01.01.2014 Views

Tourism Statistics - Government of Botswana

Tourism Statistics - Government of Botswana

Tourism Statistics - Government of Botswana

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOTSWANA<br />

STRENGTHENING TOURISM STATISTICS<br />

AND FORMULATION OF AN<br />

EXPERIMENTAL TSA - 2005/2006<br />

October 2007


0<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................. 3<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 4<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 6<br />

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 8<br />

1.1 General Background for <strong>Botswana</strong> ............................................................................... 8<br />

1.2 General Background on <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Accounts .................................................. 8<br />

1.3 Introduction to the TSA Framework .............................................................................. 9<br />

1.4 TSA Outputs ..................................................................................................................... 9<br />

2. TOURISM CONSUMPTION IN BOTSWANA ........................................................................ 10<br />

2.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 10<br />

2.2 Inbound International Tourists ..................................................................................... 12<br />

2.3 Domestic Tourists ......................................................................................................... 19<br />

2.4 Resident Outbound Tourists ........................................................................................ 21<br />

2.5 Tables 2 to 4 in the TSA ................................................................................................ 21<br />

3. TOURISM SUPPLY IN BOTSWANA..................................................................................... 25<br />

3.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 25<br />

3.2 <strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic Industries ............................................................................... 26<br />

3.3 Production Accounts .................................................................................................... 26<br />

4. ESTIMATION OF TOURISM VALUE ADDED .................................................................... 288<br />

4.1 Reconciliation <strong>of</strong> Supply and Demand ...................................................................... 288<br />

4.2 Measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> in <strong>Botswana</strong> .............................................................................. 28<br />

5. EMPLOYMENT AND NON-MONETARY INDICATORS ..................................................... 322<br />

5.1 <strong>Tourism</strong> Employment .................................................................................................. 322<br />

5.2 Non-Monetary Indicators ............................................................................................ 322<br />

6. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 34<br />

6.1 Contribution to the Economy ....................................................................................... 34<br />

6.2 Leakages and Linkages ................................................................................................ 34<br />

6.3 Conclusions on the TSA Process .............................................................................. 355<br />

6.4 The Way Forward ........................................................................................................... 36<br />

ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................ 37<br />

ANNEX 2: TSA DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 38<br />

ANNEX 3: VISTOR SURVEYS ...................................................................................................... 41<br />

ANNEX 4: SAME-DAY VISITORS – INTERNATIONAL INBOUND ........................................... 455<br />

ANNEX 5: TOURISM CHARACTERISTIC PRODUCTS AND ACTIVITIES ................................. 49<br />

ANNEX 6: BASIC PRICES AND PURCHASERS’ PRICES ....................................................... 500<br />

ANNEX 7: SUPPLY AND USES OF GOODS AND SERVICES ................................................. 511<br />

ANNEX 8: DEFINITIONS IN TOURISM ...................................................................................... 522<br />

ANNEX 9: DETAILING THE DEFINITIONS ................................................................................ 533<br />

ANNEX 10: TRAVEL CREDIT & DEBIT ACCOUNT .................................................................... 54<br />

2


ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS<br />

BOB<br />

Bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

COICOP Classification <strong>of</strong> Individual Consumption by Purpose<br />

CSO<br />

Central Statistical Office<br />

DOT<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

GDP<br />

Gross Domestic Product<br />

GFCF Gross Fixed Capital Formation<br />

HATAB Hospitality and <strong>Tourism</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

ISIC<br />

International Standard Industrial Classification <strong>of</strong> all Economic Activities<br />

NPISH Non Pr<strong>of</strong>it Institutions serving Households<br />

OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development<br />

RSU<br />

Research and <strong>Statistics</strong> Unit <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

SNA 1993 System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts 1993<br />

TGDP <strong>Tourism</strong> Gross Domestic Product<br />

TOR<br />

Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference<br />

TVA<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Value Added<br />

UB<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

UNSC United Nations Statistical Commission<br />

UNDP United Nations Development Programme<br />

UNWTO United Nations World <strong>Tourism</strong> Organization<br />

WTTC World Travel and <strong>Tourism</strong> Council<br />

3


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The project team would like to express its sincere thanks and appreciation to the following for their<br />

valuable collaboration, guidance and support:<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, Wildlife and <strong>Tourism</strong>:<br />

H.E. Mr. Onkokame Kitso Mokaila, Honourable Minister<br />

Dr. Lucas P. Gakale, Permanent Secretary<br />

Mr. Edmont Bagaketse Moabi, Deputy Permanent Secretary<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong>, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, Wildlife and <strong>Tourism</strong>:<br />

Ms. Kelebaone G. Maselesele, Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

A special word <strong>of</strong> thanks and praise should be accorded to Mrs. Temalo M. Lesetlhe, Director <strong>of</strong><br />

Research and <strong>Statistics</strong> Unit <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong>, and her team, for all their hard work<br />

and assistance which culminated in this first TSA for <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

United Nations Development Programme:<br />

Ms. Viola Morgan, Resident Representative<br />

Mr. Sennye Obuseng, National Economist<br />

World <strong>Tourism</strong> Organization (UNWTO):<br />

Mr. Francesco Frangialli, Secretary-General<br />

Dr. Harsh Varma, Director <strong>of</strong> Development Assistance<br />

Ms Vanessa Satur, Project Coordinator, Department <strong>of</strong> Development Assistance<br />

The project was undertaken by the following consultants:<br />

Mr. Kevin Millington – Team Leader<br />

Mr. David McEwen – <strong>Statistics</strong> Expert<br />

Ms. Marion Libreros – TSA Expert<br />

Mr. Joe Heym – Database Expert<br />

4


Ngoma Causeway<br />

Photo 1: Cooperation between the Department <strong>of</strong> Immigration and the Research and <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Unit <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> at Pioneer Gate – an illustration <strong>of</strong> the countrywide cooperation<br />

that took place in the UNDP/ UNWTO project.<br />

Photo 2: Interviewer Training at the Research and <strong>Statistics</strong> Unit <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> in<br />

Gaborone – an illustration <strong>of</strong> the substantial effort that has to be put into securing primary<br />

statistics. Trying to develop capacity to collect, compile and analyse primary statistics has been a<br />

focus <strong>of</strong> the UNDP/ UNWTO project.<br />

5


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In 2004, a UNWTO executed project Strengthening <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> in <strong>Botswana</strong> commenced.<br />

Its ultimate aim was to develop the first <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Account (TSA) for <strong>Botswana</strong>. However<br />

the TSA was not the only goal <strong>of</strong> this project. Over its duration the following significant milestones<br />

have been achieved:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The process for measuring monthly accommodation statistics has been improved and<br />

upgraded. Data is now analysed and published within two months <strong>of</strong> the period for which<br />

it is collected.<br />

The annual visitor survey that is used to measure tourism expenditure has been improved<br />

to provide more useful information on the economic impact <strong>of</strong> tourism in <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

The national tourism statistics database has been revised to ensure it can process these<br />

statistics efficiently, and provide reports that are useful for all the relevant stakeholders. At<br />

the same time training has been provided in methods for extracting, processing and<br />

presenting tourism statistics.<br />

A five-year statistics bulletin for the period 2001-2005 was published.<br />

However, all <strong>of</strong> these procedures have also been implemented with the ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> developing<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>‟s first TSA, following the principles set out in the UNWTO‟s System <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

(STS).<br />

2. Recommended Methodological Framework (RMF) for the Experimental TSA<br />

With regard to this Experimental TSA, every attempt has been made to follow the concepts set out<br />

in the TSA: RMF published in 2001 by UNWTO et alia. It should be emphasised that the UNWTO‟s<br />

TSA: RMF focuses upon a statistical process involving the systematic collection and compilation <strong>of</strong><br />

primary statistics, including sample surveys. It does not focus on economic modelling aimed at<br />

using econometric equations for developing estimates <strong>of</strong> tourism statistics.<br />

The benefits <strong>of</strong> using a UNWTO statistical process are that it involves a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

institutions in <strong>Botswana</strong>, as well as individual pr<strong>of</strong>essionals within these institutions, cooperating<br />

and working together to attempt to build up a statistical database that will help with key economic<br />

decision-making for this important industry within <strong>Botswana</strong>. It is reasonable to say that the<br />

cooperation has been excellent, both with the Reference Group (DOT, Bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>, Central<br />

<strong>Statistics</strong> Office, and University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>) and with others, e.g. HATAB (Hotel and <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>).<br />

In this cooperative environment the UNWTO/UNDP project has attempted to build statistical<br />

capacity within the DOT with direct hands-on training. The intention, apart from trying to compile<br />

accurate, coherent and transparent statistics, is to set up the TSA as an ongoing work in progress<br />

that can be amended, modified, and enhanced to incorporate more economic information on<br />

tourism. Also, being a statistical process, it can be implemented by DOT and key collaborating<br />

institutes in <strong>Botswana</strong> directly, without the need for outside expertise, as would probably be<br />

necessary in an economic modelling process such as those used by other agencies.<br />

3. Key Statistical Inputs to the TSA<br />

The range <strong>of</strong> statistics that have been used as inputs into the TSA process has been extensive.<br />

The DOT has provided the Tourist Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong>, the <strong>Tourism</strong> Accommodation <strong>Statistics</strong>, and<br />

the Sample Surveys <strong>of</strong> Visitors, Tour Operators and <strong>Tourism</strong> Suppliers. The CSO has provided a<br />

very wide range <strong>of</strong> material from the National Accounts, the Household Income and Expenditure<br />

Surveys, the Labour <strong>Statistics</strong>, the Transport <strong>Statistics</strong>, the Foreign Trade <strong>Statistics</strong>, the Informal<br />

Sector Survey and the Social Accounting Matrices and others. The BOB has provided statistics on<br />

the travel and transport accounts and the Balance <strong>of</strong> Payments. Further data came from the<br />

6


<strong>Botswana</strong> Unified Revenue Service, HATAB, <strong>Government</strong> Budget and private sector<br />

organisations, and indeed some econometric information from outside <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Despite this extensive range <strong>of</strong> statistics it has been necessary to work with anecdotal information<br />

as well, especially in relation to private sector activities. Where improvements could be made in<br />

forthcoming years are with respect to: -<br />

More statistical information on private sector activities, in particular the numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

tourists coming on package tours to <strong>Botswana</strong> would be helpful. Breakdowns on how<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the package tour price is spent in <strong>Botswana</strong> would also improve the TSA process.<br />

It is recommended that HATAB along with DOT be a key player in obtaining such<br />

information.<br />

Information on domestic tourism, not only by households (to be picked up next year by<br />

DOT in cooperation with CSO in a Household Survey) but also domestic tourism by<br />

<strong>Government</strong> staff and by businesses is needed. It is recommended that the DOT add an<br />

accommodation sample survey to their accommodation statistics process.<br />

It is recommended that the updating <strong>of</strong> the Social Accounting Matrix by the CSO be built<br />

into their programme. It is a major exercise but one that would be highly valuable for the<br />

TSA process, and one that could be achieved following the important sample surveys<br />

that are being carried out by CSO currently and in the next couple <strong>of</strong> years.<br />

4. TSA Outputs<br />

Following meetings with the Reference Group, it was decided to attempt an Experimental TSA for<br />

the Year 2005/2006 in order to try and make it as up-to-date as possible, taking into the account<br />

the good availability <strong>of</strong> National Accounting Data from the CSO. It is worth remarking that few<br />

countries, even statistically advanced countries, have attempted to bring the UNWTO TSA to so<br />

recent a date.<br />

The UNWTO TSA process is not in itself an economic impact/policy study. Its focus is on providing<br />

statistical input for economic decision-making with respect to the tourism sector. However, a few<br />

key observations can be made: -<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong>’s Contribution to GDP in <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

The TSA process indicates that TVA (<strong>Tourism</strong> Value Added) in 2005/2006 is around P1.9 billion.<br />

Comparisons with the Gross Value Added in the National Accounts for 2005/2006 <strong>of</strong> P54.8 billion<br />

(provisional figures) show that the Direct Contribution <strong>of</strong> the Tourist Expenditure (consumption) is<br />

around 3.4% to <strong>Botswana</strong>‟s GDP.<br />

It should be emphasised that this is the direct contribution and there are further indirect<br />

contributions that can arise from value added by suppliers to the tourism industry, who have no<br />

direct connection with the tourist, himself/herself.<br />

Indirect contribution can vary substantially, and can lie usually anywhere between 25% and 75% <strong>of</strong><br />

the direct contribution. If this were to apply in <strong>Botswana</strong>, it might be that the direct + indirect<br />

contribution would lie between 4.2% and 6.0%. These contributions relate to the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

expenditure/consumption.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Employment in <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

CSO have indicated that the level <strong>of</strong> employment in the Hotels and Restaurants exceeds 11,000 in<br />

2004. Not all such employment is associated with tourism expenditure, but then expenditure by<br />

tourists outside <strong>of</strong> Hotels and Restaurants will broadly <strong>of</strong>fset the non-tourist expenditure.<br />

Employment at more than 11,000 is highly significant exceeding employment in Mining and<br />

Quarrying, in Transport and Communications, and in Finance.<br />

7


1. INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 General Background for <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> is seen as an important sector in the economy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> providing jobs, local incomes<br />

and making contributions to <strong>Government</strong> revenues. In recognition <strong>of</strong> this importance though<br />

lacking any objective measurement <strong>of</strong> it, the <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> decided to strengthen the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> collecting tourism statistics, and embarked upon measures to analyse the economic<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> tourism with a view to underpinning a series <strong>of</strong> forthcoming strategies and policies<br />

for the development <strong>of</strong> tourism in the country.<br />

Central to this initiative has been the Research and <strong>Statistics</strong> Unit (RSU) <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> (DOT). The RSU, as part <strong>of</strong> a UNDP/UNWTO project, has been strengthening the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> all the tourism statistics in <strong>Botswana</strong> including arrival statistics, accommodation<br />

statistics, statistics on visitors to the National Parks, sample surveys <strong>of</strong> visitors, and other surveys<br />

concerned with trying to improve the <strong>Government</strong>‟s understanding <strong>of</strong> the tourism industry.<br />

As a follow-on to the improvements in the tourism statistical processes, the DOT has taken the<br />

step <strong>of</strong> putting together this „Experimental <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Account‟, following the methodology<br />

recommended by the UNWTO and endorsed by the UN Statistical Commission, the Organisation<br />

for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the European Commission through<br />

Eurostat. The DOT has been assisted in this endeavour by a Reference Group within <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

that has included the Central <strong>Statistics</strong> Office (CSO), the Bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> (BOB), and the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> (UOB). Many other organisations within <strong>Botswana</strong> also contributed to the<br />

work, including the private sector. The efforts <strong>of</strong> so many organisations have been much<br />

appreciated by the DOT.<br />

1.2 General Background on <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Accounts<br />

Virtually all countries throughout the world have National Accounts in which the main economic<br />

aggregates have been measured/ estimated, such as, for example, Gross Domestic Product<br />

