08.01.2014 Views

Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2009 - Health and ...

Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2009 - Health and ...

Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2009 - Health and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION<br />

Table 3: HDC survey results<br />

Complainants Providers DHBs<br />

Staff were polite to deal with 90% 94% 100%<br />

Staff were professional 87% 95% 89%<br />

Communications were promptly responded to 78% 83% 89%<br />

Complaints process was clearly explained 80% 77% 75%<br />

HDC role was clearly explained 77% 75% 75%<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation was easy to underst<strong>and</strong> 85% 95% 100%<br />

Letters were clearly laid out 88% 96% 100%<br />

Letters were easy to underst<strong>and</strong> 88% 95% 100%<br />

Complaint was taken seriously 67% 97% 100%<br />

Kept in<strong>for</strong>med of progress 69% 76% 89%<br />

Complaint dealt with fairly 62% 85% 87%<br />

Complaint dealt with impartially 64% 86% 87%<br />

Clear reasons were given <strong>for</strong> decision 64% 92% 100%<br />

Understood reasons <strong>for</strong> decision 57% 92% 89%<br />

Satisfied with management of complaint 54% 84% 100%<br />

“I was annoyed that an obviously spurious complaint from a clearly psychotic patient triggered<br />

a fur<strong>the</strong>r letter to notify <strong>the</strong> Medical Council.”<br />

“This was very much a new experience <strong>for</strong> me <strong>and</strong> I was quite amazed at <strong>the</strong> thorough <strong>and</strong><br />

professional approach to my complaint when you consider it was a very minor issue compared<br />

to <strong>the</strong> high profile ones seen on TV <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> newspaper.”<br />

“The HDC acted at all times as an advocate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject [of] <strong>the</strong> complaint <strong>and</strong> made no<br />

attempt to act in <strong>the</strong> interests of <strong>the</strong> complainant. The HDC needs to be impartial not biased<br />

<strong>and</strong> to consider all material presented to it.”<br />

“We are appreciative that <strong>the</strong>re is an organisation, which is independent from providers, that<br />

is able to do an investigation that is impartial. This is beneficial <strong>for</strong> providers as <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong>n an<br />

opinion as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> health service was acceptable <strong>and</strong> not a breach. Likewise if we are<br />

wrong HDC can endorse our improvement plans <strong>and</strong> suggest o<strong>the</strong>rs we may not have thought<br />

of.”<br />

“Sometimes <strong>the</strong> complaint appraisal seems weighted in favour of <strong>the</strong> complaint. Sometimes<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are overly pedantic about what, from a DHB perspective, are relatively minor issues.<br />

Sometimes DHB resource limitations do not seem to be appreciated <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are unrealistic<br />

expectations about what could be provided.”<br />

“Going to HDC really made a difference <strong>and</strong> not only benefited us, but o<strong>the</strong>rs who had<br />

encountered similar problems to us as <strong>the</strong> agency seemed to change <strong>the</strong>ir strategy after <strong>the</strong><br />

complaint — thank you!”<br />

8 E.17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!