07.01.2014 Views

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planning Committee – 18 July 2012 4.1<br />

5.11 Further to this, paragraph 9 states that “Pursuing sustainable development<br />

involves seeking positive improvement in the quality of the built…and historic<br />

environment…including replacing poor design with better design”.<br />

5.12 Paragraph 17 of the NPPF sets out the core planning principles, one of which is<br />

to, “conserve heritage assets in a manner appropriate to their significance, so that<br />

they can be enjoyed for their contribution to the quality of life of this and future<br />

generations.”<br />

5.13 In considering good design paragraph 58 of the NPPF suggests that this<br />

should, respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local<br />

surroundings and materials.<br />

5.14 In relation to conservation policies within the NPPF, it states that, “local<br />

authorities should take account of…the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the<br />

significance of heritage assets [and]…the desirability of new development making a<br />

positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.”<br />

5.15 Furthermore the NPPF states that, “when considering the impact of a proposed<br />

development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should<br />

be given to the asset’s conservation.” It goes on to note that, “Significance can be<br />

harmed or lost through alteration or destruction of the heritage asset or development<br />

within its setting.”<br />

5.16 In 2009, Planning Committee agreed a policy in relation to replacement<br />

windows. With regard to replacement windows in listed buildings, the policy states:<br />

“Any replacement or alterations of previously altered joinery items which is not<br />

of a type appropriate to the age and character of the building (in terms of<br />

design, detailing and materials) should be denied consent.”<br />

5.17 The significance in the property is twofold. It lies in the fact that for the most<br />

part both listed buildings retain much of their original form creating the grand<br />

entrance to a large, single dwelling. Although some elements have been altered,<br />

such as the windows, and extensions added to the rear, these do little to diminish the<br />

original character of the buildings.<br />

5.18 Secondly the lodges contribute to the character of the Park Conservation Area<br />

in that the arrangement of a single large house with associated buildings is<br />

characteristic of the development of the West Park area.<br />

5.19 In relation to the windows, those that exist in the property at the moment are not<br />

original. Early photographs of the buildings indicate that the windows in the bay to<br />

the front of the property were of a margin light arrangement. It is fair to assume that<br />

the windows elsewhere in the property would have followed a similar pattern.<br />

5.20 The proposed windows are multi-paned UPVC windows following a similar<br />

pattern to some of the replacement windows that are in the property at the moment.<br />

These windows are of a modern appearance therefore the replication of such<br />

4.1 Planning Committee 12.07.18 Planning Applications 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!