(GDP), value-added by different industries, intermediate consumption by different industries etc.<br />

However, such aggregation has not been possible for tourism within the National Accounts,<br />

although it is <strong>of</strong>ten done for hotels and restaurants, a key part <strong>of</strong> the tourism industries, because<br />

tourism is primarily a demand side phenomenon, that is determined by the expenditure associated<br />

to those identified as visitors whereas Value Added and GDP are measurements associated with<br />

productive activities. The concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Accounts (TSA) was put forward to remedy<br />

this lack <strong>of</strong> economic data on tourism. In a TSA, demand/ consumption <strong>of</strong> tourism, a standard<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> visitor expenditure, is identified, associated to the industries that serve them, and<br />

the value-added arising from that expenditure for the different industries that serve visitors can<br />

then be compiled and added together to establish tourism value added.<br />

The methodology for the TSA is set out in the UNWTO Manual known as TSA: RMF 2001 (RMF =<br />

Recommended Methodological Framework). Two key tenets <strong>of</strong> this methodology are, firstly, that a<br />

uniform methodology allows valid comparisons, enabling the tourism value-added to be compared<br />

with the value-added in other industries and also allowing comparisons with other countries to be<br />

made on a like-for-like basis. Secondly, a key tenet is that the information on demand by visitors<br />

(that can encompass both tourism products and non tourism products) is reconciled with the<br />

information on supply <strong>of</strong> these goods and services in the economy.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> this exercise the DOT has attempted to follow the general guidelines set out in the<br />

TSA: RMF, a Manual prepared under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the UNWTO which has given a forwardlooking<br />

guide for countries to follow in these endeavours.<br />

8


1.3 Introduction to the TSA Framework<br />

The conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> the TSA is set out in the TSA: RMF published by the UNWTO,<br />

OECD and the European Commission in 2001. Its key aspects are reiterated here and can be<br />

seen in detail in Chapter Four in the TSA: RMF document.<br />

The methodological framework for the elaboration <strong>of</strong> the TSA is made up <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> definitions and<br />

classifications integrated into tables and organised in a logical consistent way. It allows the whole<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> tourism in both its aspects <strong>of</strong> demand and supply to be seen. The Ten Tables which<br />

comprise the satellite account are derived from or related to the tables <strong>of</strong> the 1993 SNA that<br />

concern the supply and use <strong>of</strong> goods and services. They are at the centre <strong>of</strong> international<br />

comparisons <strong>of</strong> the economic importance <strong>of</strong> tourism between economies.<br />

The minimal set <strong>of</strong> tables required to speak <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> satellite accounts comprises Tables 1 to<br />

6 and Table 10. Accounts that concentrate solely on visitor consumption or solely on the supply by<br />

tourism industries and other industries do not qualify as tourism satellite accounts. At a minimum<br />

the TSA must include a detailed presentation <strong>of</strong> supply and consumption, in terms <strong>of</strong> goods and<br />

services consumed by visitors and the activities that produce them, as well as an overall<br />

confrontation <strong>of</strong> their corresponding aggregates, which is at the core <strong>of</strong> the TSA system.<br />

Figure 1.1 – The Ten Tables <strong>of</strong> the TSA<br />

Table 1<br />

Inbound<br />

Table 2<br />

Domestic<br />

Table 3<br />

Outbound<br />

Table 5<br />

Production<br />

Table 7<br />

Employment<br />

Table 8<br />

Capital<br />

Table 9<br />

Collective<br />

Table 10<br />

Indicators<br />

Table 4<br />

Internal<br />

Table 6<br />

Domestic<br />

Supply &<br />

Consumption<br />

1.4 TSA Outputs<br />

TSA: RMF suggests the following as a set <strong>of</strong> relevant indicators <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> tourism in the<br />

economy:<br />

Internal tourism consumption (in cash and in kind);<br />

Value added <strong>of</strong> the tourism industries;<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> value added; and<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> GDP.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> value added and <strong>Tourism</strong> GDP provide measures <strong>of</strong> the economic importance <strong>of</strong> tourism<br />

in the same sense as the GDP <strong>of</strong> any productive activity does. They are indicators emanating from<br />

a reconciliation <strong>of</strong> tourism consumption and supply. Their values will depend in particular on the<br />

completeness <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> visitor consumption that a country adopts, and on<br />

the country‟s ability to assign visitor consumption to the industries that serve the visitors.<br />

9


2. TOURISM CONSUMPTION IN BOTSWANA<br />

2.1 General<br />

The TSA: RMF makes it very clear as to how visitors should be viewed. The visitor is a particular<br />

type <strong>of</strong> individual consumption unit, who is distinguished from other individuals by the fact that<br />

he/she is outside his/her usual environment and travels or visits a place for a purpose other than<br />

the exercise <strong>of</strong> an activity remunerated from within the place visited. Otherwise he/she behaves<br />

like an ordinary consumer, so that the characteristics <strong>of</strong> consumption activity described in the SNA<br />

1993 are also relevant for visitors. The distinction between a visitor and a non-visitor can be<br />

almost impossible to discern from the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> a supplier, and this is one <strong>of</strong> the key difficulties<br />

in compiling primary statistics for the TSA, that need to be based on information provided by the<br />

travellers themselves.<br />

Box 2.1: Concept <strong>of</strong> Usual Environment - UNWTO<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> usual environment, and therefore tourism, has two dimensions. The first is<br />

frequency. Places which are frequently (on a routine basis) visited by a person are part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

usual environment <strong>of</strong> that person, even though these places may be located at a considerable<br />

distance from the place <strong>of</strong> residence. The second dimension is distance. Places located close to<br />

the place <strong>of</strong> residence are also part <strong>of</strong> the usual environment even though the actual spots are<br />

rarely visited. Therefore the usual environment consists <strong>of</strong> a certain area around the place <strong>of</strong><br />

residence plus all places visited rather frequently.<br />

…there is no single operational definition <strong>of</strong> „usual environment‟ that can be applied all over the<br />

world …. countries should look for a practical definition that excludes virtually all routine travel <strong>of</strong><br />

their residents and travel to places very close to the usual place <strong>of</strong> residence from tourism.<br />

Internal tourism consumption, that is the consumption activity <strong>of</strong> visitors within a country, includes<br />

the consumption <strong>of</strong> the following individuals:<br />

Inbound international visitors, staying overnight (and thus being international<br />

tourists) – travelling for the purposes <strong>of</strong> holiday, business, VFR and a number <strong>of</strong> other<br />

tourism purposes, but particularly excluding visitors being remunerated from within<br />

the country visited;<br />

Inbound international visitors, not staying overnight, and thus being same-day<br />

visitors, but nonetheless travelling outside their usual environment. However,<br />

individuals coming into the country in order to make purchases <strong>of</strong> goods to sell back<br />

in their country <strong>of</strong> origin should be excluded;<br />

Domestic visitors staying overnight - travelling for the purposes <strong>of</strong> holiday, business,<br />

VFR and a number <strong>of</strong> other tourism purposes. Visiting one‟s second home is seen as<br />

a tourism purpose;<br />

Domestic visitors, not staying overnight, and thus being same-day visitors, but<br />

nonetheless travelling outside their usual environment; and<br />

Residents on an outbound trip, who spend something within their country <strong>of</strong><br />

reference whilst being on an outbound trip – for example, pre-trip expenditure <strong>of</strong><br />

things to bring along or use on the trip, transportation using a resident carrier, using<br />

the services <strong>of</strong> a resident travel agency, etc.<br />

10


Internal tourism consumption is seen as including a number <strong>of</strong> categories <strong>of</strong> expenditure that will<br />

need to be estimated separately:<br />

Those acquired through direct expenditure by the visitors themselves;<br />

Those imputed to them (consumption for own final use);<br />

Those obtained from other institutional units as transfers in kind other than social<br />

transfers in kind;<br />

Those acquired as social transfers in kind from NPISH;<br />

Those acquired as social transfers in kind from the <strong>Government</strong>; and<br />

Those acquired for their benefit by businesses and that these businesses consider as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> their costs (intermediate consumption): transportation, accommodation costs<br />

paid for by businesses.<br />

Measuring tourism within <strong>Botswana</strong> is a very substantial task because <strong>of</strong> the physical size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country and the large number <strong>of</strong> border posts (for the measurement <strong>of</strong> international tourism). More<br />

than this, most <strong>of</strong> the border posts are road border posts involving a substantial level <strong>of</strong> cross<br />

border travel. Many <strong>Government</strong> Departments have had to contribute to this task <strong>of</strong> putting<br />

together tourism statistics.<br />

Figure 2.1: <strong>Botswana</strong> Border Posts<br />

11


Estimates <strong>of</strong> internal tourism consumption have been put together based upon:<br />

Inbound International Visitors;<br />

Domestic Tourists; and<br />

The domestic component <strong>of</strong> an outbound trip by <strong>Botswana</strong> residents.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these components is discussed in the following sub-sections.<br />

2.2 Inbound International Tourists<br />

The expenditure by Inbound International Tourists can be divided into:<br />

Expenditure by tourists themselves in <strong>Botswana</strong>, on which they can report;<br />

Acquisition <strong>of</strong> tourism and other services by Tour Operators spending in <strong>Botswana</strong> on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists, from the money already paid to the tour operator (or travel agency, or<br />

ground operator) by the tourist as part <strong>of</strong> the package tour price; and<br />

Expenditure by Same-day visitors who are coming across the border and not staying the<br />

night.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these is reported upon in the next sub-sections. There are other expenditures that need to<br />

be estimated from other sources but these are not included for the time being.<br />

2.2.1 Direct Spending by Tourists themselves<br />

The Visitor Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong>, from CSO/DOT, based upon the entry/departure cards (E/D Cards)<br />

collected by the Department <strong>of</strong> Immigration at the border posts indicate the numbers <strong>of</strong> people<br />

entering and leaving <strong>Botswana</strong>. From this information tourist arrivals have to be derived, taking out<br />

returning residents and various other categories <strong>of</strong> border entrants that are not included in the<br />

Inbound Tourist statistics.<br />

Definitions <strong>of</strong> Basic <strong>Tourism</strong> Units (from UNWTO) are shown in<br />

Annex 8. Details <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these definitions are given in Annex 9.<br />

This gives an indication <strong>of</strong> the complexities in deriving information<br />

on tourist arrivals.<br />

Since <strong>Botswana</strong> has a large number <strong>of</strong> road border posts (24) as<br />

well as several airports (4), the collection <strong>of</strong> such statistics is a<br />

major operation requiring considerable cooperation between<br />

several <strong>Government</strong> Departments.<br />

Cooperation has been good both, inter alia, for the collection <strong>of</strong><br />

tourist arrival statistics and for the visitor sample surveys carried<br />

out by DOT. The DOT published the tourism statistics for the<br />

period 2001 to 2005 in a publicly available document as shown in<br />

Figure 2.2.<br />

Figure 2.2 – <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> Publication<br />

The tourist arrivals for 2001 – 2004 are shown in Table 2.1. A substantial increase in tourist<br />

arrivals in 2005 and in 2006 is anticipated. Provisional Figures for 2005 are 1.675 million. One<br />

cannot understate the significance <strong>of</strong> the two neighbouring countries <strong>of</strong> South Africa and<br />

Zimbabwe. An exceptional situation exists with Zimbabwe, generating travel that has a complex<br />

mix <strong>of</strong> motives. Numbers are large and most travel is through the border post <strong>of</strong> Ramokgwebana.<br />

The proximity <strong>of</strong> the major towns/ cities in South Africa such as Mafeking, and also Pretoria and<br />

Johannesburg, together with family ties and commercial ties across the borders, inevitably results<br />

in substantial international travel. This includes cross-border travel, some <strong>of</strong> which will be within<br />

the „usual environment‟ and thus should not be counted as tourism.<br />

12


Table 2.1: Tourist Arrivals by Country <strong>of</strong> Residence (Overnight Visitors)<br />

Residence 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Africa South Africa 557,747 527,505 514,708 626,207<br />

Zimbabwe 354,230 454,847 550,994 576,328<br />

Namibia 50,251 64,001 69,587 57,542<br />

Zambia 41,430 25,637 83,588 72,492<br />

Americas USA 21,619 16,322 15,087 17,670<br />

Canada 2,632 1,932 2,065 2,811<br />

Far East Australia 5,669 5,728 5,708 5,595<br />

Japan 3,144 2,281 2,492 2,518<br />

Europe UK 18,486 20,548 18,518 24,069<br />

Germany 9,170 9,985 10,444 9,685<br />

Netherlands 6,342 6,377 6,146 4,929<br />

France 4,381 3,596 3,732 3,989<br />

Italy 3,087 2,323 2,782 3,196<br />

Total 1,193,399 1,273,814 1,405,985 1,522,847<br />

Source: <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> 2001-2005, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Tourist arrivals give an indication <strong>of</strong> numbers coming into <strong>Botswana</strong> but these numbers have to be<br />

converted into tourist expenditure. This requires information on how long visitors are staying in<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> and how much they are spending in <strong>Botswana</strong>, as well as a breakdown <strong>of</strong> what<br />

products they are spending on.<br />

Visitor Surveys play the key role in estimating this information (See Annex 3 – Visitor Surveys).<br />

Key information from the Visitor Surveys on these three variables is set out below.<br />

Average Length <strong>of</strong> Stay<br />

Because a total figure for tourist arrivals embraces such a wide range <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> visitor,<br />

many <strong>of</strong> them undertaking different activities and staying for varying periods, it is best to try to<br />

segment this total in various ways. „Country <strong>of</strong> residence‟ and the „purpose <strong>of</strong> visit‟ have been<br />

looked at in particular. Average length <strong>of</strong> stay varies according to the purpose <strong>of</strong> visit. Examples<br />

include some transit visitors who are staying for only a<br />

night whilst holiday visitors can be staying for nearly six<br />

nights on average. For our reference year <strong>of</strong> 2005/2006<br />

an average for the length <strong>of</strong> stay between the sample<br />

survey data for the Year 2005 and the Year 2006, as<br />

shown in Annex 3 - Table A3.1, has been adopted.<br />

In order to use figures with a lower relative sampling<br />

error, the sample data has <strong>of</strong>ten been brought together<br />

into larger groupings. The relative sampling error (the<br />

standard error times 1.96 – 95% confidence level) has<br />

been calculated as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the arithmetic mean.<br />

Photo 3: Interviewing at Tlokweng Gate<br />

Average Direct Expenditure per Day<br />

Expenditure data has been gleaned from the DOT visitor surveys for 2005 and 2006. In a similar<br />

manner to the „length <strong>of</strong> stay‟, for our reference year <strong>of</strong> 2005/2006, An average for the „expenditure<br />

per day‟ between the sample survey data for the Year 2005 and the Year 2006 has been adopted.<br />

