01.01.2014 Views

Spotlight on economic abuse - Good Shepherd Youth & Family ...

Spotlight on economic abuse - Good Shepherd Youth & Family ...

Spotlight on economic abuse - Good Shepherd Youth & Family ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Community Services Policies and Practices<br />

This secti<strong>on</strong> describes some of the key c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s between the community services sector<br />

and ec<strong>on</strong>omic <strong>abuse</strong>. Key services and programs relating to ec<strong>on</strong>omic <strong>abuse</strong> are mainly<br />

tertiary interventi<strong>on</strong>s, including some services that are specifically designed to assist<br />

individual women experiencing domestic and family violence as well as more general<br />

services such as financial counselling, legal assistance, accommodati<strong>on</strong> assistance, material<br />

aid and financial educati<strong>on</strong> programs. Service providers in these areas are also active in<br />

developing and providing sec<strong>on</strong>dary interventi<strong>on</strong>s, for example educati<strong>on</strong> and training for<br />

workers and systemic advocacy.<br />

This secti<strong>on</strong> is primarily organised around different sectors of community services providers<br />

and c<strong>on</strong>siders the ways in which they relate to ec<strong>on</strong>omic <strong>abuse</strong>. First, however, it draws<br />

attenti<strong>on</strong> to some recent research findings and to development work by community sector<br />

organisati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cerning some possible gaps and/or priorities for service resp<strong>on</strong>ses that are<br />

not sector specific or that may require collaborative resp<strong>on</strong>ses.<br />

Recent findings relating to service and program gaps<br />

In Braaf and Barrett Meyering’s (2011) recent study, workers in a variety of community<br />

services (for example, domestic violence, health service, legal service) identified financial<br />

issues as being raised regularly in their discussi<strong>on</strong>s with clients affected by domestic<br />

violence and they observed that financial <strong>abuse</strong> was very comm<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g such clients. This<br />

and other studies have also identified the following issues for services:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

A need for greater acknowledgement of the l<strong>on</strong>g-term impacts of violence and the<br />

need for post-crisis support aimed at preventing women returning to violent<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships and supporting women’s wellbeing in the l<strong>on</strong>ger-term (Desm<strong>on</strong>d 2011;<br />

Evans 2007).<br />

A need for workers supporting women <strong>on</strong> exit from domestic and family violence to<br />

provide individual ‘ec<strong>on</strong>omic advocacy’ around women’s debts, savings, assets and<br />

income as a key strategy to assist women increase their financial security following<br />

domestic violence (Barrett Meyering 2012).<br />

A need for ec<strong>on</strong>omic advocacy at a systemic level, for financial literacy educati<strong>on</strong> as<br />

preventative measures and for specialised financial literacy programs from women<br />

affected by violence (Braaf & Barrett Meyering 2011).<br />

A need for training around domestic violence and linkages with domestic violence<br />

and other services including to raise awareness of the ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts of domestic<br />

violence <strong>on</strong> women and to recognise that <strong>abuse</strong> may c<strong>on</strong>tinue after separati<strong>on</strong> (Braaf<br />

& Barrett Meyering 2011).<br />

Domestic and family violence services<br />

In the United States c<strong>on</strong>text, Christy-McMullin (2011) maintains that domestic violence<br />

services generally focus <strong>on</strong> mental health, parenting skills and domestic skills and that this<br />

reflects patriarchal society and traditi<strong>on</strong>al gender assignments. She argues that emoti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

<strong>abuse</strong>, ec<strong>on</strong>omic literacy, and wealth and asset building need to be brought to the fore of<br />

service, policy and research practice agendas. This critique does not readily apply to the<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!