PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Planning Committee – 18 July 2012 4.1<br />
5.11 Further to this, paragraph 9 states that “Pursuing sustainable development<br />
involves seeking positive improvement in the quality of the built…and historic<br />
environment…including replacing poor design with better design”.<br />
5.12 Paragraph 17 of the NPPF sets out the core planning principles, one of which is<br />
to, “conserve heritage assets in a manner appropriate to their significance, so that<br />
they can be enjoyed for their contribution to the quality of life of this and future<br />
generations.”<br />
5.13 In considering good design paragraph 58 of the NPPF suggests that this<br />
should, respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local<br />
surroundings and materials.<br />
5.14 In relation to conservation policies within the NPPF, it states that, “local<br />
authorities should take account of…the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the<br />
significance of heritage assets [and]…the desirability of new development making a<br />
positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.”<br />
5.15 Furthermore the NPPF states that, “when considering the impact of a proposed<br />
development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should<br />
be given to the asset’s conservation.” It goes on to note that, “Significance can be<br />
harmed or lost through alteration or destruction of the heritage asset or development<br />
within its setting.”<br />
5.16 In 2009, Planning Committee agreed a policy in relation to replacement<br />
windows. With regard to replacement windows in listed buildings, the policy states:<br />
“Any replacement or alterations of previously altered joinery items which is not<br />
of a type appropriate to the age and character of the building (in terms of<br />
design, detailing and materials) should be denied consent.”<br />
5.17 The significance in the property is twofold. It lies in the fact that for the most<br />
part both listed buildings retain much of their original form creating the grand<br />
entrance to a large, single dwelling. Although some elements have been altered,<br />
such as the windows, and extensions added to the rear, these do little to diminish the<br />
original character of the buildings.<br />
5.18 Secondly the lodges contribute to the character of the Park Conservation Area<br />
in that the arrangement of a single large house with associated buildings is<br />
characteristic of the development of the West Park area.<br />
5.19 In relation to the windows, those that exist in the property at the moment are not<br />
original. Early photographs of the buildings indicate that the windows in the bay to<br />
the front of the property were of a margin light arrangement. It is fair to assume that<br />
the windows elsewhere in the property would have followed a similar pattern.<br />
5.20 The proposed windows are multi-paned UPVC windows following a similar<br />
pattern to some of the replacement windows that are in the property at the moment.<br />
These windows are of a modern appearance therefore the replication of such<br />
4.1 Planning Committee 12.07.18 Planning Applications 31