2842/09 - Maryland Courts
2842/09 - Maryland Courts
2842/09 - Maryland Courts
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[WITNESS]:<br />
[PROSECUTOR]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
[PROSECUTOR]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
And I reiterated to [appellant] that, in fact, I<br />
had not lied to him. I had never specifically<br />
said who was deceased, that I had just told him<br />
at the beginning of the interview that, in fact,<br />
someone was dead and named no specific name.<br />
Now was it at that point that you played the<br />
portion of the Jackson interview?<br />
Yes. When [appellant] still appeared that he<br />
did not believe that, in fact, that was true, I<br />
played approximately 10 seconds of the<br />
interview. Just enough of the interview to let<br />
[appellant] hear [Jackson] claiming that, in fact,<br />
[appellant] was the shooter.<br />
And what, if anything, did he say after you played<br />
that portion of the Jackson interview.<br />
At that point he was angry. More so, at that point,<br />
he was angry with [Jackson]. He went on to tell us<br />
that there was a moral code and that basically no<br />
one was supposed to talk to the police.<br />
* * *<br />
[PROSECUTOR]:<br />
Now approximately what time did the interview<br />
end?<br />
[WITNESS]: At approximately, I believe, 14:55.<br />
[PROSECUTOR]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
[PROSECUTOR]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
Which would be what time?<br />
Which would be 2:55 p.m.<br />
What happened to the defendant at that point?<br />
At that point, the defendant was placed back into<br />
the holding cell.<br />
(Emphasis added).<br />
11