arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993
arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993
arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2<br />
λ<br />
Fig. 17: The Wigner semicircle distribution.<br />
Exercise. Derivation of <strong>th</strong>e Wigner Distribution<br />
As an example of an eigenvalue distribution, we consider <strong>th</strong>e Gaussian matrix<br />
model. The leading term in <strong>th</strong>e large N asymptotics of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution is<br />
<strong>th</strong>e famous Wigner distribution<br />
K 1 (λ, λ) = 1 √<br />
2 − λ<br />
4π<br />
2 θ(2 − λ 2 ) , (9.12)<br />
shown in fig. 17.<br />
Derive <strong>th</strong>e Wigner distribution from <strong>th</strong>e “Schwinger–Dyson” equations of <strong>th</strong>e matrix<br />
model using <strong>th</strong>e above procedure. First show <strong>th</strong>at for <strong>th</strong>e Gaussian potential we<br />
have<br />
〈Ŵ(ζ) 〉<br />
= 1 ( √<br />
h=0 ζ − ζ2 − 2 ) , (9.13)<br />
2<br />
and from <strong>th</strong>is obtain <strong>th</strong>e Wigner distribution (9.12).<br />
The finiteness of <strong>th</strong>e support of <strong>th</strong>e kernels has important implications for <strong>th</strong>e nonanalyticity<br />
in ζ. Consider for example <strong>th</strong>e one-point function<br />
〈Ŵ 〉 1<br />
〈<br />
1<br />
〉<br />
(ζ) ≡ tr = 1 ∫<br />
K(λ, λ)<br />
dλ<br />
N ζ − φ N ζ − λ<br />
∼ ∑ ∫<br />
N χ dλ K χ(λ, λ)<br />
.<br />
χ I ζ − λ<br />
(9.14)<br />
The nonanalytic dependence on ζ we are looking for comes from <strong>th</strong>e contributions in<br />
<strong>th</strong>e λ integrals from <strong>th</strong>e integrals near <strong>th</strong>e edge of <strong>th</strong>e support I of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution.<br />
In <strong>th</strong>e last expression we may take ζ real and ζ > ζ c . We encounter nonanalytic<br />
behavior as ζ hits <strong>th</strong>e edge of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution.<br />
Example: Let us verify <strong>th</strong>e statements about analytic dependence on ζ in <strong>th</strong>e example<br />
of a Gaussian potential. Expanding ζ = ζ c + δζ = √ 2 + δζ, or equivalently, expanding λ<br />
around <strong>th</strong>e edge of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution, we obtain a nonanalytic function of (δζ) 1/2<br />
corresponding (formally) to <strong>th</strong>e one-loop amplitude 〈 W (l) 〉 = l −3/2 .<br />
108