Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2009 - Health and ...
Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2009 - Health and ...
Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2009 - Health and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION<br />
Table 3: HDC survey results<br />
Complainants Providers DHBs<br />
Staff were polite to deal with 90% 94% 100%<br />
Staff were professional 87% 95% 89%<br />
Communications were promptly responded to 78% 83% 89%<br />
Complaints process was clearly explained 80% 77% 75%<br />
HDC role was clearly explained 77% 75% 75%<br />
In<strong>for</strong>mation was easy to underst<strong>and</strong> 85% 95% 100%<br />
Letters were clearly laid out 88% 96% 100%<br />
Letters were easy to underst<strong>and</strong> 88% 95% 100%<br />
Complaint was taken seriously 67% 97% 100%<br />
Kept in<strong>for</strong>med of progress 69% 76% 89%<br />
Complaint dealt with fairly 62% 85% 87%<br />
Complaint dealt with impartially 64% 86% 87%<br />
Clear reasons were given <strong>for</strong> decision 64% 92% 100%<br />
Understood reasons <strong>for</strong> decision 57% 92% 89%<br />
Satisfied with management of complaint 54% 84% 100%<br />
“I was annoyed that an obviously spurious complaint from a clearly psychotic patient triggered<br />
a fur<strong>the</strong>r letter to notify <strong>the</strong> Medical Council.”<br />
“This was very much a new experience <strong>for</strong> me <strong>and</strong> I was quite amazed at <strong>the</strong> thorough <strong>and</strong><br />
professional approach to my complaint when you consider it was a very minor issue compared<br />
to <strong>the</strong> high profile ones seen on TV <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> newspaper.”<br />
“The HDC acted at all times as an advocate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject [of] <strong>the</strong> complaint <strong>and</strong> made no<br />
attempt to act in <strong>the</strong> interests of <strong>the</strong> complainant. The HDC needs to be impartial not biased<br />
<strong>and</strong> to consider all material presented to it.”<br />
“We are appreciative that <strong>the</strong>re is an organisation, which is independent from providers, that<br />
is able to do an investigation that is impartial. This is beneficial <strong>for</strong> providers as <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong>n an<br />
opinion as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> health service was acceptable <strong>and</strong> not a breach. Likewise if we are<br />
wrong HDC can endorse our improvement plans <strong>and</strong> suggest o<strong>the</strong>rs we may not have thought<br />
of.”<br />
“Sometimes <strong>the</strong> complaint appraisal seems weighted in favour of <strong>the</strong> complaint. Sometimes<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are overly pedantic about what, from a DHB perspective, are relatively minor issues.<br />
Sometimes DHB resource limitations do not seem to be appreciated <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are unrealistic<br />
expectations about what could be provided.”<br />
“Going to HDC really made a difference <strong>and</strong> not only benefited us, but o<strong>the</strong>rs who had<br />
encountered similar problems to us as <strong>the</strong> agency seemed to change <strong>the</strong>ir strategy after <strong>the</strong><br />
complaint — thank you!”<br />
8 E.17