last consideration of<br />

any consumer-centric initiative and the C.O.D.E. approach<br />

is no different. Products do not buy themselves, just as<br />

shelves do not mysteriously empty by themselves. While<br />

price reductions, competition, brand equity, slotting and the<br />

like all influence purchasing, the common denominator is<br />

the consumer.<br />

It is only appropriate then, that the C.O.D.E. approach<br />

starts with consumer profiling. There are various types<br />

of consumer profiling information available, from panel<br />

purchase behavior to attitude and usage studies to focus<br />

groups. Traditionally, point-of-sale (POS) data has been<br />

utilized to tell us “what happened” but not who drove it.<br />

Through consumer regression profiling, it becomes<br />

possible to create a sales-weighted store profile by<br />

estimating future consumer demand for products based<br />

on historical sales data.<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra recommends utilizing<br />

panel data to determine category and brand breaks, and<br />

Opportunity Finder solutions to “consumerize” product<br />

movement data, enabling retail-specific and item-specific<br />

store profiles. This approach yields granular analyses down<br />

to the SKU level. The analyses become retail-specific, based<br />

on the retailer’s own data, which adds power to the recommendations.<br />

Regardless of source, consumer profiles can be<br />

used individually or in combination to formulate step one<br />

of Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.<br />

Step 2: Opportunity gapping<br />

Are you leaving sales on the table? If so, how much? What<br />

“Opportunity gapping provides<br />

an indication of how much the<br />

category could grow tomorrow if<br />

I could fully execute, instead of only trying to<br />

capture my fair share of yesterday’s volume.”<br />

needs to change to convert potential and lost sales into reg-<br />

–Michael Himmelfarb, VP of Marketing<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

