25.01.2014 Views

Centroids, Clusters and Crime: Anchoring the Geographic Profiles of ...

Centroids, Clusters and Crime: Anchoring the Geographic Profiles of ...

Centroids, Clusters and Crime: Anchoring the Geographic Profiles of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Team # 7507 Page 43<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard warnings that would apply to any geographic pr<strong>of</strong>iling scheme<br />

apply: The output should not be treated as a single prediction, but ra<strong>the</strong>r as a tool to help<br />

prioritize areas <strong>of</strong> focus. It is designed to do well on average, but may fail in outlier cases.<br />

And to implement it reliably, it must be paired with a human assessment. Please note also<br />

that models for predicting <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders “home base” are much more well-researched, <strong>and</strong> in<br />

general will be more accurate than any algorithm claiming to predict <strong>the</strong> next strike point. A<br />

police department should choose which model type to use on a case-by-case basis.<br />

Internal Workings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Model<br />

Inputs<br />

Our model requires <strong>the</strong> coordinate locations <strong>of</strong> a serial criminal’s previous <strong>of</strong>fenses, as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> order in which <strong>the</strong>se crimes were committed.<br />

Assumpitons<br />

1. The Criminal will tend to strike at locations around one or more “anchor points.” (<strong>of</strong>ten,<br />

<strong>the</strong> criminal’s house).<br />

2. Around this anchor point, <strong>the</strong>re may be a “buffer zone” within which he will not strike.<br />

3. If <strong>the</strong> criminal has multiple anchor points, <strong>the</strong> regions around those from which he has<br />

struck most <strong>of</strong>ten or most recently are more likely.<br />

Method<br />

The algorithm implements two different models, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n decides which is better.<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> first method, we assume <strong>the</strong> criminal has a single anchor point, <strong>and</strong> build likelihood<br />

regions around <strong>the</strong> anchor point based on <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> his past crimes.<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> second, we assume multiple anchor points, calculate <strong>the</strong> best number <strong>of</strong> anchor<br />

points to use, <strong>and</strong> determine likelihood around each point individually. Then area around<br />

each is weighted by <strong>the</strong> criminal’s apparent preferences, if any.<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> algorithm tests both models to see how well <strong>the</strong>y would have predicted <strong>the</strong><br />

previous crimes, <strong>and</strong> uses <strong>the</strong> model with <strong>the</strong> better track record.<br />

Summary <strong>and</strong> Recommendations<br />

While our model needs more real-world testing, its strong <strong>the</strong>oretical basis, self-evaluation<br />

scheme <strong>and</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> practical considerations make it a good option for a police department<br />

looking to forecast a criminal’s next strike. Combining its results with <strong>the</strong> intuition <strong>of</strong> a human<br />

being will maximize its utility.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!