25.01.2014 Views

THE GREAT LAKES

THE GREAT LAKES

THE GREAT LAKES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An extended view of integrity is that of a latent<br />

feature of the complexity of nature that is only revealed<br />

through interaction with observers or users. Just as in<br />

baseball, where some pitches are balls and some are<br />

strikes, ''they ain't nothing" until the umpire calls them.<br />

In this sense, integrity cannot be thought of as an<br />

intrinsic property of nature because it manifests itself<br />

only through some process of human observation,<br />

measurement, or manipulation. 22<br />

More accurately then, integrity is a feature of the<br />

interaction of nature with humans. All human attempts to<br />

understand and intervene in nature are rooted in<br />

abstractions or models. As such, they represent<br />

simplifications of a reality external to each of us. This<br />

rests on a desire to obtain an equivalent, but reduced,<br />

representation of nature. Thus, for example, some aspects<br />

are omitted, others aggregated, weak couplings are ignored,<br />

and slowly changing features are treated as constant.<br />

Features of complex systems such as integrity are<br />

irreducible, and attempts to simplify thus lead to a loss<br />

of aspects essential to the understanding of ecosystem<br />

integrity. This has important implications for human<br />

attempts to restore and maintain integrity of ecosystems.<br />

Any attempt to protect ecosystem integrity should rest,<br />

therefore, on the explicit recognition that it originates<br />

from a two-way interaction of an ecosystem with a human<br />

system of observers, managers, and users. 23<br />

In this spirit, C.S. Holling has suggested that the<br />

Great Lakes comprise three interacting subsystems:<br />

1) the set of biological, physical, and chemical<br />

interactions;<br />

2) the institutions charged with management; and<br />

3) the socioeconomic system that receives benefits and<br />

bears burdens of management.<br />

Mismatches in the time and space dynamics of processes<br />

central to each of these subsystems trigger surprises." By<br />

surprises, Holling means unanticipated and unpredictable<br />

restructuring of the essential character of any or all of<br />

the three subsystems.<br />

For example, development of a new salmonid fishery in<br />

the Great Lakes, while having some immediate benefit, has<br />

brought with it economic, ecological, and political

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!