22.01.2014 Views

mishqui-yacu, sweet water - IFAD

mishqui-yacu, sweet water - IFAD

mishqui-yacu, sweet water - IFAD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

It was an ambitious project. However, it was too much of a blueprint<br />

solution. The project was based on concrete. All thinking<br />

was concerned with cement. They planned building the dam and<br />

the canals, forgetting the fact that irrigation is not only a question<br />

of providing more <strong>water</strong>. It is essentially a question of providing<br />

good management. You have to organize the use of the <strong>water</strong><br />

upstream and all the way down. An issue involving human relations.<br />

The <strong>water</strong> associations did already exist, but they were not<br />

involved in the planning process. Therefore, the conflict did not<br />

come as a surprise. 40<br />

Four different irrigation systems were planned. However, it was the<br />

plans for Culebrillas that raised fierce opposition, probably because<br />

14 existing canals were going to be affected. A new canal meant that<br />

all 14 canals were going to be reorganized. Current canal users felt<br />

excluded from the entire planning process. They feared that traditional<br />

access to older irrigation systems was severely threatened,<br />

and were convinced they would lose <strong>water</strong> through project innovations.<br />

The situation was worsened by plans to distribute <strong>water</strong> from<br />

Culebrillas to the area of Suscal. Even though the proposed dam in<br />

Culebrillas had more than enough capacity to feed both irrigation<br />

systems, users of the existing canals calculated that the new systems<br />

would make everything worse. Since the new systems would be much<br />

bigger than the older ones, the original users of the Culebrilla <strong>water</strong><br />

assumed that meant less <strong>water</strong> for everyone. Didn't the introduction<br />

of a new canal to Suscal run the risk that El Tambo would lose much<br />

of its <strong>water</strong>?<br />

The project CARC had decided to make the dam. Nothing else; it<br />

was news to us. Suddenly the fact was there. A certain engineer<br />

Carran explained that the <strong>water</strong> was going to Suscal. All <strong>water</strong><br />

was going to be assembled in one canal, the Canal Coronel. We<br />

thought that meant no <strong>water</strong> to El Tambo. There was talk of rebellion,<br />

of suing CARC and all agencies involved. 41<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

44<br />

Interview with Rudolf Mulder, Dutch Co-Director to CARC.<br />

Interview with Julián Guaman, president of the <strong>water</strong> committee of the Canal Cachi-<br />

Banco Romerino Pillocapata.<br />

León (1993), pp. 1-3.<br />

Interview with Daniel Rodríguez, former mayor of El Tambo.<br />

Interview with Abelina Morocho Pinguil. She presently serves as mayor in Suscal, but<br />

was born in El Tambo, where she still works on her father’s land. She married in Suscal,<br />

where she also has land. She is evidently familiar with irrigation problems in both areas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!