25.12.2013 Views

obscenites renaissantes - ePrints Soton - University of Southampton

obscenites renaissantes - ePrints Soton - University of Southampton

obscenites renaissantes - ePrints Soton - University of Southampton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SINGING THE COURTLY BODY 199<br />

and Amadis in particular were soon in circulation, rapidly joined by similar assaults<br />

on the novel by French critics. Notably, French condemnations <strong>of</strong> Amadis <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

bracket it together with Ovid, bringing the vernacular novel into dialogue with the<br />

themes William McKenzie discusses above. These attacks frequently took an antiaulic<br />

turn, with Amadis cast as the mirror <strong>of</strong> a dissipated court culture, where elegant<br />

language and stylized manners serve only as cover for depraved sexual behaviour.'"^ By<br />

1571 the chorus <strong>of</strong> disapproval was loud, and Gohory accordingly uses the preface <strong>of</strong><br />

the Trezieme livre to defend the book against charges <strong>of</strong> lasciviousness. Fiis argument<br />

uses charges <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy to evoke the very desiring woman whose portrayal within<br />

the novel had been targeted by moralizing attacks. He first seems to agree with the<br />

'mesdisans' who claim that the love episodes in the novel could be considered 'un peu<br />

gayes et lascives.' However, this is only to be expected in a recreational work; and he<br />

reels <strong>of</strong>f a list <strong>of</strong> authorities who recommend recreational reading to balance more<br />

serious activity, especially for princes and other elites who require such relaxation<br />

from their efforts in civil and military domains. The 'scrupuleux et facheux', who deny<br />

the usefulness <strong>of</strong> recreation, should just not read the novel - or else get someone to<br />

mark the chapters that might contain objectionable things so they can avoid them. He<br />

closes with a scornful comment about hypocrites who read romances but pretend not<br />

to, using them as primers for relationships with their lovers while condemning their<br />

lasciviousness:<br />

sans y epargner les damoiselles qui ont confesse a leurs amans, que le soir que leur<br />

maistresse commandoit de estaindre les lumieres, elles les avoient leuz a la lueur des<br />

tisons, lesquelles neantmoins a d'autres gentilshommes qui louoient les Amadis les<br />

disoient estre trop dissolus: 6 les sucrees 6 les tendrettes, pour ainsi deguiser sous<br />

le masque de gravite ou Gel de severite, le doux miel qu'elles y avoient savoure des<br />

amoureux delices.''<br />

This blast at female readers and their dissimulation comes to seem disingenuous, for it<br />

is precisely this aspect <strong>of</strong> response that is underlined by his depiction within the novel<br />

<strong>of</strong> how noblewomen should handle encounters with sexually suggestive material. And<br />

Gohory's preface evokes another central quality <strong>of</strong> the obscene dynamic, in which<br />

charges <strong>of</strong> sexual immorality - whether pr<strong>of</strong>fered by others, or ostensibly refuted -<br />

serve to articulate the obscene and thus contribute to its proliferation. Reading<br />

Gohory's preface alongside the musical episode that closes the novel suggests that the<br />

spectre <strong>of</strong> condemnation, like the figure <strong>of</strong> the hypocritical woman reader, is here<br />

deliberately evoked both to heighten the transgressive effect and to defuse it by seeking<br />

14 Michel Simonin, 'La disgrace d'Amadis', Studi Francesi, 18 (1984), 16-19.<br />

15 Jacques Gohory, Le Trezieme livre dAmadis de Gaule (Paris: Breyer, 1571), 'Preface aux<br />

lecteurs' (unfoliated).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!