The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council
The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council
The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
appendix D<br />
AIM 2: PROMOTE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THIS OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE TO LOCAL, REGIONAL, NATIONAL AND GLOBAL AUDIENCES BY IMPROVING<br />
PHYSICAL AND INTELLECTUAL ACCESSIBILITY<br />
SEA topics Biodiversity, flora and fauna Material assets Cultural heritage Landscape and geodiversity Summary and mitigation<br />
will the management plan objective… • prevent damage and<br />
encourage favourable<br />
condition to designated sites<br />
and protected species and<br />
undesignated biodiversity,<br />
flora and fauna?<br />
Medium-term issues/objectives<br />
• promote and enhance where<br />
appropriate enjoyment<br />
and understanding of the<br />
site from a natural heritage<br />
perspective?<br />
• contribute to effective<br />
adaptation to potential<br />
impacts of climate change on<br />
natural heritage?<br />
• maintain or<br />
enhance (where<br />
appropriate) the<br />
tourism resource<br />
of the WHS and the<br />
wider area?<br />
• support national<br />
forestry policy?<br />
• protect and where<br />
appropriate enhance the<br />
historic environment?<br />
• promote positive effects for<br />
the historic environment<br />
through land management?<br />
• promote and enhance where<br />
appropriate enjoyment and<br />
understanding of the site<br />
from a cultural heritage<br />
perspective?<br />
• contribute to effective<br />
adaptation to potential<br />
impacts of climate change on<br />
cultural heritage?<br />
• protect and enhance the<br />
landscape and geodiversity<br />
value of the WHS?<br />
• promote positive effects for<br />
the landscape through land<br />
management?<br />
• contribute to effective<br />
adaptation to potential<br />
impacts of climate change on<br />
the landscape?<br />
• promote and enhance where<br />
appropriate enjoyment<br />
and understanding of<br />
the landscape value and<br />
geodiversity of the site?<br />
Issue: Ensuring a strong visitor experience on site<br />
Objective 2.1<br />
To implement key recommendations<br />
in the approved interpretation plan<br />
and access strategy: improving signage,<br />
interpretation, visitor information,<br />
access routes and visitor facilities at<br />
individual sites along the <strong>Wall</strong>.<br />
Objective 2.2<br />
To promote and enhance use of the<br />
ANTONINE WALL WHS as a longdistance<br />
route and visitor facility that<br />
links communities across central<br />
Scotland.<br />
Objective 2.3<br />
To consider transportation<br />
infrastructure more widely around the<br />
WHS and build business partnerships<br />
to facilitate access for visitors in and<br />
around the ANTONINE WALL WHS.<br />
Objective 2.4<br />
To develop and foster links and<br />
partnerships with local tourism<br />
providers and other businesses, to<br />
provide an enhanced service for visitors.<br />
/ /<br />
<strong>The</strong> SEA of the Interpretation and<br />
Access Strategy indicates that<br />
objective 2.1 has the potential<br />
for negative effects through<br />
actions which have direct<br />
impacts, but also for positive<br />
effects in terms of promotion of<br />
understanding and enjoyment of<br />
the site from a natural heritage<br />
perspective.<br />
At this level it is difficult to<br />
identify to any specific degree<br />
the nature of these negative<br />
effects, but in many cases,<br />
effects are likely to be minimal<br />
and localised. <strong>The</strong> remainder<br />
of this group of objectives is<br />
considered to have the potential<br />
for similar effects.<br />
This group of<br />
objectives is directly<br />
related to the<br />
enhancement of the<br />
tourism resource<br />
of the site, and is<br />
consequently likely<br />
to have a significant<br />
positive effect in<br />
this area.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are no strong<br />
links to forestry<br />
strategy, so the<br />
effects here are likely<br />
to be neutral.<br />
<strong>The</strong> SEA of the Interpretation and<br />
Access Strategy indicates overall<br />
positive effects for the historic<br />
environment from objective 2.1.<br />
<strong>The</strong> remainder of this group of<br />
objectives is considered to have<br />
the potential for similar effects.<br />
/ /<br />
<strong>The</strong> SEA of the Interpretation and<br />
Access Strategy indicates that<br />
objective 2.1 has the potential<br />
for negative effects through<br />
actions which have direct<br />
impacts, but also for positive<br />
effects in terms of promotion of<br />
understanding and enjoyment of<br />
the site from a landscape value<br />
and geodiversity perspective.<br />
At this level it is difficult to<br />
identify to any specific degree<br />
the nature of these negative<br />
effects, but in many cases,<br />
effects are likely to be minimal<br />
and localised. <strong>The</strong> remainder<br />
of this group of objectives is<br />
considered to have the potential<br />
for similar effects.<br />
This group of objectives<br />
has the potential for<br />
mixed effects; use of the<br />
sustainability checklist<br />
is already embedded for<br />
those actions stem from<br />
the interpretation plan and<br />
access strategy, and should<br />
identify and help to mitigate<br />
negative effects at lower<br />
levels of the plan.<br />
Recommendation: the<br />
sustainability checklist<br />
should be applied to actions<br />
which ensue from these MP<br />
objectives, to ensure that wider<br />
environmental objectives are<br />
embedded at a lower level of<br />
the plan.<br />
64