Using the „country <strong>of</strong> residence‟ and the „purpose <strong>of</strong> visit‟ as a way <strong>of</strong> segmenting the total figures<br />

allows one to take into account the considerable disparity in „length <strong>of</strong> stay‟ and „expenditure per<br />

day‟ between individual tourist arrivals. The base figures for expenditure per day are shown in<br />

Annex 3 - Table A3.2. Ideally it is „good practice‟ to focus upon expenditure with relative sampling<br />

errors below 25%, but this has not always been possible in this process.<br />

13


Total Direct Spending for Overnight Visitors in 2005/ 2006<br />

The Total Direct Spending by visitors for 2005/2006 is then estimated by multiplying the spend per<br />

day by the average length <strong>of</strong> stay by the number <strong>of</strong> tourist visitors. This total does not include the<br />

spending on their behalf by tour operators/ ground operators/ travel agents etc.<br />

Table 2.2: Total Direct Spending for Overnight Visitors in 2005/ 2006<br />

Total Number <strong>of</strong> Tourist Arrivals 2005/06 1,759,000<br />

Average Length <strong>of</strong> Stay<br />

5.3 nights<br />

Average Expenditure per Day 270<br />

Total Direct Expenditure P million 2517<br />

Source: Derived from DOT Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong> and Visitor Surveys<br />

The total direct spending is estimated at Pula 2,517 million for 2005/06.<br />

In reviewing the markets, as shown in Table 2.3 and Figure 2.2, the significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

neighbouring countries is apparent, but the above figures do not include tour operator spending on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists.<br />

Table 2.3: Total Direct Spending for Overnight Visitors in 2005/ 2006 by Market<br />

Country <strong>of</strong><br />

Residence<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

Total<br />

Arrivals<br />

Average<br />

Length <strong>of</strong><br />

stay – Nights<br />

Average<br />

Direct<br />

Expenditure<br />

per day –<br />

Pula<br />

Total Direct<br />

Spend<br />

P Million<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

total direct<br />

spend<br />

Australia 0.37% 8.5 580 31.9 1.3%<br />

France 0.26% 7.7 513 18.3 0.7%<br />

Germany 0.64% 7.8 474 41.6 1.7%<br />

Namibia 3.78% 3.6 279 66.1 2.6%<br />

South Africa 41.12% 3.6 333 872.9 34.9%<br />

UK 1.58% 8.2 567 128.4 5.1%<br />

USA 1.16% 8.8 591 106.7 4.3%<br />

Zambia 4.76% 5.0 408 170.9 6.8%<br />

Zimbabwe 37.85% 5.9 149 581.4 23.3%<br />

Other 8.49% 11.0 293 481.7 19.3%<br />

Total 100.00% 5.3 270 2,499.8 100.0%<br />

Adjustment 17<br />

Source: Derived from DOT Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong> and Visitor Surveys<br />

It is interesting to observe that although South Africa and Zimbabwe represent almost 80% <strong>of</strong><br />

arrivals, the percentage is much lower in terms <strong>of</strong> total direct spend (somewhat less than 60%),<br />

because their average length <strong>of</strong> stay and their average expenditure per day is notably lower.<br />

14


Figure 2.2 – Direct Expenditure by Source Market<br />

DIRECT EXPENDITURE FROM SOURCE MARKET<br />

Australia France Germany<br />

Namibia<br />

Other<br />

South Africa<br />

Zimbabw e<br />

Zambia<br />

USA<br />

UK<br />

Australia France Germany Namibia South Africa UK USA Zambia Zimbabw e Other<br />

Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Visitor Spending<br />

Sample estimates <strong>of</strong> the breakdown <strong>of</strong> overnight visitor expenditure are obtained from DOT visitor<br />

surveys in 2005 and in 2006. The key feature <strong>of</strong> these breakdowns is that this is the expenditure<br />

by the tourist himself or herself.<br />

The breakdowns <strong>of</strong> expenditure and the figures adopted for 2005/2006 are shown in the Table 2.4<br />

below. These figures derive from the respondent‟s view on how much he spent on the different<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> expenditure.<br />

Table 2.4: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Direct Spending by Overnight Visitors in <strong>Botswana</strong> – 2005/06<br />

Adopted for<br />

2005/2006<br />

Direct Spend<br />

P millions<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation 33% 831<br />

Money Spent on Meals and Drink 11% 277<br />

Money Spent on Transport 7% 176<br />

Money Spent on Recreation 7% 176<br />

Money Spent on Shopping 16% 403<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending 26% 654<br />

Total 100% 2,517<br />

Source: DOT Visitor Surveys<br />

15


Figure 2.3: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Direct Spending by Overnight Visitors in <strong>Botswana</strong> 2005/06<br />

26% Accommodation<br />

33%<br />

Meals & Drinks<br />

Local Transport<br />

Recreation<br />

Shopping<br />

16%<br />

11%<br />

'Other'<br />

7% 7%<br />

2.2.2 Adding Tour Operator Spending on Behalf <strong>of</strong> Tourists<br />

Expenditure by tour operators in <strong>Botswana</strong> on behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists is a part <strong>of</strong> overnight visitor<br />

expenditure (i.e. Inbound <strong>Tourism</strong> Expenditure) as required in Table 1 <strong>of</strong> the TSA. The TSA: RMF<br />

does not tabulate it as a separate component but as a part <strong>of</strong> overnight visitor expenditure.<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> has developed a substantial tour operating business, much admired in other tourist<br />

destinations. Many leading tour operators in the country are members <strong>of</strong> HATAB (Hospitality and<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>), the coordinating body for the industry.<br />

Photo 4: Mowana Lodge – HATAB Forums<br />

Even though HATAB has some excellent<br />

industry forums (See Photo <strong>of</strong> Mowana Lodge<br />

Forum, April 2007), business statistics on the<br />

tour operating/ ground operating businesses<br />

are minimal. As a consequence, it has been<br />

necessary to put together a reasonable<br />

supposition based upon what information<br />

could be obtained from sample surveys (Visitor<br />

Surveys, Tour Operator Survey, Supplier<br />

Survey carried out by DOT) and from<br />

anecdotal information in order to reach<br />

estimates for the numbers <strong>of</strong> package tours<br />

and the subsequent spending by tour<br />

operators on behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists in <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

16


Adding in the Tour Operator Spending on behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists<br />

Separate estimates have been made for the tour operator spending on behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists, as shown<br />

in Table 2.5. These are added together with the direct spending by the tourist him/herself and this<br />

gives the totals in Table 2.6.<br />

Table 2.5: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> Spending in <strong>Botswana</strong> by the Tour Operator<br />

Percentage<br />

Breakdown<br />

Expenditure for<br />

2005/2006 P million<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation, Food and Drink 41% 197<br />

Money Spent on Local Transport 17% 82<br />

Money Spent on Recreation (e.g. Park Fees, inter alia) 9% 43<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending 18% 87<br />

Mark-Up for Tour Operator for own costs 15% 72<br />

Total 100% 481<br />

Table 2.6: Total Spending 2005/2006 – Direct Tourist Spending plus Spending by Tour<br />

Operators on Tourists’ behalf<br />

Direct Spend<br />

P millions<br />

Tour Operator<br />

Spending<br />

P millions<br />

Total Spending<br />

P millions<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation 831 197 1,028<br />

Money Spent on Meals and Drink 277 277<br />

Money Spent on Transport 176 82 258<br />

Money Spent on Recreation 176 43 219<br />

Money Spent on Shopping 403 403<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending 654 159 813<br />

Total 2,517 481 2,998<br />

A best estimate is that the total <strong>of</strong> tourist expenditure (staying overnight visitors) is around P 3<br />

billion in <strong>Botswana</strong> in 2005/2006.<br />

2.2.3 Same-Day Visitor Spending<br />

Same-day travel is important for <strong>Botswana</strong> but a good part <strong>of</strong> it will not be tourism. Rather it will be<br />

cross-border travel within the „usual environment‟. Details <strong>of</strong> the estimate are shown in Annex 4.<br />

The key feature <strong>of</strong> these breakdowns is that the Same-Day Visitors into <strong>Botswana</strong> are not<br />

spending on the usual tourism services – accommodation, meals and drinks, transport, recreation<br />

- or hardly at all. They are spending on „shopping‟ and on „other‟ items, which appear to<br />

encompass a whole range <strong>of</strong> other goods and services – see Table 2.7.<br />

Table 2.7: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Total Spending by Same-day visitors in 2005/ 2006<br />

Percent Total Spend<br />

P million<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation 2.5% 1.58<br />

Money Spent on Meals and Drink 3.3% 2.08<br />

Money Spent on Transport 2.5% 1.58<br />

Money Spent on Recreation 0.5% 0.32<br />

Money Spent on Shopping 63.2% 39.82<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending 28.0% 17.64<br />

Total 100.0% 63.00<br />

17


Figure 2.4: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Same-day Visitor Spending in <strong>Botswana</strong> 2005/06<br />

DAY VISITOR EXPENDITURE BREAKDOWN<br />

28%<br />

3% 3% 3% 1%<br />

62%<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation<br />

Money Spent on Transport<br />

Money Spent on Shopping<br />

Money Spent on Meals and Drink<br />

Money Spent on Recreation<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending<br />

Even though Same-day visitors are not staying the night, some do hire tourism accommodation for<br />

the day.<br />

The expenditure by the three components <strong>of</strong> Inbound International Tourists, namely:<br />

Expenditure by tourists themselves in <strong>Botswana</strong>;<br />

Tour Operators spending in <strong>Botswana</strong> on behalf <strong>of</strong> tourists; and<br />

Same-day visitors.<br />

Make up <strong>of</strong> Table 1 <strong>of</strong> the TSA, as shown below.<br />

Expenditure by others on their behalf and estimated services provided on own account (second<br />

homes) are not included.<br />

18


TSA TABLE 1- Inbound tourism consumption by products and categories <strong>of</strong> visitors –<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> 2005/2006<br />

(visitor final consumption expenditure in cash) (net valuation) – P millions<br />

Same-day visitors Tourists Total visitors<br />

Products (1.1) (1.2)<br />

(1.3) = (1.1) +<br />

(1.2)<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

Accommodation 2 1,028 1,030<br />

Food & Drink 2 277 279<br />

Transport 1 258 259<br />

Recreation 219 219<br />

Tour Operator (Margin) 72 72<br />

A.2 Connected products<br />

Shopping 40 403 443<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

Other Spending 18 741 759<br />

TOTAL 63 2,998 3,061<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trips 213,000 1,759,000<br />

Sources: Derived from DOT & CSO Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong>, DOT Visitor Surveys, Tour Operator Survey<br />

2.3 Domestic Tourists<br />

number <strong>of</strong> overnights 9,300,000<br />

Measuring Domestic <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption requires considerable sample survey data upon<br />

household travel (making same-day trips, making tourist trips staying overnight, and making trips<br />

abroad whether same-day or staying). It also requires considerable data upon business travel by<br />

private sector companies and considerable information on travel by <strong>Government</strong> institutions<br />

including parastatals. Currently this information is not available in <strong>Botswana</strong>, though it is intended<br />

to extend the Household Survey next year (2008) to ascertain more information on residents‟<br />

travel habits. In the absence <strong>of</strong> this detailed information broad estimations <strong>of</strong> Domestic <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Consumption from different sources have been put together, as proxies for the actual statistics.<br />

It is necessary to look at Domestic <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption from three key sources, namely:<br />

Households;<br />

<strong>Government</strong> (Central and Local); and<br />

Businesses.<br />

Information from the following has been taken into account, namely the Household Income and<br />

Expenditure Surveys (HIES), the <strong>Government</strong> Budgets and the National Accounts Data.<br />

Overall, the HIES results in 2002/2003 do lead to the view that domestic household consumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> „hotels and restaurants‟ will be lower than the domestic consumption by businesses<br />

(intermediate consumption) and the domestic consumption by <strong>Government</strong>. This broadly confirms<br />

observation in tourism accommodation.<br />

There are no figures on <strong>Government</strong> Consumption <strong>of</strong> Hotels and tourism related products. Within<br />

the <strong>Government</strong> budget the following have been identified:<br />

(1) Internal Travel;<br />

(2) External Travel, and<br />

(3) Expenditure on Councils, Exhibitions and Conferences.<br />

19


Whilst P 0.9 billion is the <strong>Government</strong> budget for (1) and (3) above for 2006/2007, the precise<br />

content <strong>of</strong> this expenditure is not clear.<br />

Similarly with Businesses there is no allocation <strong>of</strong> intermediate consumption towards Hotels and<br />

Restaurants. Some 3% to 4% <strong>of</strong> intermediate consumption within the economy is not implausible.<br />

The balance between these different sources has been adapted from the Social Accounting Matrix<br />

for <strong>Botswana</strong> from 1996/97. There, the Absorption Matrix indicated that the total supply <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commodity, „Hotels and Restaurants‟ was used in the following manner: -<br />

Commodity Absorbed by: P million 1996/97 Percentage<br />

Households 59.0 11.8%<br />

Exports 210.9 42.3%<br />

Productive Activities – Intermediate Consumption 120.7 24.2%<br />

Central and Local <strong>Government</strong> 108.0 21.7%<br />

Total Output 498.6 100.0%<br />

Source: Social Accounting Matrix 1996/97<br />

The above has been adapted on anecdotal evidence to the figures below.<br />

Households Businesses <strong>Government</strong> Exports Total<br />

Breakdown 5.0% 28.0% 25.0% 42.0% 100.0%<br />

Turnover in<br />

Hotels and<br />

Restaurants P.<br />

million 204.1 1,143.0 1,020.6 1,714.5 4,082.2<br />

But only a proportion <strong>of</strong> this turnover is associated with tourism. Also the turnover has to be<br />

divided between hotels themselves and restaurants. There are number <strong>of</strong> guideposts to the<br />

possible scale and composition <strong>of</strong> components <strong>of</strong> the hotel and restaurant trade. These are: -<br />

The turnover established through the National Accounts procedures (P4.1 billion in<br />

2005/06);<br />

The balance between domestic arrivals and foreign arrivals at hotels (35:65 in 2005);<br />

The earnings that can be obtained from the capacity in tourism accommodation (nearly<br />

8,000 beds);<br />

The data from the <strong>Government</strong> Budget;<br />

Information on business operations; and<br />

Information on hotel and restaurant operations.<br />

In relation to the figure for hotel and restaurant turnover <strong>of</strong> more than P 4 billion in 2005/06, to find<br />

a reasonable fit with this information it has been necessary to assume that the hotel: restaurant<br />

split is around 39:61 and also to assume that the non-tourism component is up towards 20% for<br />

the hotels and over 70% for the restaurants.<br />

Putting together estimates such as these, which could be described as broadly plausible, is a<br />

temporary measure in order to find reasonable orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude. A key issue is that using<br />

information from both the demand side and the supply side compromises the independence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

approaches and any subsequent reconciliation <strong>of</strong> data on demand and supply. However in the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> more information this has been necessary.<br />

