Finding Their Voices - Amherst College
Finding Their Voices - Amherst College
Finding Their Voices - Amherst College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2<br />
A Wider Lens: Music in New England <strong>College</strong>s, 1830 to 1880<br />
I. The “Feminine Arts”: Music in Women’s <strong>College</strong>s<br />
The history of music in American women's colleges has been left woefully understudied,<br />
even in the already limited world of academic study of music in American<br />
colleges. 97<br />
This fact is particularly confounding because many of these institutions<br />
adopted music into their curriculums at a much earlier point than their all-male<br />
counterparts. Much ado has been made of John Knowles Paine's appointment as the "first<br />
full Professor of Music in America" at Harvard in 1876, but the same writers who have<br />
celebrated Paine’s appointment seem to have conveniently forgotten that Edward Wiebé<br />
held that title at Vassar in 1865. 98<br />
At the Mount Holyoke Female Seminary, later to<br />
become Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong>, vocal music had been taught since 1838, nearly<br />
surpassing even the claims of Oberlin <strong>College</strong>, which had appointed an Instructor of<br />
Sacred Music in 1835. The reasons for these broad oversights are not clear. In my work<br />
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
97 The few works that deal with collegiate music often either ignore women’s colleges entirely or give them<br />
a very brief overview. Among the worst offenders are Rosemary Basham’s “The Development of Music<br />
Curricula in American <strong>College</strong>s and Universities” (M. Ed. diss., University of Louisville, 1971), where the<br />
author treats all women’s colleges with a single sentence; Maurice Faulkner’s “The Roots of Music<br />
Education in American <strong>College</strong>s and Universities,” (PhD diss., Stanford University, 1955), which fails to<br />
mention a single women’s institution; and similarly Edmund Jeffers’s Music for the General <strong>College</strong><br />
Student (New York: King’s Crown Press, 1944) explores early musical practices in many men’s institutions<br />
but has little to say about institutions for the opposite sex.<br />
98 This misconception is found in many overviews of American music, including The Harvard<br />
Biographical Dictionary of Music (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996), 663;<br />
Gilbert Chase, America’s Music: From the Pilgrims to the Present (Chicago: University of Illinois Press,<br />
1987), 341-342; and Russell Sanjek, American Popular Music and its Business: The First Four Hundred<br />
Years, 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), 349. Richard Taruskin in his Oxford History of Western<br />
Music: Music in the Nineteenth Century gets the issue technically correct, calling Paine the “first professor<br />
of music at any American University.” While it is true that neither Oberlin nor Vassar were colleges<br />
instead of universities, Taruskin’s use of the term implies he meant any general institution of highereducation.<br />
! 60!