29.12.2013 Views

Base SAS 9.1.3 Procedures Guide - Acsu Buffalo

Base SAS 9.1.3 Procedures Guide - Acsu Buffalo

Base SAS 9.1.3 Procedures Guide - Acsu Buffalo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 Chapter 2. The FREQ Procedure<br />

These individual table results demonstrate the occasional problems with combining<br />

information into one table and not accounting for information in other variables such<br />

as Gender. Figure 2.5 contains the CMH results. There are three summary (CMH)<br />

statistics; which one you use depends on whether your rows and/or columns have<br />

an order in r × c tables. However, in the case of 2 × 2 tables, ordering does not<br />

matter and all three statistics take the same value. The CMH statistic follows the chisquare<br />

distribution under the hypothesis of no association, and here, it takes the value<br />

4.0186 with 1 degree of freedom. The associated p-value is 0.0450, which indicates<br />

a significant association at the α = 0.05 level.<br />

Thus, when you adjust for the effect of gender in these data, there is an association<br />

between internship and program enrollment. But, if you ignore gender, no association<br />

is found. Note that the CMH option also produces other statistics, including estimates<br />

and confidence limits for relative risk and odds ratios for 2×2 tables and the Breslow-<br />

Day Test. These results are not displayed here.<br />

Summary Statistics for Internship by Enrollment<br />

Controlling for Gender<br />

Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Statistics (<strong>Base</strong>d on Table Scores)<br />

Statistic Alternative Hypothesis DF Value Prob<br />

---------------------------------------------------------------<br />

1 Nonzero Correlation 1 4.0186 0.0450<br />

2 Row Mean Scores Differ 1 4.0186 0.0450<br />

3 General Association 1 4.0186 0.0450<br />

Total Sample Size = 223<br />

Figure 2.5.<br />

Test for the Hypothesis of No Association<br />

Agreement Study Example<br />

Medical researchers are interested in evaluating the efficacy of a new treatment for a<br />

skin condition. Dermatologists from participating clinics were trained to conduct the<br />

study and to evaluate the condition. After the training, two dermatologists examined<br />

patients with the skin condition from a pilot study and rated the same patients. The<br />

possible evaluations are terrible, poor, marginal, and clear. Table 2.2 contains the<br />

data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!