20


2.4 Resident Outbound Tourists<br />

The information from the Bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> indicates the following for 2005/2006: -<br />

Period Travel P ‘000 Transport P ‘000<br />

Credit Debit Credit Debit<br />

2005 Q3 360,723 60,602 41,468 65,177<br />

Q4 383,770 75,184 61,726 506,248<br />

2006 Q1 15,703 71,992 64,941 71,441<br />

Q2 381,529 58,460 44,218 81,387<br />

Total 1,141,725 266,238 212,353 724,253<br />

Source: Bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Travel Credits totalled some P1.1 billion, and transport credits a further P 0.2 billion, making P1.4<br />

billion altogether. These figures reflect foreign transactions within the banking system. Because<br />

there are so many ways to make foreign exchange transactions, these figures tend to understate<br />

the inbound tourism expenditure. The figures since the Year 2000 are shown in Annex 10.<br />

For outbound tourism spending, the figures indicate more than P 0.9 billion <strong>of</strong> which the majority is<br />

in the transport account. The domestic component <strong>of</strong> spending on trips abroad appears unlikely to<br />

exceed a substantial percentage addition because <strong>Botswana</strong>‟s airlines tend to deal with domestic<br />

flights and short-haul international flights. Tour operations and travel agency operations (as<br />

margins) are relatively modest in volume for outbound tourism. As a notional order <strong>of</strong> magnitude<br />

for the domestic component <strong>of</strong> trips abroad, one may be talking <strong>of</strong> 5-10%. In the context <strong>of</strong> the<br />

figures above, An arbitrary figure has been used, making it the same as the tour operator margins<br />

on the inbound tourism expenditure (P 72 million).<br />

For the estimate <strong>of</strong> outbound tourism spending the BOB figures have been used from the debits<br />

for travel and transport as a broad order <strong>of</strong> magnitude, giving a figure <strong>of</strong> P 990 million.<br />

2.5 Tables 2 to 4 in the TSA<br />

In putting together Table 2, it has not been possible to make an estimate <strong>of</strong> same-day tourism<br />

domestic trips outside <strong>of</strong> the „usual environment‟.<br />

There is a lot <strong>of</strong> domestic travel in <strong>Botswana</strong>, because the population moves for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

finding work but is still travelling back to its traditional homelands or to see family and friends. The<br />

population does not see this travel as tourism. Given its frequency, it is questionable where to<br />

draw a line between what is tourism and what is not. Also some <strong>of</strong> the population own or rent a<br />

house where they work (e.g. Gaborone) but also have a house back in their home town or village.<br />

Going between their house in their home village and their house where they work is frequent but<br />

not seen as tourism by the local people.<br />

However, in terms <strong>of</strong> tourism analysis, the house in their home town or village to which they travel,<br />

frequently or not frequently, can be viewed as a second home. Visits to second homes are<br />

considered as tourism, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the distance to the usual place <strong>of</strong> residence and the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> the visit.<br />

A breakdown <strong>of</strong> domestic tourism expenditure beyond the spending in hotels and restaurants has<br />

not been possible. The balance between domestic expenditure on accommodation and on food<br />

and beverage reflects the significant level <strong>of</strong> travel to visit friends and relatives.<br />

With these reservations, estimates have been entered into Table 2 (Domestic <strong>Tourism</strong> Spending)<br />

and Table 3 (Resident Outbound <strong>Tourism</strong> Spending) and then adding together Tables 1 & 2, one<br />

obtains Table 4 which is described as Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption.<br />

21


TABLE 2 - Domestic tourism consumption by products and sets <strong>of</strong> resident visitors<br />

(visitor final consumption expenditure in cash) (net valuation)<br />

Pula millions 2005/06<br />

Products (2.1) (2.2)<br />

Resident visitors travelling<br />

to a different country(*)<br />

Resident visitors travelling<br />

only within the country <strong>of</strong><br />

reference<br />

Sameday<br />

Total<br />

Tourists<br />

visitors<br />

Sameday<br />

Tourists<br />

Total<br />

visitors<br />

Sameday<br />

visitors visitors Visitors<br />

(2.3) =<br />

(2.6) = (2.7) =<br />

(2.1) +<br />

(2.4) + (2.1) +<br />

(2.2) (2.4) (2.5) (2.5) 2.4)<br />

All resident visitors (**)<br />

Tourists<br />

(2.8) =<br />

(2.2) +<br />

(2.5)<br />

Total<br />

visitors<br />

(2.9) =<br />

(2.3) +<br />

(2.6)<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic<br />

products<br />

Accommodation 447 0 447<br />

Food & Drink 534 0 534<br />

Transport 0 0 0<br />

Recreation 0 0 0<br />

Tour Operator/Travel Agent<br />

(Margin) 0 72 72<br />

A.2 Connected products<br />

Shopping 0 0 0<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

Other 0 0 0<br />

TOTAL 981 72 1,053<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trips<br />

number <strong>of</strong> overnights<br />

22


TABLE 3 - Outbound tourism consumption by products and categories <strong>of</strong> visitors<br />

(visitor final consumption expenditure in cash) (net valuation)<br />

Pula millions 2005/06 Same-day Tourists Total visitors<br />

visitors<br />

Products (3.1) (3.2) (3.3)=(3.1)+(3.2)<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

A.2 Connected products<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

TOTAL 990<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trips<br />

number <strong>of</strong> overnights<br />

23


TABLE 4 - Internal tourism consumption by products and types <strong>of</strong> tourism (net valuation)<br />

Pula millions 2005/06<br />

Visitors final consumption<br />

Other<br />

components<br />

Internal<br />

tourism<br />

expenditure<br />

in cash <strong>of</strong> visitors consumption<br />

Inbound<br />

tourism<br />

Domestic<br />

tourism<br />

Internal<br />

tourism Consumption<br />

(in cash and<br />

in kind)<br />

consumption consumption<br />

consumption<br />

in cash<br />

Products (4.1)* (4.2)**<br />

(4.1) + (4.2)<br />

= (4.3) (4.4)***<br />

(4.5) = (4.3)<br />

+ (4.4)<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

Accommodation 1,030 447 1,477 1,477<br />

Food & Drink 279 534 813 813<br />

Transport 259 0 259 259<br />

Recreation 219 0 219 219<br />

Tour Operator (Margin) 72 72 144 144<br />

A.2 Connected products<br />

Shopping 443 0 443 443<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

Other 759 0 759 759<br />

TOTAL 3,061 1,053 4,114 4,114<br />

24


3. TOURISM SUPPLY IN BOTSWANA<br />

3.1 General<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> has been fortunate in having an outstanding Central <strong>Statistics</strong> Office that has produced<br />

many exceptional surveys and ongoing statistics, giving a basis for considering the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> an Experimental <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Account. Important publications have included:<br />

National Accounts, both annual and quarterly<br />

Household Expenditure Surveys<br />

Informal Sector Survey<br />

Social Accounting Matrices<br />

Labour <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Foreign Trade <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

When the work <strong>of</strong> the CSO is combined with the work <strong>of</strong> the Research and <strong>Statistics</strong> Unit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> in providing primary statistics with respect to:<br />

Turning Border <strong>Statistics</strong> into <strong>Tourism</strong> Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Accommodation <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Visitor Sample Surveys<br />

Tour Operator Sample Survey<br />

Supplier Sample Survey<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> this work forms the basis for estimating the supply <strong>of</strong> tourism products and services.<br />

Table 3.1: National Accounts Data – Hotels and Restaurants<br />

NA Year Turnover Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

Sales<br />

Gross<br />

Output<br />

Intermediate<br />

Consumption<br />

Gross Value<br />

Added<br />

P Million (current prices)<br />

1993/94 308.6 73.4 235.2 65.8 169.5<br />

1994/95 366.4 45.9 320.5 126.5 194.0<br />

1995/96 449.5 89.2 360.3 116.0 244.3<br />

1996/97 585.4 109.5 475.9 159.3 316.6<br />

1997/98 721.8 122.9 599.0 210.6 388.3<br />

1998/99 859.9 159.3 700.6 235.6 465.0<br />

1999/00 1,086.9 201.3 885.5 303.6 581.9<br />

2000/01 1,172.7 213.3 959.4 310.6 648.7<br />

2001/02 1,392.5 247.0 1,145.5 394.1 751.4<br />

2002/03 2,194.2 534.2 1,660.1 551.1 1,108.9<br />

2003/04 2,707.0 839.1 1,867.9 620.1 1,247.7<br />

2004/05 2,739.0 839.9 1,899.1 630.5 1,268.6<br />

2005/06 4,082.2 1,224.7 2,857.5 948.7 1,908.8<br />

Source: CSO National Accounts<br />

25


3.2 <strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic Industries<br />

The TSA: RMF sets out clearly the <strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic Industries for which it is appropriate to<br />

present information on their production (See Annex 5). Such information is reliant upon two<br />

aspects:<br />

(1) The National Accounts relating to the different production industries; and<br />

(2) The details on tourist‟s expenditure in the appropriate product categories as shown in Annex 5,<br />

which itself is reliant upon the sample surveys undertaken.<br />

With these constraints it has been found necessary to limit the TSA to the main tourism industries,<br />

which were:<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> collective accommodation (but not second homes);<br />

Restaurants and similar;<br />

Road Transport;<br />

Air Transport;<br />

Travel Agencies/ Tour Operators (margins); and<br />

Other industries.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> information on Second Homes used for tourism purposes in <strong>Botswana</strong> means that it is not<br />

possible to compile suitable statistics. Rail travel for tourism purposes is thought to be minimal.<br />

Water Travel is similarly minimal. For the other categories <strong>of</strong> either expenditure or industries,<br />

identifying these separately has not been possible, so they are put together in the category<br />

„others‟. In principle Goods should be treated separately from services: for goods (shopping) only<br />

the retail trade margin generates tourism value added, not the total value <strong>of</strong> the good purchased.<br />

3.3 Production Accounts<br />

The production accounts for the above six industries have been estimated by using the information<br />

available from the CSO, for the national accounts for 2005/2006. The CSO National Accounts give<br />

the key breakdowns into Intermediate Consumption and into Gross Value Added. Both Output and<br />

Gross Value Added are in Basic Prices. The difference between Basic Prices, Producer Prices and<br />

Purchasers‟ Prices is illustrated in Annex 6.<br />

The TSA: RMF recommends a specific format for Table 5 <strong>of</strong> the TSA, which sets out the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> products by the <strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic Industries and then outlines the Inputs which<br />

will make up Intermediate Consumption, and then finally gives a breakdown <strong>of</strong> Gross Value Added<br />

into its components. (For the relationship between these macroeconomic aggregates, see Annex<br />

7)<br />

A key issue here is that a particular product can be produced by more than one industry, and <strong>of</strong><br />

course a tourism industry can produce products other than the product that is its typical output.<br />

Identifying and then measuring these different components is a critical task. Here in <strong>Botswana</strong> it<br />

has not been possible to identify these boundaries with clarity, and for this reason the gross<br />

figures <strong>of</strong> output for any industry may cover other products as well.<br />

Additionally, the output <strong>of</strong> any industry, even a tourism industry, is seldom consumed 100% by<br />

tourists. Except for the accommodation services for visitors, the bulk <strong>of</strong> the products go to nontourism<br />

use.<br />

In order to keep broad comparability with the National Accounts process, „Cost <strong>of</strong> Sales‟ has been<br />

included with Intermediate Consumption. The Production Accounts are in Table 5.<br />

26


TABLE 5 - Production accounts <strong>of</strong> tourism industries and other industries (net valuation)<br />

Pula Millions – 2005/06<br />

A. Specific products 1a<br />

Accommod<br />

ation<br />

Services in<br />

55<br />

T O U R I S M I N D U S T R I E S<br />

2 -<br />

Restaurants<br />

and similar<br />

4 - Road<br />

transport<br />

6 - Air<br />

transport<br />

8 – Travel<br />

agencies<br />

and similar<br />

TOTAL<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Industries<br />

Other Non<br />

tourism<br />

Industries<br />

TOTAL output <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic producers<br />

(at basic prices)<br />

A.1 Characteristic products (5.1a) (5.2) (5.4) (5.6) (5.8) (5.13) (5.14) (5.15) = (5.13) +(5.14)<br />

1.1 – Hotels and other accommodate 1,480.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,480.4 0.0 1,480.4<br />

2 – Restaurants and similar 0.0 2,315.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,315.5 0.0 2,315.5<br />

3.2 Road passenger transport services 0.0 0.0 1,068.8 0.0 0.0 1,068.8 0.0 1,068.8<br />

3.4 Air passenger transport services 0.0 0.0 0.0 668.6 0.0 668.6 0.0 668.6<br />

4 – Travel agencies and similar 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 149.0 149.0 0.0 149.0<br />

B. Non specific products 52.1 81.5 6.5 5.4 0.0 145.4 89,921.7 90,067.1<br />

TOTAL output (at basic prices) 1,532.5 2,397.0 1,075.2 674.0 149.0 5,827.8 89,921.7 95,749.4<br />

Inputs - Direct Imports & Duties 137.7 328.0 274.5 154.6 16.7 911.4 8,343.9 9,255.3<br />

1. Agriculture, forestry and fishery products 0.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 984.9 987.7<br />

2. Ores and minerals 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 92.3 92.4<br />

3. Electricity, gas and water 28.0 68.9 4.6 2.6 1.7 105.7 716.4 822.1<br />

4. Manufacturing 124.6 381.1 82.9 76.0 2.7 667.3 2,582.9 3,250.2<br />

5. Construction work and construction 30.5 74.9 2.8 7.0 2.9 118.1 2,205.2 2,323.4<br />

6. Trade services, restaurants and hotel services 18.3 44.9 10.0 5.1 1.8 80.1 4,734.5 4,814.6<br />

7. Transport, storage and communication services 130.3 320.6 11.7 18.5 3.4 484.6 1,543.1 2,027.7<br />

8. Business services 121.0 297.7 7.8 90.1 5.1 521.6 2,162.6 2,684.2<br />

9. Community, social and personal services 6.5 16.0 89.6 27.5 1.4 140.9 684.3 825.2<br />

Total intermediate consumption (purchasers pr.) 597.7 1,534.1 483.9 381.4 35.7 3,032.7 24,050.1 27,082.8<br />

Wholesale and Retail - Cost <strong>of</strong> Sales 18,956.6 18,956.6<br />

Total gross value added (at basic prices) 934.8 862.9 591.4 292.7 113.3 2,795.1 46,915.0 49,710.1<br />

Compensation <strong>of</strong> employees 175.7 198.6 236.2 86.5 33.4 730.5 13,000.9 13,731.4<br />

