26.01.2014 Views

arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993

arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993

arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2<br />

λ<br />

Fig. 17: The Wigner semicircle distribution.<br />

Exercise. Derivation of <strong>th</strong>e Wigner Distribution<br />

As an example of an eigenvalue distribution, we consider <strong>th</strong>e Gaussian matrix<br />

model. The leading term in <strong>th</strong>e large N asymptotics of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution is<br />

<strong>th</strong>e famous Wigner distribution<br />

K 1 (λ, λ) = 1 √<br />

2 − λ<br />

4π<br />

2 θ(2 − λ 2 ) , (9.12)<br />

shown in fig. 17.<br />

Derive <strong>th</strong>e Wigner distribution from <strong>th</strong>e “Schwinger–Dyson” equations of <strong>th</strong>e matrix<br />

model using <strong>th</strong>e above procedure. First show <strong>th</strong>at for <strong>th</strong>e Gaussian potential we<br />

have<br />

〈Ŵ(ζ) 〉<br />

= 1 ( √<br />

h=0 ζ − ζ2 − 2 ) , (9.13)<br />

2<br />

and from <strong>th</strong>is obtain <strong>th</strong>e Wigner distribution (9.12).<br />

The finiteness of <strong>th</strong>e support of <strong>th</strong>e kernels has important implications for <strong>th</strong>e nonanalyticity<br />

in ζ. Consider for example <strong>th</strong>e one-point function<br />

〈Ŵ 〉 1<br />

〈<br />

1<br />

〉<br />

(ζ) ≡ tr = 1 ∫<br />

K(λ, λ)<br />

dλ<br />

N ζ − φ N ζ − λ<br />

∼ ∑ ∫<br />

N χ dλ K χ(λ, λ)<br />

.<br />

χ I ζ − λ<br />

(9.14)<br />

The nonanalytic dependence on ζ we are looking for comes from <strong>th</strong>e contributions in<br />

<strong>th</strong>e λ integrals from <strong>th</strong>e integrals near <strong>th</strong>e edge of <strong>th</strong>e support I of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution.<br />

In <strong>th</strong>e last expression we may take ζ real and ζ > ζ c . We encounter nonanalytic<br />

behavior as ζ hits <strong>th</strong>e edge of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution.<br />

Example: Let us verify <strong>th</strong>e statements about analytic dependence on ζ in <strong>th</strong>e example<br />

of a Gaussian potential. Expanding ζ = ζ c + δζ = √ 2 + δζ, or equivalently, expanding λ<br />

around <strong>th</strong>e edge of <strong>th</strong>e eigenvalue distribution, we obtain a nonanalytic function of (δζ) 1/2<br />

corresponding (formally) to <strong>th</strong>e one-loop amplitude 〈 W (l) 〉 = l −3/2 .<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!