26.12.2013 Views

2842/09 - Maryland Courts

2842/09 - Maryland Courts

2842/09 - Maryland Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[WITNESS]:<br />

[PROSECUTOR]:<br />

[WITNESS]:<br />

[PROSECUTOR]:<br />

[WITNESS]:<br />

And I reiterated to [appellant] that, in fact, I<br />

had not lied to him. I had never specifically<br />

said who was deceased, that I had just told him<br />

at the beginning of the interview that, in fact,<br />

someone was dead and named no specific name.<br />

Now was it at that point that you played the<br />

portion of the Jackson interview?<br />

Yes. When [appellant] still appeared that he<br />

did not believe that, in fact, that was true, I<br />

played approximately 10 seconds of the<br />

interview. Just enough of the interview to let<br />

[appellant] hear [Jackson] claiming that, in fact,<br />

[appellant] was the shooter.<br />

And what, if anything, did he say after you played<br />

that portion of the Jackson interview.<br />

At that point he was angry. More so, at that point,<br />

he was angry with [Jackson]. He went on to tell us<br />

that there was a moral code and that basically no<br />

one was supposed to talk to the police.<br />

* * *<br />

[PROSECUTOR]:<br />

Now approximately what time did the interview<br />

end?<br />

[WITNESS]: At approximately, I believe, 14:55.<br />

[PROSECUTOR]:<br />

[WITNESS]:<br />

[PROSECUTOR]:<br />

[WITNESS]:<br />

Which would be what time?<br />

Which would be 2:55 p.m.<br />

What happened to the defendant at that point?<br />

At that point, the defendant was placed back into<br />

the holding cell.<br />

(Emphasis added).<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!