Other taxes less subsidies on production 0.7 0.5 5.5 0.0 -4.2 2.4 -1.7 0.7<br />

Depreciation 46.7 34.5 409.6 107.0 26.9 624.8 5,976.3 6,601.1<br />

Gross Operating surplus (including Mixed Income) 711.4 629.1 -59.6 99.1 57.2 1,437.1 27,939.3 29,376.4<br />

Adjustment 0.3 0.3 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5<br />

27


4. ESTIMATION OF TOURISM VALUE ADDED<br />

4.1 Reconciliation <strong>of</strong> Supply and Demand<br />

At the very heart <strong>of</strong> the TSA process, as recommended in the TSA: RMF is the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

reconciling demand and supply. This is a powerful concept that attempts to improve both the<br />

collection and compilation <strong>of</strong> statistics as well as improving the analyses that are necessary to<br />

achieve it. It introduces an exemplary rigour into the process <strong>of</strong> using tourism statistics for<br />

economic analyses.<br />

The TSA: RMF again recommends a format for Table 6 which brings together this reconciliation.<br />

The key process for bringing about the reconciliation is „Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption‟, as<br />

measured in Table 4, and the tourism share <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> products as indicated in Table 6,<br />

as shown in the following pages. Ideally, these two measures should be entirely independent <strong>of</strong><br />

each other.<br />

TSA:RMF suggests the following as a set <strong>of</strong> relevant indicators <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> tourism in the<br />

economy:<br />

Internal tourism consumption (in cash and in kind);<br />

Value added <strong>of</strong> the tourism industries;<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> value added; and<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> GDP.<br />

4.2 Measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> in <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption has been estimated in Table 4, and gives a figure <strong>of</strong> around P<br />

4.1 billion. It is necessary to emphasise that this figure is mostly related to tourists. It combines<br />

international inbound tourism (both overnight visitors and same-day visitors) and domestic tourists<br />

(both overnight visitors and same-day visitors) who are travelling outside their usual environment.<br />

It also includes the domestic component <strong>of</strong> an outbound trip by a <strong>Botswana</strong> resident. The statistics<br />

are minimal upon some elements <strong>of</strong> „Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption‟. It is reasonable to suggest<br />

that P4.1 billion is a conservative figure for <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Value Added <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Tourism</strong> Industries (VATI) is shown in Table 5. It is P2.8 billion at Basic<br />

Prices. This estimate is limited to the five industries that have been identified as <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Industries. If figures for more <strong>Tourism</strong> Industries were identifiable, then the Value added <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Industries would be higher. On the other hand these <strong>Tourism</strong> Industries do supply many<br />

products to persons who are not visitors, so the total Value Added <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Tourism</strong> Industries has<br />

these different elements which mean that precisely what is included has to be taken into account<br />

when using these measures for economic decision-making.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Value Added (TVA) is estimated in Table 6. The figure is around P 1.9 billion which is<br />

the direct impact <strong>of</strong> tourism spending. It is the gross value added in Basic Prices by the actual<br />

tourism expenditure (or consumption). It does not take into account indirect effects or induced<br />

effects.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> GDP (TGDP) is measured in market prices and involves adding back in product taxes. It<br />

will be broadly higher than the TVA.<br />

28


TABLE 6 - Domestic Supply and Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption by Products (net valuation)<br />

Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

Pula million 2005/06<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

1a<br />

Accommodation<br />

Services in 55<br />

Output<br />

(5.1a)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

2 - Restaurants<br />

and similar<br />

Output<br />

(5.2)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

Output<br />

(5.4)<br />

4 - Road<br />

transport<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

6 - Air transport<br />

Output<br />

(5.6)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

1 – Accommodation services<br />

for visitors<br />

1.1 – Hotels and other<br />

1480.4 1228.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

accommodation services<br />

2 – Restaurants and similar 0.0 0.0 2315.5 509.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

3 – Transport services<br />

3.2 Road transport services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1068.8 106.9 0.0 0.0<br />

3.4 Air transport services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 668.6 635.2<br />

4 – Travel agencies and<br />

similar<br />

Reservation services (1)(2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

Services/ Goods (3) 52.1 43.2 81.5 17.9 6.5 0.6 5.4 5.1<br />

TOTAL output (at basic prices) 1532.5 1272.0 2397.0 527.3 1075.2 107.5 674.0 640.3<br />

Direct Imports & Duties 137.7 114.3 328.0 72.2 274.5 27.4 154.6 146.9<br />

1. Agriculture, forestry and<br />

0.8 0.7 2.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

fishery products<br />

2. Ores and minerals 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

3. Electricity, gas and water 28.0 23.3 68.9 15.2 4.6 0.5 2.6 2.4<br />

4. Manufacturing 124.6 103.4 381.1 83.8 82.9 8.3 76.0 72.2<br />

5. Construction work and<br />

construction<br />

6. Trade services, restaurants<br />

and hotel services<br />

7. Transport, storage and<br />

communication services<br />

30.5 25.3 74.9 16.5 2.8 0.3 7.0 6.7<br />

18.3 15.2 44.9 9.9 10.0 1.0 5.1 4.9<br />

130.3 108.2 320.6 70.5 11.7 1.2 18.5 17.6<br />

8. Business services 121.0 100.4 297.7 65.5 7.8 0.8 90.1 85.6<br />

9. Community, social and<br />

personal services<br />

Total intermediate<br />

consumption (at purchasers<br />

price)<br />

6.5 5.4 16.0 3.5 89.6 9.0 27.5 26.1<br />

597.7 496.1 1534.1 337.5 483.9 48.4 381.4 362.3<br />

Total gross value added <strong>of</strong><br />

activities (at basic prices)<br />

934.8 775.9 862.9 189.8 591.4 59.1 292.7 278.0<br />

Compensation <strong>of</strong> employees 175.7 145.9 198.6 43.7 236.2 23.6 86.5 82.2<br />

Other taxes less subsidies on<br />

0.7 0.5 0.5 0.1 5.5 0.5 0.0 0.0<br />

production<br />

Depreciation 46.7 38.8 34.5 7.6 409.6 41.0 107.0 101.7<br />

Gross Operating<br />

711.4 590.5 629.1 138.4 -59.6 -6.0 99.1 94.2<br />

surplus(incl.mixed in.)<br />

Adjustment 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0<br />

29


TABLE 6 - Domestic Supply and Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption by Products (net valuation)<br />

Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

Pula millions 2005/06<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

1 – Accommodation services for<br />

visitors<br />

1.1 – Hotels and other<br />

accommodation services<br />

8 - Travel<br />

agencies and<br />

similar<br />

Output<br />

(5.8)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

TOTAL <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Industries<br />

Output<br />

(5.13)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

Other Industries<br />

Output<br />

(5.14)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

TOTAL output <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic<br />

producers (at<br />

basic prices)<br />

Output<br />

(5.15)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

0.0 0.0 1480.4 1228.7 0.0 0.0 1480.4 1228.7<br />

2 – Restaurants and similar 0.0 0.0 2315.5 509.4 0.0 0.0 2315.5 509.4<br />

3 – Transport services<br />

3.2 Road transport services 0.0 0.0 1068.8 106.9 0.0 0.0 1068.8 106.9<br />

3.4 Air transport services 0.0 0.0 668.6 635.2 0.0 0.0 668.6 635.2<br />

4 – Travel agencies and similar<br />

Reservation services (1) (2) 149.0 149.0 149.0 149.0 0.0 0.0 149.0 149.0<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

Services/ Goods (3) 0.0 0.0 145.4 66.9 89921.7 899.2 90067.1 966.2<br />

TOTAL output (at basic prices) 149.0 149.0 5827.8 2696.2 89921.7 899.2 95749.4 3595.4<br />

Direct Imports & Duties 16.7 16.7 911.4 377.4 8343.9 83.4 9255.3 460.9<br />

1. Agriculture, forestry and fishery<br />

0.0 0.0 2.8 1.1 984.9 9.8 987.7 11.0<br />

products<br />

2. Ores and minerals 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 92.3 0.9 92.4 1.0<br />

3. Electricity, gas and water 1.7 1.7 105.7 43.0 716.4 7.2 822.1 50.1<br />

4. Manufacturing 2.7 2.7 667.3 270.4 2582.9 25.8 3250.2 296.3<br />

5. Construction work and<br />

construction<br />

6. Trade services, restaurants and<br />

hotel services<br />

7. Transport, storage and<br />

communication services<br />

2.9 2.9 118.1 51.6 2205.2 22.1 2323.4 73.7<br />

1.8 1.8 80.1 32.7 4734.5 47.3 4814.6 80.1<br />

3.4 3.4 484.6 200.9 1543.1 15.4 2027.7 216.3<br />

8. Business services 5.1 5.1 521.6 257.3 2162.6 21.6 2684.2 279.0<br />

9. Community, social and personal<br />

services<br />

Total intermediate consumption<br />

(at purchasers price)<br />

1.4 1.4 140.9 45.3 684.3 6.8 825.2 52.2<br />

35.7 35.7 3032.7 1279.9 24050.1 240.5 27082.8 1520.4<br />

Wholesale and Retail Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18956.6 189.6 18956.6 189.6<br />

Sales<br />

Total gross value added <strong>of</strong><br />

113.3 113.3 2795.1 1416.2 46915.0 469.2 49710.1 1885.4<br />

activities (at basic prices)<br />

Compensation <strong>of</strong> employees 33.4 33.4 730.5 328.8 13000.9 130.0 13731.4 458.8<br />

Other taxes less subsidies on<br />

-4.2 -4.2 2.4 -3.0 -1.7 0.0 0.7 -3.0<br />

production<br />

Depreciation 26.9 26.9 624.8 215.9 5976.3 59.8 6601.1 275.7<br />

Gross Operating surplus(incl.mixed 57.2 57.2 1437.1 874.2 27939.3 279.4 29376.4 1153.6<br />

in.)<br />

Adjustment 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.3<br />

30


TABLE 6 - Domestic Supply and Internal <strong>Tourism</strong> Consumption by Products (net valuation) Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

Pula millions 2005/06 Imports* Taxes less subsidies<br />

on products<br />

nationally produced<br />

and imported<br />

Output<br />

(6.1)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

Output<br />

(6.2)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

Trade & Transport<br />

Margins<br />

Output<br />

(6.3)<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong><br />

share<br />

Total Domestic supply<br />

(at purchasers prices)<br />

(4)<br />

(6.4) = (5.15) +(6.1) + (6.2)<br />

+ (6.3)<br />

Internal<br />

tourism<br />

consumption<br />

Rest <strong>of</strong><br />

Demand<br />

(4.3) (6.5) = (6.4) -<br />

(4.3)<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

1 – Accommodation services for<br />

visitors<br />

1.1 – Hotels and other<br />

accommodation services for visitors<br />

other than 1.2 0.0 0.0 88.5 73.4 0.0 0.0 1568.9 1477.0 91.9<br />

2 – Restaurants and similar<br />

0.0 0.0 138.4 30.4 0.0 0.0 2453.9 813.0 1640.9<br />

3 – Transport services<br />

3.2 Road transport services<br />

3.4 Air transport services<br />

0.0 0.0 81.3 8.1 0.0 0.0 1150.1 130.0 1020.1<br />

4 – Travel agencies and similar<br />

other reservation services (1) (2)<br />

B. Non specific products<br />

Services/ Goods (3)<br />

TOTAL output (at basic prices) (5)<br />

0.0 0.0 57.6 54.8 0.0 0.0 726.3 129.0 597.3<br />

0.0 0.0 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 158.6 144.0 14.6<br />

19892.0 368.7 6000.0 92.2 5404.0 58.3 121363.1 1421.0 119942.1<br />

19892.0 368.7 6375.4 268.5 5404.0 58.3 127420.9 4114.0 123306.9<br />

*Imports excludes direct purchase <strong>of</strong> residents abroad<br />

(1) Corresponds to the services charged <strong>of</strong> the travel agencies (2) Corresponds to the services charged <strong>of</strong> the tour operators<br />

(3) Excludes valuables and tourism single purpose consumer durable goods the value <strong>of</strong> which exceed the custom threshold, and that Balance <strong>of</strong> Payments statistics and National Accounts include<br />

as imports or exports <strong>of</strong> goods under general merchandise trade<br />

(4) Domestic Supply includes both imports into <strong>Botswana</strong> and exports, which will go out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

(5) includes wholesale and retail - cost <strong>of</strong> sales<br />

31


5. EMPLOYMENT AND NON-MONETARY INDICATORS<br />

5.1 <strong>Tourism</strong> Employment<br />

CSO have indicated the level <strong>of</strong> employment in the Hotels and Restaurants exceeds 11,000 in<br />

2004. Not all such employment is associated with tourism expenditure, but then expenditure by<br />

tourists outside <strong>of</strong> Hotels and Restaurants will broadly <strong>of</strong>fset the non-tourist expenditure.<br />

Employment at more than 11,000 is highly significant exceeding employment in Mining and<br />

Quarrying, in Transport and Communications, and in Finance. These figures form the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

Table 7, which is shown below.<br />

Table 7 – Employment in the <strong>Tourism</strong> Industries<br />

2994 Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Jobs<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Employed Persons<br />

Establishments<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> industries Male Female Total Male Female Total<br />

1 & 2 – Hotels and<br />

Restaurants 2192 (2003) 3,925 7,127 11,052<br />

5.2 Non-Monetary Indicators<br />

The last <strong>of</strong> the Tables in the TSA is Table 10, which is described as Non-Monetary Indicators,<br />

which is shown below. Tables 8 (Collective Consumption) and Table 9 (Gross Fixed Capital<br />

Formation) are as yet and for the time being not included in the TSA.<br />

Table 10 – Non-Monetary Indicators<br />

a. Number <strong>of</strong> trips and overnights by type <strong>of</strong> tourism and categories <strong>of</strong> visitors<br />

Provisional<br />

Inbound tourism (*)<br />

Tourists<br />

Total<br />

Domestic tourism<br />

Tourists<br />

Total<br />

Sameday<br />

Sameday<br />

Sameday<br />

Outbound tourism<br />

Tourists<br />

2005 in „000 visitors visitors visitors visitors visitors visitors<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> trips (*) 210 1,675 1,885<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

overnights - million<br />

9.2 9.2<br />

b. Inbound tourism: Number <strong>of</strong> arrivals and overnights by means <strong>of</strong> transport<br />

Total<br />

2004 in ‘000<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

arrivals<br />

1.Air 66<br />

3. Land 1,455<br />

Other 2<br />

Total 1523<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

overnights<br />

c. Number <strong>of</strong> establishments and capacity by forms <strong>of</strong> accommodation<br />

Hotels and similar<br />

number <strong>of</strong> establishments<br />

capacity (rooms) 4,050<br />

capacity (beds) 7,800<br />

capacity utilization (rooms)<br />

41.5% (sample)<br />

capacity utilization (beds)<br />

36.0% (sample)<br />

32


d. Number <strong>of</strong> establishments in tourism characteristic and tourism connected activities classified according to<br />

number <strong>of</strong> employed persons<br />

2003 Nil 1-4 5-29 30-49 50-99 100+ WP Unknown TOTAL<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic activities<br />

