12.01.2014 Views

The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council

The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council

The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appendix D<br />

Material Assets In We consider that the <strong>Plan</strong> has the potential for significant effects on tourism<br />

resources and forestry. Effects relating to public transport could be considered<br />

under the air parameter, if considered likely to be significant (see Air above).<br />

Where possible, we will seek to encourage the use of local and sustainable<br />

materials and in development of recreation infrastructure (e.g. as set out in<br />

Historic Scotland’s Corporate <strong>Plan</strong> and accompanying SEA).<br />

Cultural Heritage In We consider that the <strong>Plan</strong> should have positive effects for the promotion and<br />

conservation of the <strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> and other heritage features. <strong>The</strong>re is the<br />

possibility of conflicts between the priorities of cultural and natural heritage,<br />

with the potential to reduce positive effects.<br />

Landscape and<br />

geodiversity<br />

In<br />

Establishment of land management strategies and guidance could potentially<br />

have negative and/or positive effects on landscape and scenic value, and<br />

geodiversity; the assessment process will allow identification and mitigation<br />

of any potential conflicts between cultural heritage priorities, including those<br />

relating to the landscape setting of the <strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> WHS, and broader<br />

landscape priorities.<br />

4.2 Scoping the parts of the Consultation Document to be included in the assessment<br />

In the scoping report we noted that the assessment would be undertaken at a level of detail that enabled<br />

us to broadly predict the likely significant effects. Table 3 clarifies which elements of the consultative draft<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> we have assessed.<br />

Table 3: Sections of Consultation Document to be assessed<br />

Section/s Assessed Y/N Reasons<br />

1. Introduction No <strong>The</strong>se sections set the context of both<br />

2. Requirement for a management plan<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> and assessment, and describe the<br />

consultation process.<br />

3. Consultative draft<br />

4. Consultation<br />

5. Responses to this consultation<br />

6. Handling your response<br />

7. Managing the World Heritage Site No This section sets out the roles and<br />

responsibilities of those involved in the<br />

management of the <strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> WHS,<br />

and the range of stakeholders who have an<br />

interest in the site.<br />

8. Delivery of the 2007-12 <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> No This section reviews achievements and<br />

developments over the life of the 2007-12<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, and draws out lessons<br />

learnt over this period.<br />

9. Looking Forward Yes This section introduces the vision and long-term<br />

aims of the <strong>Plan</strong>, and sets out underlying issues<br />

and medium-term objectives; the content of<br />

this section will underpin all outcomes from the<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!