PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Planning Committee – 18 July 2012 4.1<br />
HBC Community Services – No objections received.<br />
HBC Ecologist – No objections. Landscaping details submitted to discharge<br />
conditions are insufficient. Condition 8 therefore remains to be discharged.<br />
HBC Engineering Consultancy – Comments awaited.<br />
HBC Parks and Countryside – No objections received.<br />
HBC Property Services – No objections received.<br />
HBC Public Protection – Comments awaited.<br />
HBC Traffic and Transportation – No highway or traffic concerns.<br />
Environment Agency – No objections.<br />
Natural England – No objections. The LPA should consider potential impacts on<br />
Protected Species, Local Wildlife Sites, Bio-diversity enhancements.<br />
Network Rail – No objection to the extension of time. Concerns with respect of<br />
condition 7 in relation to the boundary treatment. The existing steel/palisade fence<br />
has suffered damage which has not been rectified by the applicant. Request that<br />
condition 7 not removed or the applicant is required to address the fencing damage.<br />
Northumbrian Water – No objections.<br />
Planning Policy<br />
2.10 The following policies in the adopted <strong>Hartlepool</strong> Local Plan 2006 are relevant to<br />
the determination of this application:<br />
GEP1: States that in determining planning applications the <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will<br />
have due regard to the provisions of the Development Plan. Development should be<br />
located on previously developed land within the limits to development and outside<br />
the green wedges. The policy also highlights the wide range of matters which will<br />
be taken into account including appearance and relationship with surroundings,<br />
effects on amenity, highway safety, car parking, infrastructure, flood risk, trees,<br />
landscape features, wildlife and habitats, the historic environment, and the need for<br />
high standards of design and landscaping and native species.<br />
GEP2: States that provision will be required to enable access for all (in particular for<br />
people with disabilities, the elderly and people with children) in new developments<br />
where there is public access, places of employment, public transport and car parking<br />
schemes and where practical in alterarations to existing developments.<br />
GEP3: States that in considering applications, regard will be given to the need for the<br />
design and layout to incorporate measures to reduce crime and the fear of crime.<br />
4.1 Planning Committee 12.07.18 Planning Applications 13