16.01.2014 Views

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter XVI. Environmental Conditions<br />

313<br />

tween the two groups were small or disappeared:<br />

Neonatal Postneonatal<br />

period period<br />

Santiago 96.2 92.6<br />

Cali<br />

92.9 93.7<br />

Sherbrooke 94.6 93.2<br />

When water was available for only low<br />

proportions <strong>of</strong> families, however, the differences<br />

were clear, as in the three following<br />

cities:<br />

Neonatal Postneonatal<br />

period period<br />

Sfio Paulo 57.2 45.9<br />

Recife 22.7 11.2<br />

Resistencia 22.7 10.0<br />

In Resistencia and Recife the percentages<br />

for the second group were only about half<br />

those for the first.<br />

The data for the Latin American areas<br />

have been combined in Table 183 to give<br />

an overall view <strong>of</strong> the situation. In the<br />

13 cities 69.4 per cent <strong>of</strong> the homes <strong>of</strong> infants<br />

dying in the neonatal period had piped<br />

water supplies. In contrast, in the eight<br />

other areas only 28.8 per cent had piped<br />

water. These percentages may be related to<br />

the goals <strong>of</strong> the Charter <strong>of</strong> Punta (de Este.<br />

Although in these 13 cities combined the<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> 70 per cent was practically reached,<br />

for the other areas combined the percentage<br />

was only 28.8, or .57.6 per cent <strong>of</strong> the goal.<br />

These areas near cities were probably much<br />

better served with water supplies than the<br />

remote rural areas. In the 13 cities combined<br />

only 37.1 per cent <strong>of</strong> the homes <strong>of</strong><br />

these infants (lying in the neonatal period<br />

had water supplies inside the house. Thus,<br />

the new goal <strong>of</strong> providing water services<br />

with house connections for 80 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

the urban p,,.pulation and water for 50 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the rural population in the decade<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 1970's poses a great challenge.<br />

Table 183 shows also the findings for<br />

homes <strong>of</strong> infants deceased in the postnconatal<br />

period. In the 13 cities combined<br />

only 60.2 per cent had pil)ed water supplies<br />

(in contrast to 69.4 for the neonatal group),<br />

a significantly lower lercentage. In the<br />

eight other areas tile proportion was 28.8<br />

per cent (compared with 21.6). Therefore,<br />

this is clear evidence that families <strong>of</strong> infants<br />

dying in the postneonatal period had less<br />

favorable conditions in regard to Iliped<br />

water supplies. The differences between<br />

families in the two groups arc apparent for<br />

many <strong>of</strong> the areas shown in Figure 155 and<br />

for the areas combined in Figure 156.<br />

TABLE 183. Availability <strong>of</strong> Piped Water in Families <strong>of</strong> Infants' Dying in Neonatal and Postneonatal<br />

Periods in 21 Areas <strong>of</strong> 13 Latin American Projects.<br />

Neonatal period<br />

Poatneonatal period<br />

reas<br />

Piped water<br />

Piped water<br />

I!<br />

Total Total Inside Total Total<br />

houses house<br />

Inside<br />

houses house<br />

No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />

Total ............................ 9.299 5,87H 63.1 3.137 33.7 12,336 6,621 53.7 2,796 22.7<br />

13 aitles conblned ................. 7,868 5,.158 69.4 2,922 37.1 10,25) 0,176 00.2 2.035 25.7<br />

8 other areas combined .............. 1,431 412 28.8 215 150 2,077 448 21.6 16i 7.8<br />

a In families in which home interviews were conducted and information was provided.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!