1 & 2 Hotels and Restaurants 6 1,194 655 46 18 12 73 188 2192<br />

WP = Working Proprietor<br />

33


6. CONCLUSIONS<br />

6.1 Contribution to the Economy<br />

The key question that is <strong>of</strong>ten asked is „what is the contribution <strong>of</strong> tourism to the <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

economy?‟ The response is frequently framed in terms <strong>of</strong> „Contribution to GDP‟ from tourism<br />

expenditure.<br />

The TSA process here indicates that TVA is around P1.9 billion in 2005/2006. Comparing this with<br />

Gross Value Added in the National Accounts for 2005/2006 <strong>of</strong> P 54.8 billion (provisional figures)<br />

indicates that the Direct Contribution <strong>of</strong> Tourist Expenditure (consumption) is around 3.4% to<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>‟s GDP.<br />

It should be emphasised that this is the „direct‟ contribution and there are further „indirect‟<br />

contributions that can arise from the chain <strong>of</strong> value added by suppliers to the tourism industry, and<br />

then from suppliers to these suppliers, etc. who have no direct connection with the tourist,<br />

himself/herself.<br />

„Indirect‟ contribution can vary substantially, and can lie usually anywhere between 25% and 75%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the „direct‟ contribution. If this were to apply in <strong>Botswana</strong>, it might be that the „direct + indirect‟<br />

contribution would lie between 4.2% and 6.0%. These contributions relate to the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

expenditure/consumption. They do not include for capital expenditure (which can be highly<br />

variable through the years).<br />

The “induced” impacts are more abstract: they take into consideration the effects <strong>of</strong> increased<br />

income on expenditure, and then, the effects <strong>of</strong> these increased expenditures on GDP.<br />

6.2 Leakages and Linkages<br />

Leakages and linkages are frequently mentioned in the context <strong>of</strong> economic initiatives to reduce<br />

leakages and to improve linkages.<br />

The Supply Survey and the Accommodation Survey carried out and put together by DOT indicated<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> opportunities for reducing leakages and improving linkages. The most important <strong>of</strong><br />

these are:<br />

Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> in employment in the tourism industries<br />

Compared with some other destinations (e.g. Kenya), there is still an opportunity to encourage<br />

more employment in <strong>Botswana</strong>. The current levels <strong>of</strong> around 6% from abroad in the hotels could<br />

perhaps be substantially reduced. Kenya is now less than 1%. There, all staff are local unless<br />

there is some exceptional skill that the foreign staff bring to a post e.g. speak Russian. If there is<br />

suitable training and there is the same level <strong>of</strong> productivity from local labour then <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

employment can be increased. However, this should be done in conjunction with the owners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

businesses, who nowadays are always seeking the most productive solutions, so there is no point<br />

in having foreign staff if local staff can do the job. But there is an opportunity.<br />

Encouraging the provision <strong>of</strong> local services and local supplies by <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

The Supplier Survey, whilst not statistically significant, does indicate that there is an opportunity for<br />

increasing supplies from local producers and local services. However, as with staff, they have to<br />

be equal in productivity and quality. Again, there is an opportunity.<br />

Mostly they have to do with the reduction <strong>of</strong> the dependency on imported inputs and capital goods,<br />

and their substitutions with nationally produced goods: this has to do with the industrial<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the country. Regarding food serving services, it might be possible to promote the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> food stuff, and also the promotion <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> local food in restaurants, based on<br />

locally available inputs.<br />

34


Encouraging the private sector tour operators to make available more information on their<br />

operations in <strong>Botswana</strong>, through the medium <strong>of</strong> HATAB<br />

Understandably there is a view that revenues declared and taxes paid in <strong>Botswana</strong> by some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tour operators are not as high as it could be. Inevitably there is some scope for „transfer pricing‟,<br />

but no serious data is available to draw any conclusions on this.<br />

„Transfer pricing‟ refers to the pricing <strong>of</strong> goods and services within a business organization,<br />

particularly in regard to cross-border transactions. In effect, the business is able to price services<br />

and goods sold to itself such that it can reduce its exposure to tax in a particular economy.<br />

The answer for <strong>Botswana</strong> to clarify such an issue would be for there to be more transparency and<br />

more information shared by the tourism industry with their representative body, HATAB, and then<br />

informed discussion between <strong>Government</strong> and the industry can take place. The <strong>Government</strong> does<br />

play a most important part in looking after the environment and wildlife, spending significant sums<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxpayers‟ money. Clearly informed debate could be to mutual benefit. Probably such an<br />

initiative through HATAB would address concerns about leakage.<br />

6.3 Conclusions on the TSA Process<br />

A very substantial effort has gone into collecting primary statistics on tourism in <strong>Botswana</strong>, where<br />

the collection <strong>of</strong> primary statistics is not easy because <strong>of</strong> the large physical scale <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the large number <strong>of</strong> border posts, and because <strong>of</strong> the large number <strong>of</strong> business<br />

enterprises involved with tourists.<br />

The TSA requires a great deal <strong>of</strong> collaboration to collect, compile and analyse primary statistics<br />

from a whole range <strong>of</strong> different institutions – DOT, CSO, BOB and UB to name some key players.<br />

Such collaboration has been good and can continue to be so.<br />

The process has helped in the strengthening <strong>of</strong> the statistical capacity within the country (an<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the UNWTO/ UNDP), which is already at a high level, but there is always a value in<br />

continuing to update. Presenting an Experimental TSA, as recent as 2005/2006, is a relatively rare<br />

event, even in some <strong>of</strong> the very advanced statistical nations.<br />

Of course, there are many improvements that can be made to this TSA process. Many will<br />

probably be made in the next two to three years with the whole range <strong>of</strong> new sample surveys<br />

being carried out by the CSO.<br />

Particularly important are considerations regarding the visitors and tourist arrivals to ensure that<br />

there is not the inclusion <strong>of</strong> arriving non-residents that are not visitors. Also the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic tourism consumption is essential.<br />

Despite the extensive range <strong>of</strong> statistics available, it has been necessary to work with anecdotal<br />

information as well, especially in relation to private sector activities. Where improvements could be<br />

made in forthcoming years are with respect to:<br />

More statistical information on private sector activities, in particular the numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

tourists coming on package tours to <strong>Botswana</strong> would be helpful. Breakdowns on how<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the package tour price is spent in <strong>Botswana</strong> would also improve the TSA process.<br />

It is recommended that HATAB along with DOT be a key player in obtaining such<br />

information;<br />

Information on domestic tourism, not only by households (to be picked up next year by<br />

DOT in cooperation with CSO in a Household Survey) but also tourism by <strong>Government</strong><br />

staff and by businesses is needed. It is recommended that the DOT add an<br />

accommodation sample survey to their accommodation statistics process; and<br />

Updating <strong>of</strong> the Social Accounting Matrix by the CSO is recommended. It is a major<br />

exercise but one that would be highly valuable for the TSA process, and one that could<br />

35


e achieved following the important surveys that are being carried out by CSO currently<br />

and in the next couple <strong>of</strong> years.<br />

6.4 The Way Forward<br />

The following table provides a list <strong>of</strong> action items that are required to move tourism statistics<br />

forward in <strong>Botswana</strong>, as well as improve the statistical base in future revisions <strong>of</strong> the TSA. The key<br />

bodies responsible for each action item are shown, as is the proposed timing (short = during 2008,<br />

medium = 2009-2011 years, long = 2012 onwards). The statistical coverage <strong>of</strong> each action item is<br />

also indicated.<br />

Action Item Responsibility Timing Statistical Coverage<br />

Domestic <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Survey<br />

Training for DOT on<br />

statistics analysis<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Database<br />

Maintenance<br />

Production on<br />

Quarterly<br />

Accommodation<br />

Reports<br />

CSO, DOT Short Domestic <strong>Tourism</strong>,<br />

TSA Tables 2 and 10<br />

Consultant Input Short All <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Consultant Input Short All <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

DOT Short Accommodation<br />

<strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Annual Visitor Survey DOT Short / Medium Inbound Visitor<br />

Expenditure, TSA<br />

Table 1<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> Annual<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

Report<br />

Update Social<br />

Accounting Matrix<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Employment<br />

Survey<br />

Package Holiday/Tour<br />

Operator Survey<br />

DOT Short / Medium All <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

CSO Medium TSA Table 5<br />

DOT, CSO Medium TSA Tables 7 and 10<br />

DOT Medium Inbound Visitor<br />

Expenditure, TSA<br />

Table 1<br />

Computerization <strong>of</strong><br />

border posts<br />

Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Immigration<br />

Medium<br />

Inbound Visitor<br />

Arrivals, TSA Tables 1<br />

and 10<br />

Update TSA for a new<br />

reference year<br />

CSO, DOT,<br />

Consultant Input<br />

Medium<br />

All <strong>Statistics</strong><br />

36


ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> the Experimental TSA is Phase 2 <strong>of</strong> the overall project involving the<br />

„Strengthening <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> in <strong>Botswana</strong>‟. The original Project Document states:<br />

“TSA Development:<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the TSA will be dependent on the success <strong>of</strong> the data collection.<br />

However, the developed TSA should be considered to be a “preliminary TSA” until the data<br />

collection procedures become more established and the data can be verified further.<br />

Phase 2: TSA Development<br />

This phase will focus on the development <strong>of</strong> the TSA, commencing with tables 1, 7 and 10 (that is<br />

inbound tourism consumption, employment and non-monetary tourism indicators). The successful<br />

development <strong>of</strong> these tables will trigger (albeit to a preliminary level) development <strong>of</strong> Tables 2 and<br />

3 (domestic and outbound tourism consumption), Table 4 (consolidation <strong>of</strong> Tables 1 and 2) and<br />

Table 5 (production accounts <strong>of</strong> the tourism supply). This will culminate in the generation <strong>of</strong> Table<br />

6, the core <strong>of</strong> the TSA system, where the confrontation between supply and demand (internal<br />

tourism consumption) takes place. Preliminary calculations, such as <strong>Tourism</strong> Value Added (TVA)<br />

and <strong>Tourism</strong> GDP will be undertaken at this stage.”<br />

Work Programme for the <strong>Botswana</strong> TSA<br />

The Work Programme for the TSA has built upon a combination <strong>of</strong> sample surveys, national<br />

accounting statistics, Social Accounting Matrices, and analytical exercises to arrive at a<br />

reasonable set <strong>of</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> the information to go into the Experimental <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite<br />

Account for <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

The guidelines indicated in the TSA: RMF (Recommended Methodological Framework)<br />

established by the UNWTO and endorsed by the OECD and the European Commission (Eurostat)<br />

have been followed.<br />

37


ANNEX 2: TSA DEFINITIONS<br />

Internal tourism consumption is the amount <strong>of</strong> visitor consumption within the economic territory<br />

<strong>of</strong> the country <strong>of</strong> reference. Visitor consumption includes flows – tourism business expenses –<br />

which national accounts classify within the intermediate consumption <strong>of</strong> productive activities and<br />

not as part <strong>of</strong> final demand. In this context a visitor includes inbound visitors to the country <strong>of</strong><br />

reference (same day and staying the night), domestic visitors within the country <strong>of</strong> reference, and<br />

resident‟s consumption within the country <strong>of</strong> reference as part <strong>of</strong> a visit abroad.<br />

Value added <strong>of</strong> the tourism industries simply sums the total value added <strong>of</strong> all characteristic<br />

producers, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether all <strong>of</strong> their product is provided to visitors. It leaves out the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> visitor consumption on other productive activities that might serve them. The estimate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value added <strong>of</strong> tourism industries is dependent on the definition <strong>of</strong> the characteristic industries.<br />

Value added <strong>of</strong> tourism industries is a measure <strong>of</strong> the supply side <strong>of</strong> tourism but is not sufficiently<br />

well defined in terms <strong>of</strong> its links to visitor consumption to allow it to be the most accurate measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> tourism supply.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> value added includes the proportion <strong>of</strong> value added generated by all industries in the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> goods and services to visitors.<br />

Gross Domestic Product generated by Internal tourism consumption is the sum <strong>of</strong> the value<br />

added (at basic prices) generated by all industries in response to internal tourism consumption and<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> net taxes on products and imports included within the value <strong>of</strong> this expenditure.<br />

Classifications<br />

In the TSA, Products and Activities (Industries) are classified as:<br />

Products<br />

Activities (industries)<br />

A. <strong>Tourism</strong> Specific A. <strong>Tourism</strong> Specific<br />

A1 – <strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic<br />

A1 – <strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic<br />

A2 - <strong>Tourism</strong> Connected<br />

A2 - <strong>Tourism</strong> Connected<br />

B. Non- Specific B. Non- Specific<br />

Source: TSA:RMF<br />

The TSA:RMF points out that the classifications to be used will also respond to different stages <strong>of</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> classifications at the international level.<br />

The TSA defines a tourism characteristic industry as a group <strong>of</strong> establishments whose principal<br />

productive activity is a tourism characteristic activity. <strong>Tourism</strong> industries are the group <strong>of</strong> all<br />

tourism characteristic industries.<br />

Products considered as tourism characteristic, tourism connected and tourism specific follow<br />

roughly the following pragmatic criteria:<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong>-characteristic products: products which in the absence <strong>of</strong> visitors, in most<br />

countries would probably cease to exist in meaningful quantity or for which the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> consumption would be significantly reduced and for which it seems possible to<br />

obtain statistical information;<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong>-connected products: a residual category, including those that have been<br />

identified as tourism-specific in a given country but for which this attribute has not<br />

been acknowledged on a worldwide basis; and<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong>-specific products: the sum <strong>of</strong> the two previous categories.<br />

38


Classifications do not exist for connected products, and as the TSA:RMF indicates, some<br />

countries may include different products and activities under the categories <strong>of</strong> „characteristic‟ and<br />

„connected‟.<br />

Key issues that make measurement difficult for the purposes <strong>of</strong> focusing upon tourism are:<br />

that particular broad product categories can be produced by many different<br />

activities/industries; and<br />

that an industry, broadly defined, may produce many different products, some to<br />

serve visitors, some to serve residents and some to serve both visitors and residents.<br />

The TSA: RMF neatly encapsulates the difficulty in the Figure below.<br />

Also the pragmatic criteria for identifying products does emphasise the need to use product<br />

categories „for which it seems possible to obtain statistical information‟.<br />

Data Transformations<br />

Developing a country‟s TSA requires from the compiler not only a basic set <strong>of</strong> direct data-collection<br />

procedures but also a transformation and partitioning <strong>of</strong> the information already existing in the<br />

national accounts <strong>of</strong> a country into the tourism orientation embodied in the TSA. This process<br />

includes: -<br />

The extraction <strong>of</strong> data on tourism-specific products and activities from the databases<br />

used for the elaboration <strong>of</strong> make and use matrices <strong>of</strong> national accounts;<br />

