State Route 22 Design-Build Project - ictpa-scc
State Route 22 Design-Build Project - ictpa-scc
State Route 22 Design-Build Project - ictpa-scc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>State</strong> <strong>Route</strong> <strong>22</strong><br />
<strong>Design</strong>-<strong>Build</strong> <strong>Project</strong>
Background<br />
SR-<strong>22</strong> was built in 1960’s<br />
No major improvements since inception on<br />
this significant E/W corridor in OC<br />
Caltrans completed PA&ED in 2003<br />
The project cost is $550 million and was<br />
funded through Measure M and other<br />
federal, state and local funds<br />
OCTA took over the project and used D/B<br />
to start the contract in 9/2004
<strong>Project</strong>
<strong>Design</strong>/<strong>Build</strong> Contract<br />
Awarded by OCTA in 8/2004 to GMR<br />
(Granite/Myers/Rados<br />
Rados)<br />
Bid price is $390.4 million<br />
The other bid was $185 million higher with<br />
a construction schedule 25% longer<br />
Opened the mainline traffic in 4/2007<br />
The substantial completion date was<br />
11/2007 and the final completion date was<br />
4/2008
Organization<br />
OCTA hired Parsons to provide<br />
program management and 2 nd level<br />
oversight<br />
Caltrans performed 3 rd level<br />
oversight<br />
Team <strong>22</strong> (OCTA, Caltrans, Parsons,<br />
GMR and URS) promotes “can-do”<br />
team spirit among all partners
Caltrans Oversight Role<br />
Reviewing QC/QA staff’s s qualifications and their<br />
work for compliance<br />
Monitoring design progress<br />
Verifying compliance with contract requirements<br />
Spot-checking construction for compliance with<br />
design plans and specifications<br />
Reviewing temporary traffic control installations<br />
Auditing environmental compliance and safety<br />
records<br />
Conducting the review of as-built plans
Best Practices<br />
Co-location, dedicated resources<br />
Establish specialty areas of expertise within D/B<br />
oversight team<br />
Functional focus meetings and over-the<br />
the-shoulder<br />
reviews timely<br />
Caltrans control resource agency coordination<br />
and all direct contact<br />
Contractor responsible to coordinate utility<br />
relocation with utility company<br />
Have contingency fund to address specific items<br />
that are not documented<br />
Provide warranty option for Caltrans to exercise<br />
at the end of construction
What Needs Better Definition<br />
Exception to design standards beyond what was<br />
ID in PR not defined in the scope of work<br />
<strong>Design</strong> standards and manual updates to be used<br />
Document agreements resulting from over-the<br />
the-<br />
shoulder meetings<br />
A HQ liaison to champion special projects<br />
Qualifications and quantity of QC/QA staff in the<br />
contract documents<br />
Process and approving authority for minor/major<br />
changes; funding responsibility for changes<br />
Close-out out design requirement as part of “Best<br />
Value”, , who signs the as-built?
Problem Areas That Need To Be<br />
Addressed/Avoided<br />
Oversight responsibilities within Caltrans and with<br />
QA/QC manager<br />
Determine appropriate staffing level of design<br />
and construction D/B oversight staff<br />
Incomplete documents being submitted for<br />
reviews<br />
Need a system to ensure the latest plan set is<br />
being used<br />
Maintenance issues are properly addressed<br />
When contractors take a risk without formal<br />
approval – they are responsible for the financial<br />
consequences
Conclusions<br />
D/B is just an “another tool” to build<br />
project<br />
Special legislations have passed to<br />
allow additional D/B opportunities for<br />
Caltrans and local agencies<br />
Caltrans is developing D/B manual<br />
Caltrans is/will be ready for the D/B<br />
contract