Semantic Annotation for Process Models: - Department of Computer ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

234 BIBLIOGRAPHY [142] INTEROP Project. Deliverable DEM 2 roadmap for UEML and UEML2.1. http: //www.interop-noe.org/, Last Visited: 2006.12.1. [143] INTEROP Project. Deliverable DTG4.1 a practical experiment on semantic enrichment of enterprise models in a homogeneous environment. http://interop-noe. org/, Last Visited: 2006.12.1. [144] INTEROP Project. UEML ontology overview. http://www.interop-noe.org/, Last Visited: 2006.12.1. [145] INTEROP Project. Deliverable DTG4.2 experimental semantic enrichment of enterprise models for interoperability and its practical impacts. http://interop-noe. org/, Last Visited: 2007.8.6. [146] Protégé. Protégé-OWL API. http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/, Last Visited: 2007.5.26. [147] Protégé. What is Protégé? http://protege.stanford.edu/overview/index.html, Last Visited: 2007.5.26. [148] Protégé. What is Protégé-OWL? http://protege.stanford.edu/overview/ protege-owl.html, Last Visited: 2007.5.26. [149] ProtegeWiki. SWRL Language FAQ. http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? SWRLLanguageFAQ, Last Visited: 2007.5.26. [150] ProtegeWiki. SQWRLQueryTab. http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl? SQWRLQueryTab, Last Visited: 2007.11.30. [151] ProtegeWiki. SWRL Tab. http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SWRLTab, Last Visited: 2007.5.26. [152] Sudha Ram and Venkataraman Ramesh. Schema integration: Past, current and furture. A. Elmagarmid,. M. Rusinkiewicz, A. Sheth, (ed.) Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems, pages 119–155, 1999. [153] Lawrence Reeve and Hyoil Han. Survey of semantic annotation platforms. In Proc. of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 1634–1638, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press, 2005. [154] Cornelis Joost van Rĳsbergen. Information Retrieval (2nd edition). Butterworths, 1979. [155] Colette Rolland. Modeling the requirements engineering process. In Proc. of the 3rd European-Japanese Seminar on Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, 1993. [156] Colette Rolland and Naveen Prakash. Bridging the gap between organizational needs and ERP funtionality. Requirements Engineering, 5(3):180–193. Springer London, 2000.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 235 [157] Colette Rolland and Rim-Samia Kaabi. An intentional perspective to service modeling and discovery. In Proc. of the 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference - Vol. 2- (COMPSAC 2007), pages 455– 460, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. [158] Michael Rosemann and Peter Green. Developing a meta model for the Bunge- Wand-Weber ontological constructs. Information Systems, 27(2):75–91, 2002. [159] Gerard Salton. Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley, 1988. [160] August-Wilhelm Scheer and Markus Nüttgens. ARIS architecture and reference models for business process management. Business Process Management, Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, Volume 1806/2000 pages 376–389, Springer- Verlag. London, UK, 2000. [161] Craig Schlenoff, Michael Gruninger, Mihai Ciocoiu, and Jintae Lee. The essence of the process specification language. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International, 16(4):204–216, 1999. [162] The University of Manchester School of Computer Science. FaCT++. http: //owl.man.ac.uk/factplusplus/, Last Visited: 2007.5.1. [163] SCOR. SCOR model. http://www.supply-chain.org/page.ww?section=SCOR+ Model\&name=SCOR+Model, Last Visited: 2007.5.10. [164] SCOR. SCOR version 7.0 overview. http://www.supply-chain.org/cs/root/scor_ tools_resources/scor_model/scor_model, Last Visited: 2006.3.22. [165] Peter Senge. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday-Currency, 1990. [166] Kaarthik Sivashanmugam, John A. Miller, Amit P. Sheth, and Kunal Verma. Framework for semantic web process composition. Special Issue of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce (ĲEC), 9(2), 2004. [167] Pnina Soffer and Yair Wand. On the notion of soft-goals in business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 11(6):663–679, May-June 2005. [168] Arne Sølvberg. Data and what they refer to. In Conceptual Modeling: Current Issues and Future Trends., pages 211–226. LNCS 1565, Springer-Verlag, 1999. [169] Arne Sølvberg. Introdution to concept modeling for information systems. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2002. [170] Arne Sølvberg, Sari Hakkarainen, Terje Brasethvik, Xiaomeng Su, Mihhail Matskin, and Darĳus Strašunskas. Concepts on enriching, understanding and retrieving the semantics on the Web. ERCIM News. Special Theme: Semantic Web, (51), 2002.
