26.01.2014 Views

arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993

arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993

arXiv:hep-th/9304011 v1 Apr 5 1993

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

If we isolate one Euclidean coordinate, call it φ, as a special coordinate, <strong>th</strong>en we can<br />

√p<br />

write <strong>th</strong>e Euclidean on-shell wavefunctions as e ipx e ± 2 +m 2φ . As long as <strong>th</strong>ere are no<br />

tachyons in <strong>th</strong>e <strong>th</strong>eory, <strong>th</strong>ese wavefunctions have exponential grow<strong>th</strong> and are not normalizable.<br />

Conversely, <strong>th</strong>e existence of Euclidean on-shell normalizable wavefunctions is a<br />

signal of tachyons in <strong>th</strong>e <strong>th</strong>eory.<br />

In order to describe off-shell physics, we introduce <strong>th</strong>e normalizable states which<br />

diagonalize <strong>th</strong>e Wheeler–DeWitt operator: e ipx+iEφ , wi<strong>th</strong> eigenvalue E 2 + p 2 + m 2 . For<br />

example, in a mixed position-space/momentum-space representation where we Fourier<br />

transform wi<strong>th</strong> respect to all o<strong>th</strong>er coordinates, we may describe <strong>th</strong>e propagator as<br />

∫ ∞<br />

G(ϕ 1 , p; ϕ 2 , −p) = dE e−iEϕ 1<br />

e iEϕ 2<br />

−∞ E 2 + ⃗p 2 + m 2<br />

1<br />

√⃗p<br />

= θ(φ 1 − φ 2 ) √<br />

⃗p 2 + m 2 e− 2 +m 2 |ϕ 1 −ϕ 2 | + [1 ↔ 2] .<br />

(5.6)<br />

Exercise. Back to <strong>th</strong>e wall<br />

What happens if φ is restricted to be semi-infinite? Put a boundary condition <strong>th</strong>at<br />

<strong>th</strong>e wavefunctions vanish at φ = log µ and calculate <strong>th</strong>e analog of (5.6).<br />

Interactions and Topology-Change<br />

One-dimensional quantum gravity from <strong>th</strong>e target space viewpoint provides a useful insight<br />

into <strong>th</strong>e origin of <strong>th</strong>e violation of <strong>th</strong>e Wheeler–DeWitt constraint in topology-changing<br />

processes. In <strong>th</strong>is case, a topology-changing process corresponds to one 0-dimensional space<br />

splitting into two as in<br />

p 1<br />

.<br />

p<br />

2<br />

p = p + p<br />

3 1 2<br />

(5.7)<br />

The “violation of <strong>th</strong>e Wheeler–DeWitt constraint” is simply <strong>th</strong>e familiar fact <strong>th</strong>at if p 2 1 =<br />

p 2 2 = −m 2 are on-shell momenta <strong>th</strong>en in general p 2 3 = (p 1 +p 2 ) 2 ≠ −m 2 will not be on-shell.<br />

This above basic phenomenon can also be realized as <strong>th</strong>e result of a contact term<br />

arising from a singularity at <strong>th</strong>e boundary of “moduli space.” Consider <strong>th</strong>e wavefunction<br />

of a particle <strong>th</strong>at interacts wi<strong>th</strong> an external potential V so <strong>th</strong>at <strong>th</strong>e wavefunction becomes<br />

˜ψ(τ) =<br />

∫ τ<br />

−∞<br />

dτ ′ e −H(τ−τ ′) V ψ , (5.8)<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!