20.01.2014 Views

ICRISAT - ICRISAT: Medium Term Plan 2010-12 - 2010-12

ICRISAT - ICRISAT: Medium Term Plan 2010-12 - 2010-12

ICRISAT - ICRISAT: Medium Term Plan 2010-12 - 2010-12

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Universities, SRI (China), FCRI (Thailand)] and final users namely, NARES, NGOs, seed and<br />

grain suppliers, input suppliers, grain storage agencies, credit agencies, poultry feed<br />

manufacturers, farmer and poultry federations and finally farmers. The outputs include the<br />

coalition building itself, improved crop production technologies, higher yields, innovations in<br />

input supply and marketing chains, dissemination and scaling out of the coalition approach.<br />

These outputs lead to outcomes at the farmer level such as access to cheaper credits, market<br />

intelligence, reduced risk and use of quality inputs. The outcomes ofr the other stakeholders<br />

involved in this activity included availability of grain to the end users (eg. poultry industry),<br />

credit uptake and assured grain quality. The impact felt at the community level were both<br />

socioeconomic in nature and also environment. Increase in income, better health and<br />

education for children and reduced use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides are some of them.<br />

Output 8: Policies and strategies that enhance agricultural diversification into high<br />

value products (e.g., legumes, livestock, biofuels, vegetables, etc) to harness<br />

emerging demand opportunities and facilitate agribusiness enterprises developed<br />

and promoted<br />

Production and marketing risks are recurrent in the Semi-Arid Tropics. Agricultural<br />

diversification is an essential risk coping mechanism that allows consumers to smooth their<br />

consumption and ensure a consistent supply of a portfolio of products by producers. Limited<br />

diversification into high value crops where countries have comparative advantages has<br />

constrained the competitiveness of SAT agriculture and the opportunity to gain from trade.<br />

Agricultural diversification towards high-value commodities can be a potential tool for poverty<br />

alleviation in developing countries. To harness this potential the following elements are critical<br />

to scaling-up diversification are: (i) production base that can deliver high value marketable<br />

surplus, (ii) physical infrastructure (roads, electricity, communication, refrigerated transport,<br />

cold chains, etc.) that can facilitate commodity flows between production and markets, (iii)<br />

efficient interactions between key supply chain players to reduce transaction costs (iv)<br />

investment in product processing and conservation for value addition, and (v) an enabling<br />

regulatory and legal framework to enhance the capacity of the public sector and encourage<br />

private sector investment in agribusiness.<br />

Diversification of agriculture towards high-value agriculture will impact various stakeholders<br />

(including farmers, processors, traders and consumers) on the supply chain for high-value food<br />

commodities. At the upstream farmers will be benefited in terms of enhanced income and<br />

employment opportunities and become more competitive. At the down stream consumers will<br />

benefit in terms of improved product quality and value, better availability and lower prices of<br />

these commodities. Other stakeholders like traders and processors will also benefit from<br />

reduced transaction costs and can exploit higher margins for their activities and services. On<br />

the whole impact of high-value agriculture will be felt economy-wide in terms of enhanced<br />

opportunities for income and employment for rural workers.<br />

In dynamic development, adaptive responses between producers and policy makers are<br />

necessary, to enhance communication among the value chain players. This will allow<br />

identification of key challenges in agricultural production, processing and marketing, and how<br />

strategically best to address them, e.g., better coordination of supply and demand, regular<br />

volumes of sales, quality requirements. Improved communication will support further product<br />

diversification and capturing new market opportunities, e.g., niche and export markets. It will<br />

also contribute to identify future research needs that respond to the identified challenges, and<br />

enhances technology transfer and adoption.<br />

Harmonization of policies and decision making processes will enable poorer farmers in<br />

producing high value products, improving livelihoods and environmental benefits. It also<br />

includes the question on nexus between high value products, market development and<br />

development. This will ensure integration of pro poor product and market development<br />

approaches, e.g., protection against market risk, safety net strategies, smart subsidies and<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> MTP <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>12</strong> 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!