ister rings? Opportunity gapping quantifies the opportunity<br />

cost to each store for missing the mark two ways—either<br />

with consumers or on the execution level. While fair share<br />

gapping is a common practice to determine if a brand or<br />

product is getting its expected share of the account or market<br />

pie, what if you could estimate how big the slice would be?<br />

Consumer profiling is the first step in executing the<br />

C.O.D.E. approach, but without action it just becomes<br />

“nice to know.” In order to quantify opportunity, matching<br />

the consumer profile to the known shoppers of an account<br />

is critical. The degree of sophistication can vary from profiling<br />

your consumer and identifying a common trait within<br />

a retailer (i.e., matching high income consumers to a high<br />

income account like Whole Foods), to scoring an account<br />

at the store level based on the most volume-predictive<br />

consumers, also known as the Spectra Demand Index.<br />

In essence, while Step One determines your consumer’s<br />

fingerprint, Step Two matches it to an account’s fingerprint—or<br />

even better, an account’s store-level fingerprints.<br />

Now you have a basic roadmap for tomorrow’s volume.<br />

44 Fall/Winter 2006


Windshield vs. rear-view mirror<br />

The C.O.D.E. methodology puts marketers in the driver’s<br />

seat, steering brands and products by looking through the<br />

windshield instead of the rear-view mirror. This approach<br />

focuses action on stores that show growth opportunity, and<br />

suggests maintenance level support for those with lower<br />

growth potential.<br />

Execution opportunity gaps materialize based on the yinyang<br />

interaction of two opposing forces: demand drivers<br />

and demand inhibitors. Demand drivers include activities<br />

such as promotions, cross merchandising and correct shelving.<br />

Demand inhibitors include competition, out-of-stocks<br />

(OOS), distribution voids, and incorrect shelving or space<br />

allocation.<br />

Case in point<br />

In a typical promotion scenario, 16% of stores won’t have<br />

available space, 22% won’t display the promotion signage,<br />

33% will put up the displays too late and 42% won’t have<br />

the skilled labor to execute the promotion. Opportunity<br />

gapping identifies problem stores—those that should have<br />

sold more based on the consumer fit and performance of<br />

similar stores.<br />

Promotions can then be adjusted to focus resources on areas<br />

with the highest potential upside. In essence, opportunity<br />

gapping acts like a forward-looking diagnosis that determines<br />

if the financial upside return from a promotion is<br />

worth the effort of store checks, additional labor, or the<br />

promotion itself.<br />

“Retailers and manufacturers are becoming<br />

more precise in their targeting of consumer<br />

segments and wish to optimize store<br />

conditions at the local level.”<br />

–Paris Gogos, Director<br />

ACNielsen Retail Execution Services<br />

Step 3: Dynamic clustering<br />

Clustering, or localization, as the Harvard Business Review<br />

calls it, is the cornerstone of scalability. More than a capability,<br />

clustering has become an operating necessity in<br />

today’s fragmented marketplace.<br />

Retailers and manufacturers are increasingly moving to<br />

micro views of their business to identify opportunities<br />

associated with the demand drivers and demand inhibitors<br />

unique to each store. This is most clearly seen in the growing<br />

number of retailers adopting local or neighborhood<br />

marketing initiatives. Most recently, Wal-Mart announced<br />

they were dropping their one-size-fits-all approach to stores.<br />

Similarly, manufacturers are becoming more precise in targeting<br />

of consumer segments, and wish to optimize store<br />

conditions at the local level.<br />

Clustering attributes<br />

While there is a virtually limitless set of criteria upon which<br />

clusters can be based, most fall into four major groupings:<br />

1. Consumer Attributes. These may be as simple as<br />

grouping stores based on a common trait like ethnicity,<br />

affluence of the shopper, or a volume-predictive measure<br />

of consumer fit.<br />

2. Organizational Attributes. These may include DSD sales<br />

routes, warehouse locations, regions or districts, or<br />

specific shelving sets.<br />

45


3. Store Attributes. These may range from physical store<br />

attributes like size and presence of specific departments<br />

to proximities to high traffic intersections or landmarks<br />

like beaches or universities.<br />

4. Performance Attributes. These can range from basic<br />

sales rates to promotion response to consumer-driven<br />

category opportunity gaps.<br />

Dynamic clustering brings criteria together into a cohesive<br />

framework that leverages critical differences within the store<br />

segments. Some companies may be able to execute effectively<br />

using just two clusters; others may require 200; but clustering<br />

is a necessary prerequisite for integrating action to “crack<br />