Page 1 and 2:
Yun Lin Semantic Annotation for Pro
Page 3:
To MY BELOVED HUSBAND HAO DING AND
Page 6 and 7:
ii The proposed approach has been i
Page 8 and 9:
iv CONTENTS 3 State of the Art 31 3
Page 10 and 11:
vi CONTENTS 7.5.2 Semantic reasonin
Page 12 and 13:
viii CONTENTS H PSAM Annotation Res
Page 14 and 15:
x LIST OF FIGURES 6.1 System module
Page 16 and 17:
xii LIST OF FIGURES
Page 18 and 19:
xiv LIST OF TABLES
Page 20 and 21:
xvi PREFACE My tremendous gratitude
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1 Introduction Business pro
Page 25 and 26:
1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT AND RESEARCH
Page 27 and 28:
1.4. APPROACH AND SCOPE 7 1.4.1 Sem
Page 29 and 30:
1.6. MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS 9 1.6 Majo
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2 Problem Setting In this c
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2.1: Zachman Enterprise Arch
Page 35 and 36:
2.2. MODELING BASIS 15 meta-model o
Page 37 and 38:
2.3. INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SEMANT
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
2.4. SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY 23 3
Page 45 and 46:
2.5. BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL 25 2.5
Page 47 and 48:
2.6. PROCESS KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 2
Page 49 and 50:
2.7. SUMMARY 29 • Creation or imp
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 3 State of the Art This cha
Page 53 and 54:
3.1. PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGES 33
Page 55 and 56:
3.1. PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGES 35
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3.1: Modeling constructs of d
Page 59 and 60:
3.2. SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY AND
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Representation primitives Process P
Page 69 and 70:
3.3. GOAL MODELING 49 From the surv
Page 71 and 72:
3.4. SEMANTIC ANNOTATION METHODS AN
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
3.6. SUMMARY 59 In the goal modelin
Page 81:
Part II Design and Application 61
Page 84 and 85:
64 CHAPTER 4. SEMANTIC ANNOTATION F
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
84 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION proce
Page 106 and 107:
86 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION in a
Page 108 and 109:
88 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION • i
Page 110 and 111:
90 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION 5.5 G
Page 112 and 113:
92 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION
Page 114 and 115:
94 CHAPTER 6. PRO-SEAT (PROCESS SEM
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
100 CHAPTER 6. PRO-SEAT (PROCESS SE
Page 122 and 123:
102 CHAPTER 6. PRO-SEAT (PROCESS SE
Page 124 and 125:
104 CHAPTER 7. EXEMPLAR STUDIES AND
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 8 Quality Evaluation of the
Page 151 and 152:
8.2. SETTING FOR THE QUALITY EVALUA
Page 153 and 154:
8.2. SETTING FOR THE QUALITY EVALUA
Page 155 and 156:
8.3. QUALITY ANALYSIS 135 to those
Page 157 and 158:
8.3. QUALITY ANALYSIS 137 annotatio
Page 159 and 160:
8.3. QUALITY ANALYSIS 139 • G1 -
Page 161 and 162:
8.5. SUMMARY 141 3. Semantic annota
Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 9 Validation of Applicabili
Page 165 and 166:
9.1. VALIDATION DESIGN 145 - RE3.3
Page 167 and 168:
9.2. SWRL FORMULATION 147 Table 9.1
Page 169 and 170:
9.2. SWRL FORMULATION 149 RE3.2 RE3
Page 171 and 172:
9.3. APPLICABILITY VALIDATION IN AN
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
9.4. DISCUSSION ON RESULTS OF THE V
Page 181 and 182:
9.4. DISCUSSION ON RESULTS OF THE V
Page 183:
Part IV Synopsis 163
Page 186 and 187:
166 CHAPTER 10. CONCLUSIONS AND FUT
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix A BPMN This chapter presen
Page 195 and 196:
A.3. CONNECTING OBJECTS 175 Figure
Page 197 and 198:
A.6. BPMN META-MODEL TREE IN METIS
Page 199 and 200:
Appendix B EEML 2005 The language v
Page 201 and 202:
B.2. RECOURSES MODELING DOMAIN 181
Page 203 and 204: Appendix C SCOR SCOR — Supply Cha
Page 205 and 206: C.2. LEVEL 2 TOOLKIT 185 Level 1 Me
Page 207 and 208: C.3. LEVEL 3 PROCESS ELEMENTS 187 F
Page 209 and 210: Appendix D Algorithm for Semi-Autom
Page 211 and 212: 191 Algorithm 1 Goal Annotation Alg
Page 213 and 214: Algorithm 4 Goal Annotation Algorit
Page 215 and 216: 195 Algorithm 6 Goal Annotation Alg
Page 217 and 218: Appendix E GUI of Pro-SEAT The prop
Page 219 and 220: 199 Figure E.3: Mapping meta-model
Page 221 and 222: 201 Figure E.5: Goal annotation UI
Page 223 and 224: Appendix F Analysis of the Annotati
Page 225 and 226: F.2. INTEGRATION APPLICATION BASED
Page 227 and 228: F.2. INTEGRATION APPLICATION BASED
Page 229 and 230: Appendix G Schema of PSAM and SWRL
Page 231 and 232: G.1. PSAM IN OWL 211
Page 233 and 234: G.2. RULE DEFINITIONS IN SWRL 213
Page 235 and 236: G.2. RULE DEFINITIONS IN SWRL 215
Page 237 and 238: Appendix H Annotation Results in Ex
Page 239 and 240: H.2. ANNOTATION OF PM B1 219 xmlns:
Page 241 and 242: H.3. ANNOTATION OF PM B2 221 Av
Page 243 and 244: Bibliography [1] ALTOVA. What is th
Page 245 and 246: BIBLIOGRAPHY 225 [26] Dov Dori. Why
Page 247 and 248: BIBLIOGRAPHY 227 [52] Ian Horrocks.
Page 249 and 250: BIBLIOGRAPHY 229 [78] John Krogstie
Page 251 and 252: BIBLIOGRAPHY 231 [102] Diana Maynar
Page 253: BIBLIOGRAPHY 233 [129] OASIS Cover
Page 257 and 258: BIBLIOGRAPHY 237 [185] Systems Thin
Page 259: BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 [214] John.A. Zach
show all

Semantic Annotation for Process Models: - Department of Computer ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?