The transformation <strong>of</strong> package tours from their gross valuation in the national<br />

accounts to the net valuation required by the TSA;<br />

The extraction <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> travel agency services from the costs <strong>of</strong> the services in<br />

which they are included;<br />

The breakdown <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> goods acquired by visitors between the distribution<br />

margins and the basic value <strong>of</strong> the good;<br />

The identification <strong>of</strong> visitor consumption in all its components as distinct from nonvisitor<br />

consumption; and<br />

A dual classification <strong>of</strong> business tourism expenses, both as a component <strong>of</strong> visitor<br />

consumption where the balance between supply and use is concerned, and as a cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> productive activities when describing these production processes and<br />

establishing tourism value added and tourism gross domestic product.<br />

39


Of the six transformations <strong>of</strong> basic information, four <strong>of</strong> them (different classifications for products<br />

and activities, separation <strong>of</strong> the margins from the value <strong>of</strong> goods, identification <strong>of</strong> visitor<br />

consumption, and dual classification <strong>of</strong> business expenses) mean that the breakdowns by<br />

products and activities are modified but the not the total values themselves. However, this is not<br />

the case for the net valuation <strong>of</strong> package tours and for the extraction <strong>of</strong> travel agency services,<br />

which have implications for the values and classifications <strong>of</strong> flows within the different concepts <strong>of</strong><br />

visitor consumption.<br />

Key Economic Concepts<br />

It is fair to say that <strong>Tourism</strong> Satellite Accounts are still very much a „work in progress‟. There are<br />

methodological issues that are continually being refined.<br />

40


ANNEX 3: VISTOR SURVEYS<br />

DOT has developed considerable expertise in carrying out sample surveys <strong>of</strong> visitors since the<br />

Year 2000 with UNDP/UNWTO guidance. These sample surveys take place in April and October<br />

and total interviews exceed 4000. These sample surveys provide the key estimates <strong>of</strong> average<br />

length <strong>of</strong> stay and expenditure per day.<br />

For the development <strong>of</strong> the TSA the sample surveys carried out in 2005 (April and October) and<br />

similarly in 2006 have been used. In addition a Visitor Survey was carried in April 2007 by DOT.<br />

There are a large number <strong>of</strong> Border Posts in <strong>Botswana</strong>. Some <strong>of</strong> these border posts could be<br />

described as remote and indeed conditions for interviewing are not at all easy.<br />

Photo A3.1: Interviewer‟s Living Conditions in Ngoma – illustrating the substantial field operations<br />

required to collect primary statistics <strong>of</strong>ten in remote border areas.<br />

Average Length <strong>of</strong> Stay<br />

Because a total figure for tourist arrivals embraces such a wide range <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> visitor,<br />

many <strong>of</strong> them undertaking different activities and staying for varying periods, it is best to try to<br />

segment this total in various ways. „Country <strong>of</strong> residence‟ and the „purpose <strong>of</strong> visit‟ have been<br />

looked at in particular. Average length <strong>of</strong> stay varies according to the purpose <strong>of</strong> visit. Examples<br />

include transit visitors who are staying for only a night whilst holiday visitors can be staying for<br />

nearly six nights on average.<br />

For the reference year <strong>of</strong> 2005/2006 an average has been adopted for the length <strong>of</strong> stay between<br />

the sample survey data for the Year 2005 and the Year 2006, as shown in Table A3.1.<br />

In order to use figures with a lower relative sampling error, the sample data has <strong>of</strong>ten been<br />

brought together into larger groupings. The relative sampling error (the standard error times 1.96 –<br />

95% confidence level) has been calculated as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the arithmetic mean.<br />

41


Table A3.1: Average Length <strong>of</strong> Stay<br />

Country <strong>of</strong><br />

Residence &<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> Visit<br />

Australia<br />

2005<br />

Mean<br />

Nights<br />

N 2005<br />

Median<br />

Nights<br />

Relative<br />

Sampling<br />

Error<br />

2006<br />

Mean<br />

Nights<br />

N 2006<br />

Median<br />

Nights<br />

Relative<br />

Sampling<br />

Error<br />

2005/<br />

2006<br />

Nights<br />

Holiday or Leisure 9.8 51 6 39% 7.7 22 7 28% 8.8<br />

Total 10.2 56 6 36% 6.8 34 5 23% 8.5<br />

France<br />

Holiday or Leisure 5.3 12 2 66% 8.9 9 10 56% 7.1<br />

Germany<br />

Holiday or Leisure 6.9 70 5 19% 7.4 60 6 19% 7.1<br />

Total 7.7 78 5 19% 8.0 81 4 28% 7.8<br />

Namibia<br />

Holiday or Leisure 4.8 35 3 30% 3.0 29 1 51% 3.9<br />

In Transit 0.7 20 0.5 50% 0.8 41 1 19% 0.8<br />

VFR 7.4 10 6.5 45% 3.6 22 2 72% 5.5<br />

Total 4.9 93 2 52% 2.2 131 1 27% 3.6<br />

Netherlands<br />

Holiday or Leisure 6.0 42 5 21% 6.0 38 4 30% 6.0<br />

Total 5.8 45 4 20% 5.8 40 4 30% 5.8<br />

South Africa<br />

Business 2.8 659 2 12% 2.9 874 2 18% 2.8<br />

Holiday or Leisure 4.2 279 3 10% 5.0 543 4 10% 4.6<br />

In Transit 0.7 50 0 34% 0.8 96 1 19% 0.7<br />

VFR 4.1 371 2 13% 5.2 443 3 13% 4.6<br />

Total 3.3 1359 2 7% 3.9 1964 2 8% 3.6<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Holiday or Leisure 7.2 108 5 31% 7.2 64 5 21% 7.2<br />

Total 7.8 137 4 32% 8.5 96 6 22% 8.2<br />

USA<br />

Holiday or Leisure 9.6 70 5 25% 7.6 58 6 23% 8.6<br />

Total 10.4 92 5 40% 7.3 87 6 19% 8.8<br />

Zambia<br />

Holiday or Leisure 3.8 5 4 38% 2.3 3 2 74% 3.1<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Business 2.1 352 1 18% 3.6 230 1 24% 2.9<br />

Holiday or Leisure 2.7 170 1 28% 4.6 195 3 25% 3.6<br />

In Transit 0.5 41 0 40% 0.9 24 1 53% 0.7<br />

VFR 6.5 1908 2 9% 6.8 1888 2 8% 6.6<br />

Total 5.5 2471 2 8% 6.2 2340 2 8% 5.9<br />

Total<br />

Business 3.8 1164 2 17% 3.5 1295 2 12% 3.6<br />

Holiday or Leisure 5.7 970 4 10% 5.6 1150 4 7% 5.7<br />

In Transit 0.9 123 0 56% 0.8 181 1 14% 0.8<br />

VFR 6.2 2377 2 8% 6.6 2442 2 7% 6.4<br />

Total 5.3 4634 2 6% 5.3 5083 2 5% 5.3<br />

Source: DOT Visitor Surveys in 2005 & 2006<br />

42


Table A3.2: Average Spend per Day–Pula<br />

Country <strong>of</strong><br />

Residence &<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> Visit<br />

Australia<br />

Mean<br />

Spend<br />

Pula<br />

N<br />

2005<br />

Median<br />

Spend<br />

Pula<br />

Relative<br />

Sampling<br />

Error<br />

Mean<br />

Spend<br />

Pula<br />

N<br />

2006<br />

Median<br />

Spend<br />

Pula<br />

Relative<br />

Sampling<br />

Error<br />

2005/<br />

2006<br />

Spend P<br />

Total 346 45 183 41% 815 34 265 66% 580<br />

France<br />

Total 602 13 414 80% 425 12 297 63% 513<br />

Germany<br />

Total 462 73 227 31% 488 75 113 69% 475<br />

Namibia<br />

Business 387 28 232 51% 263 39 134 34% 325<br />

Holiday /Leisure 339 29 222 37% 150 23 125 46% 244<br />

In Transit 202 10 167 38% 222 31 156 32% 212<br />

Total 339 76 217 28% 220 113 141 20% 279<br />

Netherlands<br />

Holiday /Leisure 241 31 83 46% 326 35 188 50% 283<br />

Total 234 33 83 45% 333 36 193 48% 283<br />

South Africa<br />

Business 431 516 305 10% 526 784 287 15% 479<br />

Holiday /Leisure 302 232 202 16% 256 530 150 12% 279<br />

In Transit 217 17 208 31% 227 62 175 23% 222<br />

VFR 165 299 75 16% 124 429 42 18% 144<br />

Total 325 1064 200 8% 341 1808 150 11% 333<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Holiday /Leisure 552 89 227 42% 541 63 295 32% 546<br />

Total 632 112 288 34% 502 95 275 26% 567<br />

USA<br />

Business 977 14 660 52% 535 18 617 26% 756<br />

Holiday /Leisure 629 61 267 42% 489 58 60 50% 559<br />

Total 679 78 332 33% 504 87 167 35% 591<br />

Zambia<br />

Holiday /Leisure 272 5 225 66% 159 3 150 33% 215<br />

Total 231 31 200 24% 586 27 167 91% 408<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Business 355 275 200 22% 171 197 62 24% 263<br />

Holiday /Leisure 278 140 170 24% 187 189 72 20% 233<br />

In Transit 172 14 145 43% 76 13 50 68% 124<br />

VFR 158 1777 63 9% 94 1841 21 22% 126<br />

Total 190 2206 85 9% 108 2243 25 16% 149<br />

Total<br />

Business 429 936 270 9% 502 1171 251 12% 466<br />

Holiday /Leisure 375 806 190 12% 353 1106 150 18% 364<br />

In Transit 258 50 193 39% 209 114 151 18% 233<br />

VFR 170 2158 67 9% 113 2378 25 16% 141<br />

Total 274 3950 125 6% 266 4779 70 9% 270<br />

Source: DOT Visitor Surveys in 2005 & 2006<br />

43


Average Direct Expenditure per day<br />

Expenditure data has been gleaned from the DOT visitor surveys for 2005 and 2006. In a similar<br />

manner to the „length <strong>of</strong> stay‟, for our reference year <strong>of</strong> 2005/2006 an average for the „expenditure<br />

per day‟ between the sample survey data for the Year 2005 and the Year 2006 has been adopted.<br />

Using the „country <strong>of</strong> residence‟ and the „purpose <strong>of</strong> visit‟ as a way <strong>of</strong> segmenting the total figures<br />

allows one to take into account the considerable disparity in „length <strong>of</strong> stay‟ and „expenditure per<br />

day‟ between individual tourist arrivals.<br />

The base figures for expenditure per day are shown in Table A3.2. Ideally it is „good practice‟ to<br />

focus upon expenditure with relative sampling errors below 25%, but this has not always been<br />

possible in this process.<br />

Relative Sampling Errors are 1.96 times Standard Error - 95% confidence level.<br />

44


ANNEX 4: SAME-DAY VISITORS – INTERNATIONAL INBOUND<br />

1. General<br />

Expenditure by Same-Day Visitors is part <strong>of</strong> Inbound <strong>Tourism</strong> Expenditure as required in Table 1<br />

<strong>of</strong> the TSA.<br />

In a country with a large physical area, with many road border posts, and <strong>of</strong>ten with strong ties<br />

between family/friends across borders, and frequent commercial relationships between<br />

neighbouring border towns, inevitably<br />

same-day visitors (day visitors) can be<br />

substantial. For <strong>Botswana</strong>, there are many<br />

ties with South Africa and also with<br />

Zimbabwe. For the latter country, there are<br />

exceptional circumstances leading to travel<br />

which looks like tourism travel in that<br />

Zimbabweans are visiting <strong>Botswana</strong> in ever<br />

increasing numbers. But it is difficult to<br />

distinguish between genuine same-day<br />

tourist travel, cross border travel which is<br />

really within the usual environment<br />

(frequency/distance) and other travel, such<br />

as short-term visits for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

picking up casual employment through the<br />

week and going home at the weekend,<br />

which are not tourism visits because the traveller is being employed in the country visited, etc.<br />

(e.g. Zimbabweans in Francistown, as the DOT interviewers found in anecdotal discussions in<br />

Ramokgwebana – see Photo A4.1 <strong>of</strong> Ramokgwebana border post above, the interviewers in the<br />

foreground).<br />

2. Same-day visitor numbers<br />

The Visitor Arrival <strong>Statistics</strong>, from CSO/ DOT, indicate that Day Visitors in 2004 were 204,000 and<br />

provisional figures for 2005 were 210,000. Provisional figures for 2005/2006 indicate a total <strong>of</strong><br />

around 213,000 day visitors.<br />

Table A4.1: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> Day visitors by Country <strong>of</strong> Residence for 2005/2006<br />

Other 3%<br />

Namibia 5%<br />

South Africa 42%<br />

Zambia 1%<br />

Zimbabwe 50%<br />

The same-day visitors are primarily from the neighbours, South Africa and Zimbabwe, and to a<br />

much smaller extent from Namibia and Zambia. In addition there are small numbers from other<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> residence but these are people visiting South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Namibia,<br />

and just coming over for a daytrip to <strong>Botswana</strong>, or indeed transiting <strong>Botswana</strong> (e.g. Germans<br />

transiting to Namibia).<br />

3. Day visitor spend per trip<br />

Expenditure data has been gleaned from the DOT visitor surveys for those respondents who<br />

indicated that they were not staying the night in <strong>Botswana</strong>. Expenditure statistics are available for<br />

same-day visitors from South Africa, Zimbabwe and Namibia. Sample numbers from Zambia are<br />

too small to allow reasonable estimates <strong>of</strong> such spending. Median expenditures for Day visitors<br />

are similar for all three <strong>of</strong> the fore-mentioned neighbouring countries at around Pula 50 per day<br />

visit. The differences in the arithmetic means are caused by relatively small numbers <strong>of</strong> higher<br />

than average spenders. The high spending derives from either „shopping spending‟ or from<br />

45


Spend per person<br />

spending on „other‟ items. From South Africa there are a number <strong>of</strong> relatively high spenders –<br />

businessmen flying over for the day and spending on lunch and other items – but these are small<br />

in number. From Zimbabwe, there are high spenders coming over and shopping, because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> goods in their own country, and also spending on „other‟ goods and services. If such<br />

behaviour is routine then they should be considered as being within their usual environment.<br />

