23.01.2014 Views

ALBERTO BOLLERO REAL

ALBERTO BOLLERO REAL

ALBERTO BOLLERO REAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Wohlfarth’s relation and Henkel plot<br />

can help to clarify the nature of the magnetisation processes. J d r (H m ) is the remanence after<br />

application of a reverse field, -H m , to the saturated sample; J r is the remanence of the<br />

material, measured after saturation (H m → ∞); J m r (H m ) is the remanence after application<br />

and removal of the maximum field H m to a thermally demagnetised sample. Measurements<br />

of these quantities are shown in Fig. 3.4 for a typical exchange-coupled two-phase<br />

nanocomposite magnet.<br />

J r<br />

J rd<br />

(H m<br />

)<br />

J rm<br />

(H m<br />

)<br />

Fig. 3.4: First magnetisation and demagnetisation curves for an exchange-coupled twophase<br />

composite magnet (Fe 3 B / Nd 2 Fe 14 B); (adapted from Schneider et al [45]).<br />

However, some important requirements must be considered for the validity of<br />

Wohlfarth’s relation: the system must consist of an assembly of non-interacting<br />

magnetically uniaxial single-domain particles and the sample must be initially in the<br />

thermally demagnetised state. Thus, a plot of J m r (H m )/J r vs. J d r (H m )/J r would result in a<br />

straight line as that shown in Fig. 3.5 for a system where the validity requirements are<br />

verified. This is the so-called “Henkel-plot” [47] which is a simple and elegant way of<br />

presenting Wohlfarth’s relation independent of the applied magnetic field. However,<br />

exchange-coupling implies interactions between particles and, as a consequence, a<br />

deviation from that linear behaviour as it can be seen in Fig. 3.5.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!