16.01.2014 Views

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter XVI. Environmental Conditions<br />

321<br />

TABLE 188. Average Size <strong>of</strong> Families <strong>of</strong> Infants, Dying in Neonatal and Postneonatal Periods in 22<br />

Areas <strong>of</strong> 14 Projects.<br />

Neonatal period<br />

Poastneonatal period<br />

Area No. <strong>of</strong> Average No. <strong>of</strong> I Average<br />

families members families members<br />

Total ............................... 9,482 4.9 12,343 5.3<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Chaco Province<br />

Resistencia ...................... 304 5.1 409 5.3<br />

Rural departments ............... 235 5.3 410 5.4<br />

San Juan Province<br />

San Juan (cit.) .................. 149 5.1 107 4.0<br />

Suburban departments ............ 314 5.5 323 5.5<br />

Rural depar rients ............... 346 5.5 509 5.9<br />

BOLIVIA<br />

La Paz ... ..................... 634 3.7 1,045 3.7<br />

Viacha .......................... 38 3.7 55 3.5<br />

BRAZIL<br />

Recife ............................ 803 5.6 1,463 5.9<br />

RibeirSo Preto<br />

RibeirSo Preto (city) ............. 202 5.0 160 5.1<br />

Franca ......................... 162 4.0 143 5.0<br />

Communities .................... 94 5.2 83 5.7<br />

Sdo Paulo ......................... 1,703 4.0 1,524 4.4<br />

CANADA<br />

Sherbrooke ........................ 203 3.6 73 4.1<br />

CHILE<br />

Santiago ........................ 583 4.5 887 4.8<br />

Colnunas ........................ 57 5.5 112 5.6<br />

COLOMBIA<br />

Cali .............................. 382 4.6 443 4.8<br />

Cartagena ......................... 208 6.3 355 0.6<br />

Medellin .......................... 263 6.0 396 6.6<br />

EL SALVADOR<br />

San Salvador .................... 689 5.0 1,338 5.4<br />

Rural municipios................. 185 6.0 440 6.2<br />

JAMAICA<br />

Kingston-St. Andrew ............... 882 4.2 544 4.7<br />

MEXICO<br />

Monterrey ......................... 956 0.0 1,524 6.1<br />

In families in which home interviews were conducted and information was provided.<br />

households <strong>of</strong> deceased infants in the two housing was less favorable for the second<br />

age groups, for 22 areas <strong>of</strong> 14 projects. For group than for the first (roughly representthese<br />

areas combined, 30.2 per cent <strong>of</strong> fain- ing the general population) and also that<br />

ilies in the neonatal group lived in one- the differences in size <strong>of</strong> dwellings in these<br />

room households, 26.1 per cent in two-room, widely separated areas were great. In Sher­<br />

17.4 per cent in three-room, and 26.4 per brooke 86.0 and 87.5 per cent <strong>of</strong> households<br />

cent in houses with at least four rooms. The in these two groups, respectively, had at<br />

corresponding percentages for families in the least four rooms. In Recife, Ribeirflo Prato<br />

postneonatal group were 39.0, 27.6, 15.4, communities, and Medellin over 50 per cent<br />

and 18.0. The data showed, therefore, that <strong>of</strong> households in the neonatal group had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!