Anecdotal evidence suggests that some Zimbabweans are coming over to complete banking<br />

transactions and foreign exchange transactions, which are tedious in their own country. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

these may also be considered as being within their usual environment. There is then an issue <strong>of</strong><br />

these transactions having an effect on the travel item <strong>of</strong> the Balance <strong>of</strong> Payments, even though<br />

they are not visitors.<br />

Figure A4.1: Same-day visitor spending per trip – Outliers 2005<br />

10000.00<br />

8000.00<br />

309<br />

3,516<br />

3,828<br />

Investigation <strong>of</strong> the frequency distributions<br />

for the Same-day visitor spending suggests<br />

that some <strong>of</strong> the high levels <strong>of</strong> expenditure<br />

could be described as „outliers‟ or „freak‟<br />

results. An illustration <strong>of</strong> the process is<br />

shown in the Figure alongside.<br />

6000.00<br />

4000.00<br />

2,559<br />

4,465<br />

4,166<br />

2,341<br />

It may also be that these „outliers‟<br />

correspond to the “non-tourism” type <strong>of</strong><br />

traveller and the expenditure is not for own<br />

use or as a gift.<br />

2000.00<br />

0.00<br />

2,858<br />

4,297<br />

4,210<br />

3,262<br />

3,228<br />

3,614<br />

2,732<br />

3,886<br />

3,746<br />

2,367<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> these „outliers‟, the view has<br />

been taken that it is better to use the lower<br />

<strong>of</strong> the means obtained in either 2005 or<br />

2006 as the appropriate statistic to be<br />

adopted for the 2005/2006 analyses.<br />

India Namibia South Africa Zambia Zimbabwe<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> Residence<br />

The estimates for Same-day visitor<br />

spending are shown in the Table below.<br />

Table A4.2: Spending on the Same-day Visit Trip - Pula<br />

Country <strong>of</strong><br />

Residence<br />

2005<br />

Statistic<br />

2006<br />

Statistic<br />

Adopted for<br />

2005/2006<br />

Namibia Mean 97.5000 53.66 54<br />

Relative Sampling Error 117% 53%<br />

5% Trimmed Mean 80.5556 51.26<br />

Median 50.0000 43.00<br />

South Africa Mean 346.8649 605.81 347<br />

Relative Sampling Error 65% 77%<br />

5% Trimmed Mean 184.8498 144.88<br />

Median 111.5000 50.38<br />

Zimbabwe Mean 728.4513 275.90 276<br />

Relative Sampling Error 27% 78%<br />

5% Trimmed Mean 509.6202 119.44<br />

Median 251.0000 50.75<br />

46


4. Total Spending by Same-day visitors<br />

The Total Spending by Same-day visitors for 2005/2006 (day visitors) is then estimated by<br />

multiplying the Spend per Same-day visitor by the number <strong>of</strong> Same-day visitors.<br />

Table A4.3: Total Spending by Same-day visitors in 2005/ 2006<br />

Total Number <strong>of</strong> Same-day visitors 213,000<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> Residence Percent Spend Total Spend<br />

Pula P million<br />

Other 2.5% 347 1.85<br />

Namibia 4.5% 54 0.52<br />

South Africa 42.0% 347 31.04<br />

Zambia 1.0% 54 0.12<br />

Zimbabwe 50.0% 276 29.39<br />

62.92<br />

The total day visitor spending is estimated at Pula 63 million for 2005/06. It is fair to mention that<br />

the relative sampling errors that are associated with these statistics are upwards <strong>of</strong> 60%. So, as<br />

with any estimates involving sampling, it is necessary to indicate that this estimate (P 63 million)<br />

could lie with 95% confidence levels anywhere between P25million and P100 million<br />

(approximately).<br />

5. Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Same-day visitor spending<br />

Sample estimates <strong>of</strong> the breakdown <strong>of</strong> day visitor expenditure are obtained from DOT visitor<br />

surveys in 2005 and in 2006. The key feature <strong>of</strong> these breakdowns is that the day visitors into<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> are not spending on the usual tourism services – accommodation, meals and drinks,<br />

transport, recreation - or hardly at all. They are spending on „shopping‟ and on „other‟ items, which<br />

appear to encompass a whole range <strong>of</strong> other goods and services.<br />

To some extent these findings coincide with simple observation. Zimbabweans are coming across<br />

to make transactions within <strong>Botswana</strong> that perhaps in other years they may have made within their<br />

own country. South Africa is different to Zimbabwe but again the focus <strong>of</strong> expenditure is upon<br />

„shopping‟ and „other‟ items. Estimates for South African expenditure could be influenced by the<br />

strong involvement <strong>of</strong> South African companies in the <strong>Botswana</strong> economy. For example, some<br />

business expenditure by a South African day visitor will be met by the local <strong>of</strong>fice in, say,<br />

Gaborone. So DOT interviewers at Sir Seretse Khama airport, would come across South Africans,<br />

both same-day visitors and overnight visitors, who had spent almost nothing because all their<br />

costs had been picked up by the company in <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

The breakdowns <strong>of</strong> expenditure and the figures adopted for 2005/2006 are shown in the Table<br />

below.<br />

Table A4.4: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> Spending on the Same-day Visit Trip - Percent<br />

2005<br />

Statistic<br />

2006<br />

Statistic<br />

Adopted for<br />

2005/2006<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation 1.1% 3.9% 2.5%<br />

Money Spent on Meals and Drink 2.7% 4.0% 3.3%<br />

Money Spent on Transport 3.0% 1.9% 2.5%<br />

Money Spent on Recreation 0.1% 0.8% 0.5%<br />

Money Spent on Shopping 64.4% 0.1% 63.2%<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending 28.8% 89.3% 28.0%<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

47


The breakdown <strong>of</strong> the total Same-day visitor spending in 2005/2006 is shown in the Table A4.5<br />

below.<br />

Table A4.5: Breakdown <strong>of</strong> the Total Spending by Same-day visitors in 2005/ 2006<br />

Total Expenditure by Day visitors P million 63<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> Residence Percent Total Spend P<br />

million<br />

Money Spent on Accommodation 2.5% 1.58<br />

Money Spent on Meals and Drink 3.3% 2.08<br />

Money Spent on Transport 2.5% 1.58<br />

Money Spent on Recreation 0.5% 0.32<br />

Money Spent on Shopping 63.2% 39.82<br />

Money Spent on 'Other' Spending 28.0% 17.64<br />

Total 100.0% 63.00<br />

48


ANNEX 5: TOURISM CHARACTERISTIC PRODUCTS AND ACTIVITIES<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic Products<br />

A. Specific products<br />

A.1 Characteristic products<br />

1 – Accommodation services<br />

1.1 – Hotels and other lodging services<br />

1.2 – Second homes services on own account or for<br />

free<br />

2 – Food and beverage serving services<br />

3 – Passenger transport services<br />

3.1 Interurban railway<br />

3.2 Road<br />

3.3 Water<br />

3.4 Air<br />

3.5 Supporting services<br />

3.6 Transport equipment rental<br />

3.7 Maintenance and repair services<br />

4 – Travel agency, tour operator and tourist guide<br />

services<br />

4.1 Travel agency<br />

4.2 Tour operator<br />

4.3 Tourist information and tourist guide<br />

5 – Cultural services<br />

5.1 Performing arts<br />

5.2 Museum and other cultural services<br />

6 – Recreation and other entertainment services<br />

6.1 Sports and recreational sport services<br />

6.2 Other amusement and recreational services<br />

7 – Miscellaneous tourism services<br />

7.1 Financial and insurance services<br />

7.2 Other good rental services<br />

7.3 Other tourism services<br />

Linked to CPC<br />

Source: TSA:RMF Figures 4.3 & 4.4<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Characteristic Activities<br />

1 - Hotels and similar<br />

2 - Second home ownership (imputed)<br />

3 - Restaurants and similar<br />

4 - Railway passenger transport<br />

5 - Road passenger transport<br />

6 - Water passenger transport<br />

7 - Air passenger transport<br />

8 - Passenger transport supporting industries<br />

9 - Passenger transport equipment rental<br />

10 - Travel agencies and similar<br />

11 - Cultural services<br />

12 - Sporting and other recreational services<br />

Linked to ISIC Rev.3 and SICTA<br />

49


ANNEX 6: BASIC PRICES AND PURCHASERS’ PRICES<br />

Source: SNA 93<br />

50


ANNEX 7: SUPPLY AND USES OF GOODS AND SERVICES<br />

Source: SNA 93<br />

51


ANNEX 8: DEFINITIONS IN TOURISM<br />

Definitions: Basic <strong>Tourism</strong> Units<br />

Visitor: refers to any person travelling to a place other than that <strong>of</strong> his/her usual environment for<br />

less than 12 consecutive months and whose main purpose <strong>of</strong> trip is other than the exercise <strong>of</strong> an<br />

activity remunerated from within the place visited.<br />

International visitor: refers to any person travelling to a country other than the one in which s/he<br />

has his/her usual residence, but outside his/her usual environment, for less than 12 consecutive<br />

months and whose main purpose <strong>of</strong> trip is other than the exercise <strong>of</strong> an activity remunerated from<br />

within the country visited.<br />

Domestic visitor: refers to any person residing in a country, who travels to a place within the<br />

country, other than that <strong>of</strong> his/her usual environment for less than 12 consecutive months and<br />

whose main purpose <strong>of</strong> trip is other than the exercise <strong>of</strong> an activity remunerated from within the<br />

place visited.<br />

Tourists (overnight visitors): is a visitor who stays at least one night in a collective or private<br />

accommodation in the place visited.<br />

An international tourist is an international visitor who stays at least one night in a collective or<br />

private accommodation in the country visited. Domestic tourist refers to a domestic visitor who<br />

stays at least one night in a collective <strong>of</strong> private accommodation in the place visited.<br />

Same Day Visitor: a visitor who does not spend the night in a collective or private accommodation<br />

in the place visited. An international same-day visitor is an international visitor who does not spend<br />

the night in a collective or private accommodation in the country visited. This definition includes<br />

cruise passengers (see below). A domestic same-day visitor is a domestic visitor who does not<br />

spend the night in a collective or private accommodation in the place visited.<br />

Cruise passengers: who arrive in a country on a cruise ship and return to the ship each night to<br />

sleep on board even though the ship remains in port for several days. Also included in this group<br />

are, by extension, owners or passengers <strong>of</strong> yachts and passengers on a group tour<br />

accommodated in a train.<br />

Direct Transit passengers: (who do not formally enter the country) who do not leave the transit<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the airport or the port, including transfer between airports and ports.<br />

(See UNWTO‟s Recommendations on <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> and Concepts, Definitions and<br />

Classifications for <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> for further information).<br />

52


ANNEX 9: DETAILING THE DEFINITIONS<br />

Category <strong>of</strong> traveller<br />

Commuters travelling to regular place <strong>of</strong><br />

work<br />

Border Workers<br />

Businessmen travelling between ancillary<br />

establishments <strong>of</strong> their firm<br />

Persons without a fixed place <strong>of</strong> work (e.g.<br />

lorry drivers)<br />

Commuters travelling to regular place <strong>of</strong><br />

Study<br />

Students<br />

Persons travelling on a routine basis<br />

Border shoppers<br />

Travellers to localities in the direct vicinity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the place <strong>of</strong> residence<br />

Long term migrants<br />

Short term migrants<br />

Persons moving to another place within the<br />

same country for an intended stay <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than a year<br />

Persons moving to another place within the<br />

same country for an intended stay <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than a year<br />

Diplomats and dependents<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> armed forces<br />

Nomads<br />

Refugees<br />

Prisoners<br />

International transit passengers<br />

Cruise Passengers<br />

Persons leaving their own country but not<br />

entering another (e.g. some yachtsmen)<br />

Nationals Living Abroad<br />

Working Holiday Visitors<br />

Transportation Crews (e.g. airline crew)<br />

Treat in following way:<br />

Exclude because seen as travelling in usual<br />

environment<br />

Exclude because seen as travelling in usual<br />

environment<br />

Include, if travelling outside their usual<br />

environment<br />

Include, if travelling outside their usual<br />

environment, but exclude if travelling to head<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice or fleet base<br />

Exclude because seen as in usual environment<br />

Include, if outside usual environment<br />

Exclude because seen as in usual environment<br />

Include, if outside usual environment<br />

Exclude because seen as in usual environment<br />

Exclude, because remunerated in place visited<br />

Exclude, because remunerated in place visited<br />

Exclude, because beyond staying beyond 12<br />

months<br />

Exclude when remunerated from within the<br />

place visited<br />

Exclude when travelling to duty station<br />

Exclude when travelling to duty station<br />

Exclude<br />

Exclude<br />

Exclude<br />

Exclude when they do not enter the country<br />

Treat as Same-day visitors<br />

Domestic visitors<br />

Include as tourists, but as separate segment<br />

Include if main motivation is place visited<br />

Include as tourists or same-day visitors<br />

Source: UNWTO Technical Manual – Concepts, Definitions and Classifications for <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

<strong>Statistics</strong> – Page 23 and Appendix B<br />

53


ANNEX 10: TRAVEL CREDIT & DEBIT ACCOUNT<br />

TRAVEL CREDIT & DEBIT ACCOUNT (P ‘000)<br />

Travel<br />

Transport<br />

Credit Debit Credit Debit<br />

2000<br />

Q1 33,478 67,815 6,079 52,043<br />

Q2 65,865 57,340 13,954 50,457<br />

Q3 2,204 57,295 14,389 58,433<br />

Q4 2,619 41,116 9,827 44,759<br />

104,166 223,567 44,248 205,692<br />

2001<br />

Q1 45,713 50,089 15,837 43,888<br />

Q2 115,948 50,335 20,352 49,630<br />

Q3 242,019 61,292 31,194 54,845<br />

Q4 87,652 65,138 20,572 47,530<br />

491,332 226,854 87,954 195,894<br />

2002<br />

Q1 92,561 59,711 23,391 43,388<br />

Q2 77,706 69,434 12,111 44,756<br />

Q3 36,867 63,220 15,407 45,059<br />

Q4 73,550 65,316 17,324 59,406<br />

280,685 257,681 68,233 192,610<br />

2003<br />

Q1 118,673 74,401 79,173 71,493<br />

Q2 49,852 32,644 16,978 35,497<br />

Q3 166,449 37,987 8,841 44,876<br />

Q4 44,779 38,161 8,367 70,594<br />

379,754 183,192 113,359 222,459<br />

2004<br />

Q1 263,686 190,067 47,373 75,700<br />

Q2 366,649 40,859 60,854 53,838<br />

Q3 235,599 49,282 3,373 68,452<br />

Q4 101,662 45,621 22,634 83,083<br />

967,597 325,829 134,234 281,072<br />

2005<br />

Q1 187,852 55,251 31,010 53,619<br />

Q2 192,566 74,226 19,150 85,723<br />

Q3 360,723 60,602 41,468 65,177<br />

Q4 383,770 75,184 61,726 506,248<br />

1,124,912 265,262 153,353 710,767<br />

2006<br />

Q1 15,703 71,992 64,941 71,441<br />

Q2 381,529 58,460 44,218 81,387<br />

Q3 243,914 74,141 45,664 83,539<br />

Q4 196,680 45,856 38,312 700,377<br />

837,826 250,449 193,135 936,744<br />

2007<br />

Q1 108,830 83,941 173,749 84,134<br />

Source: Bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!