25.12.2013 Views

Report PDF - US Environmental Protection Agency

Report PDF - US Environmental Protection Agency

Report PDF - US Environmental Protection Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Further, the OIG disagrees with TDOT’s opinion that the truck stop and TSE<br />

vendors made programmatic decisions regarding the program (OMB Circular<br />

A-187 refers to “program” as the “Federal” program). As such, TDOT made all<br />

programmatic decisions. The truck stop and TSE vendors merely fulfilled their<br />

obligations under the grant contracts. Additionally, the truck stop and TSE<br />

vendors did not use federal funds to carry out a program of the organization.<br />

OMB Circular A-187 uses “organization” to refer to the entity (i.e., truck stop and<br />

TSE vendors in this instance). TDOT carried out the project under a state<br />

program. The truck stop and TSE vendors did not have or carry out their own<br />

programs. In addition, TDOT’s performance was measured against the objectives<br />

of the federal program, not the truck stop and TSE vendors. TDOT measured the<br />

truck stop and TSE vendors’ performance against TDOT’s grant contract<br />

requirements.<br />

Second, the OIG disagrees with the Region 4 and TDOT comments regarding the<br />

project not being a public work. The OIG believes the project is a public work<br />

infrastructure project conducted by TDOT. Public works are a broad category of<br />

infrastructure projects financed and constructed by the government for<br />

recreational, employment, and health and safety uses in the greater community.<br />

Public works are often interchangeable with the term public infrastructures. Per<br />

EPA, the term infrastructure refers to the substructure or underlying foundation or<br />

network used for providing goods and services; especially the basic installations<br />

and facilities on which the continuance and growth of a community, state, etc.,<br />

depend.<br />

Congress enacted the Recovery Act to invest in transportation, environmental<br />

protections, and other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic<br />

benefits. Based on the definition above, public works are defined by “funding”<br />

and “community use,” not “ownership.” EPA determined that TSE facilities are<br />

infrastructure projects under the Recovery Act. The EPA’s DERA program<br />

determination regarding the applicability of the Buy American provision stated<br />

that TSE facilities are considered to be public works when a governmental entity<br />

is conducting the project. EPA’s determination does not address ownership as the<br />

criteria for making the Buy American determination, as discussed in the OMB<br />

example cited by Region 4 and TDOT, and the other two examples cited by<br />

TDOT. Rather, EPA based its determination on who is conducting the project.<br />

The OIG contends the project is a public works project. Therefore, TDOT, as<br />

recipient of the funds, is responsible for conducting the project. Or, alternatively,<br />

one might argue that because TDOT was the responsible entity for conducting the<br />

project, the project fits the category of public works. This argument is consistent<br />

with the DERA program determination cited on page 14 of this report.<br />

13-R-0321 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!