the retail C.O.D.E.”<br />

Step 4: Executing for the consumer<br />

The final step in the C.O.D.E. approach takes us full circle,<br />

back to the consumer and how best to shape and direct<br />

activities to each store or cluster’s shoppers. Merchandising<br />

strategies based on item roles, promotional and sampling<br />

programs, space and facing allocations—all tailored to<br />

defined dynamic clusters—can now be managed by following<br />

the four-step C.O.D.E.<br />

The C.O.D.E. approach makes high definition marketing<br />

possible, allowing marketers and retailers to zero in at the<br />

most granular level possible—the store. Working from a<br />

shared viewpoint, with shared definitions for target clusters<br />

or stores, manufacturers and retailers can collaborate on<br />

promotional and assortment strategies with optimal appeal<br />

to the right set of consumers, and operational strategies that<br />

take cost out of the system by reducing inefficiencies such as<br />

out-of-stocks and distribution voids.<br />

The C.O.D.E. holds the secret to finding opportunity gaps,<br />

making the most of consumer profile information, and<br />

improving logistical execution to squeeze more bottom-line<br />

profit out of even more top-line sales.<br />

See pages 48 and 49 for a case study that illustrates the<br />

C.O.D.E. process in action. C i<br />

46 Fall/Winter 2006


Mark Your<br />

Calendars<br />

2007Consumer 360 Conference<br />

May 14–17<br />

The Westin Diplomat<br />

Resort & Spa<br />

3555 South Ocean Drive<br />

Hollywood, Florida<br />

The number one marketing<br />

and information conference.<br />

www.consumer360.com<br />

® presented by


Cracking the<br />

C.O.D.E.<br />

A Case Study<br />

Step 1: Consumer profiling<br />

Joe’s Cookies utilized a hybrid of ACNielsen Homescan<br />

Panel data and POS-based profiles to identify its preferred<br />

consumer. Since Joe’s Cookies had low penetration in the<br />

marketplace, the company used panel data to profile the total<br />

category, and then used Spectra Opportunity Finder Solutions<br />

to profile individual SKUs.<br />

The result of this analysis: Joe’s Cookies gained an understanding<br />

of how its brand consumers differed from the overall<br />

cookie category and competitors. The typical Joe’s Cookies<br />

buyer skewed to African-American and Hispanic ethnic makeup,<br />

earned $50,000–$100,000 per year and lived in a household<br />

with children. ■ See chart 1.<br />

Chart 1: Cookie consumer profiles<br />

Joe’s Jane’s<br />

Cookie Cookies Cookies<br />

Category 16 oz. 16 oz.<br />

White Med. High Low High<br />

African Am. Low High Very Low<br />

Hispanic Low High Very Low<br />

< $50K Low Low Low<br />

$50K+ High Very High Medium<br />

$100K+ High Low Very High<br />

No Kids in HH Low Very Low Very High<br />

Kids in HH High Very High Very Low<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

Step 2: Opportunity gapping<br />

Joe’s Cookies then ranked retailer stores based on the “fit”<br />

between the store consumer profile and the Joe’s Cookies<br />

consumer profile, quantifying the consumer opportunity gap.<br />

The analysis determined that store opportunity varied greatly<br />

once the consumer was inserted into the equation.<br />

For example, Joe’s Cookies found Store A and Store B identical<br />

in every transactional way. Joe’s Cookies had two facings in<br />

each store, and the store shelf set and total sizes were virtually<br />

identical. However, sales results for Joe’s Cookies were anything<br />

but identical. Store A sold approximately $90 per week of<br />

cookies, while Store B sold closer to $230 per week.<br />

A consumer trade area analysis for each store uncovered very<br />

different shopper bases. Store A was located in an urban setting<br />

with many households without kids in its consumer trade<br />

area. Store B, on the other hand, was in a rural setting with<br />

many households with kids in its consumer trade area. As a<br />

result, Store A was not the underperforming store it initially<br />

appeared to be, but in fact, had captured most, if not all, of its<br />

opportunity. Store B, initially thought to be over-performing in<br />

its trade area, was actually under-performing and should have<br />

sold an incremental $130 more per week. ■ See chart 2.<br />

Instead of allotting resources against a store that appeared to<br />

be an under-performer, Joe’s Cookies targeted the real underperforming<br />

store. Joe’s Cookies followed the C.O.D.E. method<br />

and assessed the different demand drivers and demand<br />

inhibitors affecting the store in order to chart a path for Store B<br />

growth. This exercise was repeated for other chains to diagnose<br />

the amount of unconverted opportunity by account and<br />

develop tactical plan for realizing untapped potential.<br />

Chart 2: Opportunity gapping<br />

Store A: $90 in Sales Store B: $230 in Sales<br />

Consumer Trade Area Consumer Trade Area<br />

Few Kids—Urban<br />

Many Kids—Rural<br />

Consumer Opportunity Gapping<br />

Gap Upside: $8 Gap Upside: +$130!<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

