2842/09 - Maryland Courts
2842/09 - Maryland Courts
2842/09 - Maryland Courts
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Corporal Bachtell and myself cut [appellant] off<br />
and said, AWe can talk to you as much as you<br />
want to talk to us, but, in fact, we have to, you<br />
know, we have to advise you of your rights, and<br />
you have to be willing to waive those rights if, in<br />
fact, you want to speak to us.@<br />
There was, I would say, probably easily 5 to 10<br />
minutes of conversation for him to understand that,<br />
you know, we would listen to whatever he had to<br />
say. We were willing to talk to him as long as he<br />
wanted to talk to us, but that, in fact, he needed to<br />
understand his Miranda Rights, and we were not<br />
going to violate those and he had to, in fact, waive<br />
those.<br />
* * *<br />
[DEFENSE<br />
COUNSEL]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
[DEFENSE<br />
COUNSEL]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
[DEFENSE<br />
COUNSEL]:<br />
[WITNESS]:<br />
So you continued to talk to [appellant]? There<br />
was never a break in communication between<br />
you and [appellant] when he invoked his right to<br />
remain silent, was there?<br />
[Appellant] continued to talk to us.<br />
There was never a break in communication<br />
between you and [appellant] and [Cpl.] Bachtell<br />
once he invoked his right to remain silent, correct?<br />
[Appellant] continued to speak to [Cpl.] Bachtell<br />
and myself as I was writing, ADeclined to be<br />
interviewed.@<br />
I=m asking this a third time. There was never a<br />
break in communication between you and<br />
[appellant] and Corporal Bachtell, correct?<br />
No, there was not.<br />
(Emphasis added).<br />
13