Bibliography - British Geological Survey

Editor 1909–1946’, occurs opposite p. 63, and shows him sitting in the Society’s Library at Barbican House,
looking very much as it does to this day. See also comments under Holden 1980b)
Salzman, L. F. 1953. [Notice concerning Charles Dawson]. Sussex Express & County Herald, 27 Nov.
Salzman, L. F. & Weiner, J. S. 1955. [Letter to the editor.] Sunday Times, 23 Jan, 2. (See Houghton 1981)
Sarjeant, W. A. S. 1993. Lambert Beverly Halstead, 1933–1991: his life, his discoveries and his
controversies. Modern Geology, 18, 1–81.
Saunders, C. 1990. Piltdown hoaxer takes flight. Times Higher Education Supplement, Oct, 12. [Response
to Bowler 1990. Implicates Chipper, the goose, in the forgery]
Savage, R. J. G. 1963. Martin Alister Campbell Hinton, 1883‒1961. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of
the Royal Society, 9, 155–170, plate.
Sawday, J. 1999. “New men, strange faces, other minds”: Arthur Keith, race and the Piltdown affair, 1912–
53. In: Race, science and medicine, 1700–1960 / edited by W. Faust & B. Harris. London: Routledge,
pp. 259–288.
Schmitz-Moormann, K. 1981. Teilhard and the Piltdown hoax. Teilhard Newsletter, 14, (1), 2–4.
(Defends Teilhard de Chardin against Gould’s accusation of complicity in the Piltdown affair, based on an
examination of Teilhard’s letters from this period. Dr Karl Schmitz-Moormann is editor of eleven volumes
of Teilhard’s scientific writings.)
Schmitz-Moormann, K. 1981. The Stephen Jay Gould hoax and the Piltdown conspiracy. Teilhard Review,
16 (3), 7–15.
Schoetensack, O. 1908. Der Unterkiefer des Homo Heidelbergensis, aus den Sanden von Mauer bei
Heidelberg. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 67 pp, 13 plates. (A robust and somewhat primitive
human mandible was discovered in a sand quarry at Mauer, south-east of Heidelberg, Germany, in 1907. A
well preserved mammalian fauna was found in association with the jaw, but no artefacts were discovered.
There can be little doubt that Heidelberg was the seed that led to the creation of Piltdown Man. While the
discovery of the first Piltdown fragment in 1908 may have been coincidental, subsequent events would be
determined by Dawson’s over-optimistic expectation of finding England’s answer to Heidelberg.)
Schreider, E. 1973. Teilhard de Chardin: une victime de l’homme de Piltdown. La Recherche, 4, no. 32, 301.
Schwalbe, G. 1914. Kritische Besprechung von Boule’s Werk “L’Homme fossile de la Chapell-aux-Saints”.
Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, 16, 527–610. (In touching upon the subject of Piltdown, the
writer is unwilling to accept the proposition that the Piltdown jaw and skull belong to the same individual,
pp. 597, 603–4, 606.)
Schwartz, I. 1994. The Piltdown confession. New York: St. Martin’s Press, vi,210 pp. (A novel, described
as ‘an amazing blend of fine historical documentation and artful fiction’, including bibliographical references)
Sergi, G. 1914. L’evoluzione organica e le origini umane: induzioni paleontologiche. Torino: Bocca, 240 pp.
(Discussion of Piltdown finds, pp. 192–198, 236)
Sergi, G. 1914. La mandibola umana. Rivista di Antropologia, 19, 119–168. (Piltdown jaw, pp. 166–167;
the writer accepts without reservation Woodward’s reconstruction of Eoanthropus)
Sergi, G. 1914. Scoperta di un nuova fossile umano. Archivio di antropologia criminale, psichiatria e
medicina legale, 35, 84.
Sergi, G. 1916. Problemi di scienza contemporanea. Torino. (Discussion of Piltdown, pp. 111-117; See
Miller 1929, 462)
Shattock, S. G. 1914. Morbid thickening of the calvaria, and the reconstruction of bone once abnormal: a
pathological basis for the study of the thickening observed in certain Pleistocene crania. In: Proceedings
17th International Congress of Medicine, London, July 1913, Sect. VII, part 2, pp. 3‒46. (The Pleistocene
Piltdown cranium, pp. 42‒46 & plate)
Shaw, D. C. 2005. Piltdown and science. Skeptical Inquirer, 29 (3), 63. (Response to Pigliucci 2005)