48 Fall/Winter 2006


Step 3: Dynamic clustering<br />

The next step for Joe’s Cookies was to make similar recommendations<br />

to its retailer that could be executed in a scalable<br />

manner. Joe’s Cookies clustered similar stores based on<br />

consumer, store, and performance attributes including<br />

consumer fit, opportunity gaps, competitive interaction<br />

and existing store sales.<br />

In doing so, Joe’s Cookies focused its efforts against several<br />

types of consumers and enabled action that was scaled yet<br />

appeared customized on the shelf. Dynamic Clustering also<br />

identified which clusters were not only a strong fit, but quantified<br />

the upside opportunity. This approach allowed Joe’s<br />

Cookies to take action where it was needed and to minimize<br />

where it was meeting demand. Demonstrating the power of<br />

Dynamic Clustering in action, when applied from the category<br />

down to the SKU level, Joe’s Cookies executed against the<br />

opportunity for its brand and the category. ■ See chart 3.<br />

Chart 3: Dynamic consumer profiling—allows<br />

you to take action where there is potential<br />

Category/Brand<br />

Consumer Fit<br />

Gapping<br />

Opportunity<br />

Clusters<br />

20 Stores<br />

$2.7 Million Gap<br />

35 Stores<br />

$0.8 Million Gap<br />

68 Stores<br />

$0.0 Million Gap<br />

Step 4: Executing for the consumer<br />

Turning to tactical considerations, Joe’s first cluster (Blue Collar<br />

Suburban) represented $2.7 million in sales, spread across 20<br />

stores. It appears to be under-performing with respect to many<br />

product types and within certain cookie sub-segments.<br />

Joe’s Cookies implemented a dynamic clustering framework<br />

and pursued tactics that included:<br />

• identifying cluster potential to assist with assortment<br />

decisions;<br />

• determining the competitive forces affecting each dynamic<br />

cluster to assist with tactics;<br />

• assigning key merchandising roles to SKU-level items by<br />

dynamic clusters to determine the turf and image enhancers;<br />

• allocating shelf size based on dynamic clusters;<br />

• performing SKU-level rationalization based on consumer<br />

demand and potential sales by cluster to put the right<br />

product in the right store.<br />

The Retail C.O.D.E framework has helped many manufacturers<br />

and retailers unlock hidden sales opportunity previously<br />

masked by results aggregated at the account, region or trade<br />

area level. C.O.D.E. proponents integrate a variety of consumer<br />

and retail information to de-code available opportunities and<br />

implement comprehensive action plans designed to improve<br />

product and category performance. Are you ready to crack the<br />

Retail C.O.D.E.? Your sales depend on it. Your consumers<br />

demand it.<br />

Competitive<br />

Interactions<br />

Sales Influencers<br />

46 Stores<br />

$0.0 Million Gap<br />

22 Stores<br />

$2.7 Million Gap<br />

10 Stores<br />

$1.1 Million Gap<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

49


Trendwatch<br />

Walk-In Retail Clinics:<br />

A Healthy Savings Idea<br />

by: Joe Bucherer<br />

<strong>Segmentation</strong> Analytics<br />

ACNielsen Homescan & Spectra<br />

“Would you like some chicken soup with that prescription?”<br />

While grocery stores have always stocked this form of “liquid<br />

penicillin,” today they’re home to the real deal—walk-in clinics<br />

staffed by nurse practitioners licensed to diagnose and treat<br />

common conditions such as allergies, bladder infections, bronchitis,<br />

ear infections, the flu, heartburn, muscle pain, pink eye,<br />

minor burns and rashes.<br />

■ See chart 1.<br />

The ultimate in one-stop shopping, patients can see a health<br />

care professional, hang a left to get the prescription filled, and<br />

be on their way in 20 minutes. Anyone who has cooled their<br />

heels in the typical general practitioner’s waiting room knows<br />

that that kind of turnaround time represents a true medical<br />

miracle.<br />

The consumer pulse<br />

Clearly, consumers are warming-up to the walk-in clinic concept.<br />

In a Spring 2006 survey, ACNielsen Homescan &<br />

