26.12.2013 Views

Rainfall data for the design of sewer detention basins

Rainfall data for the design of sewer detention basins

Rainfall data for the design of sewer detention basins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40<br />

Table 3.6<br />

Volwnes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>detention</strong> <strong>basins</strong> obtained with <strong>the</strong><br />

traditional method expressed by Eq. (2.18) M~imum<br />

water depth 3.5 m. The volumes are given in m /ha<br />

re<br />

a·<br />

Return<br />

period<br />

years<br />

Catchment Maximum permi outflow (1/s ha d) re<br />

5.0 10 0 20.0 30 0<br />

Bergsjon 131 51<br />

Linkoping 1 1 86 48 30<br />

Linkoping 2 130 96 47<br />

Bergsjon 171 124 90 74<br />

Linkoping 1 161 112 72<br />

Linkoping 2 169 123 87 71<br />

Bergsjon 208 155 116 100<br />

Linkoping 1 197 142 98 78<br />

Linkoping 2 206 154 113 97<br />

Bergsjon 274 203 156 140<br />

Linkoping 1 262 188 138 118<br />

Linkoping 2 272 201 1 137<br />

The basin volumes were underestimated by, on average, 10-12%. The<br />

underestimations are larger <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger Linkoping 1 catchment<br />

than <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> smaller catchments probably because <strong>the</strong> routing <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> hydrographs are more important in a large catchment than in a<br />

small one. The underestimations are also larger <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> small<br />

outflows <strong>of</strong> 5 1/s·hared and 10 l/s·hared than <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r outflows<br />

Sjoberg and Martensson (1982) obtained underestimations <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

15-40% when comparing <strong>design</strong> <strong>of</strong> percolation <strong>basins</strong> by<br />

h i s tori c a 1 storms w i t h des i g n by <strong>the</strong> t r ad i t i on a 1 method . I t i s<br />

clear that <strong>the</strong> traditional method gives underestimations that are<br />

larger <strong>for</strong> small outflows than <strong>for</strong> larger outflows. A summary <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> results obtained in <strong>the</strong> present study and <strong>the</strong> results obtained<br />

by Martensson and Sjoberg are shown in g 3.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!