08.01.2014 Views

Effective Practice with e-Assessment: An overview of ... - Jisc

Effective Practice with e-Assessment: An overview of ... - Jisc

Effective Practice with e-Assessment: An overview of ... - Jisc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘The role <strong>of</strong> pedagogically sound,<br />

imaginative design for e-assessment<br />

on the part <strong>of</strong> tutors is <strong>of</strong>ten a<br />

significant factor in its success.’<br />

Roadmap for e-<strong>Assessment</strong> Report for JISC<br />

(Open University, 2006)<br />

e-assessment has enthused practitioners, many finding new<br />

approaches to assessment a welcome opportunity to rethink<br />

course objectives and pedagogic models.<br />

Impact on workload<br />

It is well documented that the degree <strong>of</strong> effort normally<br />

required by academic and support staff in the postassessment<br />

period shifts <strong>with</strong> e-assessment to the<br />

preparatory phase, when test development, establishing<br />

equivalence <strong>with</strong> paper-based elements, test runs, and trials<br />

<strong>of</strong> ancillary systems are a significant undertaking. The<br />

development <strong>of</strong> effective e-assessments and associated<br />

practices means that staff will require additional support<br />

during a transitional phase in which they manage traditional<br />

and new methods <strong>of</strong> assessment simultaneously.<br />

Some institutions fund departmental e-assessment<br />

champions to provide peer support. One such scheme has<br />

successfully promoted e-learning (ILT) in the further<br />

education sector, but these initiatives require medium-<br />

to long-term rather than short-term funding. The adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> wide-scale e-assessment will undoubtedly bring an<br />

increased workload for support staff and investment in a<br />

centralised unit to support e-assessment development is a<br />

likely outcome.<br />

Culture change<br />

Few higher education departments use e-assessment at a<br />

summative level. This could reflect a failure to imagine what<br />

can be achieved, as much as any real risk posed by technical<br />

systems, now considered by many to be robust enough for<br />

the task. Resistance to changes in cultural practice may,<br />

however, be as potent a restriction on innovation as the<br />

reliability <strong>of</strong> technology.<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> innovative assessment practice is still emerging<br />

and will support much ongoing research. To support this<br />

process <strong>of</strong> change, the sharing <strong>of</strong> successes and solutions to<br />

problems is beneficial. Using case studies to review and<br />

develop current practice is recommended.<br />

What are the challenges for practitioners?<br />

g<br />

Allocating time for e-assessment-related<br />

skills development<br />

g<br />

g<br />

g<br />

g<br />

Ensuring the accessibility <strong>of</strong> e-assessments for<br />

a diversity <strong>of</strong> learners<br />

Achieving a best fit between e-assessment design,<br />

course objectives and the needs <strong>of</strong> learners<br />

Developing confidence and expertise in a full range<br />

<strong>of</strong> e-assessment approaches<br />

Assimilating changes in working practices<br />

For academic staff, e-assessment<br />

must add value to learning and<br />

teaching to warrant the change<br />

from traditional methods.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!