Spectra took the public’s temperature on the walk-in clinic<br />

subject and discovered that one-third of respondents were<br />

either very or somewhat likely to visit a walk-in clinic<br />

located in a grocery, drug store or mass merchandiser.<br />

■ See chart 2 on page 52.<br />

While half of participating households had visited a doctor’s<br />

office in the last year, 8% had visited an independent or freestanding<br />

walk-in clinic, and another 1% had visited a walk-in<br />

clinic embedded in a retail format.<br />

Chart 1: Types of ailments suffered in U.S.<br />

Percent of households with at least one household member suffering<br />

from the following ailment during the past 6 months<br />

Total U.S.<br />

Allergies (seasonal and/or year-round) 51%<br />

Acid Reflex/Gerd/Heartburn/Acid Indigestion 41%<br />

High Blood Pressure 36%<br />

Cholesterol Problems 31%<br />

Joint Neck/Back Pains (Not Arthritis) 34%<br />

Obesity/Weight Control 32%<br />

Insomnia/Problem Sleeping 24%<br />

Muscle Pain/Spasms 23%<br />

Anxiety/Depression 23%<br />

Arthritis—Osteo 20%<br />

Constipation 18%<br />

Diarrhea 19%<br />

Asthma 15%<br />

Diabetes-Type II (Oral Medication Needed) 12%<br />

Menopause 10%<br />

Lactose Intolerant 9%<br />

Arthritis—Rheumatoid 9%<br />

Irritable Bowel Syndrome 9%<br />

Heart Disease/Heart Attack/Angina 7%<br />

Osteoporosis/Calcium Deficiency 6%<br />

Attention Deficit Disorder 6%<br />

Incontinence 7%<br />

Diabetes Type I (Insulin Needed) 3%<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan Panel Views Survey—Feb/Mar 2006—Total U.S. Households<br />

Presently, walk-in clinics appear to be a perimeter<br />

phenomenon, with the South Atlantic (21%) and East North<br />

Central (16%) regions leading on a household patronage<br />

basis, followed by the Pacific and West South Central areas at<br />

13% each. The eastern geographic skew may reflect a travel<br />

pattern of older New Yorkers commuting between their winter<br />

home in Florida and the Empire state.<br />

50 Fall/Winter 2006


Everybody wins<br />

Many walk-in retail clinics, like the 100-square-foot<br />

MinuteClinics, are designed and sited to feel like an extension<br />

of the store pharmacy counter, virtually ensuring captive<br />

Rx sales.<br />

While the retailer incentives are obvious and include driving<br />

traffic to the store, raising trip counts and creating the<br />

opportunity for incremental sales, the walk-in clinics benefit<br />

insurers as well. One Minnesota-based health plan determined<br />

that the walk-in clinic fees are so low (a minimum of<br />

30% below a regular doctor visit), that the insurer waived<br />

any co-pay to encourage members to utilize the new service.<br />

A rash of growth<br />

Popularity has led to proliferation. Among the more appealing<br />

aspects of the walk-in clinics are the easy physical<br />

access, proximity to home and work, available parking,<br />

intimate formats (smaller ones have chairs vs. exam tables),<br />

posted prices, evening and weekend hours, and electronic<br />

patient files that can be quickly transmitted to doctors along<br />

with a referral.<br />

Wal-Mart expects to open 50 stores by 2007, then roll out<br />

the service nationally. TakeCare has slated 20 Chicago area<br />

clinics for third-quarter 2006. MedXpress launched this<br />

summer and debuted an aggressive expansion plan calling<br />

for 500 U.S. locations by 2010. Solantic, a Florida-based<br />

company differentiating on the basis of physician staffing,<br />

intends to have 1,000 sites up and running over the next<br />

five years.<br />

Chart 2: One in three households is likely<br />

to visit a retail walk-in clinic, if available<br />

in their area<br />

How likely would you be to use a walk-in medical clinic if it were<br />

available in a grocery, drug or mass merchandise/discount store near<br />

your home?<br />

Very Likely 10%<br />

Somewhat<br />

Likely<br />

Neither Likely<br />

Nor Unlikely<br />

Somewhat<br />

Unlikely<br />

Very<br />

Unlikely<br />

15%<br />

18%<br />

22%<br />

36%<br />

Source: ACNielsen Homescan Panel Views Survey—Apr/May 2006—Total U.S. Households<br />

