11.01.2014 Views

Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar - German ...

Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar - German ...

Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar - German ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. Semantics<br />

h<br />

h:every(x, h, h)<br />

h:some(y, h, h)<br />

h:dog(x)<br />

h:cat(y)<br />

h:chase(e, x, y)<br />

Figure .: some(y,cat(y),every(x,dog(x),chase(x,y)))<br />

(qeq oder = q ). A qeq constra<strong>in</strong>t relates an argument handle and a label: h = q l means<br />

that the handle is filled by the label directly or one or more quantifiers are <strong>in</strong>serted<br />

between h and l. Tak<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>to account, we can now return to our orig<strong>in</strong>al example.<br />

e correct MRS representation of (a) is given <strong>in</strong> ().<br />

()<br />

⟨ h, { h:every(x, h, h), h:dog(x), h:chase(e, x, y),<br />

h:some(y, h, h), h:cat(y) }, { h = q h, h = q h } ⟩<br />

e handle constra<strong>in</strong>ts are associated with the lexical entries for the respective quantifiers.<br />

Figure . shows the analysis. For compositional cases as <strong>in</strong> Figure ., the <br />

value of a sign is simply the concatenation of the values of the daughters. Similarly<br />

the value is a concatenation of the values of the daughters.<br />

.. e Analysis of Non-Compositional Constructions<br />

Copestake, Flick<strong>in</strong>ger, Pollard & Sag (b) extended the basic analysis that concatenates<br />

and to cases <strong>in</strong> which the mean<strong>in</strong>g of an expression is more than the<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g that is contributed by the daughters <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> structure. ey use the feature<br />

for the representation of constructional content. While usually the semantic<br />

functor (the head <strong>in</strong> head argument comb<strong>in</strong>ations and the adjunct <strong>in</strong> head adjunct structures)<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>es the ma<strong>in</strong> semantic contribution of a phrase, the feature can<br />

be used to specify a new ma<strong>in</strong> semantic contribution. In addition relations and scope<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts may be <strong>in</strong>troduced via . e feature geometry for is given <strong>in</strong><br />

():<br />

Dra of October , , :

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!