Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) 2011 - Higher ...
Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) 2011 - Higher ...
Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) 2011 - Higher ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>PRES</strong> <strong>2011</strong> Results – September <strong>2011</strong><br />
Separating responses to Q15 by country of residence for fees purposes 19 shows that ‘Other EU’ was the<br />
least positive group for all items except Q15f (relating to guidance on institutional standards and<br />
expectations), and ‘Non EU’ was the most positive group for all items except those relating to skills (Q15b<br />
and Q15c) 20 .<br />
Figure 3.6: <strong>Experience</strong> against expectations items by country of residence for fee status, Q15<br />
3.2 Focus on skills and professional development<br />
This section adopts a different approach to Section 3.1 (which took particular demographic variables as<br />
the primary focus) by exploring the skills and professional development scales (Q2 and Q7), and the<br />
items focused on motivations and anticipated career (Q19 and Q20). The issue of skills and professional<br />
development is particularly relevant to HEIs at the current time, when dedicated ‘Roberts’ funding has<br />
ceased, yet the <strong>Research</strong> Councils still expect institutions to continue to take forward the Roberts<br />
agenda 21 .<br />
Given the continued importance of the Roberts agenda in the face of increased funding constraints,<br />
more information regarding research students’ perceptions of the training and support they receive<br />
could be of use to institutions in ensuring that their provision is targeted, well attended, and has the<br />
greatest impact possible. In that context, it is worrying that the Professional Development and Career<br />
scale consistently yields the least positive responses of all the scales in <strong>PRES</strong>. This section focuses on this<br />
19 As noted in Section 1, this is different to normal place of residence.<br />
20 When aggregated into ‘below my expectations’, ‘met my expec tations’ and ‘exceeded my expectations’, Home<br />
students’ expec tations were exceeded less than those of the other groups, and Other EU students’ experiences were<br />
below expectations more than any other group.<br />
21 The ‘Roberts’ funding derived from the Roberts Review of 2002, which made recommendations relating to the<br />
employability and career planning of PhD students and research staff and funding for their career development and<br />
transferable skills training; see Roberts (2002). For the expectations of the <strong>Research</strong> Councils around researcher<br />
development see RCUK (2010).<br />
35