Rx for the ER?<br />

One of the newest developments in consumer-driven<br />

healthcare, walk-in clinics represent the latest response<br />

to a system that encourages patients to control health<br />

costs. As a serendipitous by-product, walk-in clinics<br />

may prove to be a much-needed panacea for<br />

overtaxed emergency rooms, and an antidote for<br />

the 40 million uninsured Americans who represent<br />

the target audience.<br />

The cost savings are undeniable. One uninsured New<br />

York City paralegal priced out a doctor’s visit to deal<br />

with a minor problem. Quote: $150 for the visit.<br />

Opting to try the walk-in clinic solution, she walked<br />

out with two prescriptions and a bill for $49,<br />

including medications.<br />

Profit prognosis<br />

If retailers needed any additional motivation to take<br />

a serious run at the walk-in solution, the most telling<br />

diagnostic is the profitability test. According to a California<br />

HealthCare Foundation study, prescription drug margins<br />

run around 16% compared with general merchandise profits<br />

of less than 5%. That translates into a profit injection for<br />

the bottom line, even as center store results weaken. C i<br />

52 Fall/Winter 2006


Track the New Health<br />

& Wellness Trends<br />

with a Few Clicks<br />

So what’s the new trend replacing “Low Carb”? There is much activity around Superfoods, as consumers are<br />

looking for food and beverage products that enhance their active lifestyle. While these trends are small, they<br />

are certainly something to closely watch. The mainstream trends like Whole Grain and Low/No Fat are still<br />

popular as consumers are responding to a nationwide concern with obesity. Consumer food marketers are<br />

flooding the market with a plethora of food products with health & wellness claims, but which ones are most successful<br />

in capturing consumer sales? LabelTrends is a new service that monitors sales trends in 27 of the<br />

hottest consumer packaged goods (CPG) product segments, such as low-carb, low-fat, organic and sugar-free.<br />

With over two-thirds of Americans dealing with obesity and many individuals on some sort of diet regimen,<br />

LabelTrends is well suited to help you evaluate new product opportunities to meet consumer demand and work<br />

with your retailer partners in optimizing assortment at the shelf for fast turnover.<br />

LabelTrends help you to:<br />

• Understand the latest trends in the health & wellness arena and develop marketing strategies to<br />

provide consumer solutions.<br />

• Identify potential candidates for mergers and acquisitions.<br />

• Understand which health & wellness claims are most successful in building brand loyalty.<br />

• Assess competitor brand/item performance and develop counteractive strategies.<br />

To learn more about LabelTrends, please contact your ACNielsen Client Service or Retail Services<br />

representative or visit our web site at www.acnielsen.com.


It’s All About What’s Happening<br />

at the Store Level<br />

Success goes to the smart, the swift, and those who can manage through the complexity of today’s retail environment. Retailers<br />

and Manufacturers strive to recognize the diverse and changing faces of consumers, focusing on what increases demand while<br />

reducing what inhibits it. The store is where the best-laid plans shine or go awry.<br />

ACNielsen Scantrack StoreView provides the clearest, most flexible and precise store level picture of what's selling where, why<br />

and to whom. It provides a view that allows you to zero in on the store to understand demand drivers and demand inhibitors from<br />

different points of view. It allows for a new perspective, a more precise way to pinpoint consumer demand, focus on sales performance,<br />

analyze merchandising activities and center in on micro-trade areas.<br />

Only ACNielsen Scantrack StoreView couples a high definition view of what just happened with the tactical planning<br />

ability to increase future consumer sales.<br />

ACNielsen Scantrack StoreView<br />

Making High Definition Marketing Possible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!