14.01.2014 Views

Bibliography - British Geological Survey

Bibliography - British Geological Survey

Bibliography - British Geological Survey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Le Gros Clark, W. 1955c. Arthur Keith, 1866–1955. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society,<br />

1, 145–161, plate.<br />

Le Gros Clark, W. E. (see also under Anon. 1954c; Weiner et al. 1953)<br />

Leakey, L. S. B. 1934. Adam’s ancestors: an up to-date outline of what is known about the origin of man.<br />

2nd ed. London: Methuen, 244 pp., 12 plates. (Eoanthropus, pp. 219–221, plates V, VII, XII.)<br />

Leakey, L. S. B. 1953. Adam’s ancestors: an up-to-date outline of the Old Stone Age (Palaeolithic) and<br />

what is known about man’s origin and evolution. 4th ed. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. (Leakey expresses<br />

his personal conviction that the Piltdown jaw cannot belong to the same individual as the skull, for otherwise<br />

Piltdown man would be ‘unique in all humanity’, pp. 188–189, 212, plate XVI. In an addendum, inserted<br />

after Leakey’s book had gone to press, he discusses the exposure of the ‘hoax’ by Oakley and his team in<br />

Nov 1953, noting that the absence of the first premolar from the faked jaw had been necessary if the fraud<br />

were not to be detected at the outset, since both in its crown and root structure it would have differed so<br />

completely from a human first premolar; the articulating condyle had been removed for the same reason.)<br />

Leakey, L. S. B. & Goodall, M. 1969. Unveiling Man’s origins: ten decades of thought about human<br />

evolution. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co, 220 pp. (Leakey sets out his conviction that<br />

Teilhard de Chardin was implicated in the Piltdown ‘hoax’, pp. 90–100, 152–156. A note about Leakey’s<br />

‘forthcoming book’ on this subject was alluded to in the Ariadne column in New Scientist, 10 Dec 1970, 48,<br />

471; Morell 1995 notes the existence of an unfinished book draft.)<br />

Leakey, L. S. B. 1974. By the evidence: memoirs, 1932–1951. New York & London: Harcourt Brace<br />

Jovanovich. (Considers that Dawson had an unnamed accomplice at Piltdown, pp. 22–24, though in Leakey<br />

& Goodall 1969 he had been more specific on this point)<br />

Leakey, L. S. B. (see also: Daniel 1975; Cole 1975)<br />

Lenhossék, M. von 1914. Der Piltdowner Schädelfund. Barlangkutatás, 2, 1–18, 39–42.<br />

Lenhossék, M. von 1920. Das innere Relief des Unterkieferastes. Archiv für Anthropologie, N.F., 18<br />

(whole series 49), 49–59. (Does not accept the hominid character of the Piltdown jaw)<br />

Levin, B. 1990. Was the expert of experts history’s greatest skulduggery? The Times, 21 June, 12.<br />

(Discussion of the case against Sir Arthur Keith put forward by Spencer 1984, 1988. It prompted a response<br />

from Stringer 1990. See Levin 1992 for a reprint of this article.)<br />

Levin, B. 1992. If you want my opinion. London: Jonathan Cape. (Chapter entitled ‘Ah, sweet mystery of<br />

life’, pp. 22-25, reprinted from Levin 1990)<br />

Lewin, R. 1987. Bones of contention: controversies in the search for human origins. New York: Simon &<br />

Schuster, 348 pp. (Reprinted 1997, University of Chicago Press, in which Turritin cites pp. 60–75)<br />

Lewis, J. (John Lewis is one of those tainted by association with Charles Dawson, e.g. Dawson & Lewis<br />

1896, Combridge 1977b. John Combridge 1981 has suggested the possible involvement of Lewis as coconspirator<br />

with Dawson in the Piltdown forgery. Russell 2003, 255–260, discusses their relationship at<br />

some length.)<br />

Lowenstein, J. M. 1985. Molecular approaches to the identification of species. American Scientist, 73,<br />

541–547. (Application to the Piltdown jaw, confirming its orangutan identity, p. 545)<br />

Lowenstein, J. M. 1991. The Piltdown industry. Pacific Discovery, 44 (2), 46–48.<br />

Lowenstein, J. M., Molleson, T. & Washburn, S. L. 1982. Piltdown jaw confirmed as orang. Nature, 299<br />

(23 Sep), 294. (An immunological analytical technique, which permits identification of species-specific<br />

proteins, has been applied to the collagen in the Piltdown jaw and canine, the results of which confirm that<br />

both derive from an orangutan. It would thus seem likely that whoever put the canine tooth into the gravel<br />

pit must have known that the jaw was also that of an orangutan.)<br />

Lubenow, M. L. 1992. Bones of contention: a creationist assessment of human fossils. Grand Rapids,<br />

Michigan: Baker Book House. (Title evidently inspired by Lewin 1987. Piltdown, pp. 39–44)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!