06.01.2014 Views

recommended strategies - Hardee County

recommended strategies - Hardee County

recommended strategies - Hardee County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Street lighting – safe neighborhoods<br />

• Education system improvements<br />

• Reduce drug and alcohol use/teen pregnancy rates<br />

Participants were given the opportunity to discuss the activities, ask additional questions and talk with the other<br />

attendees prior to voting. The consulting team tallied the votes, ranking the activities as follows:<br />

Activity<br />

Community beautification/code enforcement/improve image 7<br />

Opportunities for youth/family recreation 6<br />

Education system improvements 4<br />

Reduce drug and alcohol use/teen pregnancy rates 4<br />

Planning for mining reclamation – including <strong>County</strong> benefits/uses 3<br />

Street lighting – safe neighborhoods 2<br />

Sidewalks – improved transportation and connectivity 1<br />

High speed internet/continued technology improvements 1<br />

Impacts of/perception of illegal aliens, immigration (i.e., <strong>Hardee</strong> <strong>County</strong> viewed as a sanctuary) 1<br />

Enhance/create a vibrant downtown 1<br />

Diversify restaurants/evening entertainment 1<br />

Celebrate/provide faith based activities 1<br />

<strong>Hardee</strong> Lakes – continued improvement 1<br />

Aviation Business/Services (improved/expanded – general aviation, commercial, international) 1<br />

Votes<br />

Following the ranking, the participants discussed the impact of existing <strong>County</strong> (or other community) plans and services<br />

in place for improvements (i.e., <strong>Hardee</strong> Lakes Park Master Plan) on the votes. The participants also began to discuss<br />

opportunities to combine and further refine the activities.<br />

August 2, 2011 Focus Group Meeting<br />

The Consulting Team began the meeting with a summary of the previous Quality of Life Focus Group and the Steering<br />

Committee’s comments. The team reviewed the community’s priorities and rankings and then asked the attendees to<br />

identify who should be involved in developing the programs and proceeding with initiatives (Community<br />

Collaborators), and who should lead the effort (Community Champion).<br />

The results were as follows:<br />

1-1. Community beautification/code enforcement/improve image:<br />

Who in the Community should be involved in this?<br />

• Garden Club<br />

• BoCC<br />

• Cities<br />

• Main Street Board<br />

• CRA<br />

• Peace River Explorations<br />

• Builders Association<br />

• Realtors Association<br />

• “Citizens”<br />

• Neighborhood Association<br />

• Farm Bureau<br />

• <strong>County</strong> Extension office<br />

• Law Enforcement<br />

• Churches<br />

• Cattlemen’s Association<br />

Who should lead the effort?<br />

• Group to decide based on the specific topic and focus<br />

Specific Actions/Strategies:<br />

• Develop/implement a “help thy neighbor” attitude and strategy; involve the local ministerial association and<br />

habitat for humanity, civic groups to identify and assist individual properties and or neighborhoods.<br />

o Develop a citizen/community outreach program<br />

• Develop community education programs about programs and services including establishing “community<br />

pride”<br />

Page 45 of 74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!