02.01.2014 Views

Greenwash+20 - Greenpeace

Greenwash+20 - Greenpeace

Greenwash+20 - Greenpeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shady dealings<br />

The Edwardsport project has also stirred controversy<br />

regarding Duke’s relationship with the Indiana Utility<br />

Duke Energy is currently constructing the Edwardsport<br />

Regulatory Commission. Reports by The Indianapolis Star<br />

coal gasification plant in Knox Country, Indiana. The region<br />

revealed that in early 2010 Duke CEO Jim Rogers and Vice<br />

already has more than four times the amount of required<br />

President James Turner held private meetings with IURC<br />

power capacity, 114 with “one of the highest concentrations<br />

chair David Hardy 120 and Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels 121<br />

of coal-fired generators in the world”.<br />

to warn of some of the new costs associated with the<br />

In 2010, the project director for Edwardsport confidentially construction of Edwardsport.<br />

wrote to Duke complaining of “significant risks” 115 the utility<br />

While Duke Energy argued that the meetings were merely<br />

had taken on through the plant’s construction process. In<br />

a “courtesy heads-up”, other correspondence between<br />

another communication, Duke executive Richard Haviland<br />

Turner and Hardy and between Turner and Rogers<br />

wrote: “We need an exorcist on this job.” 116<br />

raised concerns that Duke may have violated the law by<br />

Originally budgeted for between $1.3bn and 1.6bn, the attempting to influence the course of IURC decisions on<br />

cost for Edwardsport has swelled to almost $3bn. Duke Edwardsport. During the course of email correspondence<br />

Energy was blasted in 2011 by the Indiana Office of Utility Turner offered to host Hardy and his wife on Turner’s<br />

Consumer Counselor as the company attempted to private boat, and even hinted that Hardy could find<br />

push $530m in Edwardsport costs onto customers. An employment at Duke should he rule favorably toward the<br />

OUCC director testified that “Duke has not demonstrated company. According to The Indianapolis Star, Turner also<br />

any budgetary constraints on this project” and that the communicated to Rogers that “he intended to give plenty<br />

“escalating costs have been borne solely by ratepayers, of attention to the Edwardsport plant and try to shift costs<br />

with the benefits going to the [Duke] shareholders”. 117 away from the utility”.<br />

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) is in Turner resigned from Duke Energy in the wake of The<br />

the midst of deciding “whether Duke committed fraud, Indianapolis Star’s investigation. Governor Daniels fired<br />

concealment or gross mismanagement” regarding the Hardy – although for a matter that was different but also<br />

plant’s massive cost overruns 118 – nearly a billion more involving Duke.<br />

than what was originally approved. Jim Rogers himself<br />

testified before the IURC, saying “Yes, [the plant is] Dirty Coal, Dirty Money<br />

expensive. But it will be the cleanest plant in Indiana.” The Duke Energy political action committee (PAC) spent<br />

Meanwhile, Duke Energy paid a consultancy more than $1.4m during the 2010 federal election cycle alone, and<br />

$3m to testify on the issue. 119 as of November 2011 had already spent $400,000 on<br />

the 2012 election cycle. 122 In addition, Duke Energy has<br />

spent about $24m between 2005 and 2010 on federal<br />

lobbying. 123 If the merger with Progress is successful,<br />

the company will be inheriting even more influence. As of<br />

October 2011, Progress Energy spent $1.4m on lobbyists<br />

for that year – $11m between 2005 and 2010. 124 Like Duke,<br />

Progress hires the lobbying services of the Podesta Group,<br />

as well as lobbyists who are former EPA employees. The<br />

Progress Energy PAC spent more than $200,000 for the<br />

2012 election cycle as of December 2011, having spent<br />

more than half a million during the 2010 cycle. 125<br />

24 <strong>Greenwash+20</strong> How some powerful corporations are standing in the way of sustainable development

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!